Wolf0 (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
|
|
May 30, 2014, 10:25:29 PM Last edit: October 16, 2018, 03:14:19 AM by Wolf0 |
|
NaN.
|
|
|
|
QuadraQ
|
|
May 30, 2014, 11:46:13 PM |
|
I can confirm there is indeed a speed improvement. Tested on one machine with an Intel i5 2320 running Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit.
Using Lucas build: 76-88 H/s averaging about 79/80 Wolf 5/29 build: 90-99 H/s averaging about 93/94 Wolf 5/30 build: 87-96 H/s averaging about 91/92
|
|
|
|
followtheboss
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:27:03 AM |
|
Hello, thx for your miner working nice on my i3 4130 on win8 64bit i go from 65 h/s to 80h/s it's about +20% I like it cheers
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 31, 2014, 10:54:47 AM |
|
Build from 30.05 seems to be as fast as 29-05. Maybe slightly faster. but the diff is small, like 47 per thread to 47.5 on i5-2500
|
|
|
|
aikklond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 31, 2014, 01:06:19 PM |
|
How can I set thread count?
on A8-5600 it starts 3 threads and I get a total of 42 H/s (approx 14 per thread)
|
|
|
|
tequillaquagga
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 31, 2014, 02:28:04 PM |
|
Who can successfully build on OSX? I got: ./configure: line 5666: syntax error near unexpected token `,' ./configure: line 5666: `LIBCURL_CHECK_CONFIG(, 7.15.2, ,'
when running configure
|
The Camel Marches On
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 31, 2014, 03:06:37 PM |
|
So I can just type this in terminal and it'll update? cd ~/ && rm -rf cpuminer && mkdir cpuminer && cd cpuminer && git clone http://github.com/wolf9466/cpuminer-multi.git && pushd cpuminer-multi && cd ~/cpuminer/cpuminer-multi && ./autogen.sh && export CFLAGS="-march=native" && ./configure && make && unset CLFAGS && popd
|
|
|
|
Ed4252
|
|
May 31, 2014, 04:39:56 PM |
|
got a cpuminer solution for 32 bit comp?
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 31, 2014, 04:54:50 PM |
|
How can I set thread count?
on A8-5600 it starts 3 threads and I get a total of 42 H/s (approx 14 per thread)
At least for Intel CPUs, running (cores -1) threads gives best speed Otherwise with -t x, as in most cpu miners
|
|
|
|
Kyune
|
|
May 31, 2014, 04:55:05 PM |
|
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then? I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get: [2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0 [2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm. Illegal instruction (core dumped)
upon starting up the miner.
|
BTC: 1K4VpdQXQhgmTmq68rbWhybvoRcyNHKyVP
|
|
|
fusecavator
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:39:07 PM |
|
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then? I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get: [2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0 [2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm. Illegal instruction (core dumped)
upon starting up the miner. That error is probably indicating that it is still trying to use AES-NI. Code changes might be required. I'm not getting anywhere near the speed improvement wolf claims, but it is an improvement.
|
|
|
|
dewdeded
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
|
|
May 31, 2014, 06:48:04 PM |
|
got a cpuminer solution for 32 bit comp?
CryptoNight the PoW-algo is announced as 64-bit only. Maybe someone more knowledge than me, will tell you, if this true and gonna stay way (or 32-bit CryptoNight miners are possible with dirty hack or something).
|
|
|
|
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
|
|
May 31, 2014, 06:59:48 PM |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
|
BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
|
|
|
MadGhost
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
|
|
May 31, 2014, 07:01:46 PM |
|
Thanks for the miner . I will try it and post my results .
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 31, 2014, 07:02:28 PM |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
'let your freak flag fly'? i.e. be cool, don't let other people tell you how to live, and do your own thing
|
|
|
|
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1011
Reverse engineer from time to time
|
|
May 31, 2014, 07:05:02 PM |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
'let your freak flag fly'? i.e. be cool, don't let other people tell you how to live, and do your own thing Hey look, if he's trying to imply he is homosexual, I am fine with that, but those images weren't really necessary for the miner screenshots.
|
BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
May 31, 2014, 07:08:58 PM Last edit: May 31, 2014, 11:29:52 PM by vokain |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
'let your freak flag fly'? i.e. be cool, don't let other people tell you how to live, and do your own thing Hey look, if he's trying to imply he is homosexual, I am fine with that, but those images weren't really necessary for the miner screenshots. yeah I do have to agree, nah they weren't necessary but like you kinda said, I'm fine with self-expression, and I might argue that that is more right than not expressing oneself
|
|
|
|
QuadraQ
|
|
May 31, 2014, 09:00:20 PM |
|
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
June 01, 2014, 01:08:52 AM |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s
|
|
|
|
Kyune
|
|
June 01, 2014, 05:19:15 AM |
|
Win64 binaries exist but require AES-NI.
If I compile from source should I be able to run it on a processor without AES-NI then? I compiled it successfully in an Virtualbox Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine (on a Win 7 host without AES-NI), but get: [2014-05-31 09:46:38] Using JSON-RPC 2.0 [2014-05-31 09:46:38] 2 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm. Illegal instruction (core dumped)
upon starting up the miner. Configure with --disable-aes-ni Thank you. That worked. Without AES-NI available to me on this machine, I get a slower hash rate with your miner compared to the Lucas Jones miner. I'm sure this comes as no surprise, since you have been optimizing for AES-NI. Inside my virtual machine, per core, I get about 11 H/s with yours, and about 18.5 H/s with Lucas Jones.
|
BTC: 1K4VpdQXQhgmTmq68rbWhybvoRcyNHKyVP
|
|
|
|