Indeed, blockchain technology would help in managing the quality of the metal produced and the legalities involved. However, the most common problem with blockchain projects that want to explore precious metals is that they either ended up as scam or crap. Many have tried but most of them ended up fraudulent ones. Now, it is a challenge for the Karuschain to prove that they can deliver their objectives and show to the community that you are having legal business at all aspects.

Before, we thought that if the team is not anonymous and with faces published and attending to blockchain conferences, the less likelihood of screwing their investors and supporters. But it's not the case here. This is a testament that no matter what, we really have no assurance when it comes to crypto investment. And this is the reason why most ICO projects are not getting anymore investors because of these countless scammers. I really hope they will be bothered by their conscience and at least return what they owed to its investors. But this is punch in the air.

There will always be some restrictions on borrowing VIGOR because if they will not put some sort of collateral, they will easily lose the business. And with this project, the collateral is EOS native tokens.



While the lenders, which I think, they call, Insurers, escrow EOS native tokens as their insurance assets-



Now, the question is, how reliable is the escrow on both sides? How can they assess that trustworthiness of the escrow?

Yes, 2 exchanges are more than sufficient as of right now. Better develop the platform first to show some progress before thinking of adding another exchange. It is better to have good foundation and use case in actual operations so the demand for the coin will be higher rather than focus on exchange listing. If there will be a lot of clients, it means, they have business and that means they can sustain their value in the market.

Since your tokens are said to be backed by real world assets, how do we know that you are in possession of those assets? Are you going to provide the details of your assets, like your real estate exact locations, precious metals certificates and anything related to your holdings?

More than likely, they don't have anything to do with Visa or any collaboration with Visa. Better remove the word Visa as they will be infringing its use. They are just misleading the users here by using this famous name in the financial sector. You can see the team members here - https://coinvisa.org/whitepaper.pdf (pages 21-22). But neither of them has close connection with Visa.

My bet, CW can't prove that he can unlock that $8B of BTC. So maybe, as early as now, they are manipulating the price of BSV because later on, once he's proven as lying again, they may not recover the price that they are enjoying right now. For those traders that are into it right now, you have to be prepared when to exit because this might be a trap. So nope, it won't surpass bitcoin. It is alive because they can manipulate the price and so pnd is a regular scenario for this one. Nothing vital in development?

If he will list it again, he knows that he will be the laughing stock in the community. So I don't think he will do such dumb action. He doesn't need the volume that it is creating right now nor the price it is showing as more than likely, the good performance right now of BSV will not be a long term one. CZ has already all the money to live and right now, his reputation is more than the money that he will earn from it.

I have watched those two movies already and several other films included in Oscars, however, I'm not into betting in this kind of gambling as we don't know how the judges really pick for each category. They have their own criteria and most of us have no idea how the mind of film people works. But yes, I am interested also in knowing the winners but this event is really not much of a big deal for me.

Aside from that, their Co-Founder linkedin profile has only 7 connections without photo? Something shady here. Just fresh account created for this project? Does he have any other profile aside from linkedin?

Can you give us your exact location in Garland, TX? I don't it will not be difficult for you to disclose your location if you are operating legally here? And also, if you press the linkedin profile of John Baker, your Legal Counsel, it directs you to a different linkedin profile, who is - https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickohoward/. Can you fix it please? Thanks.

Can you add more items for this year? The first 2 are actually not difficult to implement as you are just relying on your users. Definitely not a trouble to do.

I am expecting more tangible activities that will attract users on the TWINS platform.

Nice update for this project! More alts included in the service means more options for its travelers. By the way, how many active users are now using travala? Just approximate figure?

Actually that's true, without real usage, it will not be valuable in the market. If they will depend on trading speculation and empty words, I don't think staking this for long time will be profitable. As we have seen, any coin or token, even with strong foundation, experienced the price drop and very few can rise up again. So getting profit from staking has really no assurance if you can get profit. No one can say that they will not lose from this because no one can exactly tell the direction of trading.

Why do you think listing in p2pb2b is ok? Have you seen a lot of allegations on them, wash trading, manipulation, fake volume? I hope, they will not be a victim of trading manipulation where they will suffer at the end. The other 2 are not really popular to most traders so let's see where this goes...
I don't know how the team selected those exchanges but I am sure they have reasons and I hope they will not regret those decision.

Can the team disclose if they have already partnered with at least couple of companies about their services? This will further entice other users to use their product if they will name companies that are already using this. And also, this also shows that private companies are trusting this project to allow part of their financial aspect open to selfkey.

Nice logic so higher than 1 sat  is better!  I don't think this will last long in exchanges. Traders will only buy this, trying to ride and for the hope of getting profit. But for long term investment, I don't think so. It can be seen already from the users that are attracted by this project. 

Okay, got it! But why WavesDex for crowdfunding? Why not regular exchanges with better trading volume? As everyone knows, WavesDex doesn't really attract much traders. But I have no idea right now when they changed it to Waves Exchange, as I was reading some feedback, they increase a lil bit of trading volume.

It is better to develop the platform first but the you should have assigned at least one staff to take care of your social media channels. In that manner, potential players know that you are taking care of your clients and are still active. Also, I noticed that the value of your token in p2pb2b is quite low. So you really need to be visible in the community to maintain the interest of players.

This is really disappointing! After more than a year of launching, you can still see this on their site?




So what are the rules that this Ingot team is following? Their own rules and not thinking of their investors? They can have a good technical documentation but where are they now in terms of actual development?