Disappointing performance from Nepal team. While chasing the target of 181 runs, already lost 7 wickets scoring 114 runs. Opener Bhurtel alone have scored 35 runs. Now the bottom order Sandeep Lamichhane and Airee at 32* runs gives the winning hope, 68 runs required in the remaining 18 overs. UAE isn't that good at bowling, but in such situation if the pressure on Nepal is used well it can turn to be a winning match for UAE.

Zimbabwe lost quick wickets as Madusanka took hold of the first spell taking three wickets. Then Sean Williams and Sikander Raza built good partnership and Raza fell at 31 runs, Williams lost his wicket at 56 runs. Going to be a difficult match for Zimbabwe and somehow the team will reach around 200+ runs. Zimbabwe can try to win the match, however this is going to be tough as Sri Lanka have got the better winning chance as the target isn't enough to defend.

Miracles happening in T20 is possible, but in test format cricket it is something impossible. Stokes and Duckett have added few runs, and to reach the target is not a possible thing. Earlier Australia Women played well and won the match against England Women. In that match it was the lack of bowling and mistakes on field were the reason for the loss of England Women team. Within few hours the match will resume and we can get the perfect outcome of the match within the first ten overs bowled.

For people who doesn't have the proper understanding about cryptocurrency and the market will simply say crypto is another form of gambling. I have experienced it in real time during a conversation. I introduced bitcoin to a brother and he had interest, but for some reason he wasn't able to buy and it got skipped. Now whenever he meets me he used to say I could've bought earlier when you said about it for the very first time. During that time another friend was with him and he briefed the past story with him, how high the price have moved in the short time period. Suddenly he stated this is kind of gambling and I tried to convince him, but he isn't ready to accept it.

When I asked him the reason why you mentioned so, his answer "The market is based on the demand to supply basis, however the real growth is connected to it for some percentage, apart the growth is happening on its own and none were able to identify it" and he said with stock market the value bounce depending on the growth of the particular company.

In the previous test match it was the tail players who were the game changers. Pat Cummins played well in both the innings scoring 38 runs and 44* runs at the very critical situation in a much responsible manner. Maybe if his wicket have fallen, England could've won the first test match. Australia leads 350 runs and somehow the tail will contribute another 50 runs. This time the match will come closer and Australia will win the match with its best bowling line-up.

Canada have got just two venue, Mexico have got three venue. So maintenance and making arrangements won't be a big deal for the hosts. With the advanced technology every arrangements can be made in a much shorter time period. Qatar didn't had the infrastructure, and for that reason it needs lot of time and they made it a big celebration. The fulfillment that Qatar gave could've increased the expectation on USA, Canada and Mexico.

Earlier it had a disappointing loss against Netherlands and this time the same gonna happen against Scotland. In 41 overs West Indies have collected 169/8 and with the small teams performing well these kind of scoring isn't enough to defend. The chance for West Indies to qualify is almost nil. Depending on the other teams performance for it to qualify is not good. As stated two time champion playing worse as this is really bad cricket from West Indies. The team should organise more training sessions or make some arrangements to have consistent performance which is more important.

The first session wickets will be the deciding factor in today's play. If England were able to take few quick wickets the pressure can move on to Australia. If this doesn't take place, then England will be in struggle. For now both the teams are in similar position, with Australia having little upper hands on the match. Both the batsmen on the crease were the best and have supported Australia win more matches. Everyday there'll be some changes in the pitch and England made a big mistake in the previous match by declaring earlier in the first innings. This time no spin bowling will make them feel bad at the end of the match.

I don't understand what OP is try to brief, if he had talked about the altcoin season then we're getting closer to it. The Bitcoin dominance in the market have been getting rejected and the BTC altcoins trading pairs were getting pumped. This is kind of indication on altcoins season start. However it isn't sure that the altcoins will get pumped, but the fail of bitcoin in dominance around the key resistance area gives a clue of altcoins pump in the coming weeks.

Netherlands team continued to score with good runrate, but they weren't able to withstand wickets. Four players have lost the wicket without scoring single runs, among this two were openers. Four players scored single digit runs which are 2, 2, 5, 7. Remaining runs scored by Barresi (52 runs), de Leede (41 runs) and Edwards (67* runs). This shows the lack in performance from expected players. Always the combined progress brings win and today Netherlands failed in it.

First session of day 4 will give better prediction on the match. Even now Australia is at the winning position with its 221 lead and 8 more wickets in hand. Khawaja, who served to be the turn in the first test match is on the crease reaching his half century. On the other side Smith have just started his batting. Anyhow the team will reach atleast 450 runs lead and request England to start their innings. Same as the first match England will lose the match getting close to the target.

It is Dhananjaya de Silva (78*) who is carrying the entire responsibility, if his score hasn't come Sri Lanka could've ended the innings within 150 runs. Even in today's match Logan van Beek have his contribution taking important wickets of Nissanka, Samarawickrama and Asalanka and the runrate is less than 3rpo. Possibly the team will set target between 230 and 240 runs. Netherlands need to start good only then it can chase the target.

Most of the time when I prefer to go with the underdog my choice will be live betting, because during the match we'll get better odds so that the bet amount can be minimised and our luck can be tried. This at times brings luck and in such a stance I've won @10 odds, but those are very minimal bet amount. Other than this when the match is in critical situation, where any of the team could win I prefer making bets which will have high chance of wins.

The winning opportunity varies between the players. However the champion USA is at the stronger position to win the matches. Few of the teams important players were not playing the tournament due to injuries. This will surely make those teams have some soret of performance lack. England is one with such a situation, where its mid fielder and striker Beth Mead is out of the tournament. This time the prize pool for the tournament have been increased to $110 million from $30 million which is really a big change in Women's FIFA.

Thats a tough fight chasing the target of 332 runs. Sean Williams as usual had played an awesome innings. To him the entire team had supported with little contribution. Oman on the other side started good and the century came for Prajapati. At the end 45 overs 268/6 and the required runrate was above 12. For the consecutive overs Oman maintained it, but the end overs became tougher. Anyhow good performance Oman and Zimbabwe have won the match by 14 runs.

It is true that majority of the gamblers in our forum is much into sports betting. Next stands the Dice which is the very common one. Myself too interested on Dice, earlier it was sports betting. At some point the instant outcome made me focus on Dice than sports betting. In simple, with sports betting for the odd @1.7 we need to wait for the completion of the match. With Dice we roll, and if we're lucky we'll get the result instantly. This drove me into Dice. When I was doing sports betting alone, I was in profit now my stats is in loss.

Already several countries have gambling ads banned partially and completely. Few of the countries include Germany, Spain, Italy, Uk and the list goes on. Does this mean that gambling isn't possible in those countries. Certain states have the ban on gambling where it isn't possible to gamble. In Qatar gambling is banned, if you remember the ads running around the ground during the days of FIFA you'll understand how effective is the ban. Ads were found around, the necessary steps need to taken on the actors and actresses, which is the effective way to ban ads. They should give the right information, not the mesmerizing chance of winning big.

The majority of the gambling addiction is out of Casinos and other games that are much dependent on luck than skills and data. With sports betting we can't see much of addiction, because very few out of the loss experienced in a game try to recover the loss with the consecutive game in which he doesn't have any idea. Here the gambler had selected the odds on pure luck, similar incidents won't happen with sports betting people. Mostly they try to bet on sports and events in which they have got idea. Addiction is mostly with people who want immediate winning which is possible with casino games. Based on my understanding maybe there'll be 10% of sports betting addicts whereas the 90% will be on luck based games addiction.

Using the emergency funds or selling the assets which will grow good in the long run isn't the right choice. Try to hold the situation and keep yourself in difficulty for a short. During the same time analyse well and find the right way to make some additional earnings. By the time you can use the emergency fund to have some passive income. This will help in cushion your life style amidst the inflation that is found all around the world.

Whenever we provide gold as collateral we'll be able to see the documentation mentioning the value of gold along with the weight. This serves as a proof, and the interest for the money borrowed with the gold collateral will be calculated. This is the procedure followed everywhere and the same gives trust on the service provided. In such a way if the pawn shop have the proper documentation, then it is good that we submit bitcoin as collateral and borrow money. However it has the highest risk than other forms of collateral as it is easy to destroy the trace of transactions using different mixing services. So, it all depends on the pawn shop, whether they're trusted one in the business and does they have registered with the government.