Interesting. I wonder if theymos can give us an explanation of his rejection.

Hey theymos are mixers banned from advertising on this forum or were you under pressure to reject that particular ad?

You must be an ultra retard to think that AM was a ponzi scheme. AM only took money from shareholders on IPO while maintaining a higher percentage of shares for themselves. Afterwards AM didn't need any outside money and they were able to operate independently of the share price. How can it be a ponzi if it's not needing new people to pour money into the company?

Can you be more retard than this?

Hello scammer! This is my reply to another post where you post tons of LIES.

Transparent manner? According to http://hashfast.org/Main_Page#Batch_1_Preorders there was nothing transparent from HashFail. According to this well documented website " Amy Woodward announced a delay of a critical component 3 days before the promised shipping date".

This is what "transparent" means for retard Icebreaker! You can't find out only with 3 days before the shipping date that you are not able to deliver anything. This is an outrageous LIE!


Did anyone force HF to be incorporated in California? I don't think so.


The difference is that AM never took any pre-order money on some advertised specs which never turn out to be true like HF did.


HF announced only 3 days before the shipping date that they can't make it This is useless!


After delivering only ONE batch of miners while they took money for 4 batches! It's a new record in the Bitcoin world and nobody will be able to replicate it.


This is AM thread, not AMHASH.

That's because they were smart enough to leak 40-50 millions of $ out of the company while being untouchable.


You are a retard! HF WAS A SCAM from day 1 while AM made over 6 time profit for IPO. HF was only able to deliver ONE batch of miners, while AM successfully operated for a couple of years and many investors saw a nice profit from AM shares.

Squid? Maybe this will help you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spondulix

Does "Block chain size/storage and slow downloads for new users" sounds like a good place to ask how do you get back a lost wallet? Ask yourself that with loud voice.

Now...What does a lost wallet mean? Are we supposed to guess whatever happened with your wallet? Provide more details maybe...

Since this is a consensus network used by everyone (big companies along with random private individuals) I think it is obvious to say that the small private user can get along with the consensus trust derived from the fact that those that have a bigger stake into blockchain will not allow history to be re-written. This is how we get to the whitelisted/blacklisted nodes.

I am thinking that BitPay or Coinbase is able to setup various full nodes all over the globe and the small users can whitelist their nodes so that they shouldn't worry that much about the blockchain being altered! In the Bitcoin ecosystem the security is the same for the big companies and for the small individual and a change in the blockchain history would affect both in the same time. The big companies will focus more on the blockchain security since they have much more to lose while the small guys can just leech the blockchain history from them.

I find this to be a very logic and productive way of working with this issue this instead of being a retard and simply banning those that can't afford to run a full node like your boss MP wants to do.

As previously said if you trust Google servers to host your Google Chrome copy then you will definitely trust Exchangers and Payment Processors to have an unaltered blockchain at everyone's disposal.


Pay attention to the full context/discussion please.

I know that there is no "full node requirement", but our friend here danielpbarron who is just Mircea Popescu's obedient dog is saying that anyone that isn't running a full node shouldn't use bitcoin which is utterly stupid and retarded and it will never happen. Here is where the discussion started:


He is afraid that the US Government will seize "the whole thing" like he saw in the movies...

I would really like to see Russian nodes being seized by the US Gov. That would be something new.

You nailed it!

I am amazed how did you managed to pull one reply without sucking quoting MP.

I have presented this point of view in summer also. I was called various names for this idea. Thanks for proving me right.

Offtopic P.S. Yes yes it's another "I told you so" moment. Move along.

Now I'm a bit confused. I don't get it how master seed+password work. Can I recover coins with master seed if I forget the password?

If we can have trusted places where we can download software without the fear of them being infected with viruses/malware then we can have trusted operators/nodes so that some users can use only a lightweight client without burdening them with a full node requirement. You sound like this is something impossible, but it's far from being impossible. What's the use of every user running a full node if they can't trust the place where they download the Bitcoin Core software?

There are many different providers of hosted files and some are trusted (Firefox, Google, Bitcoin.org etc) and some are untrusted. A random invented example would be www.OptimizeMyPC.com that promises to speed up your computer if you download their tool which is filled with malware/trojans.

We can have this with Bitcoin nodes too. This is just another business opportunity and this is very easily doable.

Again nothing constructive from your posts. Just the usual MP quotes and the usual and useless "limiting stuff is better". You have a very limited and pessimistic vision about this whole ecosystem.

I would like to see some kind of ideas of how would one DAO/DAC exist.

Stop being subjective. Let's do a small exercise. Please count the times Mr Barron replies with long/offtopic quotes from random sources/MP. Next please count the times he repeats already posted quotes. Now please compare it with the others. Thank you!


He cares more about being accepted by MP and everything around him like MPex. He doesn't care for the good of Bitcoin, he only cares about his interest and MP interest apparently. Instead of wasting a lot of time reading the whole thread (which I do recommend for a full history) just check Mr Barron post history. Here is just one quote:

If they can transmit transactions with a light client it's equal to having the banking software to me.Maybe I got it wrong but I know that nobody can spend your money without having the private key. A private key kept private makes it impossible for anyone else to spend your money.

You do know that your logic is faulty. You do not have a web server at your home to download or use stuff from the Internet or from your mobile banking system. This is stupid and utopic and it will never happen!

But it's ok to squeeze out the businesses that need a higher block limit? The businesses that actually help Bitcoin ecosystem grow?

What are your solutions?

Now it's 1 year old.

HAPPY BIRTHDAY AND THANK YOU FOR THE GREAT MINERS!

Hey Jutarul you missed this question.


I think many shareholders are frustrated about the lack of financial statement for Q4 2014 and the lack of communication overall, but they couldn't do anything about it. Saying that now it's too late makes me think that they could've done something which is simply false.

Answered: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=252937.msg10817468#msg10817468

In addition let me tell you that by suggesting the use of a 3rd party wallet is simply denying one of the most important features of Bitcoin. The ability to keep your money and to be your own bank. Just because you can't afford to keep one computer plugged 24 hours per day. This must be one of the most stupidest ideas that I've seen on this forum.

Please enlighten us more with your stupidity!

The system should be crafted around a mix of security and easy of use. How would you feel if Adobe would require you to host a server and to keep the current Flash installer hosted there? The same can apply Firefox or Chrome or any other file that you need to download. It would be a very stupid thing just like your imaginary fact

Also by your logic you just denied Bitcoin to AT LEAST 2 bil people who can't afford to keep a rPi plugged in all the time. There are TONS of people in Africa or in the Jungle or in China who could use Bitcoin with a very cheap Android smartphone (internet usage) or a cheap Nokia for SMS usage. People in Africa will not be able to host a node. Look at Australia's Internet speed. They are in the stone age there. It will take a lot of time to get those speeds in Africa, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be able to use Bitcoin. They should use Bitcoin and we already have ways to do it. Why exclude them? Just because you want it? What about we exclude you from this forum because you don't have a scuba diving suit or because you don't have a proper server which can feed the contents of the forum? Sounds retard? Well it's the same with your brilliant idea.


Last that I've checked there were mode than 6k nodes all spread all over the world. Which government are you talking about? And how do they plan to do it? Just as they did with torrents? You don't seem to trust the technology that is behind Bitcoin or you simply don't understand it.