Scratch offs were the form of instant lottery of the pre-internet era. Today you can still find some, but with the variety of instant bets available on cell phones, they have lost their meaning. I remember hearing at the time that due to the immediacy they had a higher risk of leading to addictive behaviors than regular lottery tickets but now the risk has moved to mobile.

I remember that when the site adopted the token the general comment in the forum was that in addition to the benefits that the site gave you it would help the token to appreciate in value. Even I who am not a shitcoins person bought some tokens, but I soon sold them because the price behavior was always worse than that of the Bitcoin.

The bottom is 0, as it usually happens with shitcoins.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/funtoken/

If you look at the all-time graph there you will see what the trend is, and it is getting closer and closer to 0. It only had two spikes, at the beginning, as it usually happens with shitcoins, and when freebitco.in announced it was adopting it. Then the trend has been downward. And the only thing that saves it is because it gives some benefits in the site.

Do you follow the price at all? For starters we are in a clear bull run for some time now, and the $70K was exceeded, reaching $73K, but what is relevant right now is that there has been the typical dip in which many retail investors who have bought at the top are going to be fleeced while the whales take the opportunity to collect profits, as they prepare for the next rally.

Well, but within the many types of pensions there is room for it. There are pension funds by expected retirement age, and for those who are going to retire in 20 years, for example, it has a place in the mix. Traditionally for people nearing retirement they held more potentially volatile assets, such as stocks, and as retirement age approached they increased the percentage of safer assets, such as bonds. It's just a matter of getting Bitcoin into the volatile asset mix. Even pension funds that are not governed by an expected retirement age for their participants have a place in small amounts.

I'm glad you think so because you have to be a fucking retard to gamble your life savings on a single bet. It breaks all the principles of good gambling. While he's at it he could play Russian roulette, he only has 1/6 odds of blowing his brains out and he can get much more than double what he bet, depending on the odds he wants to give him who he bets against, but like 4 or 4.5 times what he bets.

Personally when I play poker I tend to play predetermined sessions, for example one hour long, and I tend to finish the hour whether I am winning or losing. This is what is usually recommended. The exceptions may be that after a while of playing you feel tired or something, and you see that it is affecting your game, then it is better to stop. The same if you see that you are losing a lot in a short time and it starts to affect you (this should not be so for a good poker player but if you come from a bad streak in previous sessions, sit back and see that you are still losing everything sometimes is inevitable that affects you). In this case it is better to do short sessions, even if it is less than what you have planned, if you see that it is going to affect you and dedicate more time to review the game or study.

Not exactly, but similar in my case. I will make small "exits" or sales of parts of my holdings.


This is not the case. What has turned out to be "anomalous" is the pattern, which is a creation of our mind, projected on the price evolution of previous cycles. There is nothing anomalous about price behavior, it is our conceptualization of regularities.

Look at the following series of numbers:

1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,

How would you continue it?

The simplest answer is that the next 4 numbers are 1,2,3,4, and so on, ad infinitum, then if you see that the next 4 are, for example 7,8,3,2 you would say that there is an anomaly. But if the long term series is as follows, would you say that it is an anomaly as well or a regularity?

1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,7,8,3,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,7,8,3,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,7,8,3,2

I could give you countless examples like this.

I on this agree with the majority that there is nothing "bad" about his behavior and the OP himself claims that perhaps it is not the best word due to the fact that he is not a native English speaker. And the other thing I also agree on is that if the contest has been unsuccessful the OP should reflect on what he has done wrong and not blame the others, more so when most of the responses in this thread are along those lines.

My analysis is that people tend to confuse the difference between a series of events and individual events. The probability of coming out 10 times in a row red in roulette is tiny, but if it has come out 9 times red, in the next spin the probability is still about 50% (actually a little less, depending on the type of roulette). You don't bet on what happens in a series, you bet on what happens in an individual spin, hence the confusion.

No one has left a red tag in the OP's profile? Or even a neutral tag? I just saw this thread and my tagging agressivity went through the roof. I'm going to hold back for now but it has all the components of being a crude scam attempt, the title, the presentation and the responses of someone who gets very angry when he doesn't hear what he wants.

Besides, what kind of online business is offline?

The price dropped to approximately $5K at that time. Seeing that it's at $72K it's about a 1400% return in 4 years, not bad. For comparison, we can note that the S&P 500 had a return of 125% in the same period, which is not bad but far from the Bitcoin return.

This end of cycle can make us optimistic after the disappointing mid-cycle returns.

I just don't buy your analogy. The correct analogy is people shooting in the desert where there is no one and after 14 years you come to tell us that there is a danger of someone getting killed.

On the contrary, they are making a lot of sense now. Big business in the 21st century, unlike the 20th, has been done on the internet, and the capitalization of Bitcoin goes in line with that. The value of the 21st century is primarily digital. Think, for example, that states are planning CBDCs to convert money to digital.


Gold would be the last, the next thing to beat in capitalization would be Google.

This is similar to other types of promotions given to people at the casino for betting a lot or discounts given by a business to customers for spending a lot. As the business earns more, it offers a bigger discount. I would like to know if those who bet on this type of slots and get to increase the RTP notice anything, because even if it increases 2%, as it is after many spins and there is always a statistical variability I think it will be little noticeable, unless the person is autosuggested.

As I see it you expect to raise $500 if you sell all the tickets and pay out $400 in prizes. If you give away some tickets the profit is reduced. I guess you are just starting out because such a low prize is not likely to attract a lot of customers. People go crazy the bigger the potential prize, even if the probability of winning is much smaller.

What system do you use to make the draw?

I guess the OP is looking for the posts where he posted them, and that's why he doesn't see them, since they have been moved, as Cyrus has said. But when they are moved there is a link on the boards that takes you to them. The other possibility would be that the boards where they have been moved he has them on ignore, although I don't think so because he is a newbie and I don't think he would have just registered to ignore boards.

Look, I'm going to explain it to you so that someone who has the intelligence of an orangutan, like you, can understand it.

If you really think that what I write are low quality posts just report them and the moderators will delete them, according to rule 1:

Are you broken by a member of a forum that has not been active since you registered? It has happened to o_e_l_e_o what is going to happen to all of us, that's life. I agree with the other members who have expressed that you should lock this thread, otherwise you are going to earn dislikes from a few that this thread is nothing more than an attempt at merit fishing.

You are putting the spotlight where you shouldn't be putting it and in this I agree with Outhue.


Although I would express it differently. Agbamoni and Oshosondy have broken the first rule of the good gambler: gamble with money that you don't need, that you can afford to lose. If the possible outcome of the game is making you nervous to the point of rushing to cash out, it is an amount of money that is important to you, and therefore you are not respecting that rule.