bsv to BTC -10.1%
Nice poor guys need cheap coins ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Centbee is ready - South America coming India s kicking illegal coins - Chance for bsv ! Poor people need coins that will not appreciate in value, right? Namely BSV. That makes a lot of sense. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Wouldn't poor people need sound money as well as rich people, and bitcoin is the most sound of money ever known to man.. at least so far. BSV is not even going to come close to bitcoin when it comes to sound money principles... could go on and on and on about their lack of vision, except perhaps a vision to play a game of smoke and mirrors, even though they have vision in their name.. go figure? Sure, sound money comes with daily (!) usage by masses - BSV is the Bitcoin that can and will be that. Easy to see that all other Bitcoin variants will not be here in some years. Edit: Bitcoin is getting Money due to its function of a ledger of (signed) Transactions. ( the more - the better )
|
|
|
bsv to BTC -10.1%
Nice poor guys need cheap coins ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Centbee is ready - South America coming India s kicking illegal coins - Chance for bsv !
|
|
|
You need a longer longer list , for what ? Still trapped in some cave Plato has built for trolls ? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
The biggest misconception about the blockalypse is that it ever existed...
The tape tells the tale. In the last FOMO spike, we had soaring average tx wait times and soaring average tx fees... Whether or not you wish to think of that as Blockalypse ain't no matter to me. Its not whether it matters to you or not, its pointing out to the casual observer that you are making shit up. The term "apocalypse" usually describes the end of something. Bitcoin didn't die. It didn't stop or come close to stopping. No matter how you dice it, BCH is less popular than BTC now than it was during the throes of your fictional "blockalypse." The first big block experiment has been a failure. What makes you think a second bigger block experiment (led by an even bigger phony than Ver) will be a success? At the exact same time, we had a catastrophic drop in bitcoin market dominance.
Its not my fault you don't understand how the alt market historically relates to the bitcoin market and I don't have time to explain it to you. There is something else going on with this blockalypse description and implied threat from jbreher... He is trying to leave some kind of impression that bitcoin is broken in some kind of way and that the spam attacks that were going on between about December 2017 and January 2018 have some kind of persistence in bitcoin that resulted from bitcoin deficiencies and supposed organic growth that bitcoin cannot handle, rather than some nutjobs spending a lot of money to purposefully fill up the bitcoin blocks in order to perpetuate their dumb ass narrative (about supposed high fees and slow transaction times on bitcoin). Furthermore, the big blocker, altcoin pumpers, bitcoin naysayers are likely trying to figure out a way to engage in such a spam attack again that would be strategically timed, if they can figure it out and if they are given the right opportunity where they are not going to lose their asses on it, and possibly be able to profit in comparison to how much money it is going to cost them to carry out another attack while describing their dumbass clogging attempts of the bitcoin blockchain (assuming that they achieve some modicum of success) had been due to deficiencies in bitcoin... rather than their purposeful effort to engage in intentional sabotage efforts. Sure bitcoin is likely to survive these ongoing attacks and likely to thrive too, but the nutjob bigblockers are going to attempt to pump it for as much as they can in order to spread their misleading narrative to trap as many innocent bystanders into their narrative as they can.. so they can sell their bags onto a few more people -possibly bordering on dumb money - who likely buy into their stories. tl dr Segwit is that altcoin - and biggest pumped ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Bitcoin works - as much open as possible -> better with no (artificial) capacity issues There is no need to rant for some 'Netscape'-Bitcoin, economics will sort it. Have fun with ur artificial fees in BTC
|
|
|
Quality twetches can earn some good income. BSV = dawn of age of data and accountability Now people give away for free or even pay to give data to Facebook, Google and Co and they sell it then BSV, Metanet changes it all, people manage and can sell there own data for whatever time-frame specified and just about receive 100% of it. Even the slowest of the slow will eventually realize it, data is the new oil. BTC has no skin in the game. Edit: White paper outlining Escrow Document Storage and Secure Signing Registry https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/operating-an-escrow-document-storage-and-secure-signing-registry/Kinda funny - some guys deleing my positive and quality posts ( lookup the quoted ..) but negative brain trolls still here... sigh - what should that help ? Create a negitve immage on bct ? - lol
|
|
|
Yesterday - €10,000 per BTC
Today - £10,000 per BTC
Calcs 1€ = 1£ Wait ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Clarifications
Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.
Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading. As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.
bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc. bullshit! Craig and Calvin forked off their BSV shitcoin to dump on n00bies ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) you new here? sorry no. the changes BCH planned to add to the base layer seek to remove the parts that make BitCoin unique since day 1. thinks like pre-con (avalanche); ctor; and graphene all work together to make BitCoin a steeming pile of crap and removes miner competition like core wanted all along. If u go to a bank and order a reverse convertible product (or Bitcoin) and after some time you ve to learn that the product issuer / emitter (devs and miners) has changed that product ( softforked ) u d might to change the product name ( to Segwitcoin ) and thats how the financial worl works. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Permissioned 'blockchain' is a term of no use -> this is a (distributed) database - nothing new, but one of the dumbest database design of no real use > MySQL will do better! (= not immutable !)
only with PoW (buys you the DBA right for a block) a blockchain makes sense (immutable time stamp machine) >> Bitcoin works nice, but there is no proper SQL (yet >> bitdb ?)
|
|
|
On second thought, the FATF is probably not as effective as I originally assumed. According to this 2017 report, most monitored countries have only instituted basic AML regulations like making money laundering a crime and requiring banks to report suspicious transactions. Most of their recommendations go unenforced: As of April 2017, the level of country compliance with the FATF 40 recommendations rests at just 25 per cent across the 30 countries most recently assessed. While this is definitely an improvement since 2011, when full compliance across 160 countries was at 12.3 per cent, taking 27 years since the standards were introduced to get to a 25 per cent compliance level cannot exactly be called rapid progress. This sort of noncompliance may be relevant in the case of Bitcoin exchanges and brokers that don't currently require KYC: [A]reas where the majority of countries are rated “partially compliant” or “non-compliant” include requiring firms to carry out due diligence in non-financial fields such as real estate, law and accounting (Recommendation 22 – 63 per cent of countries rated either partially or non-compliant) and making sure the authorities can identify the real owners of corporations to avoid the abuse of anonymous shell companies (Recommendation 24 – 73 per cent of 30 countries rated partially or non-compliant). I still expect the guidelines to further reinforce a two-tiered system of compliant and non-compliant exchanges. Services like Coinbase and Gemini will no doubt be attempting to comply with them. Its the natural process if global adoption should happen. Maybe Libra was trigger of that, but it and more will come once more ppl will lose money on scams or illegal things are done with crypto. A lot still happens imo
|
|
|
It wouldn't be out of the ordinary for a bench warrant to be issued. That would authorize the police to arrest him, but I'm guessing there's no chance of extradition.
Basically, Wright would need to avoid stepping foot in the United States.
As Satoshi, and a proven internet forensics expert, wouldn't he not be of some help for cleaning up the Bitcoin space from many (old) criminals?
|
|
|
Let's get ready to see him move those original bitcoins from the genesis block. The pressure is on now, either move those coins or end up in jail. Let's keep an eye on those wallets, been waiting years to see someone move it
They probably will, but not such u ll like it
|
|
|
One more slap from mighty USA, obey our rules or we'll put you on the black list. If we fail to destroy you on the economic front, then we will invade you or nuke you, end of story. I'm not surprised by this attitude from the USA, but I am surprised that the rest of the world without question agrees to all conditions fearing not to end like Iran, North Korea or Venezuela, or even worse as some countries in recent past. It was only a matter of time when someone would decide on this step, which is just a sign of fear of bitcoin and some other altcoins. I'm just interested in how crypto-exchanges and other crypto related services will handle all this work, and how many of them will stop working due to increased costs. Also this move can be linked to FB coin which should be launched next year, in a way to force users to switch on more more favorable solution. Libra, new bitcoin - blessed by all the governments of the world ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) There is only one solution, Bitcoin must be simple, clear and transparent, stable protocol and scale on chain, that makes it smoothly adaptable for anyone in the world, incl banks, institutions and govs. Job done
|
|
|
What else would Gazprom bank do in Switzerland atm? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|