just curious what mhash your getting with your 5970 using 11.12 ? I messed around with several different configurations over the last couple of days for mine and the best I came up with is 11.9 w/ cgminer 2.20 - I get a nice 820 mhash - woohoo!

btw: ckvolias do you know why Anubis web front end stopped working with the 2.2.0 upgrade?

thanks!

thanks for clearing that up Luke! You never mentioned in your thread it was unfinished, understood now!


if you are using dash by default (debian, ubuntu) you get a /bin/sh Let command not found error
this is fixed by changing default shell to bash

not sure if it has anything to do with it actually working or not, but I hate errors

thanks again for all your contributions

hi Luke

I was excited to see this post as I am always excited to see new pool server software

I am a little confused about this, is it unfinished - or is it just meant to be this way?

I was able to get it working even though - there are no instructions what so ever

(tip if your using Debian or Ubuntu you will probably have to dpkg-reconfigure dash and set it to no - so your using bash as default)

but where does it connect to a db? How do you manage users and shares? I see no support for this anywhere, did I miss it?

Please give us more info - I am really excited about this project!

thanks!!!

awesome!

Since this topic is hot right now - let me pop this question

Which SDK is best for 5xxx and which SDK is best for 6xxx

can we get a point of reference here? Thanks!

If anyone is as old as me, they remember before we had the Internet we had online services like PRODIGY!

This is a brand new in the box and sealed Prodigy Personal Service Start-Up Kit + External 2400 BPS Hayes Modem
w/ 3 Months Membership Included when you enroll by 12/31/91 - (a $38.85 value!)









Make me an Offer !

thats what I thought at first before I realized he has only been a member of this forum for about 2 weeks, thats what made me suspicious

excuse me for being lazy but I keep seeing a lot of talk about 5970 , ive been too busy to keep up with the conversation - but if someone could tell me whats going on in respect  the 5970 development I would really appreciate it

my 5970 gets 380 mhash per core in windows 7 with the ccc 11.8

is it possible to do better?

thanks in advance for filling me in!

it really all depends on your situation but if you have open air with proper cooling shroudless is cooler.

for instance I have a rig that has 5 reference 5870s in it, 2 of the 5870s have the shrouds off because I bought replacement fans for it that were just slightly too big

this rig is open air with plenty of cooling (open window in winter/ac in summer)

the two 5870s with no shrouds are running cooler than the other 3 5870s with the shrouds intact

and I can prove it!
this is fresh data from that rig

GPU 0 and 1 are the ones without the shrouds, I have all fans at 50% and as you can see they are running much cooler - of course if you had these packed inside of a case you would have a different story all together but then again you would never be able to pack 5 5870s inside a case to begin with

GPU # En    Status Temp  Fan%     GPU Clk    Mem Clk    Volt    Actv    MH/s avg    MH/s 5s    Acc    Rej    Harderr    Util    Intens
0    Y    Alive    58    3307    50    900    180    1.175    99    412.06    411.64    8433    58    0    5.65    9
1    Y    Alive    48    3374    50    900    180    1.125    99    411.87    411.74    8451    47    0    5.66    9
2    Y    Alive    77    3645    50    900    180    1.125    99    412.15    413.98    8447    55    0    5.66    9
3    Y    Alive    65.5    3149    50    900    180    1.175    99    409.75    411.51    8245    35    0    5.52    9
4    Y    Alive    73    2331    50    900    180    1.163    99    412.06    413.2    8257    37    0    5.53    9

I have no use for a Silk Road seller account , but I must say - this sounds like a setup!

replace the fan with a reference fan and just keep the shroud off , you will get good temps - open air setting temps @ 50-60c

pm me pls

I noticed it immediately on the 5970's.  down to like 320ish.  I think the 580 was lower too but was inconsequential since the clock on the box is 800/300 for all cards. ( I bump the 5830 up manually if I feel like it )
[/quote]

jjimm64: where do you put the -v -w 256 - I have 15 5870s and would like to try this , when I use -v -w 256 with cgminer it does load for me

thanks!

I need to buy at least a $100 green dot money pack for Bitcoins

If your reputation is less than mine and/or I don't know you you pay first

I have several positive recent transactions on here

PM please!

thank you!

If your a Bitcoin entrepreneur and businessman like me you know the value of dedication, power and consistency.

I run several different businesses and need a go-to place for dedicated high performance servers that are reasonably priced.

Bitservers has met and exceeded my expectations, I am now in the second month of service and have leased two dedicated servers from them and I could not be happier. A company like Bitservers is ideal to help build up the infrastructure of the Bitcoin world and I sincerely hope to be doing business with them for years to come.

thanks Marc for offering a high end server product for the Bitcoin community!

That is one of the single most intelligent sentences I have ever seen on this forum.

Slush

just want to voice my opinion here, I mined my very first Bitcoin on your pool (and sold it for 0.85 cents! ) and mined probably in total 200 coins with you.

I personally think DGM sucks and will become less popular as the difficulty continues to go up.
Yes it's pool hop proof and "fair" but only really fair to a person if they want to dedicate themselves to mining with that pool and that pool only 24/7

I like your modified proportional score system - a lot of people do and I think you should stay with it , and if you really have to change, change it to a pure PPS like BTCGuild is doing.


thank you for listening

I am a lot of things but unfortunately a programmer is not one of them, I hired someone to add the statistics but the work is coming along very slowly. If you log into your account you can see the beginnings of the stats being added, but for some reason this person is incredibly slow.

The reason I have not been pushing my programmer is because I recently discovered that poolserverJ does not actually work with more than one aux chains (although its supposed to) and the developer has pretty much disappeared and apparently abandoned the project, pushpool is very inefficient and archaic and not something I want to work with, maybe doublec wants to share his pool back end with me? (I doubt it)

so due to these issues things are kind of up in the air right now, not sure what I am going to do yet.

I'm about to update my bitcoind appropriately to cast my "vote" which I shall not share here, what I do wish to share here is my concern for this quote un-quote voting process, Luke you made a point that Gavin is forcing anyone who has the latest bitcoind to vote in favor by default yet you are encouraging large pool ops to basically force a default vote upon on all of their miners by changing the pools bitcoind to not support gavins change , now admittedly I am reading/writing this from my phone so I may have missed something but in all fairness isn't this supposed vote meant to be by miners and not by pool ops?

I know for myself As someone who has mined extensively for almost a year  if I am given a chance to vote on a change in bitcoin as a miner - it should be my vote that is counted and pool ops should not have the ability to vote for me and for everyone else that mines with them.

Can someone please provide information on how the votes are counted, and how a pool op is able to vote for the miners that actually Provide the hashing power?

1 @ 4.5

1 slot 3 btc