CSW willfully created the fraudulent documents.. That's what I can see.
So, he lied. Intentionally. That's not a person I can trust. Neither should you or anyone else.
U wish he did (What sense would make all that...) U cannot proof anything Neither verify. Don't trust ur filled bags of btcs |
|
|
|
Dude, leave the legalities to the professionals.
He's not discussing "legalities." He's discussing common sense, something which you are sorely lacking. You don't seem to understand how courts work.
Neither does Craig. He knowingly submitted fraudulent documents and tried to lie to a federal judge, and you are sticking up for him for your own financial gain. That is who you are. maybe he did, cause he got hacked - and he told about, but common trolls didn't report or skewed common trolls like u just don't want to know the truth so no way u ll get it |
|
|
|
|
Nice proof of forgeritiies and hackerities - proof of twitter lawers and prejuries
- Nothing of substance
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, forking own docs and provide to a court case.
Not everyone is that dumb to believe. But some are...
Lol
Bags took over brains, positions the talking
|
|
|
|
Core wallet = full validating node. Just not mining new blocks. But verifying existing blocks. Segwit is implemented by consensus. That means everyone agreed to it. Plus, it works, so why not use it. You don't have to use it if you don't want to and stick to old school addresses, those still work.
Nope - not 'everyone' - and it's not a 'democratic' decision to change a protocol BTW - even more NOPE to change financial system having a strict definition WHITE PAPER Learn finance and compliance ... the hard way |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
yes - and no segwit, ctor, rbf, and honest miners run the nodes
>>>>>>
BSV looks the hard fact BitCoin
BTC just soft forked away
No troll wins here
|
|
|
|
Oh thank you !! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where is mr. master degree and empirical evidence to comment on this ? He got hacked and now only commenting in court https://gizmodo.com/this-australian-says-he-and-his-dead-friend-invented-bi-1746958692 >> ... “I hacked Satoshi Naklamoto [sic],” ... not really astonishing the hackers are the scammers - not Satoshi But now the hackers got triggerd and only can REACT Who made and still makes the pace? |
|
|
|
|
There is no BTC white paper - this claim got rekkt by segwit & co
VERY EASY TO VERIFY - don't trust twitter trolls
|
|
|
|
Spot on! What Vitalik said is the simplest way to prove that whomever is claiming to be Satoshi, just needs to send a signed transaction from one of the old addresses that can be traced backed to the genesis block. Showing it to just a few people won't cut it. There is a reason why vitoolik said such - scammers want others to be seen as scammers And sure - he is wrong, cause there is no easy legit proof |
|
|
|
Validating Nodes; AKA Sybil Systems There is no such thing as a validating node in Bitcoin. Bitcoin scales using SPV, but even with what some people in the BTC religion call full validating nodes, only miners matter. In particular, nodes were designed to preclude Sybil systems. Bitcoin is a proof-of-work system. Nodes are defined in six steps in the white paper. Any system that does not complete all of the six stages is not a node in Bitcoin. As such, any Raspberry Pi system is alluding itself. Your Raspberry Pi will never find a proof-of-work. Any such system is by definition a Sybil.  Yessss Some guy is getting it. If non-miner node (lol) GETTING a wrong copy - it's lost. Miners are UPDATING the state Raspis try to follow - just are behind all the time. No security coming from those 'Sybils' - don't trust them - just 'accept' what miners pass over - they verify for you - cause only miners getting paid for |
|
|
|
Quite entertaining how the trolls just only can react on BSV by derailing their thefts of original BitCoin protocol, idea, IP ... and try to social media proof that the guy who's pointing out their dumb thefts, try to make him a theft... Now, who IS still the proven thief? Core / Blockstream , abc devs ? Why going into original sourcs as long as social media gives more time for popcorn...  |
|
|
|
The level of bias is staggering. Here's post-deleting in action. But look at what I wrote and what got deleted. I simply stated my educational background as a basis for my opinion, and it was already too much to serve the Craig-denial agenda.  Censorship in a censorship resistant crypto world ? |
|
|
|
Not all miners run full nodes. The ones who connect to pools usually don't. A lot of other alts would seem to have more full nodes than BSV.
Decent miniers - caring for high connectivity run their own trusted dedicated network / leased lines / datacentres These are the miniers winning / miners of trust - cause highly invested and not happy to lose cause raspis are slow and not resilient Don't play the game every consumer wallet - node is relevant in a client server network - miners are making the blocks ot truth - between other miners, the rest = clients can only reject what the truth is - just lol |
|
|
|
So do all BSV shillers actually believe Craig is Satoshi ? Or are they literally trolling on a completely different level ? I haven't exactly followed the hole Bsv shit-show , but how can these plebs actually believe Craig is Satoshi simply because he said so ?? There would be countless of ways to prove it , if infact he was , but he failed to provide any proof . So why do people actually believe it just cause that man is spreading this crap everywhere " I am Satoshi "  How? Maybe if you have master's degree in software engineering, bachelor in informatics and 15 years of experience as a software architect, then you can make your own educated decisions listening to the man himself rather than the social media? As a professional in my field (which many people simply are not) I can say with absolute certainty that Craig is Satoshi. So your whole assumption is wrong, no one on the BSV side is believing anyone "simply because he said so". However, you on the other hand, very much show the attributes of a person who believes the anti-Craig propaganda simply because sociopaths such as OneMegGreg said so. Oh, and most importantly, I've got empirical evidence that Craig is Satoshi. You can't beat it with any other kind of evidence. You want to see what it looks like to have empirical evidence, then watch this: https://youtu.be/ji2p5pxURVsThat's just one, the list is 'endless' - but haters won't like to dig all that out - they ask here the 'surface' but ... no chance many will accept. Why do the work / google search / go to real sources if twitter is all you like ? Best thing about all that: BitCoin does not care |
|
|
|
3 more BSV nodes have fallen into line, but the contingency of stalwart nodes on 0.2.1 and 0.2.2 doesn't seem to be shaken:  Meanwhile the price of BSV still hovers around $350 Imagine how the fate of a $6.4 billion market cap could rest on the shoulders of 259 nodes... Decentralization, just like Satoshi envision it!  Funny - isn't it? True nodes are miners. = SERVERS of the network all the rest are simple relay / client nodes - why you care ? TIP: Draw some time series graph / process graph when exactly happens what in BitCoin Than you might get the understand how the systems DYNAMICALLY works Otherwise you just don't know anything (or just the STATICS) - Jon Snow |
|
|
|
Yo r0achie, you've been quiet recently
Fe fi fo fum. Look out Jew shills, cuz here I come. We can even put JayJuanGee in the camp with the Jews, so get ready. So get reeeeeeeeeeady. JAWOHL MEIN FÜHRRRERRR!!  Au weia - bitte nicht |
|
|
|
Writing / posting anything is for 'free' - what do you expect? Metanet will fix that It's a laugh alright. So you won't be using Metanet then, I take it? Not that anybody will, because it doesn't exist outside of a paid membership. Its kind of like joining the Faketoshi Fan Club for those who want to throw money at Craig directly. Right now, Metanet consists of 3 YouTube videos. Take a look for yourself: https://metanet.icu/Decentraland will be hosting full-fledged virtual orgies before Metanet has its first actual user. The internet will go more quality with micro-payments. So you might stay nichy ? |
|
|
|
Nope
Nope to your nope. See how easy that is? Anybody can do what you're doing. All they are doing is censorship by noise. They have nothing of any value to offer to the conversation and their only aim is to drown out the facts published in this thread by writing nothing of value. Writing / posting anything is for 'free' - what do you expect? Metanet will fix that |
|
|
|
Nope
Nope to your nope. See how easy that is? Anybody can do what you're doing. dto |
|
|
|
Hyena is trolling out of desperation. What kind of a person says "I know for a fact that Craig is Satoshi" and then runs away from his statement? Well, a troll. He wants us to think he's an authority on the subject when in fact he's a dev for SV-related projects and has a lot of money (and/or credibility) tied up in its success. Regardless, the subject matter being discussed here has nothing to do with the technical aspects of BSV (its basically the same thing as Bitcoin Cash with some minor alterations). It has to do with whether or not Craig is an honest individual. Hyena is certainly no expert on that. As for the profound technical brilliance of BSV, well: Bitcoin SV (BSV) Nodes Are Accidentally Connecting to Bitcoin Cash (BCH) NodesFeb 8, 2020
An issue has arisen on Bitcoin SV (BSV). Its nodes accidentally connect to some Bitcoin Cash (BCH) nodes when in safe mode.
Bitcoin SV (BSV) is a hard fork of Bitcoin Cash (BCH), and it seems that its architects did not change much. Bitcoin SV’s shoddy engineering allows for some BSV nodes to connect to BCH nodes when in safe mode...
The issue was brought to the attention of devs last week, and it was unfixed until recently. According to the comment on GitHub, the Bitcoin Cash blockchain is longer, which sometimes fools the Bitcoin SV node when in safe mode. It automatically enters safe mode when it finds a longer but invalid chain. The temporary solution now is to force-disable safe mode.
The issue underscores how similar BSV is to BCH—so similar that, apparently, even the nodes themselves sometimes struggle to tell the chains apart. The fact that the issue was allowed to persist for so long is also damning in its own right. Bitcoin SV has been live since November 2018, and only now this issue is being brought to light. Either the devs or doing a poor job or no one is paying attention to the actual architecture of Bitcoin SV.
Bitcoin SV has often faced criticism for the divisive activities of its founder, Craig Wright. Recently, even the founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, weighed in on the controversy: he says that BSV “offers nothing” and that it absolutely will not be used by Wikipedia. The comments came after BSV fans were speculating Wales might come out in support of BSV after committing to a speaking slot at an upcoming CoinGeek conference. Nope - nothing you provide holds any reasonable checks the only thing that holds a mindful conversation would be to agree to disagree - you just cant Nice try to accuse others trolling, being the one - classic concept Play your little block game - have fun |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
