What "fudder" means? I think there is another meaning different from what Urban Dictionary says. =) |
|
|
|
|
zazarb It's written wrong.
When they have a negative sign, it means that people exclude them from the trust list, but do not give any negative feedback?
|
|
|
|
https://support.binance.com/hc/en-us/articles/360022498052Binance is thrilled to enable debit and credit card payments for cryptocurrencies through our new partnership with Simplex. As part of Binance’s larger mission to increase the adoption and mainstream accessibility of crypto, Binancians are now able to use Visa and MasterCard to buy BTC, ETH, LTC and XRP, and start trading on Binance.com within minutes. To purchase cryptocurrency with a debit or credit card on Binance, please visit: https://www.binance.com/en/creditcard. Benefits of using a debit or credit card on Binance: Fast: Average 10-30 mins for cryptocurrency to reach your wallet Low Fees: only 3.5% per transaction or 10 USD, whichever is higher Convenient: Visa and MasterCard accepted To learn more about our partnership with Simplex, read our press release here. Note: Simplex payment processing is subject to local bank policies. For more information, please refer to the Simplex FAQ here and a list of jurisdictions restricted from using this service here. Thanks for your support! Binance Team 2019/01/31
The vast majority of exchanges that at some point accepted credit cards charged very high rates or stopped accepting after a certain period. I hope Binance will not make either of these two cases. And that this new service helps to reverse the price with more fiat in the market.
|
|
|
|
In a few decades when the reward gets too small, the merit will become the main compensation for users. I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large active or no activity. author=satoshi link= https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg310 |
|
|
|
Recently it was termed a scam, but going through this thread it is clear that duckdice is a trusted platform for gambling. In between some issues have broken out. One among that was posted in the forum. The same ruined their reputation, because they were stopped from running a signature campaign to promote the gambling website.
Thanks for clarifying me. That it's not scam website. I was afraid few moment ago. After many people saying it is scam. Ehm? You thought DuckDice is a scam because we do not refund lost bets to everyone?  No no sir sorry. But many people were posting it. I was afraid for moment when people are in bad situation they thought of only negative. I have been waiting for 11days sir but didn't got solution that why got inpatient. I understand sir you working hard on case but please just for a moment think of my prospective it had been more 31days he took money and from now on my reputation in society getting down because I have given the word to repay the money by 28jan but, I didn't able to do. That's why. Sorry, but I am right now in Dark moment Don't able to think anything right and afraid. I got few calls from parents I can't hide anything now from them so, I opened up what the situation is few people understand it but, few didn't ready they are insisting me to and calling me 2-3times a day. Some how sir I managing it They will never return the money that you (or your supposed son) lost on betting. There is no possibility of this, this is not how a casino works. They can at most offer some bonus or a small agreement. Now, it makes no sense for you to talk directly to their lawyer. You have to contact a lawyer to advise you before you speak to them. If your story has some real fact, a lawyer will show you if there is any possibility of receiving something. |
|
|
|
16600 doge
26690 doge Watching the video, of course, is not interesting. But this challenge is fun to keep up with. The goal is very close. How did you calculate this goal? Have you ever made a similar challenge before? |
|
|
|
Roma - 1.83
Spike Lee (BlacKkKlansman) - 9.00
Christian Bale (Vice) - 2.00
Yalitza Aparicio (Roma) - 17.00 I would bet on those names. They are not necessarily the ones I liked the most. But those are the ones that seem most reasonable to win some money. Rome as a movie is almost certain. Spike Lee sounds like a fun name to bet. Because of his career, by the political positioning he has and for perhaps being the great and unique opportunity for him. Bale, as well as Rome, seems like a sure bet too. Almost impossible to lose. And he deserves it, is incredible in the film and would be a prize for all the transformations he went through. Yalitza could be a surprise and bring a good return on the bet. |
|
|
|
|
Could you at least post an address with the Bitcoins that you are offering to pay here?
Edit. I have received the reward. Tks
|
|
|
|
Davis got fined $50k for making it public by his agent he wanted out of the pelicans. That is alot for just a tweet.  Hardens streak ends tonight with a defeat from those pelicans. From when I turned off the tv he had 27 points and only a minute and a half left to go. What people are talking doesn't make sense, it is not a matter that he will make more money. He could ask for a trade and he could inform the team that he will no sign for an extension. What he could not do is talking publicly about this. And that is why he will have to pay 50k |
|
|
|
|
The Ripple blockchain has utility and can exist without XRP. Of course, the foundation will still try to add value to XRP, but it can be a profitable organization without XRP. That is, they can sell services directly to banks that can use another currency or token. I do not think Swift will use XRP.
|
|
|
|
[OPEN] ABSolutecoin Signature Campaign | Earn up to $20/Week | Member - Hero/Leg https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5104043.0Payout Structure & Positions: 2x Members - $8/week in ABS. 2x Full Members - $13/week in ABS. 2x Sr. Members - $16/week in ABS. 2x Hero Members - $18/week in ABS. 2x Legendary Members - $20/week in ABS. Campanha gerenciada pelo @Hhampuz, que está gerenciando diversas boas campanhas. Aceita post local.
[OPEN] SIGMA POOL SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5104406.0Campanha gerenciada pelo OgNasty. Um tanto confusa quanto as regras e o pagamento é baixo em relação as outras. Mas é o escrow mais respeitado do forum e parece ser uma campanha simples. Sem muitas obrigações. The maximum amount of BTC earned in a monthly payment period is 0.02 BTC for Legendary accounts, 0.01 BTC for Hero accounts, & 0.005 BTC for all other accounts. |
|
|
|
Please ban Agueda_AmandaVamos comparar ouro e bitcoin com algumas características de dinheiro sólido
Transferibilidade: Você pode negociar ouro em papel se estiver disposto a assumir riscos de contraparte, mas, para transferir ouro, você precisa transportá-lo fisicamente. Grandes quantidades de ouro são pesadas e difíceis de transferir com segurança. Bitcoin pode ser enviado para outro endereço controlado por alguém em qualquer parte do mundo em poucos segundos, e a transferência é confirmada e imutável em minutos. O Bitcoin é mais transferível que o ouro.
Divisibilidade: Você pode dividir o ouro em quantas peças desejar, mas é complicado fazê-lo, principalmente para pequenas quantidades. O Bitcoin pode ser subdividido hoje em 100.000.000 satoshis, e o protocolo poderia ser facilmente estendido no futuro para suportar quantidades ainda menores, se isso fosse necessário. O Bitcoin é mais divisível que o ouro.
Scarcity: The scarcity of gold is well understood, though subject to variations based on how much mining is going on and how new gold deposits are discovered. The bitcoin protocol has a hard limit of 21,000,000 bitcoin units, which includes all the bitcoin where the keys were lost and bitcoin is permanently out of circulation. Changing the protocol to allow more units of bitcoins would require the consensus of all participants, which is practically impossible. Bitcoin and gold totally satisfy the shortage.
Há tantos pontos que podemos listar para comparar ouro e criptografia. Ambos não têm valor, ainda têm muito valor.
Scarcity. The scarcity of gold is well understood, albeit subject to variations based on how much mining is going on and as new gold deposits are discovered. The bitcoin protocol has a hard limit of 21,000,000 units of bitcoin, which includes all of the bitcoin where the keys have been lost and the bitcoin is permanently out of circulation. Changing the protocol to allow more units of bitcoin would require consensus from all of the participants, which is pretty close to impossible. Bitcoin and gold both fully satisfy scarcity. https://www.quora.com/Is-it-right-to-compare-gold-and-Bitcoin-What-are-some-good-solid-reasons |
|
|
|
I believe these are the last financial statements of the forum. It seems to me a very healthy and comfortable situation. And still have a good amount of Bitcoins in the donation addresses. 2015:
Income: About $144,000
Expenses - Forum software project: $849,400
Expenses - Mods and others: About $104,000
2016:
Income: About $178,000
Expenses - Forum software project: $36,260
Expenses - Mods and others: About $85,000
Expenses - Hosting etc: About $27,000
2017*
Income: About $1,065,000
Expenses - Forum software project: About $159,000
Expenses - Mods and others: About $120,000
Expenses - Hosting etc: About $40,000 |
|
|
|
I guess no one has shown the image that appears. So just to show that the system seems to be working very well, avoiding double spending and Merits inflation.  Tks theymos.  |
|
|
|
I don't know if the peeps are really getting the point here since a lot of them are repeating the same thing in their replies that it would be abused, or there shouldn't be such a giveaway etc. That is not what OP is trying to say here (if I'm understanding correctly). The point of doing this would only be to encourage people to take part in a poll, and search for the correct answers of it, which would eventually increase their knowledge. There wouldn't/shouldn't be any rewards for answering (correctly). If someone is getting a bit knowledge out of it, there is no harm in it.
More knowledge = better post quality.
Yeap! He began by talking about merits and many assumed that this was the purpose of the questionnaire. As I understand it, it would just be something fun and informative to do. And the only reward would be a badge. The purpose would be similar to the phases that sometimes appear on the ad slot. |
|
|
|
Interesting, I think your formula is better. Could someone put a print screen using this script? Maybe from an altcoin topic. I had previously suggested a possibility that would use the "ignore" function of the forum. Rather than having lists created manually, we would have list sources that would be updated constantly. It would work almost the same way this script, depending on the list you choose, but without having to install or use any kind of script. But those who commented on the topic did not like it because they thought the ignore function had to be an individual choice... :/ |
|
|
|
Eu sou novato só preciso de 1
Com spam/shiling como esse tópico https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103667.msg49481834#msg49481834
É tão horrível que significa que a troca pode levar meus fundos a qualquer momento.
E o que significa "que a troca" ? Só falta ser outro perfil do molho bechamel tentando fingir que é brasileiro pra fazer traduções porcas. |
|
|
|
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-01/iu-tht012519.phphttps://misq.org/the-invisible-hand-of-piracy-an-economic-analysis-of-the-information-goods-supply-chain.htmlThe hidden treasure of digital piracy? Can boost bottom line for manufacturers, retailers BLOOMINGTON, Ind. -- HBO's popular television series "Game of Thrones" returns in April, but millions of fans continue to illegally download the program, giving it the dubious distinction of being the most pirated program. Many may wonder why the TV network hasn't taken a more aggressive approach to combating illegal streaming services and downloaders. Perhaps it is because the benefits to the company outweigh the consequences. Research analysis by faculty in Indiana University's Kelley School of Business and two other schools found that a moderate level of piracy can have a positive impact on the bottom line for both the manufacturer and the retailer -- and not at the expense of consumers. "When information goods are sold to consumers via a retailer, in certain situations, a moderate level of piracy seems to have a surprisingly positive impact on the profits of the manufacturer and the retailer while, at the same time, enhancing consumer welfare," wrote Antino Kim, assistant professor of operations and decision technologies at Kelley, and his co-authors. "Such a win-win-win situation is not only good for the supply chain but is also beneficial for the overall economy." While not condoning piracy, Kim and his colleagues were surprised to find that it can actually reduce, or completely eliminate at times, the adverse effect of double marginalization, an economic concept where both manufacturers and retailers in the same supply chain add to the price of a product, passing these markups along to consumers. The professors found that, because piracy can affect the pricing power of both the manufacturer and the retailer, it injects "shadow" competition into an otherwise monopolistic market. "From the manufacturer's point of view, the retailer getting squeezed is a good thing," Kim said. "It can't mark up the product as before, and the issue of double marginalization diminishes. Vice versa, if the manufacturer gets squeezed, the retailer is better off. "What we found is, by both of them being squeezed together -- both at the upstream and the downstream levels -- they are able to get closer to the optimal retail price that a single, vertically integrated entity would charge." In the example of "Game of Thrones," HBO is the upstream "manufacturer" in the supply chain, and cable and satellite TV operators are the downstream "retailers." Kim and his co-authors -- Atanu Lahiri, associate professor of information systems at the University of Texas-Dallas, and Debabrata Dey, professor of information systems at the University of Washington -- presented their findings in the article, "The 'Invisible Hand' of Piracy: An Economic Analysis of the Information-Goods Supply Chain," published in the latest issue of MIS Quarterly. They suggest that businesses, government and consumers rethink the value of anti-piracy enforcement, which can be quite costly, and consider taking a moderate approach. Australia, for instance, due to prohibitive costs, scrapped its three-strikes scheme to track down illegal downloaders and send them warning notices. Though the Australian Parliament passed a new anti-piracy law last year, its effectiveness remains unclear until after it is reviewed in two years. As with other studies, Kim and his colleagues found that when enforcement is low and piracy is rampant, both manufacturers and retailers suffer. But they caution against becoming overzealous in prosecuting illegal downloaders or in lobbying for more enforcement. "Our results do not imply that the legal channel should, all of a sudden, start actively encouraging piracy," they said. "The implication is simply that, situated in a real-world context, our manufacturer and retailer should recognize that a certain level of piracy or its threat might actually be beneficial and should, therefore, exercise some moderation in their anti-piracy efforts. "This could manifest itself in them tolerating piracy to a certain level, perhaps by turning a blind eye to it," they add. "Such a strategy would indeed be consistent with how others have described HBO's attitude toward piracy of its products."
I believe that most people who believe in Bitcoin have, or had in the past, some connection with piracy. Mp3, napster, Torrents. Competition, even if it is through an unregulated competitor, requires you to improve your product or you will be replaced. This may possibly occur with fiat ...
|
|
|
|
What is investing in casinos?
You will invest to increase their bankroll. That means you are putting money into the casino so people can bet against it. That is, you are betting that the casino will win more games than it will lose against its user. It is not a simple investment. It should be regarded as a lower risk bet. But it's still a gamble.All casinos work with statistics that are favorable. This means that most likely in the long run you will make a profit. yolodice.comYou will invest to increase their bankroll. Your investment will represent a portion of the bankroll in a group. So this means you are betting on yolodice against the players. If the site has profit, you will receive your share less their commission(35%). You could leverage too. https://yolodice.com/#faq/investinghttps://bitvest.io/investingYour share is equal to (Your_Investment / (Global_Bankroll + Your_Investment)) * 100% 70% of profits to investors. So you pay them 30% if they deliver profits. https://betking.io/investYou pay 10% of the profits that you receive. So you keep 90%
https://www.crypto-games.net/faqWe take 30% of the profit/losses that are made in a 1-hour interval. Also, when calculating profit/losses, faucets and referral rewards are factored in. Over the long run, you can expect your profit to equal your percentage of the bankroll multiplied by house edge, total wagered amount, and 70%.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
