i removed the video and must not comment more on this thread i have agreed a settlment with bitcasino.io they have agreed to pay 48 bitcoins (4 per week for 12 weeks) and i confirm i just received my first 4 bitcoins
please lock the thread
I completely don't understand the reason why you have to settle for nearly 1/3 of the winning amount when you have won 171 BTC by fair means. Another thought is that he might found a bug and the reward is 48 BTC... anyway, bitcasino should share an official statement of the big winning as many other casino do IMO
Yeah, this could be a possibility. But if this is not a bug, then Bitcasino is clearly unfair as they promised to pay only part of the winnings.
|
|
|
@maxreish Nice depiction But why is the Litecoin symbol added As far as I know, Roobet only supports Bitcoin and Ethereum.
|
|
|
Kickstarting with a 100x. Username: akhjob Multiplier: 100x Bet Id: 5f0473048967ad80b1bf6837 Bet Amount: 0.1
@Harkorede Don't forget to add a screenshot as requested in rules if you get a better odds.
|
|
|
Holy Shit! Congrats on your 5700x I can understand your anxiousness, but all you can do is wait for Bitcasino to accept your KYC and unlock your account. Let's hope that you get paid your winnings
|
|
|
I was unlucky the day before yesterday that's why I found only the small smiling Buddha in Lucky Dragons But yesterday was my lucky day. I guessed the correct slot, got Bronze in Roolympics Round 2 and made a nice profit in Roolette Thank you Hhampuz and Roobet. Keep the promos going
|
|
|
IMHO, I don't think that online gambling actually adds anything to the global economy apart from the fact that the regularised gambling sites and its users pay taxes. It even cuts shorts the manpower, building space, associated property/rental taxes etc needed for running a casino. It does more damage to the global economy if you ask me.
|
|
|
Nowadays most of the test matches can be boring and one-sided. Examples are the recent tours by South Africa to India, and the tour by Pakistan to Australia. And this is one of the reasons why I wanted two divisions in test cricket, with the strongest 5 teams in the first division and the other six teams in the second division. However, the ICC came up with the stupidest idea ever, and they included 9 teams in the first division.
It's true that the recent matches are one-sided and as suggested if we have like 2 divisions we'll have some good matches. But I don't think that will be practically acceptable one when deciding the Test Champion. When it comes to ODI, we have like 8 established cricket teams(IND, AUS, ENG, NZ, SA, PAK, SL, WI/BAN). So in order to decide the test champion, we can't just remove 3-4 teams from the list and ask them to play in the qualifiers to compete with the top teams for the Test championship.
|
|
|
Are you guys really interested in watching test matches without any spectators? Test matches with spectators themselves are boring sometimes which is why no spectators makes it even more boring in my opinion.
Generally, I don't bother about the audience I love to watch test matches with or without any spectators. I agree that its slow-paced but I don't think it's boring when played between equally matched teams. In T20, batsmen don't value their wicket, they just look at ways to hit the ball for runs. In Test cricket, batsmen actually value their wickets while trying to score runs and play as long as they can. A good ball deserves a leave and a bad one is punished to boundaries, you can see this in Tests. But in T20s, batsmen go after the bowlers all they have to worry about is runs. It is test format, and I am not expecting any miracles by the West Indians. Gone are the days, when they used to dominate this format. Now I would consider it a good performance by West Indies, if they somehow avoid a complete white-wash by the England team. BTW, I am very happy about Ben Stokes. He should be leading the team more often. He has got the right balance of aggression and deviousness.
I too am expecting a complete white-wash but I want to see some fight from the West Indies team. I want them to at least drag the game to the last day. If it was one-sided it can be boring.
|
|
|
@YOSHIE If you are expecting for a short-term price jump because of the halving event in August 2020, there is a good possibility. And you can reap some good returns if the price shoots up even for a few cents as the price is currently very low. But if you are expecting BCD to reach the ATH again, that's definitely not possible IMO.
|
|
|
I completely forget that we are going to witness the first international cricket match after the three-month lockdown in a few days. Even without Root, Bairstow, Moin Ali and Curran, England looks far better than the West Indies team. Hope WI give a good fight for us and we don't see a 3-day match instead of 5 days.
|
|
|
I sent the usdt from binance to cash app btc address
If I remember correctly, Binance switched from Omni-based addresses to ERC-20-based addresses for USDT last year and no longer support withdrawal of OMNI-based USDT. So you should have entered an Ethereum Address. Did you contact Binance support? Maybe they can help. If not, there is no way to recover it.
|
|
|
1. What is the value of Bitcoin Diamond in the future....! 2. Have you ever thought (BCD) of a promising cryptocurrency / investment in the future....!
History: BCD, in 2017 touched the price level: $ 99.37 USD, now the BCD price is very far from the current level: $ 0.736123 USD. So, what do you think, Bitcointalk's friends about Bitcoin Diamond (BCD), is it possible that BCD can go back to 2017 history, up......!
Bitcoin Diamond is a hard fork with a 10 times larger supply than Bitcoin, that itself is a definite no for me. Expect for a bigger block size like Bitcoin Cash, there is nothing to consider it as a promising cryptocurrency. And I don't think it to be a promising investment as well. As you have mentioned, the coin has dropped over 99% from the ATH. Such a coin doesn't deserve a consideration when they have nothing to offer and I don't think the price would get any better because of the so-called halving.
|
|
|
What merit amount is that? 4:20? I never saw something like that. Is this a bug?
I don't think this is a bug. Most probably he used the inspect element option of the browser and then change the text on the merit field as 4:20.
Also saving my 333 here archive
|
|
|
|