Well no, it does not vary. it is simple mathematics. The probability of a trading making a profitable trade goes down with his trading frequency. If you for example tried to catch every single dip and sell every single top just to make a tiny profit then you would still have a higher probability of making losses, not profits.

Lets say you would still be trading 18x a day. Thats 504x a month which equates to over 100% loss of your holdings if we go by a regular 0.2% trading fee. (This means: if you make no profits, you will have no money left after the last day of the month to trade).

So you have to make 3.6% a day to only even out the trading fee losses. Nobody is making 3.6%+ every day. I don't care how good you are.

Your logic of profit percentage as an exponential function hits a dead end at the unpredictable nature of the market.

The very implication behind the words "Putin must be stopped" would be a third world war. Now, he has proven that his army is nothing to be feared. But he still has nuclear weapons that can end all life on earth. Sanctions are taking their toll and this can be seen quite nicely as Ukraine pushes Russia back to where they came.

I doubt Russia will be able to continue for very long. If anything they are probably building up one last wave of attacks before they run out of steam.

At least that is what I hope.

Not really sure what this has anything to do with economics but I will try to give an answer anyway.

Theres a reason why Putin has been in hiding in his secret bunker or why he fired cooks or why he won't talk to anyone personally and when he does talk face to face with a select few people, then there is always a loooong table between him and whomever he is speaking to.

He does not trust anyone. Because he knows the amount of enemies he made in the world. I am sure his Generals want him dead too.

I think it is also important to set trading limits for your trading habits. The trading fees add up and people really don't understand this, they end up going back and forth 10x a day in trades. With a 0.2% trading fee, that would be 2% loss per day and 60% per month. For example, I do not trade more than once a day because of this. And to be honest, even once a day is too much as you lose 6% on fees in a month like that.

At that point it might be better to hodl.

I expect most of them buy weed and trade derivatives until their money is gone. Still a boost to the crypto economy if you ask me.

In the short term, the promotional marketing campaigns will get you an audience and even some nice leads. In the long term, the low RTP (Return To Player) is going to make a lot of people want to leave them for a competitor with better RTP.

So in the long term, it is not such a wise decision. Maybe the gambling casino is getting tired and wants a last hurrah before becoming nothing?

Red flag for Investors if yes.

Hmm... Well that does on one hand seem like a tactic I would use if I were to say, want to commit fraud to get my losings back. But maybe you are telling the truth and you really did ask them to ban you.

The question is, did you ask them to ban your IP? And did you go into the online gambling casino under a different IP?

Because if you answered yes to either of those questions then I doubt you will get your money back. However if you asked them to IP ban you and they did not do that, then you might have a case.

But I am not a lawyer. Get some legal advice if you really want.

The fact that most people can't get out of their safe space mentallity is because the world has become too warm and fuzzy for them and now every slight cool breeze of wind will make them whimper. A bit pathetic if you think about it.

Maybe it even adds on to the fact that lots of people are scared of anything new. This fear usually increases with age. It happens to everyone.

Bitcoin cannot be destroyed and is the future. No doubt about that. Some people just take a while to understand it.

I think you may have misunderstood the very point of Bitcoin. And that is to "Be Your Own Bank".

Fiat is the money 2.0 and Bitcoin is the money 3.0. Big update. Soon nobody will want to own Money 2.0 because Money 3.0 is better. So you see, Bitcoin banks are a bit of a bad idea because you are using the old system of trust rather the new system, which is to verify (not trust).

For the people who don't trust themselves with not giving away their seed phrase to every internet site that asks for it, I guess you could do KYC on a registered crypto-exchange like Binance and just leave your money in the hands of a third party - Which is a dumb thing, but you will be able to recover your funds when you inevitably lose your password. There is also Decentralized Finance you can use with other Blockchains.

You could put your trust into banks or you can put your trust into yourself. The best thing you can do for yourself is to think about investing more fiat into Bitcoin. Thats my subjective opinion though, I am no banker.  



Literally who? I have never heard of Satoshi Nakamoto referred to as Moses Goldman.

Well first of all, staking and investing do kind of go hand in hand.

You're just leveraging your investment instead of day trading or gambling it all away. But if something happens, you can't pull out of the staking deal. Imagine if your investment goes sour and its obviously time to leave the sinking ship - I would not say that such a risk is anywhere near worth a few measly percent "extra profit".

Although those risks go down with long established coins.

It somewhat sounds like to me that you are looking for investors first and foremost. Why would someone invest into the online gambling casino and then have to manage it? Are you planning on compensating the managing work with equity or cash? You might want to add a few more details on the casino, what has been done in the past, which results you have so far reached and who is working with you.

Unless you can provide more info, this does not sound like something which would interest investors very much...

That depends. If I had to identify myself give information about my Bitcoin purchases and transactions then that would be a bit of a downer. In some countries if you want to buy or sell a certain amount of Bitcoin, you need to provide identification and in some cases, they will even ask you where you got the fiat from to purchase Bitcoin. And when you finally get the governments "approval" to buy Bitcoin, your information will still be stored in some database. Bitcoin should not need and approval to buy or sell.

That does seem slightly impressive and I, as a Bitcoiner am always proud and happy to see Bitcoin being adopted more and more. However 250k people is not all that impressive. I do hope bigger countries start jumping on the Bitcoin bandwagon soon. Its obvious that Bitcoin will get adopted and turned into the world currency at some point. I just want that to happen sooner than later.

Small steps to world domination I guess

Tagoe can really hold his own, although I somehow doubt he won't fare well against someone like Ryan Garcia. So far, Tagoe has merely a single defeat under his belt. If he can keep that ferocity going, then as they say, sky is the limit. With any luck and a few well placed punches, he might actually win this fight. Just because odds are in Garcia's side of the ring does not mean we won't get surprised.

Garcia has the better odds no doubt.

You should be careful of accusing online gambling casinos of being scams. There are a lot of people who become frustrated and angry at the gambling websites when they hit a bad losing streak. Whether or not its a scam or this is just another newbie trying to vent their frustration after having bad luck needs to be determined. I think you need to provide us with more details. How many times did you bet and how many times did you win?

I can understand your concerns with what you are saying but would an open source code really be such a good idea? In fact, that might be bad opsec in of itself. I am no expert on code opsec but I think the better option would be to keep your code secret but always audited, if possible, by verified auditors for code.

At some point in the future, once they have gone through many audits and then they decide to show everyone the code, some single hacker could find a nice loophole in the code and that will be the end of whichever platform used that code.

He does not have to buy it, he is so smart he can develop a quantum computer in his room and use it to hack everyone's private keys after finding out their seed phrases and then, when nobody is left any Bitcoin and the miners stop mining for free, then and only then, will he be able to destroy Bitcoin.

However even such a case is a bit unprobable in terms of probabilities...

What he should do instead is focus all that energy into making more Bitcoin. Or at least working for fiat and then investing it into Bitcoin. Either way.

Unless your coin/token fails the howey test and classifies as a security, I am afraid you will need to register it in the countries that have IDO investors who wish to purchase your coins/tokens. As far as investors are concerned, you need to go after DeFI investors. Theres a bit of legal stuff involved but I have thousands of contacts to VCs and other institutional investors. I have worked with projects in the past and could be able to advise you  in exchange for some compensation.

Pm me if you want to talk.

Well don't dwell on it too much. This is just an expensive lecture from life. At least that is the way that I see it. I could have had so much money by now, had I only known to invest in apple or playstation or microsoft or Bitcoin or Ethereum or and so on and so on. See, you can't predict the future you can only get lucky. That is what investors are, most of the time. Lucky.

So if you look at it that way, there is no reason to cry over spilled coins.

I am just going by my own analysis of the probable outcomes and what reasons could be driving those probabilities. I am no statistical data scientist so I am probably way off when it comes to the odds. Its just that Donaire has been giving off an air of retirement/tiredness or something similiar. Maybe its just me that is getting that feeling but if there is one thing that is certain is that odds are in Inoue's favor, no matter how you look at it.

Inoue has proven that he is not a force to be trifled with all throughout his fighting history.

I don't mind being surprised by the opposite