Users are entitled to their opinions aren't they? I mean within reason.
This is the problem. Example: College dropouts that think they are smarter than the world supermajority consensus of scientists on a certain matter, thus the defence boils down to "BUT I AM ENTITLED TO MY OPINION". The proper answer would be not to ignore, and not to accept their entitlement but to call them out for what they are: Ignorant and uneducated baboons. We found ourselves in a crisis, and it is in such crises that fake news and false opinions must not be accepted for the sake of everyone else! I'm not sure why everyone is attacking each other these days.
Discussions on issues are also being avoided, privately and publicly (whilst publicly stating that opinions can be changed or that consensus matters on some of these issues). It is a sad state of affairs. |
|
|
|
San Marino is health hell on earth.
More deaths with a population of 30000 than India with over a billion. For India to have the same in % terms it would mean almost a million death (854 089). Whatever you do, dont get sick in San Marino.
You are the literal definition of an idiot. Are you aware of this? Yeah, lets go bananas over a banana.  This forum has some very bad policies for certain things unfortunately. This corona stuff is proving it all over again. |
|
|
|
I've canceled the domain. That means someone else can now register it.
Great! I will not request mine to be taken down I like it. Good  It expires in August though. Welp, maybe peloso and the other Turkish baboons can pay for its renewal and any other associated costs.  |
|
|
|
Yes BPIP is effectively a surveillance as you put it, but I don't believe it should be shut down because of that. It usefully surveils the judgement of those who are default trust (in a position of power, as well as others), as opposed to surveillance state traditionally surveilling a large number of the population somewhat indiscriminately.
BPIP is a general surveillance tool not targeting anyone in particular. This is different. A surveillance state is a country where the government engages in pervasive surveillance of large numbers of its citizens and visitors. Not forgetting that Loyce isn't a country and BPIP isn't the government. Surveillance tool what be a better way to describe your argument  A better argument in my opinion is that it could arguably be in breach of cyber-bullying laws in certain countries, due to it's specific nature. Interesting discussion though Loyce is Switzerland, and I called him that first, therefore a country and therefore has a government. I demand that this definition is correct! |
|
|
|
That's a fair opinion, hence me suggesting it stays, to see what other users thought. To me, this is public data (taken from DT1 changes log right, more or less?) Therefore, I'd argue anyone is welcome to "re-format" this publicly accessible data and present as they please. Similar to how LoyceV is welcome to remove/keep it based on Timelord's wishes if he pleases, regardless of other users desire for it to remain. Kind of like when I did your trust statistics, no permission required for use of publicly accessible data. It is public data, data that most users will not be able to find or properly assess on their own. The website is not public data, it is targeted surveillance (be it for a joke or whatever else). I think it would be most fair for OP to shut down if a user requests it. On that note, I will not request mine to be taken down I like it. |
|
|
|
Then I think you have two issues.  Please delete the website thank you. Please don't loyce, I think it's still useful to others. (When working)Is that alright I wonder? I am fine with mine, but if somebody explicitly asks you not to do it for them and you still insist? Surveillance state? Note, I am not a fan of this mr. Timelord and think he is mentally sick at this point but I am not sure whether it is sensible to reject his request. |
|
|
|
Would that be considered as established altcoin?
There are maybe a maximum of 5 coins out of several thousand coins that you could consider anything worthwhile. The answer is no. Stop promoting scams and condoning people getting scammed by fraudulent market-cap nonsense. |
|
|
|
I left a neutral as a warning to readers in the thread. It's not entirely clear whether all/most of the other accounts also belong to kotwica666, or if Malubit purchased a few accounts. It's also unclear as to whether or not Malubit hired the "shilling service" knowing what they were signing up for, or if kotwica666 offered some sort of general advertising package that included positive PR or something not explicitly shilling. Without more information, I don't think a negative is necessarily deserved. That makes sense then. I will not do anything to that account either. What about the flags? This kind of shilling, similar to ICO bumping, is fraudulent and worthy of a low level flag, no? I have left it only to those 2. |
|
|
|
ETH is a shitcoin, TRX is a scam. What the hell are you on about? Just because you are bagholding or buying into the lies of the Asian scammers[1], that does not make any of those projects less fraudulent.
I ain't holding any of them, just Bitcoin. Left the altcoin game a long time ago Great. Then take this as a lesson (without an actual explanation) and do not suggest these things anymore so we can avoid other people from getting scammed! |
|
|
|
I hope whoever is controlling the fake newbie accounts will stop posting in your thread. Thank you.
There is nothing to hope. Either they are in on it, or they condone it. There is no other option. This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (1 post by 1 user deleted.)
Were they not in on it and were they not condoning the behaviour, they could have asked on your request.
Flag time? |
|
|
|
I reckon the core alts such as ETH, TRX and LTC should be fine, and not the ones piggybacking off their blockchains.
ETH is a shitcoin, TRX is a scam. What the hell are you on about? Just because you are bagholding or buying into the lies of the Asian scammers[1], that does not make any of those projects less fraudulent. @LoyceV what do you mean by established shitcoins? Top 10 CMC: 2) ethereum - shitcoin for smart scams 3) XRP - bank shitcoin 4) Tether -  5) Bitcoin Cash - Roger said it is trash 6) Bitcoin scam vision - faketoshi's scam 7) Litecoin - copy 8 ) EOS - centralized garbage 9) BNB - (insert any other exchange I want to make monez) shitcoin 10) tezos - another smart contract shitcoin IOTA.
Money with kill switch Speaking from a market cap - security perspective, it is as much of a scam like anything else. I like Dogecoin, but this is a fact. The answer is no.
Much wow, such coin. Meme coin. Only doge giveaway should be allowed here. Exactly. Mr. Switzerland's knowledge on these matters has always been rather minor, he knows it and I know it from our past. Time to lock this and move on.
[1] Before stupid people call racism, look who is behind TRX. |
|
|
|
This is a bad idea. There is no empirical guideline on established altcoins. What you likely consider established are very likely technological scams, e.g. EOS, IOTA. So: shouldn't for instance a 40,000 Dogecoin giveaway be allowed too?
Speaking from a market cap - security perspective, it is as much of a scam like anything else. I like Dogecoin, but this is a fact. The answer is no. Imagine the outcry and rivers of red trust if someone were to run e.g. a BSV giveaway. I mean it's established isn't it...
Correct, a established scam just like the previous 3 mentioned. |
|
|
|
making flags with you is a bad idea given your dead reputation even scams so your flags (as your means ) is nothing let another member create flag Ok boomer. |
|
|
|
No you can't ban as long as its completely against forum rules.
You are an idiot. Theymos can ban you for being an idiot completely arbitrarily, at any time. Actually, you do not even have to be an idiot. He can ban you for the sake of banning you. Rules are irrelevant. You are a idiot no more no less Stop copying me. |
|
|
|
This is a public private forum and you can't can just ban them from posting about Covid-19.
FTFY. How many accounts are you spamming with making it worth to spread lies like this? |
|
|
|
We need to stay united during this crisis; therre is not need to rant about racism now.
Liberals and their racism bullshit is unbelievable. If they can't stop ranting about it during a pandemic, there is something very messed up with their brains. They’re liberals. They think the government is better suited to handle their money then they are but do nothing but complain about the government. Obviously there is something wrong with their brains... Pretty sure Ibian is not a liberal. You can hold liberal beliefs without completely being liberal. Ibian and his likes are on the low scale of evolution. The focus should be on safety and finding cures, and not whether somebody was mean to some other race.  |
|
|
|
We need to stay united during this crisis; therre is not need to rant about racism now.
Liberals and their racism bullshit is unbelievable. If they can't stop ranting about it during a pandemic, there is something very messed up with their brains. |
|
|
|
There are 14 topics in "Bitcoin discussion" 17 in "Economics"
Pretty boring, it's so repetitive, worse than when the Merits system was added.
They're turning the boards to "Epidemiology discussions". While it can have relations with the worldwide economy etc I don't see the need to create endless numbers of topics with COVID-19, at least it's better to have only 1 topic about it and we can all discuss in. The forum is being COVIDed
Merge all topics in 1 or trash all the latest to keep 1...
don't know
The reason is simple and obvious. Most of those people do not care about discussing the actual subject. It is merit farming and sig. campaign spam. |
|
|
|
Or even create a temporary COVID-19 sub section & all the crap can go in there. I love bitcoin, it’s made my life. I’m very passionate about it & this forum. It’s upsetting to see all the crap spewed all over Bitcoin Discussion (which incidentally, is supposed to be the most important & informative part of this place).
Why is very often the proposed solution to a problem here indulge the offenders? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
