Hindsight is always 20/20. You might regret more if some of them mooned 10000x and you sold it for what ever price you are now thinking. But as there's no way of knowing which coins will die, best thing is to get at least your investment back and leave rest for the moonshot. That is if your bags give you winnings at all. Some of us want to cut our losses too, which can be very wise depending on the situation. Most of the time it's the best solution as most of the coins will die.

Your post history is full of similar questions, except you dropped $100 per day to $50 per day. Yet there are not guaranteed methods to make steady income. Even when you are "staking" your money, the price could fluctuate during it a lot. In fact that's why people make money with crypto, because of the price volatility. That however can make you rekt as well.

There's no such thing as a steady income of $50 per day unless you are filthy rich and want to compromise your wallet. And if someone says there is, he/she is probably scamming you.

So, this is another ad for Oscar swap? Other dexes are already using arbitrum, and have been way before Oscar swap, and other DEXes offer other layers and blockchains as well as arbitrum. And Oscar swap uses only Arbitrum which is a weak selling point and doesn't offer anything unique. Also CEX and DEX offer different services so they are not comparable really.

Well i was answering to OP and OP was using metamask. Also i am not sure what you mean by "ETH2.0 problem" or what alternatives are you talking about. You can always use Layer 2 options like Polygon or Arbitrum as they run of ETH so you don't need to use more centralized blockchains. If you are sending wrapped eth, or any token really.

Why an earth would anyone in charge want to adopt that? And wouldn't the adoption happen because people are already using it. So if people choose to use Polygon, it has more changes to be accepted by companies. Country leaders are the last ones in the line to adopt something.

And right now the payment and custodial system is too complicated and has too many risks that anyone in charge would want to push to people. Permissionless and immutable transactions are not something countries would benefit from if they want to stay in control.

What are we supposed to do with this? When you state in the first post that you will offer no proof or even details. Why would we believe you? That's not how arguments or accusations works. Should we believe all the fud in the internet without any proof? I am assuming that you wouldn't so why are you expecting us to do so?

I am really baffled why would you see people being so gullible that they would just take your word blindly. Unless this is just fud, when it makes total sense. And it's a simplest answer to the question if you are lying or not.

You might want to hire someone with decent english skills. I found several words misspelled and grammatical errors and that's not going to invoke trust.
Also there's really no information on your site. When i can't find out any terms of service or even frequently asked questions section, i really don't want to deposit anything on how your casino works. Telling how blockchain works doesn't really help as in here everyone knows how it works, but there's no info about creating the account, kyc, or anything other info sections that other sites have by default.

Try not to speak riddles like Yoda and form your sentences so that anyone other then yourself can understand them.
We are not mind readers and if people need to guess what you mean, they will guess wrong.

You can polish your communication by explaining what you mean. "waiting for big Money printing brrr." isn't clear explanation. It just raises more questions.
I know it can be boring or even difficult to explain everything clearly from the start, but starting from the end or from middle of thought isn't helping your message.

Every loan i can imagine has some sort of interest. Otherwise people wouldn't give loans, as it would not make any sense for them.
But if you have a business idea, why do you think it's not wise to aquire startup money as a loan? Especially if alternative is taking too long and someone with money just takes your business idea while you are still building it.

Totally, when they are online getting real time data, not only chatgpt but other AI:s as well. In fact, one could just run dozens of bots playing with each other against the humans, amd if you get 2 of your own ai:s in on same table, changes to play humans out are pretty high. But even when you are playing live, it's not far ahead for people to use augmented reality layer in their glasses that others can't see, and it will be operated by AI that suggest what you should do. Same goes with chess. They need to do nude search for those matches sooner or later.

Op wasn't talking about bitcoins, and yes there's staking without third party sites. In fact most of the third party sites doesn't offer real staking. They just call it staking. It isn't staking as participating to consensus. And Trust wallet, that OP was talking about is self-custody wallet.

But my answer to OP would be that if you can stake by yourself (meaning that you have private key to the wallet you are staking), i can't see any reason why shouldn't you stake your coins.

I am asking out of interest as you speak in past tense, did you get rid of the addiction itself or are you constantly fighting against it? Because to me it's a constant fight and trusting my plan. I feel i can't slip at all from my budget and i try to keep the budget minimal. I'll play big again only if i win big, but those are all winnings that i am playing then. I always try to remember that this is not my living, this is for fun. Then it stays fun .

That's why it's called addiction and should be taken seriously. For many people it's not something you can shake off but as addictive as drugs. If you could add possibility of financial gains to drugs, that instantly becomes more addictive as well. There's really no common sense in addictions in general and addicted people are acting very much against their best judgement because they don't get that same kind of dopamine rush from anywhere else.

Well you can definitely compare gambling in sports to trading ANYTHING. But weirdly in your text you are mixing investing and trading with charts. Maybe you consider low frequency trading as investing?
But anyway, both trading with technical analysis and betting in sports are based on probability. You factor in the facts on about teams and conditions, like with cryptos you factor in the fundamentals and market conditions. And after doing that you'll estimate the probability of making a right call. Both of them has unforeseen circumstances as those are factored in on probability.

You got more gains with bitcoin and that only means we had been lucky to invest such an early stage and markets have been good for us so far.
After bitcoin hits it's ultimate ath, you'll see my point more clearly.

Nothing rises forever and we don't yet know where the cap is on that, it might be a $1 million or more or less. If your friends would have made 10000x gains on gambling, it still would be gambling as well.

You don't measure the definition of the word gambling by success you happened to have. When people bought btc at the start of it, they never ever saw it going this high. They were totally gambling with it. And fundamentals of it haven't changed.

Instinct in trading is needs ton of expertise under it as markets are pretty much work the opposite our feelings about it. Meaning that when people should sell they are in denial instead, and they sell when they are desperate, and stay away from the when markets are depressing or look for the pump of recovery to exit on that. And obviously buy because of the hype and the greed. They rarely follow trough their plans if they keep looking at the charts.

That being said i trust on my insticts too. Meaning that i try to do opposite of them. That doesn't necessarily mean that i hold if i am scared. These days i might even sell before i am scared if my target has been hit i will sell 90%

But if i would trust my feelings, i would say that we would go sideways in near 30k for few moths and after that the real bull market starts. And that btc might even hit 50k this year. The fact that memecoins started to gain attention tells me that new people are believing crypto again.

Yeah, pretty much generic features without innovation. It's like selling brand a brand new cryptocurrency with gimmicks like it has an immutable blockchain and it's secure and decentralized.
Name does not make sense unless i am missing some meme here and selling having a dex on arbitrum layer seems also pretty weak considering that everyone else including uniswap have offered that for a long time now.

Why wouldn't they? It's the hottest layer 2 at the moment and people want to try it out so it gets traffic. I would totally launch anything in that right now if i wanted attention to my project. But it will fade after it will get flooded and filled with scams as bep20 did. Best thing about eth high fees was that there wasn't as much scam projects. I mean there was scams but bsc had exponentially more of them as they costed next to nothing. Same thing will happen with ARB sooner or later imho.

Obviously there are people who will not believe me but if those people really would be winning they wouldn't care what i say. In fact they would tell no one about their strategy so they could keep on winning.

Martingale working or not isn't really a matter of anyone's belief, it's mathematically proven not to work. I personally don't mind people using it as they might as well when everything is luck based, anything goes. If you like rubbing a rabbit foot or pray to gods or look for horoscopes it's all good fun in my eyes as it's all luck. As long as they are not betting their house because they are so sure about their superstitions.

But i do get a little annoyed when i see people selling scripts for different kind of strategies and post their "proof" of winnings. That i find immoral.

From your blog:
So which one is it? Is it controlled or regulated? And how is it controlled and who exactly are these "financial authorities"? Because that's really shady and vague concept.

As to my knowledge UAE has several several different financial authorities, like countries do. So if i google about it, or ask about them, who is going to back your story up and admit that they are controlling your layer 0 blockchain?

And thanks for the potential airdrop tip . I am just a little skeptical as your post was a little vague.

As a rule of thumb, cloud mining is ALWAYS a scam. If there would be real legit cloud mining, it would be so unprofitable to buy from a third party that no one would be interested.
There has been so many of these cloud mining scams and even icos that i lost count long time ago. But they come in waves, when enough new people don't know about them and old timers forgot to warn the new ones, they will score some new "investors" again.