I don't think the users were transferred, they create new accounts here when the forum was shifted to SMF as even Satoshi and Sirus have a registation date.

Satoshi posted about transferring some posts here from the old forum in his first thread here.

But don't think any of them were transferred here at all.

Did he just broke the very first rule which led him to a ban, doesn't looks like trolling to me either.

I would be happy to laugh at you once you face the same abuse in future and come back CRYING, WHINGING, MOANING and GROANING here with a thread. Don't make it a joke, many of such similar abuses are seriously damaging to individuals.

It would be better if you just ignore all of this as you were doing already, some of the users are here like witches to get your quotes out of context and start rambling on it. It's an long con accusation about an event which occurred in the ancient times of the forum when most of us here were not even involved in crypto. Many users around don't even think you need to answer on this half bakes.

By comparing the posts history of Bitcoin SV and korner they don't look like the same person operating both the accounts. As Bitcoin SV has very less knowledge about crypto, atleast lesser than Korner. Hope you remember Bitcoin SV can't even sign a proper message from a BTC address here

I think you would have more stronger case of Bitcoin SV being banned, by pointing his trolling in support of BSV and against BTC. All of his posts seems to be 100% trolling motivated and he could be banned for it.

This is a blant plagiarism for sure, he has not even twisted his words while copying Pros and Cons. Should be reported as such.

Btw, looks like an decent move by a merit source like you to check the legimaicy of the post before sending merits. Keep up the good work.

It's rare to see a Bitcointalk account getting traded through a face to face deal, and the offer posted on the forum itself.

Your eyes could be converted to nuts after a long debate with TECSHARE here, but this is the abuse..


You are fighting for a purely wrong action, I think most of the people here opposing TECSHARE already know that.

I think you are wrong it's still not online.

---

@wwzsocki seems to be concerned about, when the hosting would be online again and probably know the reason for the shutdown as he quoted the same post you are linking him to.

I don't think they should be tagged until the above is proven, but yes the most probability of it is being a scam.

Obviously, CMC is full of misleading data on it, and I would never recommend anyone to realy on it for info. One could experience a whole bunch of threads regarding fake volumes and much more here, its basically more paid shill overall.

Putting HitBTC at top is just a big LOL.

The best way to judge peoples honesty and trustworthiness is if they practice what they preach, but you on the other hand just teach others what you don't even bother to do. I am just pointing this to the people who thinks your words are like a ethical person and believe you, even to once who shower some merit sperms on you.

The thread topic isn't about you, but the one of the strong reason it has arised is because of your constantly attacking TECSHARE on multiple occasions, some of your steps here have surely boosted this situation in the OP. Anyways TECSHARE's main reason behind this thread is to make this abusive pattern public, and I am helping him in doing so.


I could not stop laughing on it loud, was it really less than honest ?

He solved a issue between two users in a very mutual and friendly manner. Asked both of them politely to remove each other's rational ratings. Many people around the forum ( not much globals as the gang can attack them) were convinced and happy with his balanced minded act of handling the situation and this made him get that non random but fruitful and on-the-point inclusions. A person having IQ less than number of his balls can understand the reason behind it was not abusive but situational.

Yes, there is only one reference link but it should be fill with some informative links ( atleast by DT's ) rather than someone's totally vendetta based posts. But here the whole rating is a big game play and abuse in official words.

Blant BS, look at the mirror ! You do the same.



Probably because he has started liking you as your agends suite him somehow. Even he has put your clumsy post of attacking TECSHARE as a reference to his absolutely agendic trust rating.

Notifications: http://loyce.club/notifications/1021758.html


Heartly appreciation !

It's surely a scam !

For me whatever I do, login or logout on google, clear cookies, try different devices, use tor..I get the same result on top by searching simply "bitmian" every time. They are probably using some cheap SEO techniques to pump them up with that keywords.

As I see the website and more stuff around it.

One can clearly see, the original https://www.bitmain.com/ was created on Created on 2007-07-16 while the fake https://bitmain.farm/ was created on Created on 2019-08-09 around 4 months ago.

Original : https://www.bitmain.com/


Fake : https://bitmain.farm/


Also,

Original : https://www.bitmain.com/:

Fake : https://bitmain.farm/:

In the above details about the website, one can see many of things are faked and no tech contact is even mention of on the fake https://bitmain.farm/. There are even difference in IP locations.

Fake transactions on there website which link to the original Antpool, unprofessionally developed webites with social media thumbnails linking nowhere, all of this is enough to put this up as an scam con and seeing it on the first search record on google is really harmful and unwanted overall.

@Cryptodevil, it seems logical to me to look at a person who is involved with some old scamy exchange at any official position for long time, points towards him being friendly and involved with the main authorities somehow. Some of the evidences like Novacoin being listed immediately makes the sentence more stronger and titled towards the exchange authorities engagement accusations.

But as @Balthazar said here,


He was just an active community member at first and later became moderator as other active members of the community and continued without any rewards. This nowhere makes Balthazar shady or untrustworthy to trade with as even if he choosed wrong peoples to work with he still does right things at a right time. His weight of his good deeds and knowledge here are very much weighty than him just working with an exchange, even as someone just like pseudo-official.

At last it comes to personal judgment while painting trusts, but someone who is in DT should atleast have some solid base to his accusation, rather than saying there is no evidence against his claim hence he is right.

Most closely related reason for it would be him being embarrassed of himself looking at the accusations against him on bitcointalk. It looks like an overall community success on bitcointalk towards building more cleaner crypto environment.

Asshole !

@TwitchySeal, You are just spitting on OGs repo in different threads with spatualtive accusations over and over. No one seems to see your accusations with solid base, even if OG got the funds they were worth pretty much less than what the two figures amounts of BTC look in today's BTC market. There is nothing much in digging up the ancient tricks people used to make profits out of BTC, no one knew it would become so serious afterall.

I think you should get back to P&S hole of yours and practice your attacking there, rather than firing accusations in air here.

I agree with theymos here, sending merits to alts in not always that untrustworthy to make a person risky for trade anyways. Rather that is not an solid evidence of trading merits even ( Ex.A chatlog about the trade could be a solid one ).

They should have rather accepted being shady and try to prove us that they have become legit somehow. But there core was shady afterall, and they already knew they were fighting a fake fight. Dick Move !