|
jjdub7
|
 |
August 15, 2014, 12:15:09 PM |
|
^One of my problems is idiots like you blaming me for their idiocy. You don't understand what I said for the same reason you're such a failure as an investor--you're simply not bright enough.
You still haven't thanked me for warning you about Active Mining, where the fuck are your manners?
Right, because that one really needed a warning. Obvious scam is obvious? |
|
|
|
|
feifa
Member
 Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
August 15, 2014, 12:33:41 PM |
|
 Somebody can't wait for the divs
|
|
|
|
|
|
empoweoqwj
|
|
August 15, 2014, 12:44:50 PM |
|
Somebody can't wait for the divs Hopefully not a hacked havelock account like I suffered |
|
|
|
|
|
KarmaShark
|
|
August 15, 2014, 12:48:20 PM |
|
Somebody can't wait for the divs The shareholder may have needed the BTC, otherwise this is quite the risky move on the eve of launch. Never a dull day in crypto securities folks! |
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4242
Merit: 9858
|
|
August 15, 2014, 03:48:53 PM |
|
I'm in (but I'll have to stop trolling  ) I'm in too but I think I can forgo the .05BTC per month and maintain my freedom of speech. It would take at least .055BTC to shut me up!  |
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4242
Merit: 9858
|
|
August 15, 2014, 03:49:50 PM |
|
Somebody can't wait for the divs The shareholder may have needed the BTC, otherwise this is quite the risky move on the eve of launch. Never a dull day in crypto securities folks! Ah ah aha! Constructive posts only or you'll lose the reward Tsk tsk |
|
|
|
|
|
stompysteve
|
|
August 15, 2014, 04:03:06 PM |
|
I dont think you get anything if you edit the signature to what you have it as lol  |
|
|
|
|
|
trek27
|
|
August 15, 2014, 04:07:32 PM |
|
Such selling urgency, especially in current situation, seems suspicious - why to accept 0.255 if you could easily get at least 0.28? Oh, and 796.com didn't even budge.
This could have been malicious use of someones account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
stompysteve
|
|
August 15, 2014, 04:13:21 PM |
|
Such selling urgency, especially in current situation, seems suspicious - why to accept 0.255 if you could easily get at least 0.28? Oh, and 796.com didn't even budge.
This could have been malicious use of someones account.
lotss of BTC sell movement right now maybe they knew something *tinfoilhat* |
|
|
|
|
server
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 892
Merit: 1002
1 BTC =1 BTC
|
|
August 15, 2014, 05:43:59 PM |
|
sig sux, it's annoying and should be banned :/ AM@.25, I'm buying  |
|
|
|
|
jjdub7
|
|
August 15, 2014, 06:02:01 PM |
|
Such selling urgency, especially in current situation, seems suspicious - why to accept 0.255 if you could easily get at least 0.28? Oh, and 796.com didn't even budge.
This could have been malicious use of someones account.
More likely that the BTC-USD fell below their stop-loss and they cashed out what they could |
|
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
August 15, 2014, 07:58:04 PM |
|
although AM just started pricing in BTC. this drop will hurt profits a lot, unless prices are rebased.
they produce BTC, it's natural to price them in BTC, actually. |
|
|
|
|
trek27
|
|
August 15, 2014, 08:11:57 PM |
|
Such selling urgency, especially in current situation, seems suspicious - why to accept 0.255 if you could easily get at least 0.28? Oh, and 796.com didn't even budge.
This could have been malicious use of someones account.
More likely that the BTC-USD fell below their stop-loss and they cashed out what they could Yes, perhaps. Given rather low liquidity on Havelock it would probably be more efficient (less costly) from the point of view of a speculator denominating his investments in USD to hedge against adverse movements in btc/usd rate via leveraged positions on btc exchanges allowing such trading. However, let everyone decide for himself |
|
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4242
Merit: 9858
|
|
August 15, 2014, 10:40:48 PM |
|
Such selling urgency, especially in current situation, seems suspicious - why to accept 0.255 if you could easily get at least 0.28? Oh, and 796.com didn't even budge.
This could have been malicious use of someones account.
lotss of BTC sell movement right now maybe they knew something *tinfoilhat* FC needed some cash to buy shipping boxes. |
|
|
|
|
freedomno1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1094
Learning the troll avoidance button :)
|
|
August 16, 2014, 12:28:20 AM |
|
Well we got a sales rep so that is something ^_^ OP confirmed being belong to our our sales team.
|
Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
|
|
|
|
jiefangqian
|
|
August 16, 2014, 01:54:40 AM |
|
|
XBC:B7jR5zX8pBpyjyrcMMiYCQyLVLC6YZjFYh
|
|
|
michaelGedi
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
"to be or not to be, that is the bitcoin"
|
|
August 16, 2014, 10:01:37 AM |
|
sig sux, it's annoying and should be banned :/ AM@.25, I'm buying I'm starting to envision legions of AM shareholders (I know it's capped at 30 but humour me here) posting in the AM thread - constructive posts only of course - to each other, all with the same sigs, in order to make up their 50 post count. To be honest I don't know if I would count this post as one of my 50, but - here we go! |
|
|
|
|
jdany
|
|
August 16, 2014, 10:18:11 AM |
|
sig sux, it's annoying and should be banned :/ AM@.25, I'm buying I'm starting to envision legions of AM shareholders (I know it's capped at 30 but humour me here) posting in the AM thread - constructive posts only of course - to each other, all with the same sigs, in order to make up their 50 post count. To be honest I don't know if I would count this post as one of my 50, but - here we go! Nah, I don't think that would happen at all. Has anyone transferred any Havelock shares lately back to direct? Still taking 2 weeks? |
|
|
|
|
shitaifan2013
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 874
Merit: 1000
monero
|
|
August 16, 2014, 10:51:40 AM |
|
sig sux, it's annoying and should be banned :/ AM@.25, I'm buying I'm starting to envision legions of AM shareholders (I know it's capped at 30 but humour me here) posting in the AM thread - constructive posts only of course - to each other, all with the same sigs, in order to make up their 50 post count. To be honest I don't know if I would count this post as one of my 50, but - here we go! Nah, I don't think that would happen at all. Has anyone transferred any Havelock shares lately back to direct? Still taking 2 weeks? takes way longer atm. I have a transfer open for over 1.5month now, but my guess is that fc is busy and will get to the tranfers right before the dividends. |
|
|
|
xhomerx10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4242
Merit: 9858
|
|
August 16, 2014, 12:58:16 PM |
|
sig sux, it's annoying and should be banned :/ AM@.25, I'm buying I'm starting to envision legions of AM shareholders (I know it's capped at 30 but humour me here) posting in the AM thread - constructive posts only of course - to each other, all with the same sigs, in order to make up their 50 post count. To be honest I don't know if I would count this post as one of my 50, but - here we go! I'm pretty sure this program wont even last a month before they sell all the chips. If it does, those BE200 chips are going to be worth less... or worthless. I wonder if I'll get my 0.05 BTC if the banner program only goes for 25 days? |
|
|
|
|
|
