He'll not reveal his ID forever, there's just a too much complicated upcoming problem he's going to face if he just simply reveals his true identity and such a bad and not wise move for someone who holds so many coins.
Well, someone even considers that satoshi already dead but who knows, every year, there's always someone claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto but can't prove it.
Whether the impact which will affect bitcoin if satoshi reveals his identity is good or bad, it doesn't matter, the time will answer.

There's no official bitcoin physical but a forged coins made from silver, gold, and so on which contains an address filled with bitcoin inside it.
I'm actually not expecting a cashless world to be realised unless the internet has covered the whole planet, otherwise, the cashless world will seem to be a dream forever.  Maybe, in the future, there'll exist a technology that could allow the usage of digital currency everywhere without needing an internet connection but it's still uncertain, just hoping the best tho.

Tell me why the majority of cryptocurrency can be traced through blockchain explorer which provided by their own developers while the real money in which often used for currency can't and you're already thinking that these cryptocurrencies could spread the corruption? Which financial system that shows transparently to the public without the need of permission except the blockchain? there's none.
Probably people who said that bitcoin could get the corruption worse is those who know nothing, it's really clear that every transaction will be saved up in the blockchain forever, blockchain(in this case used by bitcoin) is actually more transparent than any existed financial system.

Only for japan's government, of course, there's no point for other countries to follow what japan have done. Though japan (only) accepts bitcoin as their legal tender but it's already made a big impact towards the demands of bitcoin, it's a good thing of course.
The anonymity of bitcoin itself actually not an obvious anonymous, everything can be traced once the owner of an address revealed, thus, it's actually not a threat to the government, just if they know it ofc. maybe government just consider bitcoin as a threat because it has the potential of taking over their economy and replace the current monetary system, but, who knows?.

As repeatedly discussed, the blockchain.info's fee policy is outdated that if you use their auto fee feature, you'll more likely to get trapped into the low-fee transaction and the confirmation will arrive within more than a day.
I've been trapped with this and it's really depressing, actually, there's some way to speed up the confirmation even if the fee is too small(CPFP, Replace by fee, using accelerator such as viabtc.com) but it's better to prevent this from happening. Better to always check the currently recommended fee and use it instead of using what blockchain.info has recommended.
And yeah, blockchain.info is actually lying, such a bad experience given by them to their users. wrecking their users directly.

I honestly think so, after the blockchain is overloaded by the unconfirmed transaction, the fee is now drastically increasing and it's such a pain in the ass. I still remember a good day when 0.0002 as a fee is considered as high and will get confirmed immediately, but now. It's as low as 0.0005 or above if you want your transaction to be confirmed within next 3 block, the recommended is no2 240sats/byte. Well.

It's definitely blockchain.info's fault. Their fee policy is outdated thus making their users have their fee below the current recommendation and the transaction stuck because of this. I'm also honestly trapped by this.
If you make a transaction through blockchain.info recently, you'll see that their auto-fee feature will recommend you the fee which they said will get your transaction confirmed within 10 minutes while the fee they just recommended is really below what it should be.

it seems that their fee policy is now currently on 120sats/byte whereas the latest recommendation is 240sats/byte. There's nothing you can do but wait depressingly.
Just wonder how outdated their system is by looking on this, it's a trap for their users and yeah, a half of current recommendation fee will gets your transaction confirmed within more than a day supposedly.

Not in every place on this planet but in every place of your locals, just tell me if when you're paying with zimbabwe dollars in U.S.A. I don't really sure people will accept the money. But, bitcoin also have a debit card which you can buy easily through debit card issuer and load it with your bitcoin. You can cash it out through nearest ATM or just go to some shop which accepts VISA or MasterCard. Therefore, the reason you mentioned above is not exactly valid as it's basically not comparing the features based on fact.

The low ability of reading causes these two to don't know the meaning of the post. probably they're just picking up the last words which are "nice £22000 profit". It's a serious problem and could make people have lower IQ than what they should have, LOL.


As stated by OP, he needs money and has no choice but to sell his bitcoin, and he just lost his job right before that.

he's referring to few other ICO projects which have recently listed in exchanges and not quantum, read it carefully.
That's actually right, by hitting the 1000 BTC doesn't mean other investors will automatically following to invest into this project, it all depends on those investors to decide so and how they get interested into joining the project.
But, if quantum just crossing over 1000 BTC, already a good result isn't it?.

Then, why investing in bitcoin instead of fiat in which have the same stability but fiat have advantages of backed up by the government and widely accepted without that much risk which ibitcoin investor bear?
Investor/trader will definitely prefer fiat and gold because it's also recognised officially by the local government, bitcoin might be banned, but these two will always be accepted and will always be for another century.
And be honest, an international currency without the recognition of the major country is nothing.

Governments aren't greedy, government exists to keep country alive and existent, what makes the government corrupt is people inside it, some are greedy and pathetic while there's still good people exist inside the government. It's wrong to say that government is greedy and corrupt if without it, a country will never hold on and the whole country will be destroyed then.

Mining can be really profitable, you just need to buy a chip rig like R9 290 (pretty affordable) and mine some coin which still has pretty low difficulties, mining bitcoin is only wasting your time if you don't have that good rigs and mining is not that risky, you just gamble to whether earning profit or not in a month, you will not lose your rigs because of mining.
And one thing, business like online shop also have a risk, there's no business in this world which don't have the risk to be honest, all is fair with the earning you can get.

That's about to right, why the heck a professional trader will share their daily trades, if people get profit out of following this trader they'll more likely to say nothing but if they're losing because of following this trader as well, they blame this trader. Sharing daily trades is just unnecessary for me, maybe someone also does.
Though, if you're always following those professionals activity, you'll never develop a decent skill, but still, gain profit out of it until you lost connection with those professionals.

The main question here, what's the benefits which government could gain if they're start to accept bitcoin? Bitcoin is basically volatile that if government just convert their money to bitcoin means they're risking the whole economy.
There's no real benefits for the government at all as I've seen and the benefits is purely there for an individual who uses bitcoin, nothing more.

Based on this forum, everyone is satoshi, John Nash, Dorian Nakamoto and so on. but still, I doubt among these is exists the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but, when I just typed Satoshi Nakamoto in the google there'll appear the face of Dorian Nakamoto as a thumbnail for the Wikipedia page, a coincidence? I think yes. Either the writer has made a mistake or google just picking up random image for the thumbnail.

Agree with this. Whoever Satoshi Nakamoto is, it'll not change the fact that his invention is now popular and success.

Not likely while the money which goes to the altcoins keep on increasing every day, the majority of crowd sale/ICO even use ethereum instead of bitcoin. Therefore, people who want to invest into some projects will be forced to convert their bitcoin to ethereum which means increasing the dominance of alts towards bitcoin even if many currencies' cap merged into one.

Grammarly is not that good, sometimes Grammarly often makes a mistake that could make the whole sentence have a different meaning, it's still better to get a service from a native English speaker whose grammar is perfect and well educated. So, this recommendation is kinda useless.

Beside of using bitcoin directly to buy a phone, you can simply issue a debit card and load it with your BTC, by using this, you can buy either in online or offline shop, national or international. so it'll give you wider coverage and more option where to buy the phone you're aiming, though, using BTC directly is still a good way to go. Hope you success.