I was into dubstep before it was cool, and now I'm too old to be cool anyway.  I feel your pain.

Oh how I wish this were true.  Look at all these rabid Derek-Chauvinesque rentacops salivating at the prospect of tagging these four accounts.  Why?  Because they're ALTS of one another!  OHZNOZ!  ALTSZEZ!

Even though they've done nothing abusive and it's not against the rules to have alts, according one rentacop they need to show up to this thread and tell us why they shouldn't be tagged.  Sounds stupid, doesn't it?

This is the only reason I don't like to create generic seeds in Electrum.  Unless I'm going to use the seed solely for Electrum I prefer to have a Bip39 seed for hardware wallet compatibility.

I've used the Ian Coleman tool on an offline burner OS to generate 24-word Bip39 seed phrases.  To overcome the entropy limitations of a browser-based seed generator I use dev/urandom to generate a 256 character HEX string, and use the advance entropy settings.

That's all great advice, but I have a feeling this wallposting "newbie" has been around long enough to know better.   

You must be the one who has been bugging me on Telegram the last couple of days.

So, let me get this straight, you're offering to sell identification documents for people to use to create fake accounts, and you're offering to use documents as collateral for a loan?  How is anyone supposed to trust you for either scenario?

I too, trust the court system to figure it out, but the court doesn't get to choose whether they review the validity of an election.  It's up to the Attorney General to challenge the results, which never happened.  Why did that not happen?  Was William Barr not aware that the election seemed suspicious?  How would the media have reacted to such a challenge?  How would the country have reacted to such a challenge?  Would such a challenge cause more harm than good?  I don't blame Bill Barr for not challenging the results of the election, because with all the things going on at the time, I'm certain it would have hurt the country even more than the damage that has been done.  And, because this isn't about one man, and it most certainly isn't about one party.

But now here we are.  We know that a crime was perpetrated against the American People.  A treasonous crime.  Remember when that word was being thrown around willynilly by John Brennan, who should know the gravity of such a claim?  Perhaps he was intentionally calling anyone who disagreed with him a "traitor" specifically to minimize the value of such an allegation.  There are indeed traitors among us, they committed crimes, those crimes should be punished.

If those crimes are to be punished, the Attorney General of the United States must bring the charges.  What are the odds that Merrick Garland is actually gong to investigate this matter?


You must be confusing me with someone who's going to defend Swamp Rat Republicans, sorry you've got the wrong guy.

Like most of us, Trump was under the impression the institution of democracy in the US was insurmountable.  Little did he know that the Democrats hated him so much that they were willing to destroy the democratic sanctity of the United States to remove him from office.  They threw the proverbial baby out with the alleged bathwater.  It just goes to show how much value the Democrats attribute to real democracy.  It's nothing more than an obstacle on their path to absolute power.  Trump told us that was case, he often said that the Democrats and Media don't really care to destroy him, they want to destroy our liberty, independence, financial security, and our sovereignty.  He just happened to be in their way.



Exposing the crime is the first step to admitting that we have a problem, and the first step towards preventing it from happening again.  I don't plan to watch the movie, because I'm already pissed off and I already knew this was happening.  I knew it as soon as I saw the results of the 2020 election.  Trump got more votes than any other presidential candidate in the history of the United States, and somehow I'm supposed believe that BIDEN got more?  What a fucking joke!



Nor should they be, but the validity of our elections shouldn't be decided by biased, corporate media either.  Our ability to question the validity of elections shouldn't be squashed by big-tech or the media.

---

The hardest part about this is that we now have solid evidence that the United States is currently a bananas republic.  All the horrible things the Democrats and media told us about Trump were the things of which they were actually guilty:

Illegitimate president?  Remember that?
Russian Collusion?  Hunter's laptop should clear up who's been colluding with foreign powers.
Stolen election?  They failed to steal it in 2016, but not for lack of trying.
Nazi in the White House?  Lets not forget that the Nazis were socialists who limited gun-ownership and free speech.  Sound familiar?

If a Democrat opens his mouth to deride a conservative, you can rest assured it's to accuse that conservative (notice I didn't say Republican) of the very thing of which he, the Democrat is guilty.

And speaking of Republicans, where the fuck are they?

A movie by Dinesh D'Souza called 2000 Mules (2022) has just been released, and attempts to expose the concerted effort to thwart the 2020 presidential election.

I know this has been discussed here before, and all the power in the universe came down hard on all those promoting "conspiracy theories" about the validity of the 2020 election.  The real conspiracy was the effort by the media to marginalize anyone who sided with Trump as a conspiracy theorist.  The far-left leaning operatives of Democratic party colluded with the media to squash any attempt at rational discussion.  Any one questioning the validity of the election was written off as a right-wing nut-job conspiracy theorist, and subsequently ignored.  All the "Fact Checking" seemed to diminish the value of real, hard evidence that there was a criminal effort to steer the election away from Trump.

Now this move shows just how real the threat to our elections really is.  Not to fear, however, the misinformation machine is already in full swing with more "Fact Checking," excuse making, and deflection.  Just do a quick google search for "2000 Mules" and enjoy the hair-raising vacillations of leftist operatives.

So now, we have at least two verified methods used by the Media and the DNC to steal the 2020 election: The killing of the Laptop story in October 2020, and the far-reaching evidence of mass-voter fraud.  The Criminal Enterprise known as the Democratic Party needs to be stopped.

I have a feeling we'll soon be hearing about Georgia, Mariposa County, and Dominion Voting Machines again in the near future.  But, don't expect those headlines to trump the January 6^th "insurrection" as a "threat to our democracy."

Good catch, but I'm not sure what to do with this information just yet.  The site does appear shady, but I don't see any evidence that they've scammed anyone.  The plagiarism sure doesn't look good, though.  The user has been hear for 4.5 years so far, and nearly half of his posts have been deleted (presumably for spamming the link to the recovery site?)  It's definitely worth keeping an eye on this user, but I don't see enough evidence of wrongdoing to justify tagging him.

Making noise with a lawyer is good, if you can find the right cage to rattle.  If you're in the US you can file a complaint with the FBI's Internet Crimes division, as well as with the SEC.

Sent: https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/58944f253f738cc23d0b38dd3d18aa086a0698585b1b96277f51e52f1632a2fd

Hey, the amount is no problem.  But, I messed up.  I got a new phone not long ago, and a new PC at work last week, and neither have my wallets set up on them yet.  I won't be able to send the funds until this afternoon, around 4pm PDT (11pm GMT.)  If that's a problem, please feel free to keep the request open.

That's a good start.  How about all the past applicants who never wore the signature, but whom you've already tagged?  Do you plan on removing those tags?  That would be the right thing to do, in my opinion.

Unfortunately, Freewallet has been scamming people for years.  It's just a matter of time before they show up here assuring you that they're taking a look at your account, and to just be patient, but don't believe a word they say.

It's been two years since I made the list below, and as you can see they've been stringing many of these people along for longer than that. 

I can help if you still need this.  Post your address here or send me a PM.

I'm looking forward to Thursday's match.  Arsenal and Tottenham always make for a good game, but obviously this one has huge implications.  If the Gunners can take it away all the points, it's a done deal, they'll seal the fourth spot.  If not, it's going to be two nail biters to finish the season; Newcastle and Everton have been on hot streaks lately.

It's not quite official yet, not mathematically.  Arsenal and Tottenham both have 3 games left, so a 4 point lead isn't a guarantee.  At the very least they can't fall below fifth, but I'm hoping for them to finish third.

Patiently waiting for the highlights real, they only had the Everton game on here. 

@JollyGood, your response to dkbit98 is full of excuses and deflection, and doesn't really help your case.  We both know I've been critical of your reviews in the past, hell you booted me off of your trust list after I made some off-hand comment that was obviously sarcastic.  But despite my objections to your red-tagging of participants of the scam campaign, to this day I have not added you to my exclusion list for a reason: I mean it when I say that I believe your heart is in the right place.  So far I've been convinced that the good outweighs the bad (no pun intended.)


I'm sorry but I take objection to this attitude.  This is not the way DT should be conducting themselves.  It should not be the OP's obligation to "get positive feedback" to counteract an undeserved negative.  In fact, if the OP started obviously doing thing to gain positive feedback, he'd likely get tagged for farming trust.  The OP has not been a spammer, there's no indication he ever tried to scam anyone, and he certainly doesn't appear to be dangerous to deal with (which is the premise behind negative feedback.)  

As for his contributions (or alleged lack of,) they may not be to your standards, but he also doesn't appear to be shit-posting.  Regardless, lack of contribution is no justification for a red-tag.  You are abusing your power making these demands, just because the OP applied for a campaign which doesn't meet your approval.

Again, I think your tags for the participants the scam campaign are counterproductive.  They don't prevent the scammer from scamming, and only dilute the value of red tags.  They hurt the DT system more than they hurt the scammer.

Cristiano has been impressive, and I'm curious what he decides to do next year.  I'm sure he's not making a decision based on money, but after such an impressive return the Premier League it's hard to see him retiring.  I'm still hoping to see him come across the Atlantic and play in the MLS before he does retire.

Speaking of top scorers, Son's goal for Tottenham was a clinic in teamwork, positioning, and execution.  A thing of beauty.

Others had done it before, but certainly not to the extent that Peyton did.  He was essentially the QB and the Offensive Coordinator, which makes a lot of sense if you can get it done.  He's the guy living amongst the opposing defense, and his team mates.  No one has a better real-time perspective of the game.

Good, veteran QB's are often getting 3 or 4 plays in their ear, which they take to the huddle and then choose one from the line.  Peyton took the whole playbook into the huddle because he had it all memorized.