Which part of, "I will remove the negative rating if they delete their participation posts" is complicated?

Yesterday alone I tagged and then subsequently removed about a dozen ratings from people who complied. So, no, it isn't heavy-handed it is fair and effective.

Genuine LOL! That is just *beautiful*.

Here, let me just explain how this conversation just went:

You: "Why you accuse us of being scam?"
Me: "Because everything about your posted details accurately describes it as another ponzi scam"
You: *posts text explaining that likely scam threads aren't deleted by the forum mods*
Me: *head-desk*

Have you even read your own OP announcement in this thread.

It literally screams obvious-ponzi-is-obvious.

Almost every single phrase, assertion and promise is typical ponzi scammer bullshit. You must think everyone on this forum is as dumb as you. Pro-tip: We're not.

:rolleyes:

Here, let me make it *real* fucking simple for you morons who can't think straight: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1382239.msg14068566#msg14068566

Here, let me make it *real* fucking simple for you: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1382239.msg14068566#msg14068566

(Hint: It isn't about Ponzi schemes being illegal)

Yes, we *know* you believe it to be the most awesome claim of 'fact' ever. Trouble is, you keep ignoring all the evidence being presented to you which clearly explains why you are mistaken.

You *do* know, right, that some people access this forum from oppressive regimes where a direct link is blocked? So they have to use TOR.

You *do* know this, right?

Please tell me you aren't so fucking moronic as you are repeatedly proving yourself to be.

Sorry, do I seem like I give a shit about your whining?

I didn't intend to give that impression, please forgive me.

*sigh*

Here, let me make it *real* fucking simple for you: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1382239.msg14068566#msg14068566

You do? So why do you whine about being slapped with negative trust when you are proven to be wanting to support fraud through your participation in scam threads?

It is almost like you type your posts without actually reading them.

Feel free, I'm sure Theymos just *loves* to hear from whining dirtbags about how they hate being held to account for being the dirtbags they provably are.

Yeah, we know.

Trouble is, even in the face of proof that your assumption is not proven fact, you keep repeating it as though it were.

You *really* suck at this.

Repeating the same bullshit assumption over and over doesn't make it any less of the bullshit assumption it is.

I've logically explained why your bullshit assumption is false, now you have to try and prove why it is not. You will fail.

Hey, kiddo, go google up the meaning of the word, "blackmail" then kindly go fuck yourself.

Then, when you're (notice the correct use of the non possessive 'your' by utilising the short form for 'you are' as you should have used) done, click on the green text down here and educate yourself as to why your scumbaggery warrants being exposed for what it is. vvvvvv

Just as much as you *know* it to be a fact, I *know* it to be false. So, how do you think we should proceed from this point in?

*raises hand*
I know! I know!

How about you actually offer up some fucking evidence for your baseless assumption? You claim that ALL people who encounter the message that their IP has been flagged as previously being involved in wrongdoing are also scammers, yes? Prove it.

(Hint: You know how I *know* your claim is utter bullshit? Cos I've paid that fee before when circumstances caused me to have to ask a discrete question through a TOR connection without anybody knowing who I was and I know I wasn't scamming anyone. So, you know fuck you and your stupid assumptions)