binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
November 26, 2013, 12:00:10 PM |
|
Bring on the full-time PR person from AM. Sorely needed.
I'm sore tired of discussions of Gen1, Gen2, Gen3, and now today Gen1.5 AND Gen2.5 have been introduced lol
Won't even start about the nm discussions.
If you don't have facts, please stop making up version numbers of GenX.X - its turned into a bad farce.
+1 (reminds me we established a convention some time ago, something like g1b2 for the gen1-new blades, g1usb2, etc. I don't remember it... That didn't account for the 1.5 and half-made 2.8 that apparently just appeared though...)
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
|
November 26, 2013, 02:57:06 PM |
|
So much money for cooling . . . for such inefficient chips.
I would rather see the 200TH mine that Bitfury is running. I would bet it is all air cooled, and uses 1/5th the power of ASICMINER.
|
|
|
|
Alphi
|
|
November 26, 2013, 03:56:58 PM |
|
So much money for cooling . . . for such inefficient chips.
what you fail to realize is that just like stock coolers and water coolers for home PCs.. these coolers can be used to COOL any kind of chips provided the form factor is the same.. This means that the money spent on COOLING will pay off in the long run as each new generation of chips gets moved into/onto the submersion coolers.. looking at how much effort they went to in order to set up their immersion cooling.. you can bet that ASICminer plans to be around for a very long time... even if eventually they fail at producing competitive chips and end up buying 3rd party chips.. they will still have a competitive advantage because they are way ahead of the competition in terms of cooling on a huge scale.. lets just hope they dont have any catastrophic failures in the cooling system leading to a Chernobyl style meltdown lols
|
KARMA: KSc9oGgGga1TS4PqZNFxNS9LSDjdSgpC1B VERT: VgKaooA5ZuLLUXTUANJigH9wCPuzBUBv9H DOGE: DRN7pXid34o6wQgUuK8BoSjWJ5g8jiEs4e
|
|
|
binaryFate
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
Still wild and free
|
|
November 26, 2013, 04:01:19 PM |
|
lets just hope they dont have any catastrophic failures in the cooling system leading to a Chernobyl style meltdown lols
It seems much much more secure than any air-cooled data-center regarding fire or overheat actually! No risk of fire for all parts that are immerged, and even if the pump/cooler breaks you have plenty of time to react.
|
Monero's privacy and therefore fungibility are MUCH stronger than Bitcoin's. This makes Monero a better candidate to deserve the term "digital cash".
|
|
|
|
Alphi
|
|
November 26, 2013, 04:26:34 PM |
|
It seems much much more secure than any air-cooled data-center regarding fire or overheat actually! No risk of fire for all parts that are immerged, and even if the pump/cooler breaks you have plenty of time to react.
I was thinking more along the lines of a leak cause by an earthquake or some other disaster causing some of the vats to drain.. or someone sabotaging the system.. its pretty cut throat out there and there are more than a few dodgy 3rd party contractors who cut corners and/or can be bribed.. EDIT.. not saying it would happen simply playing devils advocate. liquid cooling systems require far more maintenance and are far more prone to catastrophic failure than air cooled systems...
|
KARMA: KSc9oGgGga1TS4PqZNFxNS9LSDjdSgpC1B VERT: VgKaooA5ZuLLUXTUANJigH9wCPuzBUBv9H DOGE: DRN7pXid34o6wQgUuK8BoSjWJ5g8jiEs4e
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
|
|
November 26, 2013, 04:43:34 PM |
|
479.4131794 BTC / 400,000 shares = 0.00119853 BTC Not much, but more indeed.
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
November 26, 2013, 05:28:02 PM |
|
479.4131794 BTC / 400,000 shares = 0.00119853 BTC Not much, but more indeed. Is that the solo address, or cumulative with franchisee revenues?
|
|
|
|
romerun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
|
|
November 26, 2013, 05:35:00 PM |
|
Knc coming with 20nm
|
|
|
|
jbest8283
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2013, 05:37:42 PM |
|
MacDaddy coming with .67nm
|
|
|
|
Zubilica
|
|
November 26, 2013, 06:17:22 PM |
|
Knc coming with 20nm
this is true they have send a notification
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
November 26, 2013, 06:29:32 PM |
|
Knc coming with 20nm
this is true they have send a notification Source?
|
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
November 26, 2013, 06:45:15 PM |
|
Interesting thanks for sharing. Still not convinced this will result in significantly more efficient chips. As we have seen how AM 144nm tech competes with KNC 28nm, I wonder how 40nm vs 28nm will compare.
|
|
|
|
strmir
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2013, 06:50:28 PM |
|
Interesting thanks for sharing. Still not convinced this will result in significantly more efficient chips. As we have seen how AM 144nm tech competes with KNC 28nm, I wonder how 40nm vs 28nm will compare. There's a notice on the linked page that KnC's 20nm design should reduce power draw per GH by some 30%. That would be somewhere around 0.7W/GH, given that 28nm Jupiter is listed with ~1W/GH (at wall). Now, IIRC 40nm ASICminer's chip is expected to perform at 0.2W/GH.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
November 26, 2013, 06:52:15 PM |
|
Interesting thanks for sharing. Still not convinced this will result in significantly more efficient chips. As we have seen how AM 144nm tech competes with KNC 28nm, I wonder how 40nm vs 28nm will compare. There's a notice on the linked page that KnC's 20nm design should reduce power draw per GH by some 30%. That would be somewhere around 0.7W/GH, given that 28nm Jupiter is listed with ~1W/GH (at wall). Now, IIRC 40nm ASICminer's chip is expected to perform at 0.2W/GH. Is 0.7 w/gh for knc chip or entire asic?
|
|
|
|
strmir
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2013, 06:56:36 PM |
|
Interesting thanks for sharing. Still not convinced this will result in significantly more efficient chips. As we have seen how AM 144nm tech competes with KNC 28nm, I wonder how 40nm vs 28nm will compare. There's a notice on the linked page that KnC's 20nm design should reduce power draw per GH by some 30%. That would be somewhere around 0.7W/GH, given that 28nm Jupiter is listed with ~1W/GH (at wall). Now, IIRC 40nm ASICminer's chip is expected to perform at 0.2W/GH. Is 0.7 w/gh for knc chip or entire asic? They list Jupiter efficiency for the entire miner (at wall), I don't know how it's in reality though . So, I'd say that 0,7W/GH should be for entire miner also. But can not speak for themselves.
|
|
|
|
data
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
November 26, 2013, 07:19:39 PM Last edit: May 30, 2014, 07:17:02 AM by data |
|
Not wanting to ridicule KnC or anything, but once again ASICMINER is the only company not taking preorders. With the current increases in network and unclear deployments by others, you are taking a huge gamble on ordering anything that would not be able to make back it's money even in a 1EH-network.
|
|
|
|
jimmothy
|
|
November 26, 2013, 07:22:02 PM |
|
Not wanting to ridicule KnC or anything, but once again ASICMINER is the only company not taking preorders. With the current increases in network and unclear deployments by others, you are taking a huge gamble on ordering anything that wouldn't make back it's money even in a 1EH-network.
Not to mention that the only thing pre-orders leave you with is a dick in your mouth.
|
|
|
|
sochee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
November 26, 2013, 07:53:43 PM |
|
Not wanting to ridicule KnC or anything, but once again ASICMINER is the only company not taking preorders. With the current increases in network and unclear deployments by others, you are taking a huge gamble on ordering anything that wouldn't make back it's money even in a 1EH-network.
Yes, let us bask in the moral high ground of not taking preorders. KnC has already shipped 28nm. But it's okay, we are superior to KnC.
|
|
|
|
|