♦♦♦♦♦♦[ANN]♦♦MTR♦♦MasterTraderCoin♦♦10.4m♦♦TOSHIDESK LLC♦♦ETNA Partnership♦♦♦♦♦♦

[charlieSeen]

I wonder if there is a way we can file a "community complaint" to have Barabass banned from this forum. Perhaps collect signatures. He is Obnoxious and NEVER has anything constructive to say.

Vegas

He has been reported several times already. It seems that it is not only on this thread that he is causing trouble. A start would be not to quote any of his posts and ignore anything he says.  He said a few posts back that he thought he was out of this thread but then he got quoted and was pulled back in. Lets then not quote him and ignore his posts.

I reported him too. Guy is making himself look like a fool anyway.

[Gumbork]

So whats the plan for a no sale on the ICO? Maybe the price was set to high? We can maybe go with the price and supply of the 2nd place winning vote? Dev, your thoughts?

[jc12345]

So whats the plan for a no sale on the ICO? Maybe the price was set to high? We can maybe go with the price and supply of the 2nd place winning vote? Dev, your thoughts?

I still think 100k @ 75k is the way to go, or 400k @75k.

[Gumbork]

So whats the plan for a no sale on the ICO? Maybe the price was set to high? We can maybe go with the price and supply of the 2nd place winning vote? Dev, your thoughts?

I still think 100k @ 75k is the way to go, or 400k @75k.

I feel like 400,000 mtr at the price point of 75,000 satoshi is also a good move.

[Allforone]

So whats the plan for a no sale on the ICO? Maybe the price was set to high? We can maybe go with the price and supply of the 2nd place winning vote? Dev, your thoughts?

I still think 100k @ 75k is the way to go, or 400k @75k.

I feel like 400,000 mtr at the price point of 75,000 satoshi is also a good move.

I'd agree.. If we are looking at getting these coins out that would take forever if the price is set too high!

[mastertrader777]

So whats the plan for a no sale on the ICO? Maybe the price was set to high? We can maybe go with the price and supply of the 2nd place winning vote? Dev, your thoughts?

I still think 100k @ 75k is the way to go, or 400k @75k.

I feel like 400,000 mtr at the price point of 75,000 satoshi is also a good move.

I'd agree.. If we are looking at getting these coins out that would take forever if the price is set too high!

Hello Community,

Thanks for your comments and thoughts.

Looks like we have about 4 days left until the ICO for the 400K MTR is over.

I will say it doesn't look like its getting much of any action at 120K which is fine, we will just have to heed to the situation at hand and come up with a solution.

It's quite simple, and I agree with the suggestions you guys have made.

Everyone voted for MTR to be 120K sats, and I understand why..but if its not getting real interest at 120K that tells us the price is too high and we must lower it to attract more market demand.

We will have to go ahead with 400K at 75K Sats, as it looks like that's the floating floor floor.

Looking for more feedback on this, and I'm open to suggestions...so keep them coming.

ETNA Licensing Agreement looks like it will be signed by tomorrow evening, as we are waiting for our legal team to come back to us with their verdict. In my opinion it looked 100% good, and we have asked all the questions and addressed all the concerns we had with the ETNA guys, so things are moving in the right direction at a good pace.

CLEF has agreed to do a nice little marketing campaign for us and I have gotten all the required information and points over to them to better assist them in developing a campaign that will be successful and help ToshiDesk get some mainstream attention.

Cointelegraph is also looking to do a 90 second explainer video for us, along with a marketing campaign to create a "trend" evolving around ToshiDesk. More details on that later.

I also got in contact with Thor from BuyAnyCoin.com today. We had a brief conversation and in talks about having MasterTraderCoin added to their platform.

Read more about these guys here: http://cointelegraph.com/news/114576/buyanycoin-a-prepaid-crypto-card-at-your-local-store

ToshiDesk News Page has been revamped a bit more, and now is 100%

Clef Login in the Login Page is now on top.

More updates on the way guys.

Cheers,

MasterTrader777

[bizz]

Hm I don't like moving entire amount lower. Better to sell 100k at 75.

[Allforone]

Hm I don't like moving entire amount lower. Better to sell 100k at 75.

Don't you want this coin traded? Volume brings in more people we are getting no volume right now

[bizz]

Hm I don't like moving entire amount lower. Better to sell 100k at 75.

Don't you want this coin traded? Volume brings in more people we are getting no volume right now

True but it's not that simple. Higher float lowers price and volumes in BTC. You can see it these days 0.5 BTC volume is easy but when price was 30k sat it was struggling to get 0.2 BTC volumes. Anyway it's not a deal breaker & I'd also like to see 400k on market but what if this doesn't sell? Lower price to 0?

[Altynbekova]

What's wrong with this coin ?
Why the sudden death ?

[bizz]

What's wrong with this coin ?
Why the sudden death ?

Nothing wrong. Market responding to talks about new price of ico sale.

[scarsbergholden]

I just picked up a good amount. Thanks alot peeps.

[Speedracer]

I just picked up a good amount. Thanks alot peeps.

Lucky

[scarsbergholden]

I just picked up a good amount. Thanks alot peeps.

Lucky

Yea I saw some just sitting there and scooped them right up. The markets reacting to speculation of a lower price ICO is pretty funny to me. Money is made when others fear to lose it.

[jc12345]

If a lower price is chosen, which is more prudent imo, then I would suggest that consistent processes are followed for transparency etc. Let the 120k floor run its course because you never know if there will be someone that wants a lot of coins and will pick it up at that price. In a few days when that runs out then agree on the new price and number and then do another placement accordingly for the same period of time. In the meantime carry on with your development and the good work.

Regarding the comment on dead coin, one has to look at the characteristics. A dead coin has the following attributes imo:
- No dev / abandoned dev / no development
- No listing on an exchange
- No/low trade volume causing an exchange delisting
- Price <100 sats

MTR only has one of the above attributes which is low trade volume, yet it is enough to maintain a Bittrex listing which then means that none of these attributes are actually true for MTR. I dont see MTR as a high volume coin as most investors seem to be long term investors for the future earnings potential. I also dont expect high trading volumes during development as well as placement periods. Once the future earnings start to kick in through the implementation of MTR use cases, and the use cases become clear, the volume and activity will increase.

[DFiLeR]

If a lower price is chosen, which is more prudent imo, then I would suggest that consistent processes are followed for transparency etc. Let the 120k floor run its course because you never know if there will be someone that wants a lot of coins and will pick it up at that price. In a few days when that runs out then agree on the new price and number and then do another placement accordingly for the same period of time. In the meantime carry on with your development and the good work.

I agree, as the closing date is close I say let it run its course and revote on what to do with the remaining funds. I believe they were going to be moved into a holding account with no staking?

Also, as usual great work mastertrader, dcgirl and others. All the hard work is coming together

[HegelianCattalactics]

Why would you lie?

I bought those.

I just picked up a good amount. Thanks alot peeps.

Lucky

Yea I saw some just sitting there and scooped them right up. The markets reacting to speculation of a lower price ICO is pretty funny to me. Money is made when others fear to lose it.

[HegelianCattalactics]

I recommend this second ICO be set up as follows.

100K Coins @ 75k    Sats for a 10 Day Period
100K Coins @ 90K    Sats for a 20 Day Period following that
100K Coins @ 105K  Sats for a 30 Day Period Following that.

60 Days of funding and liquidity.

This provides liquidity, incentive and price flooring.

Allowing the price to be below 75K Sats is unwise respective to the market and the ventures value.

[Speedracer]

I recommend this second ICO be set up as follows.

100K Coins @ 75k    Sats for a 10 Day Period
100K Coins @ 90K    Sats for a 20 Day Period following that
100K Coins @ 105K  Sats for a 30 Day Period Following that.

60 Days of funding and liquidity.

This provides liquidity, incentive and price flooring.

Allowing the price to be below 75K Sats is unwise respective to the market and the ventures value.

This makes More Sense To be honest.

[Dexter12]

I recommend this second ICO be set up as follows.

100K Coins @ 75k    Sats for a 10 Day Period
100K Coins @ 90K    Sats for a 20 Day Period following that
100K Coins @ 105K  Sats for a 30 Day Period Following that.

60 Days of funding and liquidity.

This provides liquidity, incentive and price flooring.

Allowing the price to be below 75K Sats is unwise respective to the market and the ventures value.

This makes More Sense To be honest.

Yes, would also recommend do it that way. I really dont understand how you guys could  have voted for 120k, it didnt even make any sence.