Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 06:11:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 ... 162 »
1741  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 03:12:32 PM
I don't have any beef with anyone.

I think the Politics & Society section should be considered as off-topic. As it is entirely based on a person's interests.

And it's my view that it's causing people to post more than what they normally would. So I posted a suggestion of it, let's leave it for the campaign managers if they like this suggestion or not. Smiley
1742  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 02:46:41 PM
Moved.

I consider them as off-topic and I believe they allow people to post a lot of insubstantial posts which are Unnecessary. It's ok if you don't agree with that but I'll leave it up to the campaign managers to decide which section they include and which not. Smiley

I will however ask Mods & Admins, to provide another board where a person can talk about his other interests and where it doesn't gets mixed with spam and troll posts.
1743  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 02:15:55 PM
I don't see your point. Why are you asking signature campaign managers to exclude posts made in the politics section? There is meaningful conversation there, probably more so then in many other sections.

I would repeat my solution to shit posts in the forum would be for campaign managers to do a better job of weeding out shit-posters.

I am asking that because I consider them as off-topic. Let me ask you this, where would a person who wants to discuss about Movies or Music post? in off-topic right? And that's not paid for because it is considered useless.

But people arguing whether a religion is right or not is meaningful and paid for? How can that be fair?

Argue about religions is more useful than talk about what kind of music do you like, or am I wrong?

Arguing about religions pretty much will create an endless debate , this happens many time even on this forum . Each party will keep on pushing their religions towards the other using some facts about how good their religion are but some threads in politics and society is still okay imo


I may agree with you, but I think we cannot compare the off topic section with the Politics & Society or am I wrong? Or with the Meta section. He wants only that all the posts made in the off topic will count, but have you seen the threads in that section  Roll Eyes?

NO I never said that all posts in off-topic should be counted.

Don't throw words in my mouth man, as it is there is a confusion about the points I mentioned in this thread. Please don't take this elsewhere.

Arguing about religions pretty much will create an endless debate , this happens many time even on this forum . Each party will keep on pushing their religions towards the other using some facts about how good their religion are but some threads in politics and society is still okay imo

You're right, so maybe it should be taken on thread per thread basis. There are threads in Off-topics also which can be considered meaningful. So maybe off-topic shouldn't be banned also.
1744  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 02:07:32 PM
I don't see your point. Why are you asking signature campaign managers to exclude posts made in the politics section? There is meaningful conversation there, probably more so then in many other sections.

I would repeat my solution to shit posts in the forum would be for campaign managers to do a better job of weeding out shit-posters.

I am asking that because I consider them as off-topic. Let me ask you this, where would a person who wants to discuss about Movies or Music post? in off-topic right? And that's not paid for because it is considered useless.

But people arguing whether a religion is right or not is meaningful and paid for? How can that be fair?

Argue about religions is more useful than talk about what kind of music do you like, or am I wrong?


Maybe it will be useful for person who follows a religion, to others who doesn't it would be useless. Same thing can be said about any interests. Me I like movies but to you, the discussion may feel not worthy.

So my point is either include other off-topic posts which are meaningful too or consider the politics as off-topic too. You can't say 1 is bad and the other is good. They're both interests.

Some people hate politics but they like Entertainment but can they discuss about it and get paid? No
So it seems like certain interests are paid for while others are not. As I said, Either include both or exclude both.
1745  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 01:55:04 PM
I don't see your point. Why are you asking signature campaign managers to exclude posts made in the politics section? There is meaningful conversation there, probably more so then in many other sections.

I would repeat my solution to shit posts in the forum would be for campaign managers to do a better job of weeding out shit-posters.

I am asking that because I consider them as off-topic. Let me ask you this, where would a person who wants to discuss about Movies or Music post? in off-topic right? And that's not paid for because it is considered useless.

But people arguing whether a religion is right or not is meaningful and paid for? How can that be fair?

How can you say that a person's interests and his discussion on that matter is meaningful while others are not?

Either include both or exclude both.

1746  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 01:42:19 PM
I don't think you understand what the "off-topic" section is for. It is for any discussion/topic that may be of interest to bitcoineers that do not fit elsewhere in the forum. If there is a thread anywhere in the forum and a post is not specifically discussing the OP in some way then that post is off topic and should be deleted.

The off-topic section is filled with shit threads like 'your favorite drink', 'how long you have been logged in', 'your favorite...'; IMO any thread (especially those in off-topic) that can easily be responded to by many people with just one sentence should be disallowed as there is not any actual conversation that takes place in these types of threads. There are however many threads in the Off-topic section that have good conversation. The off topic section needs to be seriously cleaned up.

If people are having meaningful conversation anywhere in the forum there is no valid reason to exclude posts that are being made as others will read such posts and potentially will respond. The question if an additional sub should be created is off topic.

Let me ask you this, it meaningful conversation is taking place in any part of the forum then why should posts not be paid for if a company is receiving advertising? Don't you think it would be a better solution to not pay for posts that just fill up space and are shit, regardless of where they are posted?

Thank you. Yes, that's exactly my point. If I love to talk about Movies/Music/Games and want to discuss something about those then why it is that it should be considered off-topic? (Because that's the only place I can discuss those)

And only people discussing about Politics & Society be considered meaningful.

If you're just going to label it as a place where people talk non-sense, then I can argue that people writing HUGE ass posts on why a religion is good or not is also non-sense and should be considered as off-topic.

Not obsessed man, simply posting my opinion.

How is one's interest considered on-topic while others off-topic? Maybe you like Politics, other might like movies.

So the person talking about politics is right and is not making insubstantial posts and the person talking about movies is?


Are you reading what I'm writing? I've already argued against this and certain sections being paid and others not. It's you who's arguing for more subs to be barred from payment, so yes, how is one's interest considered on-topic while others off-topic? You're the one saying certain things are ok or not or right and wrong. And you're obsessed with the idea that off-topic = nobody should or does get paid for these because in your opinion they shouldn't therefore politics is also like off topic and also shouldn't be paid, but it is only certain campaigns that even deduct posts from off-topic, not a forum rule. You're clearly still looking at this from an angle of it's a universal rule that nobody gets paid for posting in off-topic when that just isn't the case, and like I've said multiple times it's not the sections but the posters that are the problem so pay for posts in off-topic or politics as long as they're relevant and constructive.

No man, I did read, you're simply not getting the point.

Just tell me what is considered off-topic and what is considered as on-topic?

If I wanted to talk about Movies/Music, where would I post? In off-topic right? And no matter how meaningful the discussion there is, it will be considered as worthless.

But all the non-sense topics in Politics & Society are meaningful?
1747  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 01:16:46 PM
Well I think it is relevant to the problem because I feel that Politics & Society does falls into Off-topic and the discussions taking place in that board shouldn't be counted towards paid post.

...in your opinion, which has been stated numerous times is not a solution to the problem at all.

So if talking about politics is counted for, why not Entertainment & Arts? I am sure there are Movie/Music/Arts/Games lovers on this forum who have to make their discussions in the Off-topic board. They would love to get paid for them if there was another board for it.

If that's too much than Politics & Society should be considered as Off-topic also and posts/discussions made there shouldn't be counted.

Well that was just an ex. but many posts can be made on other topics which are not politics & society but are about movies, games, music, arts , food and there can be some people who have good knowledge/interest in those and they can discuss about them in long sentences.

So either we call politics & society also an off-topic or we give others another board to discuss all the above and they can discuss about them and get paid for it?

Because there's likely no need or not enough demand for Entertainments & Arts so they're fine in Off-topic. Why are you so obsessed with getting subs labeled a certain way so they suddenly become worthy of payment or not? Simply calling a sub 'off topic' or creating another one doesn't mean Campaign Managers wont decide to pay for posts in there or not, and besides not all campaigns bar posts in off-topic. If someone was concerned about that they would just join a campaign that doesn't anyway.



Not obsessed man, simply posting my opinion.

How is one's interest considered on-topic while others off-topic? Maybe you like Politics, other might like movies.

So the person talking about politics is right and is not making insubstantial posts and the person talking about movies is?
1748  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 12:49:11 PM
And I didn't say they were spamming that section but just because they can keep making arguments like we are doing right now, and keep getting paid per post, they don't stop. And they know they won't get in trouble as they're simply discussing their views.

So what's the problem? Why would they 'get in trouble' for making constructive posts? They're not sneakily getting away with something here but for some reason you think they are. Should we ban Meta now because people get into discussions here? Bitcoin Discussion too? It happens all over the forum. That is what discussion forums are about.


If you're going to allow discussions on any topics, then why not allow off-topic discussions too:

Code:
Satoshi Nakamoto - 1,5 million Bitcoins - We need answers 	 	
General Football Discussion
Water-Powered Cars & Inventors Killed
Scientific proof that God exists?

I believe these are also discussions of some sort, so let's include them too? If you call these off-topics then Politics & Society fall right into that.

Or let's make another board called "Entertainment & Arts" Because some people might not be interested in Politics & Society but they'd love to discuss and get paid talking about whether "Miley Cyrus is a whore or not?"


Yeah, why not? I don't post shit in spam threads in off-topic as do many others. Off-topic or any other sub forums are not the problem, poor quality posters are. If someone wants to write a 400 word essay on why Miley Cyrus is a whore or not why not let them get paid for that? However, if someone wants to just write 'yes she's a whore' then those people are the problem.

Well that was just an ex. but many posts can be made on other topics which are not politics & society but are about movies, games, music, arts , food and there can be some people who have good knowledge/interest in those and they can discuss about them in long sentences.

So either we call politics & society also an off-topic or we give others another board to discuss all the above and they can discuss about them and get paid for it?
1749  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 12:44:46 PM
And I didn't say they were spamming that section but just because they can keep making arguments like we are doing right now, and keep getting paid per post, they don't stop. And they know they won't get in trouble as they're simply discussing their views.
So what's the problem? Why would they 'get in trouble' for making constructive posts? They're not sneakily getting away with something here but for some reason you think they are. Should we ban Meta now because people get into discussions here? Bitcoin Discussion too? It happens all over the forum. That is what discussion forums are about.
If you're going to allow discussions on any topics, then why not allow off-topic discussions too:

Code:
Satoshi Nakamoto - 1,5 million Bitcoins - We need answers 	 	
General Football Discussion
Water-Powered Cars & Inventors Killed
Scientific proof that God exists?

I believe these are also discussions of some sort, so let's include them too? If you call these off-topics then Politics & Society fall right into that.
Or let's make another board called "Entertainment & Arts" Because some people might not be interested in Politics & Society but they'd love to discuss and get paid talking about whether "Miley Cyrus is a whore or not?"
Wait a minute. That isn't relevant to this problem. If you feel like there should be more sections or some restructuring effort then you might as well suggest it in meta.
One could argue that there aren't enough threads that would fall into that subforum. That's probably why we don't have one. Besides, this is supposed to be a forum about Bitcoin. We should be glad that we already have the sections that we have. Technically they should all fall into off-topic. Anyhow that's a different issue.

The issue are the spammers. Luckily ndnhc and marco are willing to cooperate. What about the other campaigns? I'm not sure how many people are in them but I'm sure that it would still make a difference.

Well I think it is relevant to the problem because I feel that Politics & Society does falls into Off-topic and the discussions taking place in that board shouldn't be counted towards paid post.

So if talking about politics is counted for, why not Entertainment & Arts? I am sure there are Movie/Music/Arts/Games lovers on this forum who have to make their discussions in the Off-topic board. They would love to get paid for them if there was another board for it.

If that's too much than Politics & Society should be considered as Off-topic also and posts/discussions made there shouldn't be counted.
1750  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 12:29:12 PM
And I didn't say they were spamming that section but just because they can keep making arguments like we are doing right now, and keep getting paid per post, they don't stop. And they know they won't get in trouble as they're simply discussing their views.

So what's the problem? Why would they 'get in trouble' for making constructive posts? They're not sneakily getting away with something here but for some reason you think they are. Should we ban Meta now because people get into discussions here? Bitcoin Discussion too? It happens all over the forum. That is what discussion forums are about.


If you're going to allow discussions on any topics, then why not allow off-topic discussions too:

Code:
Satoshi Nakamoto - 1,5 million Bitcoins - We need answers 	 	
General Football Discussion
Water-Powered Cars & Inventors Killed
Scientific proof that God exists?

I believe these are also discussions of some sort, so let's include them too? If you call these off-topics then Politics & Society fall right into that.

Or let's make another board called "Entertainment & Arts" Because some people might not be interested in Politics & Society but they'd love to discuss and get paid talking about whether "Miley Cyrus is a whore or not?"
1751  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 11:15:42 AM
And "Politics & Society" has become like an off-topic board, where again all the posts are on the subject but really not necessary.

I don't think it has but once you discount it then a month later you'll be saying Bitcoin Discussion has become like Off-topic or whatever. People just seem to be getting annoyed by the fact that some people are making a lot of posts in there which will happen if you get into an argument or discussion. If people are engaging in heated political discussions and contributing their opinions on a subject (whether you agree with them or not) that doesn't mean they should be discounted or are spamming (unless they're making half-assed posts).


But that's what I mean. I don't think (some of them) will get so actively involved in heated political discussions if they knew that they're not getting paid for it.

Again, then if that's true those people will move somewhere else and spam there instead and that's why this isn't a solution.


If they really are passionate about discussing politics than it shouldn't matter to them if they're being paid or not. I am not saying block them from posting there.

And I didn't say they were spamming that section but just because they can keep making arguments like we are doing right now, and keep getting paid per post, they don't stop. And they know they won't get in trouble as they're simply discussing their views.

If they move to other sections, they can, I am not saying to stop anyone from posting anywhere but if you see some people deliberately abusing sig-campaigns by making a hell of posts in that section, it's not hard to understand that they're simply doing so to increase their post counts. Because the thing about politics is that one can keep arguing non-stop and if you don't like this now, wait until that section goes out of hand.

As anyone participating in sig-campaign will simply go to that section and start arguing for no-reason but to simply increase their post counts.

I was only thinking about closing this thread because I think this suggestion won't be liked by the posters who post obsessively in that section and might piss them off, if this rule gets applied to the campaign they're participating in.

And if that is allowed, then why not allow Off-Topic too?

Because how is this Question :  

Off-topic/Scientific proof that God exists?

any different from:

Politics & Society/Why do islam hates people?

In both the threads people are arguing over their viewpoints, if one is allowed to be paid than the other one should be too?

Which is why I say Politics & Society should also be considered off-topic and removed from sig campaigns paid boards.
1752  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 10:40:55 AM
And "Politics & Society" has become like an off-topic board, where again all the posts are on the subject but really not necessary.

I don't think it has but once you discount it then a month later you'll be saying Bitcoin Discussion has become like Off-topic or whatever. People just seem to be getting annoyed by the fact that some people are making a lot of posts in there which will happen if you get into an argument or discussion. If people are engaging in heated political discussions and contributing their opinions on a subject (whether you agree with them or not) that doesn't mean they should be discounted or are spamming (unless they're making half-assed posts).


But that's what I mean. I don't think (some of them) will get so actively involved in heated political discussions if they knew that they're not getting paid for it.

The forum is struggling with spam and most of it is because people trying to make as many posts as possible to get paid higher. While discussing about good/bad about the Forum and/or about Politics and Society is not exactly spamming but people are desperately trying to post their views on Meta on Questions that were meant for Mods or are already answered.


I agree that Meta and Politics & Society section should be excluded but I don't agree that Meta section is only for Mods to reply. Isn't this section open for all users to suggest or complain about this forum? All the questions might be for the Mods to answer but even forum members can give their opinion about the system and if they agree or disagree. I only don't prefer users replying on threads which read as  "Why was I banned?" And members behaving as self appointed Mods. These members don't even know who banned the user. Also, Scam Accusation section should be excluded in that case where it's a dispute between the buyer and seller.

I didn't say that it's only for the Mods to reply but I still feel some questions are targeted at mods and maybe they should only reply. For ex. "Why was I banned?" Now a Mod/Admin can simply know the reason behind it and therefore it should be left for the Mod/Admin to answer it, rather than posting "Maybe" replies. Ex. "Maybe your posts weren't good enough, you shouldn't spam!". I don't think it's solving anything as the questioner still continues to wait for the Mods/Admins for the answer.

Then there are questions which are answered in first 2-3 replies but the thread continues to grow by same answers only phrased differently.

Mods can move this thread if they think this is the UN-appropriate board for it. In-fact I am thinking maybe I should close this thread as I seem to be pissing people off and I don't want to do that.
1753  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 09:57:52 AM
Not talking about you, quickseller or shorena. There are some people on this forum who have a lot of knowledge and they can be excluded from this rule. But if you see some threads on Meta, you'll see that some people are not exactly spamming but they're also not adding anything new. They just rephrase the same answer by adding a few sentences here and there smartly which makes it look like that they're telling something new but in reality that's not true.

And "Politics & Society" has become like an off-topic board, where again all the posts are on the subject but really not necessary.

Anyways, this is just a suggestion, what rule they follow is up-to the campaign manager's discretion. But my intention was not to target you or any one else, just simply trying to think of ways to bring down spam on this forum as I feel that it is the no.1 concern right now.
1754  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 09:17:34 AM
Excluding posts in those subsections are a good idea if you ask me. I've noticed a lot of unnecessary (but not off-topic or spam) posts in Meta and it's getting worse.
 
I would like to add my thread "Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns" to this appeal as well. I've already reduced the amount of unnecessary posts a lot by contacting the people organizing signature campaigns, but in case they haven't added it yet, I would like to hereby appeal them to do so. Hope you don't mind twister.

I don't mind at all. I feel the same and think the amount of discussions on signature campaigns in that thread might get reduced when the participants realize that they are not getting paid to post in that thread.

1755  Economy / Service Discussion / Appeal to Sig-Campaign Managers to Exclude "Meta" & "Politics & Society" on: April 20, 2015, 08:55:24 AM
The forum is struggling with spam and most of it is because people trying to make as many posts as possible to get paid higher. While discussing about good/bad about the Forum and/or about Politics and Society is not exactly spamming but people are desperately trying to post their views on Meta on Questions that were meant for Mods or are already answered.

Same is happening at Politics & Society, For ex:

CNN national poll: Rand Paul 13%, Bush 13%, Ryan 12%, Huckabee 10%, Christie 9%
ISIS destroys Syrian Church on Easter Sunday
Why do islam hates people?
Miracles of Bible...
Etc..

These are some of the examples, people are hyper actively discussing about their views on Religion, Culture, Global-affairs and other such stuff, which as I said is not spam as that place is there for such discussions but I think some people are deliberately dragging these discussions just so they can increase their post count. Which I believe they wouldn't normally do if they weren't getting paid for it.

So my request is, simply exclude "Meta" and "Politics & Society" from the Pay-Per-Post board as Off-topic board is. And if the members still feel like discussing about World-affairs and/or the Forum they can do that without getting paid.

---------
ndnhc has already excluded "Beginners & Help" & "Politics & Society" to help bring down the spam and insubstantial posts. But I think Meta should be excluded too, as it isn't a place where companies would like to advertise.

2. Beginners & Help and Politics & Society will be excluded.
3. No spam will be tolerated.

Hoping that others Sig-managers see this and include this rule in their campaign from next week/month.
________
Kindly also exclude "Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns" as requested by thread owner, see below.
1756  Other / Off-topic / Re: Question about Computers "Please move if in the Wrong Directory" on: April 20, 2015, 07:17:08 AM
I think it's your Hard-drive, I have had similar experience in the past with a Laptop that would freeze without much load and would take a lot of time boot. And I realized that my HD was dying and I was right about that as a week later my Lappy didn't boot and error showed "No-Hard-Disc-Detected" and I am pretty sure that is the case with yours.

Be smart, take back-up of your necessary data before it dies completely and arrange for a new one.
1757  Other / Meta / Re: Trim or eliminate "default trust" on: April 20, 2015, 07:08:36 AM
3) some people on default trust even make a hobby of marking red on people who haven't ever traded with them but with whom they simply disagree (see, for example, Vod vs MSCorp Key Sellers; or Quickseller vs. people who refuse to do business with him (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1023038.0, inter alia))


I don't think they're giving negative trust to people simply because they enjoy doing so which is exactly what a hobby is.

They give negative trust because they feel that a person has bad motives and in future he might scam others, they're doing this to protect other users, not because it's their hobby. And do remember that they're not moderators, they're simply doing a public service trying to keep naive users safe from scammers.
1758  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: [Da Dice] Signature Campaign Discussion Thread | Join The Fun! on: April 20, 2015, 05:34:52 AM
Would anyone mind if we exclude Meta and Beginners and Help boards from next week?

You can certainly post there, but only it won't be counted. But, if we find very useful posts in Beginners and Help we will certainly count them. Smiley

What do you think?



Yeah I agree, read my suggestion here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1031511.msg11133478#msg11133478

I think Politics & Society should also be excluded, that board more or less has turned into another sub-forum where all the off-topic discussions take place. Apply this rule from next week and post your agreement their if you agree, so other campaign managers can also follow this decision if they see it right.
1759  Economy / Services / Re: DaDice Social Media Campaign on: April 20, 2015, 05:30:06 AM
the time is running day by day, and the update is running slow ...
patient patient and patient , the post promotion should be paused for now. and back if the issue solved.

They mentioned that they will rectify everything by this Wednesday, which is the payday, so I am guessing they will provide payment for this week and the past week's discrepancies together. So let's wait till Wednesday before jumping to conclusions.

Good Day everyone

Jono here. I am getting on nicely with the audit. Yes there have been a few discrepancies along with new people not being added. Still finishing up the audit and I intend to have it perfect. By the coming Wednesday for all new payments the discrepancies will be sorted as well so we do everything in a once off. I will include my findings in the google doc as well for everyone to have a look at. From both myself and DaDice I would like to thank you all for your patience and understanding And to assure you we are back on track for the future as well
1760  Other / Meta / Re: Spams are high in "Beginners & Help" sub-board! Please resolve. on: April 20, 2015, 05:17:19 AM
Yes but we should remember that those rules should only be 'forced' by the various signature campaign maintainers and not by the staff. However I am still thinking that the two parts should cooperate to reduce the quantity of insubstantial posts.



Exactly, it should be applied by campaign managers but I really think that it would cut down on a lot of insubstantial posts.

Rules look good.

Meta board is fine IMHO.

All boards are fine, I am not saying block people from posting in those boards, I am just saying that posts made in these boards shouldn't be paid.
Pages: « 1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 [88] 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 ... 162 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!