Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 11:44:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 206 »
1881  Other / Meta / Re: Why do all the sr. and hero members with negative trust hate on the trust system on: April 08, 2014, 07:33:29 PM
Just people from DefaultTrust can not take criticism....

 DefaultTrust is the problem. IMO, each forums user should be responsible for creating their own trust list based on their own interactions and research.
1882  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 08, 2014, 07:26:53 PM
You're doing the same things like Butterfly Labs supporters.
You're lying about people just because you think that you are helping the forum.
Quote from: fsb4000
Anyone who says that I am bribed or scammer is a liar.

 ...yet you are being bribed with a chance to win a free Monarch ?

 How is that fact a lie ?

 Chances are, if that carrot was not being dangled in front of you, you would not be participating in this charade.
1883  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 08, 2014, 03:01:50 AM
If everyone would have ethics and morals like my than the world would be without any crime or scam...

 Forgiving the fact that you are completely avoiding the questions, explain to me again how I am spamming by shining the light on Butterfly Labs supporters, like yourself, who are polluting the forum trust system in the name of some misguided "contest" ?

1884  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 07, 2014, 05:12:14 PM
If you believe that the trust system works, then you wouldn't have be so much butthurt  Cheesy
My motivation has many reasons. Anyone who says that I am bribed or scammer is a liar.

 It's not a matter of butthurt, but a simple matter of resenting being called a spammer. Your assessment of the reality of the situation is misguided at worst, and woefully ignorant at best.

 I would be interested in knowing your definition of what constitutes spamming if you want to turn this into a semantic argument.

 If leaving a single comment per user about them gaming the trust system as part of this reprehensible and obscene "contest" constitutes spamming, then I'm guilty as charged, and question your ethics and morals.
1885  Other / Meta / Re: Should trust system spammers be banned? on: April 07, 2014, 04:45:12 PM
real trust spamming:

 Again, I resent the implication and question your motivation.
1886  Other / Meta / Re: Those who are Spamming the trust system. Action needs to be taken! on: April 07, 2014, 03:31:43 AM
If any actions will be taken against the accounts in the first message, than the same actions should be taken to these accounts. They do the same things.

 I'm no spammer, friend. I resent the implication.
1887  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BeeMiner 1T BTC Miner official thread based on Bitmine A1 on: April 07, 2014, 01:24:54 AM
I'd be interested in snagging one.
1888  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 03, 2014, 06:01:54 PM
 Very nice to see ! Looking forward to ordering one when they become available again !!
1889  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 03, 2014, 10:38:04 AM
It sounds more like they are affraid of bitcoin and what is gonna happen on april 15th. Lets hope they won't run out of business.

 Shit. That is a terrible thought Sad
1890  Other / Meta / Re: Bring back the newbie jail on: April 03, 2014, 10:27:45 AM
I am against newbie jail. I don't think any open forum should have a restriction like that.
I think the "signature spammers" are a bigger problem. (those people who have been here 2 months with 3000 posts) But obviously this is another discussion.

 You can turn off viewing signatures in your user preferences. It's what I ultimately did to mitigate the problem.
1891  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL starts taking pre-orders for 1TH Imperial Monarch Miners on: April 02, 2014, 08:19:11 PM
if you actually believe he had a chat with a DA and they are preparing a case against bfl, i have a bridge in my back yard to sell to you.  
...
Government doesnt care, bfl is too small for them.

 I honestly don't know how to reasonably respond to that, other than to ask you what possible motivation I would have to lie about receiving the aforementioned call ?

 If it makes you feel any better, the nice fellow did add (paraphrasing) "At least you got some money back. I have a lot more calls I need to make with people who haven't"

 Check my history, friend.
1892  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL starts taking pre-orders for 1TH Imperial Monarch Miners on: April 02, 2014, 07:13:58 PM
In other news, just got off the phone with a nice District Attorney who is preparing a case against Butterfly Labs, who wanted to discuss and get more details on the complaints I submitted last year.

What do you know... The justice system works, even if the wheels do turn slower than we'd like sometimes.

*whistles innocently*
1893  Other / Meta / Re: BFL bringing down the trust rating? on: April 02, 2014, 09:22:41 AM
Quote
04-01-2014, 02:46 PM #30
 BFL_Josh  BFL_Josh is offline
Employee
                   
BFL_Josh's Avatar Blog Entries

Just not on those days... meaning you'd have 1 less entry into the contest when we run the random drawing. Each day is a separate ticket to enter in the raffle basically.

I think this constitutes spamming the trust system. Will the mods take action?

Nope.
1894  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: AntMiner S2 1TH/s Miner (1w/GH/s) on: April 02, 2014, 05:15:14 AM
... patiently waiting for Batch 3 to become available ...
1895  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: EMPBitcoin 2TH/s Miner - Escrow Only on: April 01, 2014, 04:01:35 PM
I might suggest posting some photos of the unit, and sending an evaluation unit to a senior forums member to prove this is not a scam product.
1896  Other / Meta / Re: BFL bringing down the trust rating? on: March 31, 2014, 04:19:17 AM
And because we're sticking to the unmoderated system, my negs are there to stay :/

 I'm sorry you're a Victim of Zerlan, dogie Sad

 You're a totally cool dude in my book, FWIW.
1897  Other / Meta / Re: BFL bringing down the trust rating? on: March 30, 2014, 08:11:16 PM
*Shakes head in disgust*
1898  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Habanero Project - Third Party HF Mining Board on: March 29, 2014, 05:31:13 AM
* mumbles something about not messing with Texas *
1899  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Swedish ASIC miner company kncminer.com on: March 28, 2014, 12:13:18 PM
August / September deliveries for Batch 2 @ $10k means I should probably ask for a refund, huh ? Sad I'll be able to pick up 3TH for < $9k next month...
1900  Economy / Speculation / Re: China BANNED BITCOIN! This time for real! on: March 28, 2014, 12:30:53 AM
No one said taking the bankers down would be easy folks.
+1
+2

It going to be a long fight!! Before we succeed. That is why I look at BTC as a long term investment not short or medium term.
+3

It isn't just an investment; it's a world changing frontier, and we're all on the rollercoaster together.
We'll go up, and we'll go down, but the destination is going to be the promised land.
Not just for us, but for everyone. I'm glad to be on the coaster with our forum members. Smiley
+4

HOLD!

HODLING !
Pages: « 1 ... 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 [95] 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 ... 206 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!