|
Never heard of this exchange until now. It already has a warning - the connection to this site is not secure. That alone will give the impression that you should not trust this new exchange. So thanks for the heads up. And this exchange is newly created this month, they might be still in the development stage so maybe let us wait more info on this exchange.
|
|
|
|
Introducing https://pegnetmarketcap.com -- a market cap site dedicated to PegNet which is build on top of the Factom Protocol. PegNetMarketCap.com was created by Factomize, a Factom Protocol Authority Node Operator. This is nice, I am seeing a lot of fiat currencies on this site. And fortunately, I saw my local fiat listed also. Yes, there are still a lot of room for improvements here. But already a good start though. Will be following the pegnet network, I might use it someday as alternative to my local exchange. |
|
|
|
How will your exchange differ from the rest? How will you bribe your users?
Hello, Soraix will enable companies of all sizes to raise capital via their own ETOs issued on our platform, via a dedicated blockchain. Retail traders will be offered a wide array of both simple and complex trading tools and features, including an unprecedented revenue sharing model, Soraix will enable investors to acquire digital shares of companies in the form of equity tokens and trade them for other digital assets like cryptocurrencies or other equity tokens. It looks very interesting and promising. I hope you succeed, the idea is not bad and I think it would be useful for the cryptocommunity. How is your ICO going? isn't that something normal? some exchanges already do that, and if the shares is in the form of tokens I don't think is suitable, you have to give the company real shares to the trader then make this platform so good in the eyes of the trader And those shares you don't have idea if it will be valuable or not. You may get large number of shares, yet it is not worth your effort and investments. And from my impression of how much they are raising right now, I guess this will not go that far. Hope I'm wrong. |
|
|
|
Do you have real gold? Used to anchor
They actually do. The token is 100% backed by physical gold and is kept in a secure vault. Check out for details here to verify for yourself: https://gold.storage/en/auditsis that mean they will make the price more stable same thing with gold since its backed i already see many project told they are backed by gold but they cant maintain the price. Yes, all the previous project who claim their token to be back with real were unable to maintain the price of their token but the Gold digital token is different cause the token is absolutely backed with pure gold and its price have been intact with the price of gold in the market so far. I don't know how the team achieves this but they are prove to be totally competent right from the birth of this project. I am curious where will this project be after a year or couple of years. Can they really sustain this coin and be consistent that this is backed by gold? Regarding the audits, how authentic do you think are those? Is there no bias in undertaking such audits? I still have hesitations on this project as I remembered the Maya Preferred project. They have all the docs attached showing the metals owned by the team, yet, it turned out to be a huge scam. |
|
|
|
i've followed them on medium for quite awhile. never really thought they were legit but perhaps they are. i have seen replies in the thread they got their tokens but were confusing that they got different Jarvis tokens from different contract address. talking about being pro right?
I allow myself to answer since i received, like many users, two different tokens. Explanation, already given here, is the first distribution (which did not concern the tokens bought during ico but coming from bounties or other events) went wrong : tokens were sent multiple times (2 to 4) to same wallets. The team stopped the distribution and decided that the first jrt batch would become 'useless'/with no value, then created a new contract before, a few days later, the distribution (which happened without any issue) I hope I was able to enlighten you and would like to add : who does not make mistakes?  i see. which contract address is valid? i stopped following the project right after that news. it felt like scam already but since they still kept in contact with the community they've built i guess there must be truth to the near launching of the exchange. the fact that there will be no KYC on this jarvis while they do have fiat gateway must be interesting and worth the wait for the investors and traders. You can check this contract address - it says Jarvis Reward Token https://etherscan.io/address/0x8a9c67fee641579deba04928c4bc45f66e26343aI think this address has the most active transactions as compared to other Jarvis-related eth addresses. The team should put the official eth contract address on their website so people can easier check their tokens if they receive it from the right or wrong address. |
|
|
|
Where is the proof that this is backed by US$ assets? It is easy to say that it is backed by certain fiat currency, but if you ask for proofs, they will find ways not to answer the very basic question. If you have initial supply of 30M ETD, it means, you should have 30M USD in your possession. Where can we see that amount? Any third party who is auditing your assets to confirm this holdings?  |
|
|
|
I think this project is dead but dev is still standing here, is there a more interesting plan for the future and where is your whitepaper, so that the people here have a goal of what you are going to do
They are trying to revive this project. Seems that they are almost in the meltdown stage here. The team is trying to give life on their trading market. But that is not a sustainable approach, they will get tired of their own trading and later on, might fully abandon this platform. Just take a look at their trading history in vindax, you can obviously see that they are trying very hard to have an active trading for this coin.  |
|
|
|
Getting this figure from the above report, you can see a promising future for this SHUF token.  Ref. [ https://intothecryptoverse.com/index.php/2019/10/15/shuffle-token/] However, this will only continue if the actual price will increase up to the 3% level burned as seen in the above graph. If the actual price deviates when it hits the 2.5 to 3 % burned, we might see a different trend. So for now, it is interesting what will gonna happen at those levels. Is he going to update us if we surpass the 2.5-3% burned tokens? |
|
|
|
I foresee a bright future for bitblocks!  I really believe in this project, the developer of this coin helped us create ours, we are very confident in our project as well. Bitblcks will undoubtedly value a lot. Success. Can you explain further how this coin will be valuable in the future? Because if I am new to this coin and see the trading graph, I won't give a positive impression. I won't even try to trade as I don't see any positive points going on lately. How can you convince traders to take a look on this coin? |
|
|
|
1% house edge is the most common nowadays. But there are also a handful of dice sites which offer lower. Crypto-games, as you have mentioned is one. They have 0.5% house edge. I don't have a problem with the site. They even have a clean account here, as compared to other gambling sites that have red tags. Just like crypto-games, safedice is also offering 0.5% house edge. Megadice is also offering lower than 1% house edge. They have 0.9%. And if you are regularly following Bitsler's offers, you might chance upon a 0% house edge offer for a limited period of time.
Afaik Cryptogames has 0.8% House edge. I won't recommend to gamble on safedice although they offered you 0.5% house edge (kinda low from other gambling sites) since they still have problem with their site (admin goes offline since a year ago, their main account also hasn't active on here anymore). That is the problem of some sites who are offering a lil bit lower house edge than others. They couldn't maintain the operations or let's say, they can't cope up with the competition. Even though they are offering lower house edge, yet, the sustenance is quite hard especially if you have no sufficient bankroll on hand. So I would say, sometimes it is better to play with known sites even if they are offering like 1%, but you know for sure when it comes to payout, you will have no problem at all. |
|
|
|
I understand that your resource has not yet been launched, because I went through the link, and there it comes from the count of the timer, which still has seven days left? I would like to quickly see the real features of your site. And regarding the company's bounty, why did you decline to signature compaing ? Yes we decided to run bounty one week before we open, this way we have good interest upon launch. We declined signature because we feel like there is too much signature campaigns already with alot of bad quality posters and think that such campaign does not add value to Jackbit, but instead give it a spam based image, which Jackbit really does not want. Of course, I understand all your concerns about the Bounty Company. But I want to draw your attention to the fact that if Signature compaing has certain conditions, such as 10 posts per week that need to be written in at least 3-4 days, this will not provoke spam on the forum and thus your signature and The company’s image will not dislike users due to spam. Of course, there are companies that provoke spam, when, based on the conditions of the Bounty, companies force participants to write in specific sections of the forum and a large number of posts: 25 and above. This is, of course, an abuse that will negatively affect the company's reputation and the trust of the member of the Bounty company itself. Thanks for your feedback. For now we will not include a signature campaign in this bounty. If however we ever to decide to do a signature campaign, this will be outside of the bounty that is running now and will have its own specific terms and conditions. A separate signature campaign to promote jackbit might help in attracting players from the forum. And if you will pay them in btc or eth, it will attract more attention from the community. Credibility is hard to build but if you will do it the right way, in time you will gain players even if you have the pvp concept. Interested on what it will offer to the players here few days from now... |
|
|
|
I see great interest in your project , many forum participants wear your signature . The project looks very good .
Bounty presses are very many, up to 400 participants joined their project. But I don't see the latest developments in the project that have caught this person's attention. We need not worry about the project because this is one of the oldest project, that's why many participants are showing interest in this campaign. Developments will follow them, we need not worry because potential projects will always take their own time to develop the project. I hope your words do happen with a long journey that they will take to make this project a success because I don't see updates on this thread. Not so many people asked about this project even though there were so many bounty participants. And guess what, TON and LIBRA's future is still hazy at the moment? They need to change their title thread. Both projects are still in their trying stage. I see great interest in your project , many forum participants wear your signature . The project looks very good .
Bounty presses are very many, up to 400 participants joined their project. But I don't see the latest developments in the project that have caught this person's attention. Recently the bounty has been concluded and already they have distributed the tokens to bounty people. Yes, this project impressed many bounty people to participate in the bounty campaign and the only problem after getting the payment where should we sell the BIP coins? That is the usual struggle of most bounty hunters. Even if they do have received their respective shares, there is not even one market to sell it off. And you have to wait for god how long? And most of the time once they are listed, you already forgot that you have that coin up until it has no more value. |
|
|
|
What is the status of your listing request to bittrex? 3rd quarter is already over.  Better to see this coin in bittrex as they have relatively good reputation as compared to new ones and they have been here for 6 years already. |
|
|
|
Can you ask the team about their relationship with BitcoinHD? it seems like both of LTCHD and BTCHD are the same, from their technical in using cPoC and the same template on their website. it could not be a coincidence, right?
why did they create a new project without improving the slightest thing? why do not they develop an existing one instead of creating a new one?
it is going to be a waste of time and money because nobody wants to participate in the IEO for now.
And no originality, using the name of litecoin within their name. If they want to be known for their own identity, they should have created their own name. And they are not satisfied with one, more than likely they are the ones who created the BitcoinHD. But they came up with a 30-page whitepaper, but no team members are disclosed. I wonder how they will perform with their IEO with anonymous team? |
|
|
|
Swiftcash is actually following the path of Bitcoin. This is not really appreciated by many investors. Because this model should only exist in coins with high reputation.
For new projects, I think big marketing costs are needed to attract users.
and the Halving event caused the price to increase due to public reactions, but the mechanism of the coin could not increase itself.
Therefore, I am waiting for the best marketing plan from the team in the future.
Are they following the popularity of usage of bitcoin? I guess not. Because the price should not be like this -  However, maybe it is too early to say as they are only almost a year old? |
|
|
|
Dev announces the completion of the transition to a new protocol:"...we are glad to inform that all our exchanges have upgraded to the latest version. We will be activating the new protocol in few hours. Please upgrade your wallet to avoid being left behind. our new protocol is enforced. We have been monitoring it and everything seem to be working fine including all our security features. Please ensure your node is working properly too and let us know if you face any problem..."
I can see that there is positive increase in price for BEET coin in the past few days, however, the increase is very slow and achieving the 100-sat price might be seen for another month. But let us hope that level will be achieved here. After more than 1.5 years, this coin is trying to survive while most of its contemporary PoS/MN coins have long been in the grave already. But haven't used its leading exchange - Chaoex yet, might want to get some beet as I am more than positive that this has high chance of increasing its value in the next few weeks or months. |
|
|
|
Look at the charts of all cryptos except BNB, can you come up with one success between 2018-2020?
This is not about waves, it is a bear market super cycle.
BNB is a good comparison because it is an exchange coin.
Stellar is a competitor to Waves, it is valued to $6 billon and it's a mess. Waves is fluent and user friendly for merchant business.
Sometimes less is more. Tokenized commodity does not need fancy scripts to work as intended.
What do you think will be your edge to be successful in waves platform? On my end, I know waves is very easy to use but I don't understand why it is not popular among crypto users or traders. Very few are really into waves as compared to ethereum. Stellar, can't say about this network as I am not a holder of stellar or user of this platform. |
|
|
|
Is this an old project? because I can see the airdrop distribution schedule on your website and it stated you are in phase 3.
another thing is you have started ICO phase 2 which, but why we can not see anything about the ICO and the airdrop on this thread?
have you guys checked the wallet? do not randomly install it, I am unable to download it right now.
And also, this is another altcoin using the name of bitcoin. Nothing much to offer to crypto community. If you want to invest, better buy bitcoin, at least you know that it has corresponding value in the market. While this one, they will try to capitalize those buyers who bought at cheap prices or bounty hunters that got this coin for free to have trading movement but give it couple of weeks and they will slowly die. |
|
|
|
interesting exchange. I look there, right on the site as a form, you can list your token. I wonder is it free or what the fee will still need to make? if free of charge then of course the exchange will begin to be in demand. at least at first, to attract people
Free listing will eventually accumulate crap, scam tokens. Name it. There should be at least a set of standards before accepting them. But to commence their exchange, they might resort to this tactic. They want to earn traders of course. But listing just any other token will not give you loyal traders but only traders that want to dump their holdings and move on to the next. The team should think long term goals to compete with others. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
