Here's the thing, why are you concerned about race mixing? It doesn't have any rational basis. Your 'concern' is disconcerting.

As for black-on-white crime, is there something different about black-on-white crime than any other kind of crime? What about black-on-black or white-on-white or the whole lot kinda mixed up into one coffee-coloured criminal act?

Concern about crime, yes, that is valid. 'Concern' about black-on-white crime is less about the crime and more about your hatred for black people.


No, but do you know a stone-cold mother-fucking fact about people who go out and commit racist hate crimes? They are racists. They perceive the world through their nasty racism and prejudices and you, you who might not actually do the deed and assault someone for being 'the wrong colour', you are part of their supporting network of 'sympathisers in general agreement'. You are an apologist for violent racism. You help fuel the fire inside their belly which drives them towards their racist violent acts.


I don't for a second believe that this 'violence' you speak of from equal-rights campaigners arises out of nothing. I'm pretty confident you're simply referring to people who won't simply keep quiet while their liberty is being assaulted.

In any event, here's the thing you're missing. Violence is wrong from either side. Doesn't change the simple truth, though. You have no basis by which to declare yourself more important than a gay person. You are not special. Nobody is special. We are all human beings and some are healthy and well-balanced functional people and others, like you, harbour toxic hatred against other human beings for no apparent reason other than you don't like how they want to live as equals to you.


Awwww, are the bad people stopping you from declaring your hatred freely?

TBH, though, it's probably not even that you're actually stopped from declaring your hatred freely, it's more likely that if you go to a place where decent human beings gather and readily announce your bigotry and hatred, they'll not want to associate with you.

So its not like your 'free speech' is being trampled on, it is actually more a case of you having to learn that there are consequences to that free speech as a result of it showing people your nasty and hate-filled mind.

:facepalm:

Yes. Yes it does you fucking dim-witted numpty bigot. That's what 'treating humans as equal' means, that you don't get to pick and choose what people can or cannot do based on their gender, orientation or skin colour.

Get it? That is what 'equality' means. Treating people equally. Not discriminating against some of them by telling them they are not allowed to have an adult relationship with the same legal recognition as other adult relationships.


Ah 'Tradition', possibly the worst justification for anything, ever. So, do you believe that simply because a practice has generally been done repeatedly a certain way for a long time that it lends any credence to the practice concerned? Because I suggest you go take a fucking look at some of the atrocities and barbaric acts of 'tradition' that human beings are routinely capable of.

If you do something repeatedly simply because it has been done repeatedly before, you're clearly an idiot and quite a dangerous idiot at that.


Why? Why would I do that? What connection is there between two humans having their adult relationship legally recognised and human/animal relationships?

Your argument is the 'slippery slope' fallacy and is false.

The majority of people opposed to homosexuality ARE theists. Simply because it takes a certain kind of ignorance to rage against something that has zero effect on your personal life. It takes the kind of ignorant demand for deference and respect infantile followers of mythical magic-man-in-the-sky 'believers' think they are entitled to.


Yeah, we already know you don't want gay people to have the same rights as you. It's called 'being a bigot'. You basically want what you want and everybody else has to behave how you want them to behave. You're not much for treating decent human beings equally as decent human beings. You want to live in a world where you and your kind have the rule over anybody who isn't like you and your kind. And that fact thrills you and doesn't cause any consternation in you whatsoever that I have just described that you want to live in a fascist 'utopia'.


Oh, sure, reducing large swathes of the population to second-class status doesn't cause twisted perceptions that they have less value than 'normal' human beings, like you and your kind, and are, therefore, routinely abused and discriminated against because they are, after all, second-class citizens, the 'ones we don't want to treat equally' as you and your kind believe.


Let me guess, you're one of those nut-jobs who EVEN IN THE FACE OF EXPLICIT RACIST MANIFESTO, want to spin it that your idol only killed those black people because . . . drum-roll please . . .they were Christian! It was a hate-crime against Xtians, wasn't it, nothing to do with racism or anything like that. The confederacy wasn't about hating the blacks and wanting to continue treating them like animals, like property, noooooo, the confederates were simply 'Rebels' right?

The fact they were 'rebelling' against abolition of slavery is irrelevant. To you. It's all about how mother-fucking cool they were for being so god-damn rebellious!

Totally *not* about racism.



You know what makes a civilization great? Being civilized. Treating human beings as equals. That is civilized.

You're just so full of bile and hatred you can't see the love and joy which comes from families who are supportive and nurturing and accepting of others who are supportive and nurturing. No, all you want to do is fill your world full of people you can hate, so you can hate them so hard and fill that empty void inside yourself.

Says the theist who, by definition, lives in a demon-haunted world.

There are no demons in an atheist world, just other human beings. Some of them are healthy and well-balanced neurologically-speaking, others are damaged and toxic. There is no 'good and evil' there is only functional and dysfunctional.


For someone clearly so ill-informed about atheism and atheists, you sure are making some boldly ignorant statements. You *do* know, right, that simply asserting something doesn't make it true? You have to have a reasonable argument to support your claims, which you do not.

The majority of fundamentalist Xtians oppose gay-rights, yes.

Let me ask you a quick question, why are you so fixated on sodomy? Do gay men force bakers and public officials to watch them have their gay-bum-sex?

Besides, what about gay people who are celibate? What about lesbians?

Where do you stand on people who aren't having gay-man-bum-sex but are in a committed same-gender relationship?



'nobody would give them a second thought' - except, of course, for the fact that in countries where violent homophobia is rife the, predominantly male, supposedly heterosexual, majority tend to spend an inordinate amount of time fixating on who 'might' be gay so they can. . .kill them.

Your views ferment violence and hatred all the while you're claiming you 'just want them out of your sight'. It is people like you who are the problem, you are toxic and possess an irrational fear of people who want to have a relationship you do not 'approve' of.

Oh, Bryant, you are a tool, an ignorant and toxic little tool.

Please explain why you are choosing to associate adults who have sex with each other in ways you are too immature to ignore as being none of your business and the abuse of children and/or animals.

That is a false association. But it doesn't surprise me in the least to see you post it. You are, after all, a demonstrable idiot. That's not an ad-hominem, by the way, you clearly have demonstrated repeatedly in this thread and others that you lack many basic reasoning skills.

But you're missing the point. Nobody with a healthy and functional neurology gives a flying one that you and your hateful bigotry are 'offended' by same-gender relationships, because your response to the situation is borne of toxic dysfunction within your sociofamilial environment. There is no rational justification for you to be so full of hate for gay people. None. Same-gender relationships have absolutely no bearing on your own personal life, so you have no right to demand that others change theirs to suit you.

Nobody has the right to demand to never be offended.

I think part of the reason scrypt.cc is so able to convince these marks they should invest is the longevity of the scam. They are able to claim they've been running since early last year when the truth is that, as far as I can tell, for several months they dropped off the radar somewhat due to 'Admin' claiming to have been hospitalised.

I wonder what level of 'business' they were doing during that period. Because they appear to have suddenly increased their claimed hashrate to absurd levels much later in the year, probably to coincide with the release of actual Scrypt ASIC miners. They do seem to utilise certain events to try and paint an impression that they are legitimate. The timing of their 'power outage' was clearly meant to coincide with a marked drop in LTC hashrate that occurs routinely, so they could assert it was the result of their miners going offline and play with the numbers-on-the-screen to their advantage during the panic.

It would also mean that they'd have a small group of 'investors' who had been swinging the lead for those several months of limited performance from the site but who are likely to be looking at much larger actual profit from being early 'investors' once 'Admin' performed his magical ASIC-making trick and upped the game later in the year.

If you check out the scrypt.cc thread you will see barely anything being posted for the first few months and lots of indicators that people believed it was about to go *poof*! Because it didn't he now has an army of joyous marks who will rabidly defend his amazing 'investment' site for reason that have already been cited here, namely, "Fuck you, I'm getting mine".

So you claim that homosexuality is 'opposed' by the majority of people on the planet and then when asked for a citation you post stats that show the kind of people you're referring to as being against homosexuality. Backwards, ignorant and superstitious countries are the 'majority' you speak of. Forward-thinking modern countries are generally populated by people who understand that they have no right to oppose two adult choosing to have a relationship, irrespective of their gender.


You've already had it explained to you why these countries are likely to be breeding grounds for homophobia but, one quick question, wtf are you thinking by claiming "Anyone with some family values" will have a problem with it?

Are you trying to claim that nobody who isn't against relationship equality, as you are, can possibly have healthy and functional sociofamilial 'values'? Because that it utterly absurd, surely you can recognise that?

Oh, hang on,
Ah, I see, no. No you don't recognise anything outside of your own warped prejudice and hatred. You are claiming that anybody who doesn't hate homosexuality, as you do, has an extremely low IQ. Enough said. You're an idiot.

LOL. Citation or GTFO.

But, here's the thing, this isn't a thread about homosexual sex, this is a thread about ZOMG THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!1!! bigotry about the US deciding that it is wrong to continue refusing to legally acknowledge same-sex marriages as equal as opposite-sex ones.

Why do you homophobic bigots all want to screech about gay sex? Is there something else you want to tell us, perhaps?

Gay marriage is not about sex, gay or otherwise.

There, FIFY.

No, no they don't. Trouble is, you aren't actually interested in considering that you may be mistaken. You aren't interested in applying a little critical thinking to your belief because you are conditioned to reject anything which might force you to suspend your special-pleading intellectual dishonesty.

How does it feel to know that you are someone who doesn't want to understand life properly?

Because that is exactly what you are when you refuse to submit your beliefs to objectively reasoned analysis. For example, we know how to induce 'spiritual' sensations into people, 'presence of God', even 'alien abduction', simply by applying some intense magnetic impulses to particular parts of the brain. Neurological responses cause subjective psychological and emotional experiences.

We understand how the brain can easily be fooled and we understand how our senses and our perceptions cannot be relied upon for much of anything when it comes to demonstrable knowledge, without independent verification from other data sources outside of our unreliable perception.

We can easily explain how religions come into existence, how the psychology of the theist mind is constructed and how, as a group, the myths and legend develop and are reinforced through symbolism and ritual.

You *do* know, don't you, that all your special symbols and rituals don't actually do anything, right? I mean, if I genuflect and I scratch my balls halfway through, does it count as the magic needed to induce, well, whatever it is you believe you are inducing by genuflecting?

So, in that we can rationally explain everything as long as intellectual integrity is maintained, there is only self-deception left for you to cling to. Which is what you and your kind do, with much vigour and desperation. Trying to get you to understand that you are mistaken is no different to trying to reason with somebody suffering from amphetamine-induced psychosis. You both *know*, I mean absolutely 100% *know* that you are right about what you are perceiving . . . that anybody who tries to explain otherwise to you is a threat.

Q:What's different about the speed-freak curtain-twitcher who is convinced that he is being watched and you who believes likewise?

A: The tweaker could actually be under surveillance

Your proposition towards the existence of an omnipotent invisible super-being who has a set a rules we're all supposed to follow is less credible, even, than those who believe they have been abducted by aliens. They, at least, invoke things which could be measurably real in our Universe.

Citation or GTFO.

This is typical homophobic twaddle. Let me guess, you want to cite something dumb like a for-profit business, say a bakery, not being able to discriminate and choose whether they are going to serve a customer or not based on whether it offends their religious sensibilities?

Gay marriage is not about sex, it is about legally recognising a relationship between two people, irrespective of their gender.

Stop making it about sex because otherwise you end up looking like dumb-asses when somebody asks why, if marriage is supposed to be for a heterosexual couple to procreate, and only for that purpose, would you agree with heterosexual married couples who cannot or choose not to, have children?

What if the heterosexual couple are celibate? What if the gay couple are celibate?

OhNoes! How u gonna discriminate then? Won't *somebody* please have sex so we can judge whether or not it is disgusting and shameful.


The dying gasps of theist privilege to demand their infantile belief system be shown undeserved respect and deference for their bigoted hatred of anybody who doesn't show respect and deference for their right to hate those people who are not them.

So you ask a question but then ignore the answer because you don't want to see the facts?

Why bother posting? You could have avoided seeing those inconvenient truths I posted if you'd only keep quiet and controlled your urge to post questions you don't want the answers to.

It's like you have DID and one part of you is typing questions before the other part of you kicks in and aggressively snarls rude things at us. That would explain why your post began seeming like you actually wanted to know the answers to the questions you asked and then weirdly deteriorated into ad-hominem about our asses.

Things is dull around here while we wait for the wheels of justice to catch up with Homero.

In the meantime, anyone up for XPY-Lite? Poor spelling, freshly incorporated Limited Companies and deeply-vague hand-wavy ideas included!
Now targeting XPY and scrypt.cc 'tards near you!
https://talk.paycoin.com/discussion/1556/uk-digital-futures-announces-statement-of-intent-and-open-source-clarity-regaurding-trustplus/p1

Because centralised is good and decentralised is baaaad!

Killer comeback to the valid points I raised, Ilic.

You sure showed me.

@ilic

Let's just take a look at how your post, which claims to be asking a genuine question, rapidly serves as evidence of its own answer

What possible justification do you have to continue to refuse to accept the evidence that is staring you in the face? Evidence you can check the origin of yourself?


Because you, like all their other 'investors' are intellectually dishonest and will rage against facts you dislike being posted. They know you'd never check the reality of their claims. They were right and they continue to be right, you truly are so incredibly dumb you actually exist in a state of delusion whereby you believe that raging against those who repeatedly show proof and reasoned explanation as to how you are being duped by these criminals, will somehow magically make the facts not be true and, instead, your personal fantasy involving any number of excuses as to why and how you are going to reap the financial rewards of your clever 'investment', is going to over-ride reality. All you need to do is to keep attacking anybody who doesn't align themselves with your delusion.

It's like a religion to you. Free-thinkers come along and point out the logical fallacies in your belief in order to help you understand where you are mistaken and . . .you attack them.


Because you're all willfully ignorant. You actually don't want to hear about how the math doesn't add up, shit, they could say they've just switched on 100Petahash of Scrypt to mine some super-secret Scrypt coin that nobody knows about and you'd all trample on each other in your rush to buy these mythical 'KHS'.


Do you see what you're doing? Math proves they are lying and you want to make the lie something 'good' so you don't have to accept reality. On the one hand you say they are not a ponzi scheme, but on the other you can't actually say what legitimate operation they could actually be. One that, by the way, needs to lie to you all in order to function properly.


Again with the aggressive dismissal of us for darkening your happy thoughts with inconvenient facts which serve to inform you that, no, you're not going to get rich, quick or otherwise, with this criminal scam.


No. You don't want to accept the fact that they are, yet you have no explanation for why a legitimate 'investment' scheme would need to lie to its 'investors' so blatantly.

The only thing scrypt.cc needs you to be is you and not be intellectually honest with yourself. You are doing that magnificently for them. You are what every religion is founded upon and continues to be supported by.

Ffs, how can you be so wilfully ignorant?

Go to those links I have provided for every screenshot. They are completely independent sources you can check them for yourself!

The list of pools will show you that, for starters, the top two are Chinese! They are known to predominantly be large ASIC farms in China. So even if scrypt.cc was so dumb that they wanted to mine on a pool instead of solo mining with no pool fee with their massive claimed hashrate, they'd not be mining on a Chinese pool when the hashrate they have is accounted for as being miners in China!

Open your eyes, read the data that it is in front of you.

850GH/s is a massive amount of Scrypt hashpower. Immense for one entity to claim to have.

As for claims about 'all the other scrypt coins' seriously, am I going to have to start doing more basic math for you all again?

I despair for your futures, I really do.

Now, who wants to know the inside scoop of how scrypt.cc is going to perform their next manipulation of you marks?

Here's how it is going to go down and it is all going to by driven by the greed of people who believe they will be able to eventually pull their 'profit' out before the final end-game which, given LTCGear performed that audacious 'send more money in to get your money out' maneuver could still see more entertainment to come.

1. Some of you will be given access to your accounts
2. Some of you will be able to withdraw your btc back to your own local wallet
3. The rest will be told they need to send support tickets as, you know, the 'audit' is still being done
4. Those of you who have withdrawn your BTC, now see the the value of 'KHS' on scrypt.cc is incredibly cheap now
5. Most of you who have successfully withdrawn your BTC will now send it back to scrypt.cc in order to 'get in early' on the cheap 'KHS'
6. NOMNOMNOMNOMNOM You 'buy' cheap 'KHS'
7. Make sure your 'autoreinvest' is activated and sit back to do some calculations on just how much richer you are going to be now you have even more 'KHS' than you ever had before.
8. Congratulate yourselves on being so fucking smart
9. Post screeching abuse-laden 'Haha! Told you so, cryptodevil, you fuck. Now GTFO while I watch my 'investment' grow even fatter

When your BTC return to scrypt.cc, 'Marcelo' will unlock another batch of marks to run through the same process

Rinse-and-repeat as long as your marks remain dumb enough to keep doing exactly what you intend, which is to withdraw, re-deposit and buy back in.

If all goes to plan you 'recover' from this 'hack' with your fanboy marks crowing about how fucking smart they all are and just how great scrypt.cc is - inviting even more marks into the scam and their btc.

Until, eventually, because math doesn't lie unlike scrypt.cc

10. The amount of new funds coming in to the scrypt.cc deposit address threatens to drop lower than the amount of withdrawals being made so, enact operation "We wuz haxxored" all over again.

At some point numbers-on-the-screen outpace the reality of the coins-in-the-wallet and *poof* game over. Or, if they take a leaf out of LTCGear's playbook, get the idiots to send you more money to release some of their own. Or at least make it look like that's what you're doing when in reality you're just posting successful "I got my munnies" stories through sock-puppet accounts and pocketing the bonus BTC you've cleverly conned out of the herd.

 

Actually that's not a bad idea. Seems a shame for this to get buried under the usual flurry of bile and hate-filled shill/fanboy posts.

Done and done: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102560.0