How can we know it? Do we have an accurate source regarding that?

Maybe that is something we don't really need to know or discuss. People have different reasons why they gamble regardless if they are rich or not. We will just give a headache to ourselves if we will think about that since again, we don't have anything like an accurate source to know the exact details about it.

The reality though is, many are really gambling regardless of people's financial status and capability.

What great luck indeed. As most say and one of the famous statements or quotes regarding the chances of winning the lottery, it's even more chance to get hit by lightning than winning a lottery lol. I can't imagine the feeling of these people who won big starting from what's the real deal and how to manage the winning money.

Surely, those plans prior to winning won't be followed out of excitement holding that kind of huge money.


For sure, most lottery bettors already know the term and are just fine with it once they won.

To them, what matter here is winning that lottery. A half amount as a reward prize is still an imaginary amount that anyone dreams about.

The comparison is not appropriate. Gambling and crypto are in different stages.

Aside from that, people also have different preferences. We can't just force or lure people into crypto even how far we explained to them the technical aspect of it and the promising good returns in terms of considering crypto as an investment. Gambling in general can somehow considered a form of entertainment and there is no doubt that if such a thing is entertaining, more people will be hooked on it - a social community.

Don't take it too much technical. The level of risks has really nothing to do with why people are mostly gambling instead of investing or taking part in crypto.

There will be no accurate (or even close) answer here even how far we discuss it because we don't feel the actual pressure on the situation. We don't know being struck with that situation and we can't understand how far the gambling addiction of that person involved is.

Others can easily say, to stop, to continue, or so on because it's easy to make a guess without any pressure.

For me just a matter of respect to our parents but as we know, we will surely have a different approach once we are in that situation for real.

I wouldn't call it or consider it a mistake.

In the first place, what if the other way happened instead and our luck direct hit us at that moment?

It's just that we take the risk of wanting a bigger prize in return. That's common and usual to happen when we do gambling. In most cases, we are struck with different options just to try our luck and hope for a better result in the end.

Regret does happen. It's not a mistake. Just charge it to our experience and take that as reference for a much better good decision making in the future.

Actually, Philly is always doing their best to build a strong core around Joel Embiid every season. Even reshuffling the coaching staff is being considered. They are always active at trying to get into hot trades and actively fishing some good role players at the free agency.

The "Trust the Process" that is currently several years in the making now achieved 1 achievement, and that is Embiid now finally getting his NBA Season MVP award. The next and the biggest one should be the NBA Championship but will he be able to achieve it in Philly or elsewhere?

Chemistry issues indeed. Again as I mentioned, several times already where Philly tried to build a solid lineup around Embiid but nothing works effectively. Maybe Embiid can find it on another team but as long as he won't demand a trade, Philly should just try their best to find a good role players out there that will perfectly blend with Embiid.

Mate, the purpose of the said event is to allow the use of such drugs. Therefore, it will be allowed.

The participating players here obviously accept the terms and are interested in using such drugs.

The only thing that can stop it is if most countries will oppose that event and won't allow that to commence no matter what.


Obviously, participating athletes here are separated from the athletes in the Olympics.

I doubt the event will be successful because for sure the organizers will face lots of legal issues especially if the said enhancement drugs do have a status of being "prohibited in general" and not just for sports. Anyways, let's see then at the end of the year if this will really push.

Don't make your gambling experience too technical and complicated.

Regardless if that money used in gambling came from so-called "spare money" and as you mentioned there's no such thing as spare money (I partially agree with you on that) it all depends on how responsible you are during your gambling session.

Spared money, saved money, money that you can afford to lose, etc., or whatever terms you want to name it, that is all useless if you are not responsible for managing it. In the world of gambling, managing properly the bankroll is the key to taking our gambling session in the long run without harming directly our own money in our pocket.

That's possible but yes, it's rare to find such a bonus.

I've subscribed to an email list at most fiat online casinos and most of them are offering good bonuses but obviously, there's a wagering requirement. If there's a promotion referring to No Wager bonuses, they are only giving out a few free spins and there's a deposit requirement.

For me, don't expect too much from that as there's a good and better way instead even if there's a wagering requirement involved. That is, bonuses should allow a decent max withdrawal amount especially if the wagering requirement or turnover is difficult to achieve. Sometimes I'm seeing only an average $50 max withdrawal for an x30 - x45 turnover. That was something hard to do and the reward for the effort is not worth it.

Aside from that, I think the move was also an advantage for Cam Payne as he will be utilized more in another team.

With the current stacked roster of the Phoenix Suns right now especially at the guard position, Cam Payne will not grow anymore on this team. It's a good move that instead of keeping him on the bench for long, used his value to get a good deal.

Both Phoenix Suns and Cam Payne do have a win and advantage on that deal. I'm expecting Payne will make a noise next season.

No, there's still part of the support that naturally comes from the player. The use of doping will combine with the player's natural performance, therefore, crossing the limit of the player's capability. As mentioned by the President itself of this event, unlocking the true potential of that player.

Anyhow, looks like they are really determined and eager to push this event. I'm sure organizers will face lots of problems before it can be actually commenced. I wonder also if the event can comply with the required and necessary permits or licenses to operate knowing they will fail on the health-related concerns as the event is a sports competition. They should also follow the country's law on wherever the event will take place.

But to rival the Olympics? Hell no. This is just an ordinary event for me if push.

That was just a product of frustration that's why it ended up in that kind of challenge.

I already mentioned before that I don't think the fight will happen for real as both billionaires obviously know what's the best thing to do to settle the score. They will surely fight in the most appropriate way which is filing a lawsuit against each other and that's it.

Aside from that, even how they aggressive they are to push this fight instead, their respective camp will surely always talk about health concerns and that will be a big reason not to push this crazy idea just to settle the problem. There will be no solve case even this fight will push.

If we talk about luck-based games, obviously there's no such thing as expecting consistent wins here since everything depends on just luck, that's it. However, if we talk about sports betting, somehow a bettor doesn't need to rely only on luck as there are ways to increase the chances of winning here.

But there's a friend of mine that takes gambling as his main source of income for several years already. Not with playing slots, roulette, etc., or being a sports bettor but he's really damn good at playing billiards. Even way back during our younger days, he is seen as having potential at that sport and is currently, now one of the most skilled and popular billiard players here in our community. He always has a match every day and it involves a big stake. Playing gambling on that sport for many years, he already provided a good life for his family.

However, my friend's success in gambling as his major income is not surely possible for anyone. It's possible to take gambling as a major income but surely, it requires special considerations that would be hard to achieve by most people who are eyeing that goal.

Does the research tell, at least, an accurate source of that data about the harassment of the LGBTQ in a physical casino? I mean, how it can be determined? Only thru surveys? What kind of harassment that these people are experiencing inside a casino?

As far as my main understanding is concerned, maybe the research only focuses on a few locations but the result obviously can't be generalized.

Honestly, as involved in gambling for many years, I never encounter news or related things that members of LGBTQ are being harassed within the casino premises. I believed most casino gamblers only care to win and do not bother with that kind of stuff related to LGBTQ. We can even notice a great social activity between fellow gamblers and staff.

Most casinos staffs also cared for their profession and casinos are strict on the part of how to entertain guests and customers as these staff are carrying the name of the said casino. For sure there are bad or worst casino staff but not to the point that the case of harassment is only focused on LBGTQ.

Regardless, even not a main event, what matter is, it's a title fight.

Not that really a big deal that from an expected main event, it will now be part of the undercard of the mega bout between Terence Crawford and Errol Spence Jr. Promoters did a great job here to boost the PPV sales after the changes happened on the original undercard list.


If he wins against Alejandro Santiago, Nonito Donaire Jr. will top his previous achievement of being the oldest bantamweight champion. He got it at the age of 38 when he defeated Nordine Oubaali in a 4th Round KO win and become the WBC Bantamweight World Champion, his third time being a bantamweight title. Now at age 40 (turning 41 this year in November) another milestone in his career will be achieved; the oldest bantamweight champion at the age of 40 and a 4th-time bantamweight title holder.

Almost the entire advantages are on Donaire. It's now up to Santiago to defy all the odds and take advantage of his young age.

Regardless of the purpose, as far as I know (and anyone can correct me with this), being a licensed bookmaker is one of the main requirements for getting Sports Odds Providers service. In other words, the site will be subject first to checking before granting the service.

Out of curiosity, do you plan on building a sports betting site? Even if there's a cheap provider available or maybe close to being free (I believed there are), I doubt you can lure bettors on testing your site. It's obvious that in building a betting site, you will really need to spend decent capital to start with.

If you can't afford to spend on the "priority" things that a sports betting site should have, then it means you are not ready yet.

Correction, it doesn't need to wager the whole balance. Just a percentage of it e.g 20% of the deposit amount or in most cases, ranging from 1x to 2x turnover, etc. But honestly, just come to think of it, why users will just deposit an amount on that gambling site and then later on, will withdraw it without even playing? It's already alarming and will really lead to suspicious activity.

Aside from that, anything about AML policy is one of the requirements that a centralized gambling site should comply with. No choice but to follow.


It's a wrong mindset to think that odds like 1.01x is a sure win. If it does, you should have already seen that as an effective strategy on most sports bettors. Specifically referring to saving the ass on the purpose of doing money laundering, kind of risky for me to just bet on that kind of odds to make the plan succesful.

I believed the presence of a medical term is already a protocol at any sport events.

Referring to this particular event in the subject, not because for the sole reason of the doping effects but rather accidents do happened unexpectedly. It's mandatory and standard protocol that medics are always there.

Anyways, if we talk about the effects of these enhancements drugs, the side effects occur mostly or being shown after a long term of usage. It can't be seen during a live event since for sure athletes are being checked if they are capable to play.

It's not that I afford to lose those money I used in gambling but regardless, be responsible enough to know our limits. Technically, there's no specific amount we can consider as an amount that we afford to lose. We always breach our set limits because temptation to continue is always there either we win because we feel luck and we chase losses during the losing streak.

There's no such thing for me as being practical in gambling because in the first place, how the hell we want being practical to our money but will used it on gambling. It doesn't make sense.

Again, just be responsible enough to know our limits.

If I remember before, during the rumored (or supposed?) fight between Spence Jr. and Keith Thurman at 152, the former's camp claimed that their boxer is not that fit anymore or in good shape to fight at 147 and consider it as one of the reason why Spence will moved up weight and won't fight Crawford. Regardless if that's true or not, still props to him for finally accepting the fight with Crawford and now finally settle the deal that takes several years in the process.

I can't say that both boxers are still at their respective peak, like the way they performed during their prime, but referring to being in "good shape", I think Terence Crawford do have much of that characteristic. Not spoiling the fun or being negative but as I previously said before, not until the day of the fight, there's still a chance that this fight might lead into unexpected scenario "knowing how Spence's camp drama and behaves" since then.