Acquiring Eric Bledsoe, Justise Winslow, Keon Johnson and a 2025 second-round draft pick isn't too bad of a deal. If they couldn't maximize Powell's output for the team, why not try something new? That trade also made Blazers under the luxury tax threshold. The new players that will most likely be used for rotation might be a gamble but that was still a good business move.

This should be Safepal. It's available for mobile and hardware wallet.

Last year, Kraken released their findings on the S1 hardware wallet to which they claimed it has security flaws^[1]. Safepal immediately replied saying Kraken failed to steal the seed and addressed other issues raised^[2]

I personally find their mobile app convenient for small transactions. I also think their Binance Dapp is very useful for people who do not like to submit to the Binance Exchange KYC.

[1] https://blog.kraken.com/post/7874/kraken-security-labs-finds-flaws-in-safepal-s1-hardware-wallet/
[2] https://blog.safepal.io/our-response-to-the-security-findings-from-kraken-security-labs/

Hindi ako masyadong pamilyar sa ganyang style at nabasa ko lang sa isang post sa social media.

Ganito bale ang kwento (summary):
1. Nagbebenta siya ng SLP through Binance P2P
2. May bumili sa kanya (person A) at payment method ay GCash
3. May natanggap si seller na payment pero galing sa ibang pangalan (person B). At this point, pinadala na din niya yung SLP.
4. Bigla may tumawag sa kanya na ibang tao nanaman (person C) claiming na na-hack FB niya at yung hacker daw ay humingi ng pera kay person B. Yun daw yung napunta kay seller.

Person C filed a police report na naging sanhi ng pagka-suspinde ng Gcash account ni seller. Kawawa naman at mukhang hindi pa naka-cash out.

Ano sa tingin niyo? Scam ba?

Meron din siguro sa inyo gumagamit ng Binance P2P at Gcash din accepted payment method. Doble ingat lang tayo.

You've probably seen this tweet posted many times around this forum and social media:



Apparently, the owner wanted to make money out of it by selling it as NFT on Opensea. The current price is around 1.7 ETH ($5K+).

Opensea link: https://opensea.io/assets/0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e/83584298764877393909683920256144949094050210591762876769547109989870544617473

https://opensea.io/assets/0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e/1684294517069921161380706694658171983823848071194747088938082780185138036737

Account: https://opensea.io/collection/crypto-tweet

^ Pretty clever isn't it?

If Jack Dorsey was able to sell his very first tweet as NFT, this person should be able to do it as well.

Does Coinbase support withdrawal through BSC network? If so, you can do it that way. You would need both BNB and USDT (BEP-20) to buy on BSC AMMs/DEXs though.

Just an FYI that in most platforms, USDT are converted back to BNB or WBNB before it's swapped to any BEP-20 token. As a result, the transaction fees could be higher compared to buying with BNB directly. Good thing the added fee is minimal on BSC.

I already explained the reasoning why it's not a currency to them in the OP. Also, it doesn't have to be classified as such before it could be taxed. Stocks aren't considered as currencies and yet income derived from investment and trading are subjected to tax.

Tax crypto income first, more regulations on centralized exchanges and custodial wallets to follow

Aware naman ako na may mga cases na ganyan at meron pa nahuli/nagsara na mga mixers dati pero Chipmixer kasi ang nasa isip ko while typing that comment.

It becomes a game of cat and mouse na talaga yan. Pagalingan sa pag-trace at pag-break ng transaction links. May mga hackers na din naman ng nahuhuli kahit sa dark market pa sila.

It's considered as such probably because it was announced by the Indian Prime Finance Minister herself. It's like written in stone already even without the written law as one of the journalist said.

Was it? The new tax table was further divided into more categories compared to the old one but the max for both was still 30%.

This was one of the very first token I traded when I was still a beginner in 2017. I can't believe this token still exist after their failed attempt to launch a new business model which started in Ethereum.

Isn't that ironic? How would you authorize your wallet to connect without knowing what functions you are approving?

People's reaction are mixed on this proposed tax digital asset income. Some are understandably angry while others are okay with it because it's still better than a ban. Those who agree said it's just the first step though which probably means they are waiting for the actual law and also plan to make proposals to reduce in the future. If passed, I think it will take a few years before amendments will be made.

Gagana yan kung sobrang ingat ng hacker. Maaring nag-upgrade na ang mga tracing tools pero matagal na sana out of business ang mga mixers kung kaya nila trace lahat. Wala na din siguro naniniwala sa mga non-custodial wallets na may kakayahan din mag-mix o putulin ang link between addresses kagaya ng Wasabi at Samourai.

It's should be 120,000 BTC and 64K is more than half.

How about the money that went into alts instead of BTC as another reason? It's possible that $75K would have been reached if there was only BTC.

I've seen a diagram showing the flow of money in different phases of a bull market and it's something like Fiat > BTC > Large Caps > Medium Caps > Low Caps/Gems then goes back to fiat/stable coins once the market turns bearish. The process is repeated market cycle.

Tama. Ganyan nangyari bago ko napisa yung Ultimate Ao sa itaas. Rare lang magulang pero mga ninuno magagandang klase.

Magiging Gen 2 parehas ang anak dyan. Bale yung may higher gen na magulang ang masusunod tapos +1 lang sa anak.

Gen 10 (M) x Gen 0 (F) = Gen 11 (child)

Dagdag ko lang na kahit bagong panganak, magkakaroon na agad ng breed count lalo na kapag high gen. Sa halimbawang binigay ko, breed count niya agad ay 5 (pet Gen/2). Yan lang yung catch sa kanila, pwedeng maganda na genes pero dagdag oras naman sa breeding time.

I would not dismiss this as a mere proposal because it's their Finance Prime Minister who is already talking. I won't be surprised if it becomes a law by next month.

Nailed it.

Yeah we have different view but I still find it important to make a clear distinction from their perspective.

Based on what I read, it seems like they made theirs much simpler. Taxes can only be applied when you transfer or sell your crypto. Anyway, it won't be long before this proposal becomes a law. Let's wait for that to get more details.

They will probably find it hard to implement this tax law at the beginning but I bet they have the means to track those who previously used custodial/centralized platforms to trade.

For now, it's 30% but who knows if there will be future amendments? Maybe the crypto community there could have some power to make suggestions in the near future.

We'll have to wait and see the actual law when it's out.

You can find them most of them on an online casino's list of restricted countries. Curacao is an example. Despite granting licenses to different companies, they do not allow their citizens to online gambling. That's quite odd isn't it?

If you cannot stop them, tax them. It's the same situation with alcohol and other previously banned products.

Many of the OGs probably left the forum a long time ago and I know some of them have huge followings on twitter now. When I was still active in that platform, I only saw 1 post from one of them mentioning bitcointalk and it wasn't even positive. The message was phrased like I made all these profits without visiting bitcointalk.

Ilabng beses na din yata napalabas sa TV yung bitcoin at crypto (last yung Axie kung hindi ako nagkakamali) pero mukhang hilaw pa mga music companies dito sa Pinas pagdating sa blockchain at Metaverse. I know some local artists are already into NFT arts and P2E gaming kaya andun pa din yung possibility na sumunod naman ang music. Malay natin ma-engganyo din mga kumpanya na may hawak sa kanila.

Probably not gonna watch (madalang nga lang ako manood ng libreng online concerts) pero it's probably a good time for them habang maaga pa dahil mukhang hindi na talaga matatalo ang COVID. Pwede bumaba alert levels kung saan allowed ang live concerts tapos tataas nanaman after a new variant at bawal ulit mass gathering.

Update (June 23, 2022): They could add another 28% tax on sale of goods and services (GST).
Also, title change.

The proposal by the Indian Finance Prime Minister as announced during the Budget 2022:

• 30% tax on all income/profit from sale/transfer of Digital Assets
• No deductions allowed in the tax computation except the cost of acquisition
• Losses are also non-deductible or cannot be used as an offset against other income
• 1% Tax Deducted at Source (If I understand correctly, it's similar to Withholding Tax)

If you're wondering why they used 'Digital Assets' instead of 'Currency', they do not recognized crypto as a currency. The PM said it only becomes a currency when it is issued by the Central Bank (CBDC) and anything outside it is an Asset.

What are your thoughts on this?

It's a double edge to me. We have the legalization aspect (after so many ban proposals) but the rate looks quite high especially when they lowered the personal income tax rates (for certain income brackets) and the Capital Gains Tax appears lower too. It seems like they really want to get the most from crypto retail traders and investors because they know that there is a strong demand and a large number of transactions.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/30-tax-on-digital-assets-all-you-need-to-know/articleshow/89267925.cms

Chill lang while slowly building port at account. May iba naman pinagkakaabalahan ngayon kaya hindi na masyado nagaalala sa price drop. Isa pa, marami pa din tokens na sumisipa ngayon dahil mataas pa din hype sa P2E NFT games at Metaverse (panandalian nga lang). Pwede ka maglagay kung malakas sikmura mo sa mga quick flips.