~
Constantly attacking those who you perceive as having wronged you is not going to change the fact that you're a plagiarising ICO-bumping maggot. Stop derailing threads with your butthurt. I just mentioned a fact. I hope that doesn't count as something worth of red trust from an abusers perspective which you are trying to defend. |
|
|
|
Previously theymos has told that DT users who use the trust system to negative tag a person for their posting habits will not longer remain a DT member.
I have nothing personally against JollyGood , but I wonder if any of the DT members who have it on their list have removed (distrust) him due to inappropriate use of negative feedback? Personally, I felt on my skin that such abuse is punished by other DT members very expressively without any hesitation. No, mostly because he didn’t do it to some poor undeserving user out of some personal vendetta to destroy their account.. He was right, even though he used the wrong tag button.. He has done it around dozens of time previously out of his personal vendetta. It's clear that he has too much of an ego and likes to shit on others user trust wall without any solid reason's for doing so. He always uses wrong tag button to show whom he puts on ignore. ( but can't stand by his words anyways). Maybe this is more clear now. |
|
|
|
For this situation, your post resembles a call to make "however many elective records as would be prudent." Are you genuine? The guidelines of abundance organization sound so that in the vast majority of them they preclude the investment of elective records. This implies if individuals have second records, they ought to show up as isolated profiles. Totally discrete. In any case, administrators don't suggest that. It's simply that individuals make more records to expand their profit. I have seen two client Hhampuz and yahoo62278 both took an interest in one mark crusade. The venture of overseeing more than o e record and meeting the week by week portion isn't a simple errand and you may end up spamming which may decrease your odds of being acknowledged in a lucrative mission.
https://archive.st/b1kxBy chance? And you rewrite many other people's posts like that? Looks like use of some text spinner to me. Yet this don't look like something which deserve a neg tag from someone like JollyGood how enjoys abusing trust. |
|
|
|
You're abusing the trust system to settle your personal disputes. Those are the facts evident in your trust history. You can talk all you want about some mysterious motives and your surely have fooled enough users to maintain your position in DT but I'm not one of them, you patronizing lying piece of shit scammer.
Many users in DT leaving OGnasty use trust system to settle there dispute's. Some even use flag system at times when someone offends them in a way. I don't think OGnasty has fooled anyone to put himself into DT, rather the vessels making most noise here are the once fooling innocent and new users to fall into there fake trap. |
|
|
|
|
JollyGood still seems to be a general imbecile. Can't imagine how low life troll he is...
Shame on DT for still keeping that biased trust abuser there.
|
|
|
|
|
I think bob123 over reacted by giving JohhnyUA a red tag for merely stating he doesn't care about a law. Even I don't like some laws and think it's acceptable to voice an vaild opinion against it.
Bob123 seems to be an friendly guy overall and he could reconsider the feedback as it is reflected in DT feedback to many. It can also harm JohhnyUA's business one way or another.
|
|
|
|
I read it, and I am firm at my decision to oppose it. ( I don't how many times you would come up with the same argument )
As many times as needed until you read it and present a coherent counter-argument. You made false claims when you initially opposed the flag. Then you changed your reasoning to "there is no financial loss reported", which is irrelevant since I'm not claiming that there is financial loss reported, hence you still haven't read it or you're being obtuse. So feel free to try again. Third time's a charm maybe. I am on the point already. Spy100 didn't wanted to use an escrow as per his services thread. You just went in and jumbled it by asking for an escrow again. He didn't had any reported risk or loss with his betting service until then to accuse him of anything. You could have just acted as a big man and left the thread and spy100 alone, but you are yet here triggering him to go into worst mental state everyday. |
|
|
|
you can see for yourself what they are doing ... imagine if your a baker,barber or painter etc and some troll group like Lauda try to scam you for money ... i don't get why moderators are not doing nothing anything and ban this type of people ...
we got to show their true nature else people will think we are the scammers ... i know it's not polite to dox ....
I reported them to moderators ...but they are not responding ...
Even in true hacking forums on darkweb people have respect ...but on bitcointalk it's like there is no more order ... back in 2014-2015 you couldn't do this type of scams they are doing ,they would have gotten instant ban.
I can understand you're true frustrations and am sure you are put into this high risk loop by members like suchmoon and others, whereas there is no financial loss reported until. It's not wrong to say most of the user's supporting the flag against you have not understood the situation or not even read the explanations in the threads clearly. Reporting them to the mod would never work until they broke some forum rule, hence you should try disputing the flag.
You should try disputing the flag against you as it's not legit.
The flag against spy100 is legit and as you can see he's putting a lot of effort towards proving that. You just didn't read the referenced stuff. I read it, and I am firm at my decision to oppose it. ( I don't know how many times you would come up with the same argument ) |
|
|
|
You scared suchmoon ?  Scared of what, your meltdown? Not really. There is a bit of a risk because some other scammers have been peddling my alleged dox around the forum and you sound deranged enough to act IRL on a fucking forum disagreement. However you clearly haven't thought through the logistics so the chances of you actually showing at someone's door are not very high. You'd probably end up doing some keyboard warrior stuff like sending nasty e-mails to my alleged employer or registering me to a child porn site. All i have to do is find where you live ...and after we going to have a little talk you and me ...face to face. And i will tell you then the cost of you trying to scam me or other people. If you dig more you could easy find suchmoon's dox here, but I don't think it's an good idea to speak of physical threats on this forum as it's not allowed. You should even not dox anyone btw, it's probably the way of cowards like Lauda. You should try disputing the flag against you as it's not legit. |
|
|
|
7 of my insightful old posts criticizing BSV were deleted yesterday by the same hypertroll mentioned in the OP. I support the proposal of stopping such fudster from creating self moderated threads. |
|
|
|
Is this your Twitter account ? https://twitter.com/bitcoinfast1Even the ETH address used in the spreadsheet linked to the negative trust reference match to the recently posted address of yours, it atleast means it's your address and you were the one who signed up and abused the bounty. |
|
|
|
I have conveniently linked to a post above where it's clearly shown that you made an obviously false claim so you either didn't read or blatantly lied in the flag reference thread. Consequently you (1) opposed the flag under false pretenses, which I don't really give much of a shit about since that's your regular guild MO, and (2) you're continuing to spam your useless drivel that has no plausible connection to actual facts or any semblance of informed opinion.
AKA shitposting.
I don't think "please" is something you understand but still. It is on point that the OP didn't scammed anyone, and is victimized with clear mobbing at most. Turn it as you want to. |
|
|
|
Please, I do not shitpost or have any incentives to do so and I have also read all the realted threads so stop repeating it. Even after all this reading, I think spy100 was not willing to scam anyone but was just trying to be an bookie at most. Mobbing has made his account, which is as old as yours worthless without him doing anything highly risky. What's more to this anyways ? |
|
|
|
Does anyone act like adults around here anymore? Boo hoo suchmoon left me a feedback, get over it dude. Trust isn't moderated. Making 10000000 threads and reporting them to a moderator will get you 0 results.
~suchmoon in your trust list and move on.
Everyone is acting like an adult but not until when you're business and account's reputation here is being destroyed with unwanted risk flags and red trusts as on the OP, it's not easy to move on. @spy100 didn't scam anyone or tried to do so, it's just that suchmoon got offended in his betting thread and built up an drama which is later encouraged by more unethical and ass licking users as well as DTs by adding more red trusts and supporting the risk flag. |
|
|
|
They say they need more donations to keep the site going so I think the money will go to good use making tools that scan websites.
Don't look like an nice scam busting site, as they are personally accepting advertisements from 1xBit on there website. Looks fishy.  |
|
|
|
It looks like 24kcasino bought the spot in question. Unless the spot is being subleased, or they didn’t pay their winning bid, the two entities are probably one and the same. They even ran a successful looking signature campaign here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213621.0Probably, both 1xBit and 24kcasino are owned by the same person.
Any suggestions for a particular charity?
Ofcourse, go with @Royse777's one as mentioned above. |
|
|
|
~ What kind of comedy would it be without the village idiot? I guess, you are enjoying too much of an comedy while the whole world is facing pandemic depression. You probably have an childish sense of humour indeed. And thanks for showing you don't care about any abuse and are just here to talk about comedy. **New Clown**
spy100 is not even a newbie to force him to use an escrow.
Nobody is forcing him to do anything. He made the claims about escrow on his own. You came up with the escrow thing, he didn't said anything about it initially. Since you're not funding it yourself your service is useless and 10% is way more than any reputable escrow would charge for escrowing a simple P2P bet.
I wanna play. Who's the escrow?
Also, it's pretty clear that spy100 would not run away with 0.01ETH (~4$) and doesn't deserve a risk flag.
He had 10 bets listed so he's looking for 0.1 ETH or more - there isn't really an upper limit to this. But it's great that this is so clear to you. Feel free to send him your money. One can even bet on a single option and just wager 0.01ETH if he/she wants to, so nobody is forcing anyone to wager on 10 different bets at the same time. Its just that you got offended with his words and started making an issue out of it by giving red trust and starting a flag. I think this is more clear now. I have a feeling you didn't really read or understand this debacle and just posted a couple of pounds of word salad to make it look like you have a reason to oppose the flag. That's fine. Would be shocking if you missed this opportunity to desecrate the corpse of the English language.
Wrong as always. I read both the threads before posting here. |
|
|
|
As per I see, suchmoon tried to hijack spy100's topic and claimed, he is to be offering scam services, where as it was clear that spy was offering an P2P betting service as per mentioned in the thread title and OP there. This was arrogant too. spy100 is not even a newbie to force him to use an escrow. All these "services" that you're coming up with sound more and more like scams. Stop before someone flags you.
I am opposing the flag as even a 14 year old child would understand the difference between betting and scam. Also, it's pretty clear that spy100 would not run away with 0.01ETH (~4$) and doesn't deserve a risk flag. P.S: I can see those usual trust abusers taking interest in painting him red. Perfect Mobbing by usual abusers. |
|
|
|
So I see how a nice thread is opened in the Croatian board about me, in which the person in question for some reason known only to him calls me with a female name
We got one more here. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5271472.0everything he did after I opened this thread shows what kind of character he is. True indeed. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
