Awesome! I added your note as well.

By the way, for consistency purposes I'd suggest one more small change: replace


with


Practically, I deleted the ": " after "*", in order to be same alignment and spacing as in the case of "**".

---

Basically, I'd say to let everyone vote the preferred mark for this explorer... That would simplify the two questions into a single one


In rest everything is correct. Let's do this

You must live in an alternate reality. After replying to all your rigmaroles, I asked you some questions (starting with Jan 27th); today is Feb 23rd yet you never replied. You just popped-in, threw some words, ignored all questions and vanished like saxydev.


Looking forward to it, although I doubt it'll ever happen.


Obviously, how else?


I already explained you, and 1miau too, that there is no way in the world for you to prove that you are not his alt, as it's no way to prove you are his alt. So stop this BS. But you don't read any post, in fact, do you? You just appear here to throw various words after your master account notices that your reply is requested.

By the way, 1miau is also waiting for an answer from you:



I would also appreciate now if FCSB would be winner of Romanian Superliga. Sadly, things aren't always the way we wish. Gotta live with them as they are.


Neither do I. You could have used just just your main account, no need to write from both.

---

You PMed someone you trust? Loooooooool! Who gives a shit on who you trust?!
Just for the sake of the discussion: is this guy bekli23 or andulolika?


This is like saying "tomorrow it may or may not rain" -- and be right in any of the two situations. Your friend Rizzrack advised you to choose your words so carefully?


Yet, still, you can't present any proof.


100% 👍
You showed me!

---

Probably, being supported in scam by a forum official gave him enough guts to continue this charade. As PrivacyG said a while ago,


However, I am sorry for your loss. But it's hard to do anything when the scammer is supported by forum staff. Officially supported by a forum official.

Multumim pentru informatii, NeuroticFish!

Intamplator, m-am jucat si eu un pic zilele astea cu Blue Wallet. Nu am uitat observatiile tale cu privire la acest portofel, insa mi-a picat in mana intamplator si am vrut sa vad ce stie. De retinut, pe langa partea de LN, Blue mai detine alte doua functii: una de creare de portofel "normal" de Bitcoin si una de creare a unui portofel tip seif ("Vault"). Acesta este un portofel multi-sig si poate fi definit numarul de semnaturi necesare dintr-un maxim de 7 semnaturi. Mi s-a parut foarte interesanta abordarea. Aditional, utilizatorul poate seta el insusi entropia, apeland la monede, zaruri cu 6 fete sau chiar zaruri cu 20 de fete (!!!). Un plus este ca portofelul lucreaza cu Tor.

Una peste alta, din toate portofelele acestea, nu am vazut unul pana acum care sa nu fie custodial si sa fie si usor de folosit...


Ar mai fi, in aceeasi lista, si Strike (fie el si pentru "no coiners" ). Cred ca ai uitat de el.

Si Eclair

This is a very good score for a Newbie Jr. Member user! Congrats for your rank-up! I decided to merit your post as I believe you are a normal user of the forum, based on your post history. Apparently, being here for almost 6 months now you had enough time to learn about the forum and about Bitcoin.

---

It's okay, don't worry! You will have plenty of time to learn and I am sure that you already learned some precious information from the quiz! I am quoting your score in full image below, since your rank does not allow you to do it.

Am revenit cu inca o actualizare a tabelului din OP: acum apare si coloana sugerata de IntimitateaG -- "Funcționează fără JS". Din fericire, nu a fost nevoie de multa munca in BBCode pentru a avea tabelul afisat in mod corespunzator. In prezent afiseaza toate coloanele in intregime, neexistand texte trunchiate:

---

In ceea ce priveste comentariul aferent site-ului Atomic, am inlocuit "Momentan, link-ul redirecționează către site-ul Trezor Explorer" cu "Momentan, link-ul afișează a copie a site-ului Trezor Explorer"

---

Actualizarea este parte a uneia mai mari, in weekend urmand a aparea si alte modificari. Va fi lansat, cel mai probabil, si un chestionar cu privire la anumite note acordate unora dintre site-uri, dari si alte intrebari referitoare la tabelul principual.

Okay


Oh gawd... =)))

---

After some struggles with BBCode (can't be else, can it?) I also updated the translated topic by including the column suggested by PrivacyG (don't worry, the emoji stayed!), as I was curious to see how it looks in Romanian as well. I know that some more changes will follow but I had to add this update anyway so I did it now. Surprisingly, it looks great and no other adjustment was needed.

What I would further recommend is to either (1) delete the "**" placed next to "Partially", as nowhere in OP is explained what "**" means or (2) place the "**" next to "Works without JS" (thus it will look like this: "Works without JS**") and replace


with


(Also please don't forget to change "PrivacyG" from OP with "PrivacyG" )

This way, the "**" will also be explained somewhere in OP.

Additionally, I'd also suggest replacing "Works without JS" with "Works without JS?".


Looking forward for next update!

OP, you reached a fair conclusion but only by seeing a small part of the bigger picture. It's good though that you reached this conclusion before being prejudiced by an exchange. I will list below more reasons for which everybody should avoid exchanges.


This is also correct. Fear these exchanges and avoid them like you'd avoid a plague! Because this is what they are: a plague for Bitcoin community!

Here's a list of reasons for avoinding exchanges:

• the rule "not your keys not your coins" is more than real: a Court decision from 2020 practically says that
• centralized exchanges may be hacked and you lose your money
• centralized exchanges may seize your account at any time and you lose your money
• centralized exchanges may also lose your personal information due to hackers and this puts your life in jeopardy, as hackers sell your private data on dark web and you never know what burglar may show up at your door
• centralized exchanges may perform an exit scam and you lose your money
• centralized exchanges offer your personal information to authorities
• centralized exchanges may even sell your personal information, as it happened in Coinbase's case
• last, but not least, centralized exchanges imply KYC and this topic of 1miau will explain even better the risks associated with KYC: Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless.

More references: the article Hacked Exchanges since 2011, written by VB1001.

Now you have a full list of reasons for avoiding exchanges.

So after being offline since Februyary 13th, Rizzrack's alt suddenly wakes up; again, just after he posted from his main account and pretending it's just a coincidence. How sweet!


I never mentioned you are not his alt. I mentioned that (1) it's possible for you to be his alt and (2) that it doesn't matter if you are, or not, his alt.


I don't know how you read texts, but I think I was very clear.


Ohhh I must feel blessed! Thanks for this sign of generosity! However, be careful that you read with attention those questions, meaning word by word, in order to make sure you understand what I asked and avoid embarrassing yourself like you did until now, when you either said something which I did not say or you made another Houdini move, just like saxydev did.

Holy Mother of God!



I was wrong! How can it be?

It's been already 204 hours and our prince charming is still sleeping! Is sleeping beauty feeling well?

It's hard to understand how such an active businessman can sleep so much... Who runs the businesses in his place? It is possible though to actually assist to the Houdini move?

c0ldbrewz, I guess his "financial department" still did not reach you yet? If so, maybe they have a problem with their Internet connection or with phone lines... Perhaps saxydev is working his ass out right now, harvesting some strawberries at an Italian or Spanish farm, for obtaining your 90$? (It may take a while though; although the amount seems small it is, in fact huge!)

Meanwhile, Rizzrack's alt still did not support your flag so Rizzrack must have mixed feelings for supporting it. In part, he is still supporting the scammer, as he opposed the flag created for scamming dkbit98. Watching forum staff officially supporting scammers can only bring confidence to all users.

Rizzrack's alt also did not have the guts for answering my questions. All good.

Well, if you want so much to be politically correct, who am I to stop you? Seriously now, I think it's a good idea. Let's make a poll about it.


=)))

Picture this: we all know that Usain Bolt is fastest man alive, right? Now let's suppose he did not run 100m in 9.58" but in 15". And nobody else would run this distance faster than him. Therefore we would still consider him fastest man alive, right? No matter that he runs 100m in 15" and we actually know that it's possible to do it in 9.58". Does that make sense? Now imagine this analogy regarding Blockchair. Nevertheless, a poll with more users voting what they think about Blockchair is a fair choice.


ChickenG

(By the way, in Romanian chicken is a substantive having also feminine gender  )


Then we must coerce icopress somehow to not cancel this category.


Yay!


Pardon my blasphemy   Emoji must stay!


It seems the 1% trim worked just fine. I noticed the "as" from BitcoinWhosWho, which was not shown earlier, is shown now, as you placed it on the second row. Besides, the "t" from "edit", which was also not shown, appears well now.



1miau, you are tables master! I bow down! Can we have this update implemented in OP now? (I took the screenshot from post #141.)


For me, the comment is fine as it is now. Let's see though what PrivacyG says about this.

---

I love complex BBCode the way I love wearing winter pyjama trousers during hot summer  


I merited your proposal, as this feature of BBcode seems very exotic to me, as I only saw it used very rarely. I like it! However, it comes together with the lack of functionality on mobiles.

Having this in mind, together with the fact that 1miau already found a way for trimming the table enough (the power of 1% is so incredible, as always!) in order to still have all information shown, I guess we can use it like this (meaning the way 1miau trimmed it)? Comments column can still be left as it is, as now all text is shown... Practically we reached already what we were trying to obtain: implementing PrivacyG's new column while having whole table displayed properly.

Ummm... I thought about that, and I decided to try first to obtain my answer from the community, if possible. I believe that, in his position, theymos receives dozens, if not hundreds messages on a daily basis (remember, he also works on Reddit). I can't imagine how his inbox looks like. Furthermore, I believe he is also very busy everyday... I have to admit, when I PMed him I was lucky enough to receive replies in about 75% of occasions. Some times I had to send him a second PM asking him if he noticed the earlier one I sent. So yes, I am grateful that he replied to almost all my PMs.

And, by knowing this situation, it is possible to (1) not receive any reply, if he considers the subject to be of a very low importance; (2) not receive any reply, in case he won't even notice the PM, given the probably huge number of PMs here receives.

Then of course, in case I won't find any answer from the community, I will actually try to watch again all those documentaries. If not even by doing it I will find my answer, then I will consider PMing him too... But I would not feel comfortable to disturb him with something which may be of a very low importance for him...


I hope he did not go that far...

I think I was the one Is it needed a History & Education board?

---

While xtraelv's signature still makes me shiver, I can recommend OP a bunch of historical threads, which I consider to be a must-read for everybody:


Furthermore, I would also add the following topics:

• List of Major Bitcoin Heists, Thefts, Hacks, Scams, and Losses, by dree12
• Hacked Exchanges since 2011, by VB1001
• 12 years later and people still don't know to use Bitcoin nor what it's good for, by GazetaBitcoin
• Bitcoin - a bloodless revolution, by GazetaBitcoin
• Governs' oppression of bitcoiners may turn against them, by GazetaBitcoin
• Libertarians -- where are they now?, by GazetaBitcoin
• A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace - We all should read it, by GazetaBitcoin

I hope this helps.

Se mai intoarce roata Anul trecut aproape toate concursurile le ratam, daca nu erai tu


Bafta!

---

Asa este... Am si realizat de ce: cand am vazut diamantul acela de la Utopia ochii mi-au trecut instinctiv mai departe, crezand ca este vorba de campania de recenzii. Iata ce poate face puterea obisnuintei
Revenind la concurs, din ce observ, nu este deloc greu de participat. Parerea mea este ca oamenii acestia chiar vor sa faca o treaba cu aplicatia aceea... Au cerut si recenzii, acum incearca si sa o popularizeze cu aceste concursuri... ce sa zic. Nu stiu daca vor reusi, dar e de apreciat efortul. Daca ar folosi BTC, ar avea mai multe sanse. Sau, macar, daca ar folosi si BTC...

Ah, si apropo de campania de recenzii, mi-am amintit alta treaba: ai primit plata de la Betnomi pentru recenzie? Mi-am amintit de situatia ta de mai multe ori zilele astea, cand, plimbandu-ma pe forum, am vazut un topic la adresa lor.

Hehe, I just realized now that, while trying to find a movie starring theymos, I also shared some very interesting materials for those interested about Bitcoin at large. I can grant you, all documentaries are worth watching. If I may suggest you, I'd recommend to start with Bitcoin: Shape the Future, continue with The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin, then Deep Web. Then you can pick the rest in any order you wish

If you are so interested in such materials, I can also recommend you some more movies / documentaries, these ones being about Ross Ulbricht, Julian Assange, WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden. Again, all are worth watching.

Silk Road Case - The Real, Untold Story - documentary about the injustice suffered by Ross Ulbricht during Silk Road trial

Ithaka - a documentary showing Julian's struggle to avoid extradition to US
Mediastan: A Wikileaks Road Movie - a WikiLeaks very own documentary - full movie
Risk - a WikiLeaks documentary, directed by Laura Poitras (a friend of Julian Assange) - full movie
The Fifth Estate - a great movie about WikiLeaks
We Steal Secrets: The Story of WikiLeaks - yet another documentary about WikiLeaks
Underground: The Julian Assange Story - another movie about Julian, depicting his early career

Citizenfour - documentary about Snowden, starring himself
Snowden - fiction movie about Snowden, starring Joseph Gordon-Levitt

I hope this helps.

---

Oh well, that makes sense a bit. I did not think about that...

In any case, I believe that if theymos actually had a - how is it called? - cameo ( ) inside a movie, he appeared with his nym, not with his name. I am sure that from all those which ever heard about theymos, 99% know only the nym theymos and maybe (only maybe!) 1% know his name. And that 1% may be a big number. Most likely, if you'd tell his name to those knowing the nym theymos, they will just nod their heads, without understanding about who you are talking.

Following this idea, I am also certain that, if theymos ever appeared in a documentary (after all, my friend could have been wrong, leading me to live with this impression in vain), then he appeared in credits as theymos. If his name were there nobody would know who is the one they watched, lol (or almost nobody).

Ce m-a intrigat foarte tare, atat la procesul lui Assange, cat si la cel al lui Ross, sunt urmatoarele lucruri (de retinut, Ross si-a epuizat deja toate caile de atac: fond, apel, recurs, apoi i s-a interzis solicitarea de a-i fi analizat procesul la Curtea Suprema de Justitie pentru a vedea daca a avut parte (sau nu) de un proces echitabil):

- Assange a castigat procesul pe fond
- lui Ross i s-au retras acuzatiile de angajare de asasini platiti.

Si totusi, unul este in continuare inchis (ciclul legal neincheindu-se inca in cazul lui Assange) iar altul primeste dubla pedeapsa pe viata cu inchisoarea.

De ce a castigat Assange procesul pe fond? A fost "lasat sa castige", oare, pe premisa ca "si asa, oricum intoarcem decizia la apel"?
De ce s-au retras acele acuzatii in cazul lui Ross? Lipsa probelor, desi ar trebui sa fie un motiv intemeiat in orice instanta din lume, acolo unde a fost el judecat nu avea nicio valoare. Aceeasi curte a admis probe nelegitime, a interzis martori legitimi etc. Deci de ce s-au retras cu adevarat acele acuzatii? Oare pe premisa "lasati-l fratilor si fara acuzatiile alea ca, oricum, ii dam 800 de ani pentru ca a detinut un site"?

Sesizati asemanarile? Ambii au castigat ceva, ceva ce ar fi trebuit sa fie foarte pretios in orice instanta, insa in ambele cazuri a fost apa de ploaie. Au lasat acuzatorii de la ei, din generozitatea lor, sa faca impresie buna publicului, dar ei stiind, de fapt, deznodamantul?

---

Imi amintesc de tovarasul de la exchange-ul centralizat romanesc care tinea datele clientilor pe Google. Atat l-a dus pe el capul. Nici macar sa minta nu l-a dus capul, sa fi spus ca le tine pe un PC neconectat la Internet sau, nu stiu, sa spuna ceva ce insufla siguranta. El chiar nu avea nimic de ascus

Daca ar fi auzit saracul Tim May, s-ar fi intors in mormant...

Radem, glumim, dar eRON exista deja Dupa tentativa esuata numita BitLeu, Bitcoin Romania chiar a pus in practica ideea, lansand moneda stabila proprie RON Coin a aparut si moneda RON Coin.

Din blogul Bitcoin Romania am crezut ca e moneda lor, insa m-am inselat. E facuta de altii si promovata de ei. Are site propriu si este prezentat drept



Si am mai gasit ceva foarte interesant:


(Din ciclul ca la noi la nimeni, materialul apare doar pe site-ul Bitcoin Romania, nu si pe cel al RONC.)

Mai mult, oferta este din octombrie 2019, insa eu abia acum am aflat de ea Oo Sun curios cati comercianti accepta daca poti face vreo plata, o singura plata, in toata tara asta, folosind RONC.

---

Se pare ca NeuroticFish navigheaza regulamentar pe forum. Ai inceput bine saptamana, ce sa zic =)))

(De altfel, ar fi culmea sa mai aiba cineva curajul sa nu navigheze regulamentar! Eu, ultima oara cand am facut-o, am inbracat puiul de vulpe in rosu De atunci m-am lecuit!)

Cu scuzele de rigoare pentru intarzierea unui raspuns aici...


IntimitateG, de multe ori cand te citesc, am impresia ca parca ar fi scris kevin   Nu stiu daca si NeuroticFish simte la fel, insa mie fix senzatia aceasta mi-o dai. Stii, cum e si intalnesti pe cineva pentru prima data si ai impresia ca il cunosti, ca l-ai mai vazut, de fapt... (Nu ma intelege gresit, nu sustin ca esti kevin -- ci doar ca imi amintesti de el. Si dicutiile cu el le purtam cu drag.)

Vorbele tale de mai sus imi amintesc de un schimb de idei cu kevin, cand am postat dintr-o carte pe care am tradus-o integral in romana: The Satoshi Revolution, de Wendy McElroy. Voi copia aici ce citasem in acea discutie, subiectul fiind fascinant: acopera atat interdictia prezumtiei de nevinovatie (sugerata de tine) cat si dublul standard al moralitatii (sugerat de mine -- mai precis, altii care au fost inchisi pentru aceeasi fapta sunt liberi de mult). Sper ca paragrafele pe care le vei citi sa-ti treazeasca curiozitatea de a citi toata cartea  

Capitolul care contine citatele respective incepe foarte "tare" (in sensul de intens), cu niste ganduri ale autoarei:


Sa continuam...



E ca si cum ai primi 25 de ani pentru ca ai calcat pe un melc. Crima cu premeditare! -- ar vui ziarele. Crima deosebit de grava! La beci cu infractorul! -- si tot asa. Sentintele astea frizeaza ridicolul.


Lol, bine zis!

---

In cazul lui Assange s-au speriat ca o sa-si ia talpasita daca-l lasa liber pana la proces. Asa ca, mai bine, tii in parnaie omul nevinovat (cel putin, nedovedit inca a fi vinovat) pana se termina procesul. Ca sa fie bine, sa nu fie rau. Ei bine, procesul lui Assange s-a terminat in ianuarie 2021, cel putin in prima faza. Culmea (zic culmea intrucat era neastaptat acel rezultat), omul castiga! Castiga dreptul de a nu fi extradat. Insa e tinut in continuare in parnaie, ca a anuntat procuroru' american ca o sa atace decizia la curtea de apel. Asa, si? De ce e omul asta tinut in continuare inchis? Asta dupa ce a stat inchis si din aprilie 2019 pana in acel moment, dupa ce i s-a reziliat azilul politic de catre Ecuador si a fost fortat sa paraseasca o alta temnita (de data asta voluntara), unde se afla din 2012.

Deci avem asa:
- august 2012 - aprilie 2019 temnita voluntara (ma rog, fortat de imprejurari, dar macar s-a dus el singur acolo)
- aprilie 2019 - ianuarie 2021 temnita fortata, ca, vezi domne, sa fie omu' la loc sigur pana se termina procesul!

Ei bine, se termina procesul! A castigat dreptul de a fi liber! Il elibereaza? Nu!

Pai mai stai la noi oleaca, sa se faca si apelul! Dar ce treaba are sula cu prefectura? Ma rog, in conditiile in care oamenii legii il tineau "preventiv" in arest pe om, care nu fusese declarat vinovat nicaieri de nimeni, de ce ar fi de mirare ca si dupa castigarea procesului sa ramana tot arestat?

In fine, se face apelul. (Nu mai insist asupra faptului ca apelul ala putea fi facut, legal in 40 de zile sau ceva de genul, dar a fost facut peste 10 luni!!! De fapt, Assange chiar a contestat in instanta faptul ca apelul nu a fost facut in termenul legal dar, evident, a fost apa de ploaie.) Desigur, la apel s-a corectat "greseala" instantei anterioare, al carei judecator fusese probabil beat de l-a lasat pe Assange liber (ca nu a fost eliberat asta e alta treaba). Judecatorul de la apel isi face treaba: omul trebuie extradaaaaaat!

Mai departe, ca sa fie treaba-treaba, i se si interzice dreptul de a contesta decizia curtii de apel. Cumva insa, pana la urma i se permite aceasta miscare, daca nu cumva aceasta contestatie are loc, de fapt, la Curtea Suprema de Justitie (nu inteleg exact din articol). Daca e doar recurs, cazul inca se judeca. Daca insa contestatia aceasta mentionata de presa are loc la Curtea Suprema de Justitie, acolo, din ce stiu, nu se mai judeca dosarul pe fond, ci doar daca a avut parte sau nu de un proces echitabil. Sunt foarte curios de rezultat.

Cert este ca ne aflat in februarie 2023, iar Assange este inchis din aprilie 2019 asa, de pomana.


Mai mult: daca si-au epuizat si toate caile de atac, nici nu mai au vreo sansa de a redeschide procesul. C-asa-i in tenis...

---

Doamne, cat de tare e vorba asta...

My finger is itching me to start deleting your posts. Where have you seen anything about doxxing here?


That's probably best idea.

---

I am not sure I'm following. What "year documentary"? And what is a "year documentary"? And where did I state that anyway?


I was hoping for that...


This is certainly not a 2024 movie, lol. How, in the world, could it be released in 2024 if we are in 2023? How could you have watched it? =)))
In any case, this is a movie from 2014:




Thank you for the link. It's also available on Youtube, at the link I shared in OP.

So, in any case, have you watched this documentary? Is this the one starring theymos?


Jesus, where did all this insanity come from?! Who ever talked about mentioning theymos' identity anywhere?! This topic was only about finding in which documentary he appears, not for writing his name here and there.

Seriously, where do all these ideas come from?!

---

It seems an entire hysteria started yet I don't know from where nor why. I think I'll start deleting posts soon, lol. One talks about doxxing, one talks about a movie from 2024, which he watched already, one writes a 100+ words phrase, competing with Victor Hugo... I don't understand what I have done so wrong to have all these people replying in my topics (facepalm). Now instead of talking about documentaries I have to talk about (denying) doxxing. Jesus!

Have you ever heard of dot? You know, it's a punctuation sign, graphically represented like this: .. It is used for separating sentences.

By looking at what you wrote, at your 132 words phrase, I am wondering if you wanted to compete with longest phrase from literature, which appears in Victor Hugo's Les Misérables, this one having 823 words.

---

Why should he?


... unless he starred the respective documentary at his own will.


Who and how violated theymos' privacy?


Since he is a public figure and he actually said what Lucius mentioned, respectively:


then how can you come up saying no one knows his identity?


Are you just eagerly trying to fill your quote for the campaign you are enrolled or what's the reason of this ridiculous post which has only one dot within 132 words?

Lol, I also noticed that and it made me laugh a lot =)))

In any case, I just remembered that there is one more documentary about Bitcoin which I also watched and I added to OP:


And I think this is the one... I remember this is the most recent I watched and it intrigued me the way it was filmed: is has a shadowy narrator, talking with a distorted voice, this being a hacker, if I remember well. At some point he describes how he made "his first sack of money" or something like that. And it was even more interesting, as it was the only Japanese documentary about Bitcoin. Maybe this is the one I talked about with my friend... However, I can not be sure. But if nobody knows, if nobody actually watched these documentaries, then I guess I'll have to watch them all again, one by one. But I'll start with this one.

Actually, yes. Or I know what is believed to be his name. As you can see, NicNacCoin also posted a Twitter link containing this information.


Actually that friend of mine recognized him in one of those documentaries, but I don't know if he managed to do it because theymos' name appeared somewhere during the documentary or because he actually knew how theymos looks like.

All I remember is that I watched all those documentaries and, at some point, I was talking to my friend about one of them. It's just I don't know about which one we were talking. And he said something like "this documentary is even more interesting, as theymos also appears inside the footage".

And I am sure that it's one of those documentaries because I did not watch any other Bitcoin documentary excepting those ones (and I know that because I wrote their names down at some point). So it's one of them.

I asked this question to avoid watching all six movies again, as it would take a lot of time (especially if, considering my infamous unluck, I'm sure that the movie where theymos appears will be the last one I'll watch from all those 6 documentaries).