Bravo! This is the crucial part of the matter, indeed.

Somehow, the situation feels similar to the spring-summer of 2017: the whole space undergoes growth while being at a tremendous assault of external factors.
Nobody knows what will transpire-it is really a "give" and "take". In 2017 the situation resolved bullishly, resulting in 10-15X in just a few months.
It is not clear to me that we have a similar situation here, but a bullish resolution is possible.

Sun Tzu said “If you wait by the river long enough, the bodies of your enemies will float by.”
I guess, bitcoin just have to wait long enough...I just don't see how a geometrically increasing debt situation can be resolved in a positive fashion.
It might take a decade, though.

Unfortunately, I don't have an extra decade in which to contemplate this without taking action, so started my distribution out of the space to something both physical (renovations, RE projects) and spiritual (travel).
Did not start with bitcoin, of course, but I am no longer in the accumulation phase, generally speaking, after a decade or so.
Judging by 2017, I have a terrible timing for my sales...so whatever satoshis I will peel off this year-enjoy the discount when buying your stash!

Apart from the obvious typo of 999 instead of 99, it is an inherently contradictory statement because you start current century with a "0" (aka 2000), but you started the first century with a "1".
That said, there was no zeroth century (AD or any other count), indeed.

It shouldn't, but tard traders react-timewise, a perfect correlation.

It's the proposed sentence for CZ, I agree.
However, the reaction to me seems to indicate that the bull is currently a bit weak/finiky.

he is into 200week MA...js
200day is a classic, sure.

It's OK to be conservative, but we are NOW at 65K or so.
Slightly above 100K, say, 105K, is less than 14% a year for the next 4 years.
Even Nasdaq beat this in the last decade or so.
I would venture a guess that practically no one invests in btc for these kind of returns.
If you have said: 30% a year (185K at the next halving), I might have agreed.
If you want to counter that current 200wk average is much lower, I would say-would those investing today consider a 200wk average in their buying?
Of course, not, they would only compare their level of success to the buy price, which is also the current spot price.
200wk average is there to show the history as it's trajectory is meaningless when projected forward since at any moment a curve bend might occur (adoption, etc).

2035?

However, Jurrien Timmer says that btc may be $100 mil by 2035
https://www.coinspeaker.com/fidelity-bitcoin-btc-100-million-2035/

and 1 billion by 2038:
https://www.coinspeaker.com/bitcoin-worth-1-billion-2038-fidelity/

Of course, $$ will have to lose about 90% of the buying power by then (so, it is more like $100 mil in current $$)

Again, there is no discount in GBTC, so, with high volatility, 1.5% A YEAR fee is irrelevant unless you want to keep GBTC position for 5-10 years without trading in or out.
GBTC is largely a nothingburger at this point. The question of high volatility is not, however.

something annoying, but inevitable (relevant for US only):

https://bitcoinist.com/irs-reveals-preliminary-tax-form-for-digital-assets/
the proposed form itself is here:
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1099da--dft.pdf

I still don't get it how it 'works' with assets that you transfer 'in' to Coinbase, for example.
how can they determine the cost basis?
Without this, it is meaningless and WILL result in collection errors.
Additionally, they call digital assets "securities", which is strange.

it's possible as this is how major Wall street firms make their "trading" money.

Sorry, but it is irrelevant as you don't know the future trajectory of mini.
Example: it could trade at a premium and since GBTC trades with no discount, you still come out ahead. For example, ibit trades between 0.84% discount and 0.98% premium. Same for FBTC.
That's almost 2% range. I know...the snickering must continue regardless of the facts, lol.
However, ask yourself: how relevant is this when we go up/down 5% a day?

someone mined an invalid block... or two.

Finally, 840000 with 37.63 BTC fees!!!

ViaBTC (buzz120) got all those fees, about $2.5 mil.

Details  
EDIT: look at those fees! Above 1 btc in the last 4-5 blocks.

dude, you are saying the same as me aka that halving would be on 4/20  .

We are up about 7.30X since the last halving on may 11, 2020 or 730% in 1439 days or 0.1385%/day or 65.7% a year.
Not bad, lol

Since we are counting btc price by Bitstamp and it is in Europe, then, officially, halving would be on 4/20-this is historic!  .
Besides, both UK and Central Europe plus Asia, Australia, etc are already in 4/20.
Congrats!

Well...what now?
Oil 100 in a few weeks?

Bitcoin? Unknown.
At least is was BEFORE the halving.

EDIT: below 60K...or about..moving up-down erratically.

Wall Street is simply trying to tell everyone who is the boss and that we should pay no attention to halving, etc.
They can succeed in a short time frame, but not in the long one.

That and: strikes are reported... Dow and S&P futures are down, gold, oil and silver are up.

Bitcoin is moving up/down a thou in a few hours, repeatedly.
I think that it is really 'thin' on exchanges and this exacerbates the moves.
Let the corn grow!