We are in 2023 but how there are still people out there who invest their money because they got random person from phone call with an attractive proposal? If they search about the proposal on the Google itself will give what is that exactly means but people are still blind to trust someone and hope they will make them rich.

But unfortunately, you and I still live in a centralized world run by governments; fiat and banks still dominate the financial markets. You will still need a bank because all your daily spending is fiat, you need banks and exchanges to convert your bitcoins to fiat. Bitcoin is a revolution, it is very good, but it cannot replace or compare with banks, banks provide us with many services. Similarly, why do we still need exchanges today even though they are centralized like traditional banks? Both are necessary for us, I will be happy to see both coexist and support our life more perfectly.

Giving out your personal information online is really risky because once the account is hacked, it is certain that your personal details are already in danger as hackers may use it for illegal purposes. Although I know it’s a wrongful act, but for security purposes, some gamblers have kept their personal information and instead use other names in order to pass the KYC requirement. However, if anything happens to the website, you will also find some troubles retrieving your funds if you provide wrong information to them.

I think the phasing out of paper money is still possible but it won't happen in the near future, and it may take longer than we think. As you say, if we can successfully reduce the circulation of paper money, then just more time to get rid of it completely is possible.

To be honest, paper money causes some problems such as printing and circulation costs, and is quite cumbersome if shipped in large quantities. But in some cases, paper money also gives us convenience such as paying small bills very quickly, and using paper money still gives us a little more privacy than an account bank or CBDC.

Heneral Tourist Extension Day In El-Savador

https://twitter.com/nayibbukele/status/1613714037094715392?t=iyHhFgNOcWwnuCerN6_gSg&s=19


This is to bring to the notice of the general public rhat the government of El-Savador has endorsed an extension for it tourist enthusiast o have a longer stay of 180 days instead of the initial 90 days stipulated, this will help in a long way to make discoveries and enjoy every provisioned targeted on bitcoin tourists from across the globe, this was coming in after the official release of the intention to bring in more bitcoin investors into El-Savador, this is a double celebration as the bitcoin price is getting back it bull to start the race of moving up and up.

People already know what Bitcoin is, so what Miss El Salvador did shouldn't cause a significant impact on Bitcoin price. If Bitcoin can increase constantly in the last few days, it seems caused by other factors. I assume people have a better desire to buy Bitcoin because there are no longer bad news/issues. So, by more people bought Bitcoin, the price can increase constantly. It seems people don't want to miss a chance to buy at a lower price. Another reason, we are already in the 2nd year of bearish. So, in theory, the price should increase gradually and the dip rate have been passed already in the last year.

But I got some point in not mentioning it because he wants to encourage poor people to think big and succeed. In fact, many poor people have changed and pushed themselves to work hard but unfortunately, not all become successful. Mr. Kiyosaki is just expressing what he experienced during his young age but if we ask those who are really poor condition, I mean those who are really in the dip situation, we can assess that it was not the mindset making you rich but financial education as well. Meaning, they still need to spend more money for this, yet they don't have any to support it - they lose the opportunity.

I honestly never know what Satoshi thought about his privacy in bitcoin's early years ^{[when bitcoin was not yet valuable].} We're only speculating about him right now, but he's too smart to keep that up until now. Whether he was male or female, we never really knew until recently.

Making himself famous only put him in danger, but I don't think Satoshi really thought about it in the first place, but quickly changed after bitcoin was in huge demand. Of course this is just my opinion, no need to argue because I'm just a bit logical.

No, I do not think so. Because, I read somewhere "a strong Muslim is better than a weaker Muslim" just like there is another matter "Get knowledge even if you have to go to China for it" here it's not saying this all just for men it's saying all things equal for men and women but sadly right now Muslims have few groups which are bringing their own theory and trying to work on this which is clearly against the will of Islam it's just bullshit and nothing positive that all sports and education is just for men.

Few months back Afghanistan having soccer and cricket teams with Iran are also having soccer team for the women and few other Muslim countries are also involved in this all because now they are realizing things are not favourable to ban women's from all aspects of life which is good change but sadly these Taliban are never been true face of Islam.

I think you should go T20 topic for discussing about Ireland and Zimbabwe T20 match.  Because this topic is  for ODI cricketDespite losing the last match, Sri Lanka's performance in this match disappointed me more.  Sri Lanka scored a  lot of runs in the last match too, although Sri Lanka lost I applauded their performance but today they gave a very bad performance.
But I congratulate India for taking this series with one match in hand. And I think if there is a performance like that they can easily whitewash Sri Lanka but I thought Sri Lanka would get a little help. But I think the credit behind today's game win has to go to India's bowlers as most of them were active in taking wickets today and among them Kuldeep Yadav and Mohammed Siraj contributed brilliantly with their each three wickets.  I think Sri Lanka will not be able to win if India has this position in the upcoming third ODI match.

Rishab Pant is a great player. The strike rate does not matter for the Test format. However, batting with a good striker rate at critical moments makes it easier to win the match. On the other hand, if the pitch is not conducive to batting, scoring runs quickly can give a decent target. And so India needed a batsman like Rishab Pant. As India has been facing some problems with the batting line-up for a long time. India needed an experienced player like Pant against an experienced team like Australia. It will be very difficult for India to win against Australia.

What you just posted here reminds me of the naivety that befell me in the early times I knew about crypto. I had far more Bitcoin and other crypto transactions than you, to the point that almost all the companies that were paying me for my services between 2016-2022 paid with crypto. But I was just exchanging it for fiat then until last year when I joined BTT and become serious with my trading and investment of coins.

This is painful, and I don't want to think back regarding that, and you should just let go as well.