As long as they keep giving it away, the value will dilute. Once it is well distributed it has a chance to gain in price.
But when will they stop giving them away then? Is it a matter of months or years? August 27th, 2017: The bitcoin lumen program will conclude. If there are unclaimed lumens, they’ll go to Stellar.org’s operational fund and to the Build Challenge. However, I have no idea if that means they will be done done. Just consider this a buying opportunity. |
|
|
|
I think Stellar needs to go beyond the moon this time.
I don't see how you can be so optimistic, it just gets worse and worse to me... As long as they keep giving it away, the value will dilute. Once it is well distributed it has a chance to gain in price. |
|
|
|
it's been 24 hours and 31 minutes. Still not included in a block.
Sigh...
It's really not that bad of a fee so it'll go through at some point. If not (which I would honestly be shocked) you could always have your transaction rebroadcast, but I don't think it'll come to that. idk, given how full the blocks are I'm not so sure. |
|
|
|
|
it's been 24 hours and 31 minutes. Still not included in a block.
Sigh...
|
|
|
|
Oh man. BTC is pushing some of us out. 0.03 doesn't seam like dust. It can buy a few meals in some countries. weird one. I thought fees where under a buck, they just take pretty long.
Sure, if it were a .03 output, it wouldn't be a problem. But, yes, this seems to be a weakness in the bitcoin protocol, especially with the small block sizes. |
|
|
|
Hmm... well, I've got the tx sent with electrum with a 50 sat/kbyte fee. It cost $7 to send but worth is rather than paying $75.
Transaction fees have got a bit higher now, so it's possible it could take longer. I recommend submitting your transaction to the ViaBTC accelerator at the start of the hour to try and get your transaction in when they mine a block. Since they've started dedicating a lot of hashrate to BCH, they'll mine less blocks, but you should still give it a try. Tryed to submit, after finally getting the captca right (I hate those) it says fee too low. So, I guess I'll just wait it out and see what happens. |
|
|
|
|
Hmm... well, I've got the tx sent with electrum with a 50 sat/kbyte fee. It cost $7 to send but worth is rather than paying $75.
(175 inputs, 25862 bytes)
Now to see if/when it gets confirmed.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what's up. I dropped the fee in coinomi to .0002 and it still tells me not enough for fees. Not sure how it's calculating this.
I tried it with Myclium and at it's low-pri (>150sat/byte) setting it tells me fees will be about 2/3 of the spend.
Is there another bip44 wallet that support derivation account path that lets you set your fee per byte? Perhaps Electrum?
|
|
|
|
I can't seem to login to Bittrex. It says try again in a few minutes.
Anyone else having this problem?
works fine here (logged out and in again, from Central Europe) Edit: Noticing, that Ethereum wallet is now under maintenance, right after the re-login. So it just might be a lag for you. Keep trying. I was getting this message last night. Stupidly I thought was because I was logged into another pc. So, I remoted to that PC and logged out. I should have not done that. Argh! |
|
|
|
|
I can't seem to login to Bittrex. It says try again in a few minutes.
Anyone else having this problem?
|
|
|
|
Wonder what kind of dump or panic will happen when poloniex will release their 60000 bcc... (down to hell?)
And why do you think everyone will sell their BCC?, in fact I believe at most only 10k will be sold, rest will keep it as an hedge , Both poloniex and coinbase have stated they have not decided if they will allow buying or trading of BCH So far all we know is they will allow you to withdraw to a wallet I dont know how this will affect things since a lot of people just keep their coins in coinbase instead of a paper/haedware or other wallet The coinbase people can just transfer their BCC to another exchange wallet. I don't think coinbase will block a transfer if the address you transfer to is an exchange wallet or your own personal wallet. No, they can't. Coinbase so far didn't credited BCH to their users. Coinbase announced that they will start to support Bitcoin Cash only in January. People who where holding bitcoins on Coinbase during fork, now have to wait until they will be able to claim their BCH. They say "by" Jan 1st... it could be before that. |
|
|
|
Wonder what kind of dump or panic will happen when poloniex will release their 60000 bcc... (down to hell?)
And why do you think everyone will sell their BCC?, in fact I believe at most only 10k will be sold, rest will keep it as an hedge , Both poloniex and coinbase have stated they have not decided if they will allow buying or trading of BCH So far all we know is they will allow you to withdraw to a wallet I dont know how this will affect things since a lot of people just keep their coins in coinbase instead of a paper/hardware or other wallet GDAX said they will open BCH markets. And, Coinbase owns GDAX. So I assume you could also buy/sell BCH on coinbase as welleventually. |
|
|
|
If you look on the right, you'll see the estimated delay for each fee that you pay. Currently, I'm seeing that you can pay 20-60 satoshi/byte and still expect your transaction to confirm in about a day most of the time.
Thanks, I'll try that. There's no hurry to move this, so I can wait a day or so. |
|
|
|
I have about .03 of BTC in dust. It's from a cloud miner.
Sadly, not thinking it is all in an HD account that I set up, with a different derivation path than my primary BTC. I wanted to keep it separate so I could keep track of how much was mind. This means those small output's can't be combined with larger ones when other spends are done, to keep the size down. If I try to send it all to another address, I am told the fees would cost more than I'm sending by coinomi with a .002/kilobyte fee set. I even dropped the fee down to .0014 per 21.co's web site.
So, is there anything I can do to recover/use any amount of this stuff.
I think this is one of the big flaws of Bitcoin also. Is anything being done to address this issue... it really makes bitcoin very bad for micro payments.
So you are saying that you got required fee over 0.03 btc? Don't know how to help here but i'm just curious how many incoming transactions do you have? Feels like it was like thousands transactions from different faucets. The wallet just says "not enough to spend", doesn't tell me what fee it calculated. There 354 transactions in the address (not sure how many unspent outputs are in there currently I did roll some back in to buy more hash power)). The receives left are all less than .001 many of the newer ones less than .0001. As I said, they are from a cloud miner (genesis) with daily payouts. Of course, when I first got the contract the payouts were much bigger, but they got smaller and smaller as the difficulty raised and I didn't buy more hash power because I got more btc just from buying it directly. |
|
|
|
|
I have about .03 of BTC in dust. It's from a cloud miner.
Sadly, not thinking it is all in an HD account that I set up, with a different derivation path than my primary BTC. I wanted to keep it separate so I could keep track of how much was mind. This means those small output's can't be combined with larger ones when other spends are done, to keep the size down. If I try to send it all to another address, I am told the fees would cost more than I'm sending by coinomi with a .002/kilobyte fee set. I even dropped the fee down to .0014 per 21.co's web site.
So, is there anything I can do to recover/use any amount of this stuff.
I think this is one of the big flaws of Bitcoin also. Is anything being done to address this issue... it really makes bitcoin very bad for micro payments.
|
|
|
|
Its still not profitable for large mining operations unless price rises significantly and Bitmain still haven't mined Bitcoin cash.Looks like they are holding out for segwit2x.
New here. When will segwit2x be applied? To BCH? It won't ever. BCH is NoSeqwit8x. |
|
|
|
|
Since no one took up my WTS offer I sold my ICO purchase on bittrex, made some money.
I wish you all the best of luck... hopefully for you all this goes to the moon and I come to regret it.
|
|
|
|
You could temporarily install a wallet like vialectrum, create the wallet using your private key, send the coins, receive coins, then close down the program, delete it, delete the wallet.dat (possibly permamently erase it, if you know what I mean), and go about your merry way.
Yes, this will work. But what you want to do totally defeats the purpose of a paper wallet, which is to store keys that have never been on a connected PC. You should create your paper wallet on an air gapped Live CD distribution so you are 100% sure the keys have no way to see the light of day on line. Obviously a paper wallet is a better solution. But he seemed to be asking of a simple way (for someone used to the windows environment) to create a wallet. He didn't seem to be asking about the most secure way. Yea, I'm not saying what you said was wrong... but he's probably just as secure creating a viaelectrum portable on a thumb drive, use a strong password and store the seed somewhere off line and secure incase he loses the thumbdrive (wallet.dat). What do you think about storing your keys in a password manager like lastpass with 2FA? It's really strong encryption, and their entire system seems to be built very solidly. That's were I store all my seeds and passwords. I'm less paranoid than some though.  The nice thing about this is you can create one strong password, I use a 7 word diceware password as my master lastpass password. |
|
|
|
Just came in here to show off my avatar on point everyone to my signature!
Done. Now everyone go to Coinomi and request they add Viacoin to their wallet. (Which has shapshift built in) https://coinomi.com/AddingSupportForANewCurrency/Although, may be something the lead dev needs to do. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
