It's not that easy for everyone to become a scammer. You have to be a sociopath, you need a certain skillset (to be able to tell people what they want to hear), and it carries certain risks - such as prison. Homero might have had some cash (probably not bitcoins though, remember he was a shitcoiner and there was bear market in 2015) hidden somewhere with family members and used it to start this new scam. But - as I said before - if he had e.g. 100 bitcoins why would he bother scamming again. I'm guessing he didn't have much of a stash.

LOL... no.

Model 3 reservation holders got thoroughly fucked on their $35k price. The reservation was $1000 and it didn't matter anyway. Tesla was horribly late, then started selling fully loaded trims first. By the time they got to sell their cheapest trim (which was still more than $35k), their vehicles were no longer eligible for the federal tax credit that was a big part of their sales pitch at the time of reservation.

CT buyers will be fucked much worse. Although they might enjoy it.

Homero is still as illiterate as ever. United "State" of America LOL

And yes, they're larger than Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile in case you didn't know.

According to the Texas taxable entity search the HXO business no longer exists:



The explanation for "franchise tax ended" is:

The entity's franchise tax responsibilities ended because the entity has ceased to exist in its state or country of formation or has ceased doing business in Texas.

I don't recall if it was still active a few days ago when it was first mentioned in this thread. I like the idea that Homero is in full panic mode and closing down his shell companies

I think Philly needs to graded on a curve here. Merely smashing store windows can't count as a riot there, nobody would even notice it.

How's that going to work? I mean niners vs iggles.

Anyway, I think niners will finally collapse this week (sorry Dire), Bengals will crush KC (who already seem to be looking for excuses - Mahomes injury etc), and after the SB there will be a riot in Philly either way.

Based on archive.org, the nomadinternet.com site exists since 2001, was dead from ~2008 and the supposed ownership change probably happened in ~ April of 2020 when the site design changed to the Homero style, which also coincides with his release from prison.

Not sure about the BTC stash. Obviously with the run up to $60k+ he would have needed only a few coins for some fancy cars etc. On the other hand, this nomad scam is likely very profitable in the short term. He's charging $100+ per month for something that costs him likely less than $40 and aside from the website and a few paid articles and probably some ads there doesn't seem to be any significant expense... so it's like $50 pure profit per "customer" per month. If he's got at least 1000 suckers (judging by the number of reviews - quite possible) he can live quite lavishly until the feds come knocking again.

Ok, so if this can't harm your reputation then why can't you ignore it?

You won't be able to prove a negative anyway (that the TG chat didn't exist, or that you didn't send a message to the client). It's your word against Royse's, and since he's the one making the claim (about you messaging the client) then he should prove it. That's what I would state, perhaps without excessive name calling, and leave it at that. Anyone who can do 2+2 would see this situation for what it is. Opening new threads - like you did with the unsubstantiated forgery accusation - doesn't help you at all. You should have considered other possibilities (e.g. someone pretending to be a potential client to screw with Royse777) before assuming that Royse777 made it up and trying to fit the evidence to your preconceived conclusion.

Just be careful and don't end up with your "research" like these muppets, who also believed their glorious leader Putin and the holy GRU:

whataboutwhataboutwhataboutwhatbout

But ok, let's play your little silly game.

Did Moscow not have "air defense systems" until now? And the best they can do is lift a vehicle-based SAM on top of a building?

I can stop laughing just thinking about the logistics of it... missiles, crew, fuel, etc. I'm guessing someone at the MOD was tasked to "protect the Kremlin from Ukrainian drones" and just went for the галочка, not too concerned with how things actually work.

Was putting up a SAM on the roof of the Russian MOD building one of the goals?

I think it shows only reviews for your country/language. So they might have bought some fake reviews from that guy in Rwanda or whatever, which don't show up by default.

It redirects me to the main site. Have I been banned already?!@?!?

One can stand their ground and not stoop to the level of grotesque mud-slinging this is turning into. Let's say Royse777 lied, PP can add this statement to the OP and not add more negative ratings. I don't expect de-escalation any time soon but I think by now it's quite clear where the sides stand in this debacle and I doubt anyone's opinion will be significantly affected if one of them stops counterpunching.

That's a good excuse to wrap up the whole "special operation". We don't want Ukraine anymore, it's bombed to shit and in debt, let's go home. Can you pass this idea to Putin? Thanks.

Royse777 (can we skip the childish name mangling) posted telegram screenshots of a potential client telling him (Royse777) that they (the potential client) received a message from you. I don't know if the alleged message was telling them not to do business with Royse777 nor did they say it was a PM, and my statement is mostly hypothetical anyway. If you're saying you didn't send the message then one of you three is lying (you, Royse777, or the client) but honestly I couldn't care less at this point. Can you be the adult in this drama and step back? Someone should, might as well be you.

It's not like you've ever lied so it must be true.

I'm hearing the weather's gonna be... uhm... fun. Nothing that can't be fixed with copious amounts of beverages though.

If the trust rating indicates PP's poor judgement then exclusion is the way to deal with it. But I don't think it's abuse of the trust system, i.e. it doesn't really break any trust system rules or guidelines as far as I can see. Negative trust is for high risk, and PP stated as much in the feedback, and also created a thread to substantiate the claim (again, if you disagree with the facts/opinions/conclusions presented - that's a valid concern but I wouldn't call it abuse).

As I said in the other thread, I think contacting Royse777's clients is not cool, but as far as trust system is concerned, I wouldn't call it abuse unless PP said something like "if you do business with Royse777 I'll red-trust you".

I hope this is the last thread in the drama.

I don't think it's abuse. Now that it's been properly referenced I don't see any problem with it.


It's not a self-mod thread, so how could he possibly expect it to be one-sided? Makes no sense. As evidenced by you being able to post your side of the story, which TBH you could have made less petty but that's your choice.