Stake your Bitcoin address here

[Charles-Tim]

I believe i will need it..
Please verify someone.

Message:

Code:

Hi bitcointalk... 9/19/24
I belive we still alive(NFT)..

Addy:

Code:

bc1qrnlu96vh6r4s0lp50vnwu5e930lcknc3cc2qg0

Signature:

Code:

ICh4Mp8REmuqiYy/9rqvaikq2BGv6Wiy3+V9r9Vmyb31bo6mECmG1t+SBhhPqex/59UMSdirYnZ5ubp7gXlHCz4=

Verification successful

[pawel7777]

Anyone please verify:

Message:

Code:

Address bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t belongs is controlled by bitcointalk.org user pawel7777

Address:

Code:

bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t

Signature:

Code:

Hz9IZNGvKcq3AaFPfQRkAd2+Vo2FHhvSpBHBRCduHiXaHksTCgRxNXjQFk8INuaLAF/9zWjOyy4MhWEOQdiwlgA=

Thanks in advance

[Charles-Tim]

Anyone please verify:

Message:

Code:

Address bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t belongs is controlled by bitcointalk.org user pawel7777

Address:

Code:

bc1q79vqvnghljgu926g7gtuhnncq560kc24cur43t

Signature:

Code:

Hz9IZNGvKcq3AaFPfQRkAd2+Vo2FHhvSpBHBRCduHiXaHksTCgRxNXjQFk8INuaLAF/9zWjOyy4MhWEOQdiwlgA=

Thanks in advance

Verified.

[giammangiato]

pls if someone can verify

Code:

i am giammangiato from bitcointalk.org and today is 14.10.2024

address bc1qrt735jppkrtmwjl85gzskl464j5wftzujel2ug

signature

Code:

HzGNohyW8fZmrM60XmgDDQgIZc3LuXTJWpRxx0eaOQgMUtB1xCd5lUCbRCw2IPTQjf/C8t+DKoRNGOpNqpAQfpU=

[bitbollo]

pls if someone can verify

Code:

i am giammangiato from bitcointalk.org and today is 14.10.2024

address bc1qrt735jppkrtmwjl85gzskl464j5wftzujel2ug

signature

Code:

HzGNohyW8fZmrM60XmgDDQgIZc3LuXTJWpRxx0eaOQgMUtB1xCd5lUCbRCw2IPTQjf/C8t+DKoRNGOpNqpAQfpU=

quoted and verified

[coaio]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm coaio for bitcointalk.org, today is 19th of oct'24 @nd this my old address.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1CoaioNp2QvNfQ3A32a1Yg3nzxF3252eLW
IBpiAjTST3ca1qY1b9dJtGzal/8pGerqh9W00NP2I+9ZV6HcPfcpKUURDcti+fgyFay3HyHUoVy7SUMKsMWJHho=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[Xal0lex]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm coaio for bitcointalk.org, today is 19th of oct'24 @nd this my old address.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1CoaioNp2QvNfQ3A32a1Yg3nzxF3252eLW
IBpiAjTST3ca1qY1b9dJtGzal/8pGerqh9W00NP2I+9ZV6HcPfcpKUURDcti+fgyFay3HyHUoVy7SUMKsMWJHho=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quoted and verified.

[xenomorfo]

I have to do it too, let's see if I can organize myself
do you use electrum?

[paid2]

I have to do it too, let's see if I can organize myself
do you use electrum?

You just need to sign a message (which includes your username / date) with a BTC address, you can do it with Electrum or any other software, someone here will verify it for you. There are several threads on the forum that explain how to do if you don't know yet.

[Charles-Tim]

I have to do it too, let's see if I can organize myself
do you use electrum?

...There are several threads on the forum that explain how to do if you don't know yet.

On desktop Electrum, he can click on tools -> sign/verify message. Then he can input the message and the address he wants to use and click on verify.

On mobile Electrum, he can click on his wallet name -> sign/verify message.

[Zaka1221]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Zaka1221 from bitcointalk.org and today date is 29.11.2024
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qvzg2zvue5yegykwehd2dfzvjvxaqqunznc6cnu
H3heDbOLXuOpsLeu1sr/s5IYJD9yORO1Lzx/pV4FnM+CfhzlBHwvgzGQNl2L6l/RqRk6lhajSXgVJhu8vqWfmpA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Please someone verify thanks.

[Charles-Tim]

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Zaka1221 from bitcointalk.org and today date is 29.11.2024
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
bc1qvzg2zvue5yegykwehd2dfzvjvxaqqunznc6cnu
H3heDbOLXuOpsLeu1sr/s5IYJD9yORO1Lzx/pV4FnM+CfhzlBHwvgzGQNl2L6l/RqRk6lhajSXgVJhu8vqWfmpA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Please someone verify thanks.

Signature verified.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I have to do it too, let's see if I can organize myself
do you use electrum?

You just need to sign a message (which includes your username / date) with a BTC address, you can do it with Electrum or any other software, someone here will verify it for you. There are several threads on the forum that explain how to do if you don't know yet.

Well, not just any other software app but a very few and limited ones, though electrum seems to be the most popular amongst bitcoin wallet software through which signing a message using one's bitcoin address is possible, it is also possible to achieve the same result with mycelluim wallet, in fact, I did mine with mycelluim wallet and it's the only bitcoin wallet software I make us of till date.

Coming back to software apps with the sign message functionality, I say it's limited because, wallets softwares like Trust wallet doesn't have such a feature even though there is provision for bitcoin, coinomi also doesn't have such feature except they have upgraded, been years I used this software last, plus a host of others I can't start mentioning.

[Charles-Tim]

Well, not just any other software app but a very few and limited ones, though electrum seems to be the most popular amongst bitcoin wallet software through which signing a message using one's bitcoin address is possible, it is also possible to achieve the same result with mycelluim wallet, in fact, I did mine with mycelluim wallet and it's the only bitcoin wallet software I make us of till date.

There are many bitcoin wallet that has the feature. Bitcoin Core (a full client wallet), Sparrow, Bluewallet, Blockstream Green, Unstoppable few other wallets, including some close source wallets which I will not mention.

Coming back to software apps with the sign message functionality, I say it's limited because, wallets softwares like Trust wallet doesn't have such a feature even though there is provision for bitcoin, coinomi also doesn't have such feature except they have upgraded, been years I used this software last, plus a host of others I can't start mentioning.

If you are looking for a good bitcoin wallet, Trustwallet is not among. Coinomi can sign bitcoin message. I knew this since 2020 that I used the wallet until I came to this forum to know the difference between open source and close source wallets.

[LoyceV]

There are many bitcoin wallet that has the feature. Bitcoin Core

Bitcoin Core still can't sign a message from a Segwit address. As far as I know, Electrum made-up their own "standard" for signing.

[albert0bsd]

Bitcoin Core still can't sign a message from a Segwit address. As far as I know, Electrum made-up their own "standard" for signing.

Well, I really don't know why the signatures of a Segwit addreses is not yet an Standard

I want to try to make an example of something curious, a signature that is valid for both address P2PKH (Legacy) and P2WPKH (Segwit)

I am going to use my staked address here:

address

Code:

bc1qjyhcjacmpc9pg8wes82lktyrjcwk4sdvqtm7ky

message

Code:

albert0bsd from bitcointalk.org 27 Sep, 2023

signature

Code:

KA55lRDVVcmNzydSdLsknjq2QS/CFW0utVGhtfmr3iirPW/zGoviBY7n7lE72nH81SV+D2a5syJpb2OZ/NUzdns=

The public key of that wallet is

Code:

02b96b69d11f50e029da620d879a1ddf0d759123b23364a5384cfd815fbb183e79

The RMD160 Hash for that public key is 912f89771b0e0a141dd981d5fb2c83961d6ac1ac

So in this page we can calculate the address https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/script/p2pkh/



The P2PKH address for that public key 1EEfvk3usipJwrvekE12cESXWDrCZWgv3S

You also can calculate the Segwit address on this page: https://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/script/p2wpkh/



Now the signatures, if you make a signature that is valid for Legacy addresses ( Compressed P2PKH)

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
albert0bsd from bitcointalk.org December 2, 2024
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
1EEfvk3usipJwrvekE12cESXWDrCZWgv3S
IAyi+i9eayGP1PTxgd6HI9FNjbPswZRwxn87fe6tSuyYbrPmkW/qirDEYGN4NlzpP+8SI2xrL7YINzmQvaeKEGU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

Now please look a at the signature

Code:

IAyi+i9eayGP1PTxgd6HI9FNjbPswZRwxn87fe6tSuyYbrPmkW/qirDEYGN4NlzpP+8SI2xrL7YINzmQvaeKEGU=

If you replace the address with the Segwit : bc1qjyhcjacmpc9pg8wes82lktyrjcwk4sdvqtm7ky

The same signature data is also valid for the segwith P2WPKH address:


Check by yourself:

address

Code:

bc1qjyhcjacmpc9pg8wes82lktyrjcwk4sdvqtm7ky

message

Code:

albert0bsd from bitcointalk.org December 2, 2024

signature

Code:

IAyi+i9eayGP1PTxgd6HI9FNjbPswZRwxn87fe6tSuyYbrPmkW/qirDEYGN4NlzpP+8SI2xrL7YINzmQvaeKEGU=

Obvious because both address are generated from the same public key.



This usually don't happen in the other way, because the Electrum standard use another encode byte that is not compatible for the Legacy Signature Chekers

[Charles-Tim]

Obvious because both address are generated from the same public key.

Although it is actually because both addresses are generated from the same private key which is required for the signature. The private key generates the public key which still makes you correct, but it is private key that is important about it.

[albert0bsd]

Although it is actually because both addresses are generated from the same private key which is required for the signature. The private key generates the public key which still makes you correct, but it is private key that is important about it.

Yes exactly, and that is my whole point, why the signatures for segwit isn't an standard yet, regardless its trivial to extended the current standard to check them, a lot of wallets support it, just the "standard" title is missing.

I know this topic is just to stake address along their signatures. Sorry to divert the topic I just want to point this. Thank you!

[DireWolfM14]

why the signatures for segwit isn't an standard yet,

Because segwit is just a segway to taproot, and will be obsolete soon.  Plus, no matter how much you like signing messages with bitcoin addresses, that's not their primary purpose.  Bitcoin as a message signing tool lacks significant features, and isn't as practical as GPG.  Bitcoin development is focused (as it should be) on reducing block size and transaction fees, not trying to recreate GPG.

[Charles-Tim]

Because segwit is just a segway to taproot, and will be obsolete soon.  Plus, no matter how much you like signing messages with bitcoin addresses, that's not their primary purpose.

You mean segwit version 0 will be obsolete soon? But it is still the most used address and also recommended by some wallets for lowest fee. Even if not recommended, it remain the default. Also what albert0bsd meant is that the message signing is not exactly signing message with bitcoin address but with bitcoin private key which can generate all types of the addresses.

Bitcoin development is focused (as it should be) on reducing block size and transaction fees, not trying to recreate GPG.

You mean increasing block size and reducing transaction fee. For lower transaction fee, segwit version 0 (segwit) is comparable with segwit version 1 (pay-to-taproot). P2TR has lowest consolidation fee and also if the inputs are getting more. But segwit version 0 has the lowest fee if the outputs are more or if the inputs and outputs are the same. The output virtual size for version 0 is lower while the input virtual size for taproot is lower.

The reason we thought taproot was created which will significantly reduce transaction fee is in multisig, by requiring just a single signature for transactions, just like in singlesig wallets, and also having just one public key required in fee as both signature and public key will combine into one for making transaction despite that there are more keys and signature required for the transaction. But as of today, I was unable to see any wallet have that feature. The known multisigs are still legacy what its addresses start from 3 and segwit P2WSH that its addresses start from bc1.