Never rushing is so important that, even if you make a huge amount of profit, you should reinvest all of that back to crypto, can you do that? Doesn't mean you have to, if you think it will go down then getting out makes sense, it is about "being able to".

So, let's say you once invested 1k into bitcoin, not a lot of money, but it became 100k one day, would you be able to not cash that out? If you can do that then you are doing the right thing. This is why I love bitcoin, it teaches people patience like zen masters, you do not have to go to Himalayas or whatever and learn to be a monk, if you can see your profits rise or drop and still do not act, that's fine.

That is what I tried to say. I mean if Zidane can't get the UCL title to them, then Pochettino didn't neither, so what's the difference? If it is the possibility of Zidane bringing PSG  that title, then Pochettino may have the same possibility as well? We do not know. So at hand, to me at least, we have the "get zidane and possibly get UCL" and also "keep pochettino and possibly get UCL" as well.

Just because he didn't get it so far, doesn't mean that he can't get it this year, there is no guarantee that he won't get it. This is why it makes no sense to convince a coach and maybe like pay double what you are paying right now, for the same possibility, because to me, it is just the same possibility for both of them.

I think they did that crypto acceptance thing because of sanctions. Which meant that if you were a rich oligarch that had a ton of usd, you could use crypto to turn your USD into Russian ruble, and that was the main idea.

Today, they look at the money and how valuable ruble is even during a war and sanctions because the whole world needs to get it from Russia, it is obvious that they do not need the money of oligarchs anymore. They already got it as much as they could, and that meant that the extra that is left, shouldn't be a big amount, they got what they wanted out of it. This is why they gave up on crypto hopes which would make their ruble valuable, they no longer need it.

The schrodingers cat situation with Zidane is ab it of a confusing one. Yes he coached Madrid to titles all the time he played, and won UCL three times in a row, and all of that are correct stuff. However, he managed only 3 seasons and even though he was amazing using that time, he didn't managed any before or after. Which means that we need to see a great sample to say if he is as good as we think or not.

Maybe if he managed real Madrid since those days, they wouldn't get another but ancelotti got it? Who knows, is there a guarantee that it would happen? Or if he goes to PSG today, maybe they won't even win the league let alone UCL, is there a proof? We just need to wait and see.

If all of your indicators are showing downside, that usually means that it will go down, but if they all show upside, that doesn't always mean that it will go up. The problem there is that bitcoin market is fragile, when going up, people are afraid that it may start to go down, it goes up 2x? Then people say it is time for it to start going down, when in fact it could do another 3x on top of it. Don't believe me?

Check topics when it went from 10k to 20k in 2020, it then went to 68k at peak but during 20k many said it will start to go down. However, when it is going down, people do not think it will reverse, they think it could go on going down even further, which often does because of it.

This is what I did as well but mainly with peter lynch for example. Between Peter Lynch, Warren Buffet and Robert Kiyosaki, you are going to have three amazing investors who can navigate through the market and the financial world we are in and tell you the secrets on how to get rich.

You can learn how to invest effectively with Peter Lynch when you do not have a lot of money and how to find companies that would be profitable, then you can use Warren Buffet to find ways to invest into things that can return something to you for you to reinvest back, so create a vicious cycle that will not end, and with Robert Kiyosaki could allow you to start with almost nothing, but find debt to be quite profitable if you know what you are doing and use others money to make you money. All could be applied to crypto directly.

How is it not impossible though? Plus, Lewandowski is a great player, but if we are talking about "can barely raise that much money", do you really think that he should be the first player to get? Or even striker should be the first position to get? Someone at that age, providing no future profit possibility, just because he is a superstar?

I honestly believe that it would be another bad transfer made by Barcelona. They are famous for making terrible transfer decisions, and this would be another one of them. I liked Xavi's decisions, torres, traore, aubameyang, these are all players that would shine in a Barcelona system, Lewa doesn't sound like it would be a good idea.

We all were, I really didn't expected it to drop like this, don't get me wrong it is not unnatural for bitcoin to drop, it happens all the time and this is just another one of those times, but it wasn't expected neither. I would say that it is going to be okay, I can't give any guarantee or anything, but by the looks of things I can say that it is not going to be that much of a shock neither, it should be quite alright.

By this time in a month or two, we could be very well above 40k, not saying we will, but since bitcoin is volatile enough to drop like this, we all know that it is also quite volatile enough to go up very fast when needed be as well.

Unfortunately that is the truth in all of the hyped projects in crypto. It could be like ICO, or DeFi, or whatever, they are all overhyped and that is why we are seeing it go down like this. However, if you invest into solid foundations and good fundamentals then you could make a profit, and that is how everyone should approach it. Like bitcoin is the king right?

So, when you invest into shiba for a token, or cryptopunks or ape whatever for nft, then you need to realize that it will not be as long lasting as bitcoin and you will be quite upset about it. It's fine, you can make mistakes and it's fine, but you need to just realize you made a mistake and never repeat it hopefully.

Which is a proof that even when we are awaiting for it to go up, there is room for it to go down and that's fine, we could always be wrong and that is fine, there is nothing wrong with that. I personally feel like we shouldn't really focus on how we could make something out of nothing, we should be doing something with this.

I believe that we would definitely not be doing a major detail on crypto and find the exact reason why it goes up or down, we can't find that. But when we wait for it to go up, and recovering a bit, we can see it cashing down hard, or vice versa could happen as well. This is why I believe it should not be really "expected" to do anything.

I agree, that is not going to be that easy at all, it is going to be an incredible challenge. Let me put it this way, Benzema had 13 goals this season right? That means you need to have 11 seasons like that in a row to pass Benzema if you start at zero.

Of course Mbappe and Haaland is doing great, and I believe they will do even more great in the future as they grow older because they will not only be good players, but they will have experience as well, Benzema did that 13 when he was 35 I believe. But the question is, will they stay healthy? And will they always be in a team that will fight for as many games as possible? That decides to many of the goals, eliminated in the groups would mean terrible for their future, and maybe both of their clubs are good now, but you do not know what will happen in 5-10 years.

I agree, he is one of the clubs best players that retired, if you want to hang a jersey up the rafters, that is one of them for sure. Marcelo played 15 very strong years for Real, and he provided so much talent and won so much with the club. Of course not all achievements are his, but he was there when it happened.

Ever since Roberto Carlos retired, Marcelo took up the position and made sure that the left back was a place Real never considered with a problem. I am sure that Mend will be great after Marcelo as well. I do not know what Marcelo will do next, but I am sure that he definitely has place in Real Madrid staff somewhere if he wants to.

I do not think that 1% of the people sell their assets to buy bitcoin. When you think about assets as things like houses or cars then you might be right, that is not common. However, when you consider assets such as gold, foreign currency, stocks, and other stuff like that, those are assets as well and people could end up changing stuff there and it would be making a ton of profit by selling those and moving to crypto and making a better result.

I am not saying that it should be a good deal, all I am saying is that the best thing we could do about this problem that 8k means a ton more people selling all other liquid assets like stocks, which would help a ton.

Unfortunately there are some places that still charge this as a "service fee", but the competition made it a bad thing. If all websites charged this, then all would continue to do it, but when a few big names start doing it for free, it became a forced thing to do for free otherwise everyone would go there.

Like Binance does user to user transfers for free, the network fee is still taken, but if it is another user on the receiving end, you could get the network fee back, or send that to the receiver as well. When even the biggest one which is Binance does this, Paypal sort of had to do it, but still some charge you for it in the name of providing a service.

It is true that getting advice from others could be a bit of a problem. Long term solutions to what we have right now would be to learn how to trade. I always said the same thing, if someone tells you which coin to buy, then you should stay away from that person at all costs, but if someone tells you how you could pick a coin to trade, then you could be doing a lot better. This is why learn how to trade, and not what to trade.

Diversification and DCA together makes it impossible for you to lose if you have patience. Those three things could lead any person, with any capital, to turn into a rich person with enough time, it may take a few years, or may take a few decades but they will become rich.

You are talking about the NFT's that are images, and you are right there is a good case that it won't boom again. However, NFT is not only the images that we have seen, all those cryptopunks and apes and all that are futile and useless. The real deal would come when projects start to utilize NFT even more, when you do that the fact that it will go on will stand.

Like there are literally musicians that sell the rights to their songs, so you could earn from their royalty, not a lot but the feeling is enough. As long as the utility of NFT stands, there will be some projects that will have a different approach which will make it popular again one day.

There is no exchange with 100% security guarantee, you could never be safe in any exchange without any doubt of problems, of course all exchanges have that. However, regular pc, or ledger nano, or anything else that a regular person would have not 100% guaranteed neither.

Even if a hacker can't manage to scam you directly, they could very well find a way to social hack you, meaning they could make you GIVE your money to them somehow, basically by talking to you, that is how scams work in most cases. This is why you shouldn't really be trusting anything if that is the path we are going with. Exchanges at least have higher security than our computers.

They can do whatever they want, it is not going to change anything in the short term. People do not want them to comeback with a million dollars giveaway or something, that would not be the way to comeback and convince people that they are here for the long term.

People want them to comeback, and stay, that is the path. If they comeback and be active everyday for a year, then they are doing a great job and people will trust them again, even if there isn't anything more than the regular signature campaign, because they would see them as back. However, if they come back, and text a million dollar giveaway once, and be absent for another 3 months, how could you trust them?

I do agree that BNB has a good potential to be up there, it is a very fluid development project as well. Whenever something gets a bit more famous, they end up putting something in BNB that will cover it, and that is why I believe that it is 100% something that will get a ton of attention. I know that ETH is great, and I believe that ETH will keep on being the second ranked coin and it will get used a ton by the people for sure.

However, just because it is that great, doesn't mean that other ones are bad neither. By this logic, what I mean is, while eth could go from 2 to 4, bnb could go from 1 to 2, still lower in ranking, but at least same levels of increase.

People like Vettel and Max and Hamilton has a bit more advantage during the Baku race. The difference is that they are fierce and aggressive racers that do not only rely on talent but also take risks that are like inch to the side and you are done. Obviously Vettel will do probably nothing this race, wouldn't really matter to the top, and it is unlikely that Hamilton would matter neither, possible but unlikely.

This leaves Max there, so if Max races like crazy again, and takes all the risks and every part of the available track, then he will have an easy win. But if something unexpected happens and his risk doesn't pay off, he could crash out and Charles could still win.