ASICMINER: Entering the Future of ASIC Mining by Inventing It

[Rival]

The market cap of mining is much higher than it first appears. You have the capital invested in shares of companies, the capital invested in pre-orders, capital invested in secondary ventures (board manufacturers awaiting chips, etc). Add all of that up and you have a huge pie, irrespective of the current market cap of BTC. And it is getting larger every day. The two may be tethered, but they are not interdependent.

Most investors invest in what they understand. Many understand manufacturing. It's a known wheelhouse, with numbers they can crunch quite easily. Other types of infrastructure improvements don't necessarily model easily when you are looking for specific profit metrics. Manufacturing chips is proven. Building an exchange or a better wallet, not so much. It is an ideal entry point.

[Maciek]

Again please...


Where do I buy - ASICMINER Block Erupter Blade  ?
At a good price?


any reliable source?

[canth]

Let's say we agree that mining makes sense as an investment. Is there anything that suggests $200m would be a real number to use? What would you do with it - make diamond encrusted mining hardware?

[zefyr0s]

Pretty much. Good analogy as, for you to profit above the $200 million investment,
 it would be as likely as you would if you spent it on diamond-encrusted miners.

[Rival]

Let's say we agree that mining makes sense as an investment. Is there anything that suggests $200m would be a real number to use? What would you do with it - make diamond encrusted mining hardware?

You could have the whole world mining on your hardware.

[iCEBREAKER]

Again please...


Where do I buy - ASICMINER Block Erupter Blade  ?
At a good price?


any reliable source?

Click link in my sig.

[DeathAndTaxes]

I must be missing something here..

Why would any experienced investor give $200 million to a small ASIC startup? ...

You aren't missing anything it makes absolutely no sense (for anyone with independent critical thinking skills).

However I would phrase the question more broadly. Why would anyone invest $200M into bitcoin mining (or bitcoin mining hardware)?  It would be like there is some niche disease treatment which potentially could result in $100M in global revenue so a biotech company decides to spend $8394208309483249328 quadrillion to develop a treatment.  Even if you win, you lose.

Remember people this is a market where the combined global miner revenue is ~$130M.  That doesn't mean $130M in miner profit or even $130M in mining hardware sales, that is $130M in global mining revenue.  Some portion of that is going to be electricity so lets say $30M of it.  The price of ASICs are far more elastic than the price of electricity so I am being generous but you can look at it this way:

GLOBAL GROSS MINING REVENUE = AMMORTIZED HARDWARE COSTS + ELECTRICAL OPERATING COSTS + LABOR/TIME + PROFIT

Lets assume all miners value their time at $0 and they are all so stupid as to paint themselves into a corner where profit is $0.  Likewise lets generously assume that only $30M of the $130M is electrical costs. 

So that means ~$100M in ammortized hardware.  Say the average ASIC is economcially viable for 18-24 months (due to Moore's law and more efficient units).  This means the annual market for hardware is maybe $50M a year in hardware sales.  So $50M?  Yes (as an upper limit) but that is gross revenue not profit.  Even if you could hold margins at say 30% we are talking maybe $15M in profit.  For the record I am again being generous.  Intel who is pretty much the best semiconductor company on the planet, and one in which the barriers to entry are massive (estimated cost to develop a competitive CPU architecture is on the order of $1B to $5B) has net profit margins in the 15% to 20% range.

Nobody (who is smart enough to have $200M) dumps $200M into a venture that AT BEST worth $15M in profit.  Remember this is assuming 100% global marketshare, generous to the point of being rediculous variables, and taking all profit from miners).   People that do stupid things like that tend to not end up with $200M

Lastly there is no NEED for $200M.  While maybe Avalon (or ASICMiner, or xyz) is getting some deep pocketed VC in the near future they wouldn't even know what to do with $200M.  There is a reason that companies tend to go through various growth stages (seed financing, round A, round B, IPO, etc).  I mean $20M would be a ton of operating cash.  Sure there is the NRE and you need to pay salaries, it likely will take some time to tape out, prototype, and test a 20nm design but it doesn't take take $200M.

Note: before someone "correct" the numbers the point isn't to calculate down to the Satoshi the exact amount of global profit.  Who cares.  Much like an interview question "how many windows are their in NY city?" the point is to do some quick back of napkin math and say "$200M? is that even within one magnitude of making sense?"  The answer is a resounding no.  $2M invesment = highly plausible.  $20M investment = maybe but we are starting to push it.  $200M = stupid.

[canth]

Also, investing in infrastructure will only make the rest of the market as a whole
more lucrative. They'd be smart to invest just $10-20 million in mining prospects
and $80-90 in infrastructure.

e: Also it seems people are sliding over this. I think for $200 million any current mining operation would simply sell.

I think that this is the right track. If a wealthy investor latched onto bitcoin as the NEXT BIG THING^TM then I could see creating a $200m fund. Take this fund and spread it around:

- buy or fund a hardware operation
- buy or fund infrastructure companies (payment gateways, exchanges, etc)
- buy or fund a retail online store that sells stuff for bitcoin
- buy some bitcoin

I'd still say that $200m is too much, but hey maybe I'm not thinking big enough.

[canth]

Let's say we agree that mining makes sense as an investment. Is there anything that suggests $200m would be a real number to use? What would you do with it - make diamond encrusted mining hardware?

You could have the whole world mining on your hardware.

I don't see how that really helps - bitcoin won't rise in value because 1 firm dominates the hardware industry. Without a rise in bitcoin value, there's no way to make the $200m back. Bitcoin needs investments in a half dozen areas for it to truly succeed and mining (network hashrate) is only one part of the picture.

[Rival]

It is rare that an investment opportunity arrives where one can completely dominate an exponentially growing market. Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon... the list goes on. Will Avalon or ASICminer be on that list next year? It all depends on who can attract the deepest pockets. $200 million is chump change for a shot at being on that list. If you believe bitcoin will succeed, you know it is inevitable that someone will be on that list. And they will be getting help from Wall Street to get there.

[DeathAndTaxes]

It is rare that an investment opportunity arrives where one can completely dominate an exponentially growing market. Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon... the list goes on. Will Avalon or ASICminer be on that list next year? It all depends on who can attract the deepest pockets. $200 million is chump change for a shot at being on that list. If you believe bitcoin will succeed, you know it is inevitable that someone will be on that list.

No because there is no barrier to entry.   Intel could join the Bitcoin mining space 5 years "too late" and dominate it overnight as a small project which barely is a footnote in their R&D budget.  Now as an ASICMiner shareholder this doesn't concern me one bit, because by the time Bitcoin mining hardware is large enough for any major company to notice ASICMiner will either have already made a massive return or it will have failed.

Also Bitcoin mining isn't exponentially growing.  It only appear that way because we are at a technological revolution.  In 3 years time you know how you will make more profit running a professional mining operation.   Drop $20M into 18nm tech?  No that would be stupid.   Move somewhere where power is cheaper.  Dropping your power costs from $0.10 per kWh to $0.05 per kWh would allow your "old" 28nm tech seem new again deliver a higher ROI% then trying to beat someone else to newer tech.   At this point chip prices are far more elastic then electrical power costs.  Bitcoin mining is a commodity business and mining hardware is only marginally so because of the scale of the investment needed relative to the scale of the investment done before.  Compared to someone throwing together a GPU rig, a $1M NRE seems impossible but as we are seeing first hand ... it isn't.

[zefyr0s]

In five years mining will be even less profitable than it is now. If the major
money to be made in the future is in transaction fees, then the short term
should be mining hardware and the next level (and more investment) would
be infrastructure (exchange platforms, payment systems, transferring
software/hardware, etc.)

Or is it that the size of the mining operation will also correlate with tx fees in the future?

[canth]

In five years mining will be even less profitable than it is now. If the major
money to be made in the future is in transaction fees, then the short term
should be mining hardware and the next level (and more investment) would
be infrastructure (exchange platforms, payment systems, transferring
software/hardware, etc.)

Or is it that the size of the mining operation will also correlate with tx fees in the future?

It all really plays together or nothing ends up being profitable in the end.

Either bitcoin succeeds, becomes more widely respected and held, is used in more transactions, generates more mining fees and rises in value OR it stagnates and so does every business and investment associated with it.

[supert]

It's just supply and demand.
A bunch of new supply transferred into the passthrough.
A load of btc sucked out of the market by ipos.

Really, nothing more than that.

[aahzmundus]

Looks like we got a better node?  http://blockchain.info/block-index/404381/0000000000000055ae447a961be1166778d794227f65b911cac51cf562ea9ae9

[ianp]

Reminder:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/15Ws1XzJeynK_vsKiQ9NaufQfLZOSKsRfsSgqMLTdIRs/edit

You can still vote -- questions will be compiled and submitted in a few more days.

[AngelSky]

From the Labcoin Forum:

Quote
[12:02] <dexX7> labcoin seems almost small now in the light of new competitors like btcgarden, hashfast, actm, terrahash.. do you think you can keep up?
[12:02] <+labcoin_dev> btcgarden?
[12:02] <+labcoin_dev> well, guys, i would do a reality check before saying such things
[12:03] <dexX7> please elaborate, i'm curious
[12:03] <+labcoin_dev> undoubtedly ASICMINER, AVALON and maybe BFL have some kind of advantage

Cute

[velacreations]

[12:03] <+labcoin_dev> undoubtedly ASICMINER, AVALON and maybe BFL have some kind of advantage

AM is about to steal Labcoin's lunch money...

[wo0x]

Looks like we got a better node?  http://blockchain.info/block-index/404381/0000000000000055ae447a961be1166778d794227f65b911cac51cf562ea9ae9

awesome. thanks for watching and public update, aahzmundus

Number Of Transactions	698
Output Total	2,588.67971735 BTC
Estimated Transaction Volume	1,367.87214522 BTC
Transaction Fees	0.31125621 BTC
Height	250946 (Main Chain)
Timestamp	2013-08-08 16:20:34
Received Time	2013-08-08 16:20:52
Relayed By	ASICMiner

[wo0x]

Looks like connectivity was improved after the last orphaned block about 27 hours ago...