I may be misunderstanding your question, or you may be misunderstanding which wallets are segwit.  Addresses that start with bc1 are native segwit (p2wpkh,) and addresses that start with 3 are nested segwit (p2wpkh to p2sh.)  Both are cheaper on fees (by small margin) when spending, and both are fine to use.

Some web wallets, exchanges, and other services can't send to a native segwit (bc1) wallet, so if you use those services often you may want to use a nested segwit wallet (3) instead.  There's no limit as to how much you can send to, or spend from either type.

That issue has to be on Shopify's responsibility.  The only thing Ledger should be blamed for is the fact that they're still using Shopify.  They really need to work that shit out.  I have no reason to promote Amazon, but at least their service works and is secure.  Ledger needs to pull their products from Shopify, and pronto.

I wouldn't go so far as to call Ledger's products "crap" just because of a this marketing mishap.  I myself prefer the competitor's hardware wallet, but the Ledger is a decent product as well.

Neither am I, but I wouldn't kick you out of my bed for eating crackers. 


Confusion abounds.  But one thing is for sure; vaginas are nice.


I bet our members from Brazil can give you some pointers.


Damn, I've been saving up my sats all this time, and for what? 

It's been a long time since I've futzed with Exodus, but if I'm not mistaken it has a mnemonic seed back up.  You don't have to export individual private keys, you can use the Exodus seed phrase backup to import the entire wallet.  This will include your master private key, which is used to generate all associated addresses.

Once you've written down the seed phrase, in Electrum click on File>New/Restore, enter a name then click Next>standard wallet>I already have a seed.  Enter the seed phrase in the field provide, then click the Options button.  Select Bip39 seed.

---

Electrum and Exodus are only client software.  They just access the same information from the blockchain.  You can still make transactions in either, and they will both update once the information is sent to the blockchain.

Your ETH will continue to be accessible by Exodus.  You can import your ETH into other wallets the same way, with the same seed phrase...

Which brings me to something else:  Using a single seed phrase for multiple currencies isn't a very secure practice.  I recommend against it.  It provides more opportunities to have your seed compromised, which can jeopardies all your coins.

DireWoIfM14 attempted to scam me on Telegram a few months ago.  I told him that I needed more psilocybe cubensis if that was going to work.  He then blocked me and deleted our messages.  It was quite the religious experience.

You have one other option:

Use coin control, select to spend from the unconfirmed transaction, create another transaction with higher fees, and broadcast that.  Currently mempool is averaging about 110 sats per byte, if you set your child transaction to about 200 sats per byte you're looking at a fee of 0.000384.  That's about $18 USD at the moment.

Thanks for the puzzle Kroth.  This one is much harder, I must admit.  I'm up to nineteen usernames, and I found some that should be, lol.  I've had enough for tonight, I hope to find the last one tomorrow night.

Congrats on cracking the code, plen.  I guess it's going to come down who has the fastest connection and sets the highest fees, lol.  Good luck every one.

Yes, it's my opinion that he's high risk, and it's my opinion that he was clear about his request.  He posted in the lending board, not in the currency exchange board.  He asked to take a "'loan', if you can call it that," not a purchase with an optional full refund.  Which mean's he'll buy your bitcoin if the price goes up, but borrow it from you if the price goes down.  That's not a loan, that's a scam.

Feel free to disagree.

There are a few out there that will accept Credit Cards, but the legitimate ones will have daily limits, usually just a few hundred dollars.

The trouble is that most Fiat payment methods are reversible, so companies who accept these payments don't want to risk making large sales that could potentially be reversed.  That's why most legitimate exchanges insist on KYC.

Not to mention regulations pertaining to AML laws.

You many not have to transfer your bitcoin to Electrum.  If your current wallet is a web-wallet or a exchange wallet, then yes, you should transfer the money to your Electrum wallet.  But, if your currently using another desktop wallet you can just import your backup seed-phrase or the private keys into Electrum.  Doing so won't cost you anything in fees.

User scammed-by-nitro has earned himself a mention in this thread, and a tag-&-flag to go along with it.  His behavior suggests he's high risk for trading, and he's intent discrediting those making the lending board safe.  He's been trolling the lending board for a couple of weeks now.  The rampage started shortly after posting this gem of a loan request:


Essentially asking for someone to sell him BTC, with the option of returning it if the price goes down.  He practically says so himself by putting the word loan in quotes, adding "if you want to call it that way."  People tried to explain the flaws in his request, but narcissism can cause blindness.

Since then he's taken to trolling people who try to keep the Lending board safe from opportunistic wannabe scammers such as himself, a few examples:

---

Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2633

Okay, but please don't do this:




Maybe I'll try to emulate your exact random keystrokes?  I might be here for a minute or two.



Lol, I'm coming for your $4 in change.

Just kidding by the way, I'm not sweeping it.  I just wanted to see if I figured out the password.

I'm not an anarchist, but I'm fairly conservative and as such of course I condone privacy.  Especially privacy from the government.

I also condone exercising my 2nd amendment rights; I own firearms similar to ones that have been used for crimes.  Should I lose the right to keep those guns because of the acts of criminals?  I suspect you agree with me in this situation.  Wouldn't condoning one right that might be abused by criminals, and then opposing another in a similar category be somewhat hypocritical?

Regulation has taken control of the US dollar from those who possesses it and given it to those who trade it.  It's essentially created a RICO style monopoly on the value of USD.  Not only has our government done little to mitigate the problem, quite the opposite, the individuals in charge have profited from it.

There was a time, before WWII when personal income tax was considered unthinkable, immoral, and it's still unconstitutional.  The way they got around the constitution was by claiming it was supposed to be temporary, to help pay for the rebuilding of Europe and Japan.  Temporary turned into the America The World Police constantly running around the world involving themselves in one conflict after another.  Not because we believe we're morally superior, and rushing to support the little guy, it's because war is good business.

Now we live in a world were our privacy is a threat to taxing more of our money.  Kudos to ChipMixer for doing something about it.

No.  Electrum is a purely a light-client bitcoin wallet.  It supports the bitcoin blockchain and the Lightning Network only.

Vod is one of the most active members on the forum, has done amazing work to find and expose scammers, is considered one of the most honest and reputable members here.  He also has the support of some of the most honest and reputable members here.

Is he prone to mistakes?  Obviously, we all are.  We're all human.

Is this situation one of those mistakes?  In my opinion, yes.  I don't know why he left you that feedback, and I don't agree with it.

Am I going to exclude Vod from my trust list over this indiscretion?  Fuck no!

If it's between the blemish on your account and the vast amount of work Vod has done to protect this forum, I'll leave it to you to guess which way a logical person would choose.

---

Actually, it's this post that Vod points to as a reference, not the original post at the top or the thread itself.



Interesting construction of the link above.  You seem like a very experienced SMF user.



Butthurt causes people to grasp at straws.  A lot like this thread.

---

By the way did you take my advice that I left in the other thread:

That was an exciting finish, lots of back and forth.  On paper ManU should have dominated this game.  Goes to show there're no guarantees in the EPL.  I was rooting for WB because I had a small bet on them, but I would really like to see any team other than City take the league.

If it's such a profitable business, why is it for sale?

Regardless, unless you have collateral you won't get a loan here.  No one will give a complete stranger $15k without a guarantee that the money will be returned.  You should lock this thread and consider other options.

That's a pretty good return, and you know what they say; no riskit no biscuit.  They had been doing everything right up until the 44th minute, as long as they come out with the same energy in the second half I think they have a shot.

I took WB @ 3.10, and two minutes later Fernandez levels the score.  The way United is playing they're likely to give it up anyway.

How to get ManU to lose matches when they have a good shot at the league title?  Pit them against bottom dwellers.

ROFLMAO!  Sea, Aye ddn't need a singul trhead.