yep and fyi windows 64bit unzipper works just fine to unzip files over 4 gb, now older 32 bit unzippers wont  still client just sits there and cpu load is 0 with the app running.. I just cant win Icon Win64 unzipper SEEMS like it works fine, but I'm telling you, it doesn't. You need to use 7zip (or something else). |
|
|
|
...we are not suckpuppet...
lol suckpuppets |
|
|
|
lol graphene toolkit  Couldn't have come up with a better name for something that is all hype and no substance (or I guess one atomic layer of substance that has no real world applications). |
|
|
|
Its quicker and easier to create a new coin because of the ownership and licensing issues with monocle, also who knows what state the blockchain is in and we don't need someone dumping massive amounts from the old blockchain. Couldn't have said it better myself. Monocle isn't really *ours* to develop. Not *ours* to develop, but *ours* to host a website for? http://monocle.vertcoin.org/Also, on the github page it is licensed MIT, and just says "Copyright (c) 2009-2013 Bitcoin Developers Copyright (c) 2014 Monocle Developers". https://github.com/monocle-project/monocle-legacyMaybe you can just ask erkmos if he will transfer the copyright? Even if not, IANAL, but I don't think the copyright would apply to anything really besides the logo, since the code is MIT licensed. Isn't someone dumping massive amounts kind of the whole idea of price elasticity? I think implementing this trial on something where there's already some very large holders, which is much more akin to what it would be like implementing it for vert, makes more sense than starting with a fresh coin, not less. I do have a bunch of MON, but really, that isn't why I'm campaigning for it, I just think it would make a much better test case than starting something from scratch (unless you're gonna have a massive premine on the hypothetical fresh test coin that you hand out to a few people or something). |
|
|
|
bigger letters, because obviously, its fuckin hard to scroll 3 messages up before posting your shit |
|
|
|
Not a huge surprise, imo, SISAR. A couple of months ago when the Unity project was announced, there was a decent pump, and now it seems like "lite" versions that might run on Android or iOS are getting closer to reality, so some price rise is to be expected, I think. |
|
|
|
anyway, what is so great about monero?
monero might be anoymous than bitcoin but bitcoin with a litte mixing is already anoymous enought
there is no need for another coin
the blackmaket will never adopt monero, because bitcoin has value and monero does not
You still here? I've arrived at the conclusion that senorkavasaki is reverse-trolling. Every good anything needs some troll(s), and lately the Monero threads have been somewhat devoid of trolling - no Blockafett, no BitcoinEXpress, etc. I'm pretty sure he used to be a supporter, so I think kavasaki is just doing his part by fulfilling (what he feels is) the necessary role of community troll that is a vital part of any thriving cryptocurrency community. |
|
|
|
the slowest (fairest) emission schedule of all cryptonote coins
Quazarcoin is even slower but the idea that slowest=fairest is kind of silly considering that someone could just create another one that is even slower than Quazarcoin. Where does it end? True but would you concede the point that slow er = fair er to later adopters? (Or better still smoother = fairer  ) All's fair in love and crypto. Seriously though, I wish someone would fork duckdarkdigitalnote and change the emission curve to be 50 years instead of 50 days, and call it an experiment in authoritarianism (since dNote loves to say that his super fast emission curve is somehow related to an experiment in libertarianism). |
|
|
|
|
Maybe just PM iGotSpots. That dude has made like 500 scamPoS coins.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I didn't really want to download the wallet...
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a way to see how many masternodes are running, and on what IP addresses? Curious to see if there's more than like 10
|
|
|
|
I tested that AMD GPU miner,.. the hash rate is faster, butttt almost no accepted shares. I get more shares with minergate, and that results in more coins in 1 hour. At minergate i use my CPU only, its still not possible for me to use the program for GPU. I prefer more shares/coins then a higher hash  I would test a different pool than minergate with the Claymore miner. There are several others listed in the first post of this thread. Minergate uses closed source pool software, so maybe it doesn't play nicely with Claymore miner... |
|
|
|
Wait, is this a new XDN?
He just likes to keep changing the name. Duck, dark, digital... Maybe next is Dicknote? Dollarnote? Dognote? Dsharpnote? |
|
|
|
* jwinterm not sure what's happening... Need to get XDN on some other exchange(s). I'm not using polo anymore since verification thing, and wouldn't trust hitbtc with more than a dollar or two  Not trying to pry into your affairs, but what is your hinderance of using polo because of verification? For level 1 verification, all they require is a First and Last name and the country of residence. This isnt really verification as they dont really verify anything at all. Level one allows full exchange and margin trading and a daily 2k USD withdraw limit. I dunno, more just the principle of it. It left a bad taste in my mouth how they sprung it on everyone with 48 hours notice. Also, I've heard anecdotally that if you use a blatantly false name (Bugs Bunny or something), then they will lock your account, so I guess they verify something. |
|
|
|
* jwinterm not sure what's happening... Need to get XDN on some other exchange(s). I'm not using polo anymore since verification thing, and wouldn't trust hitbtc with more than a dollar or two |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
