That's okay LMAO! My dear Marcel, I think you should, instead, work harder for elevating your judgement to madnessteat's standards That's a good question and it applies also to the remaining 47 users which still trust Ratimov (they were 49 in the last update, but meanwhile Charles-Tim also deleted him from his Trust list) -- Balthazar, silversurfer1958, peloso, Gianluca95, rby, SiNeReiNZzz, thandie, tmfp, s0nix, WhiteManWhite, nimogsm, SPQRCoin, my luck, FutureBitcoin, Wapfika, dimonstration, whyrqa, BtcMan2009, CarnagexD, imhoneer, Chrystora123, Best_Change, KTChampions, Smartprofit, Coin-1, Julien_Olynpic, sky999, Ridcan, bubbalex, XEOP$, taikuri13, Snork1979, DabLjat, FontSeli, YOSHIE, elmanchez, KOPHEP, WEX-SCAM, ajanwalker, Zilon, _BlackStar, Shamm, KingsDen, Nathrixxx, SatoPrincess, Silence Scream and Jossque. KOPHEP and Nathrixxx are banned so they can't answer this question, while others are inactive. Yet the question is still valid for many of the names mentioned above.
|
|
|
If you had any proof of Ratimov's abuses, I would have a completely different opinion of him. All proof is in OP. One must not forget the presumption of innocence. Ratimov benefited from the presumption of innocence for 4 years. Until people finally started to open their eyes. I am not a friend of Ratimov as you stated above. I stated that you are his minion, not friend. As I have already said more than once on this forum I am ready to bear any punishment with my head up if I really deserve it, up to the blocking of the account This will happen if it'll be the case.
Meanwhile, Ratimov's no. 1 fan ( after jokers10 decided to abandon the sinking ship, LOL!) decided that judgement of LoyceV, suchmoon and lovesmayfamilis is not up to his standards. As a curiosity, he also distrusted me but 1h33'03" later he decided that I am not that untrustworthy so he deleted me from his distrust list.
|
|
|
three sites have successfully been taken down and now they have hosted a different domain to continue their scam. Oh gawd, I can not believe this! I just reported the website to Google but I believe we need once more iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 experience here. Meanwhile, everybody should report this website to Google and also the 2 remaining Telegram groups.
|
|
|
iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 this is simply amazing! You took down 2 websites on your own! Chapeau for that! Guys, I believe iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 needs some more merits for his incredible efforts and - more important - for his incredible results! iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 alone managed to shut down 2 websites pretending they are they real UniJoin! So if you have sMerits left do not hesitate to merit iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2!
Having all imposter websites taken down, I believe we can focus more now on our old "friends": Fake channel: Fake group: https://t.me/+9-b0IbSBkNhlNTkx Fake telegram channel: Fake telegram group: https://t.me/+w2Dzbpg_dCMxMmYx Please send the reports to abuse@telegram.org and /or to https://t.me/notoscam. Who would think that taking down 3 websites will take less than taking down 2 Telegram groups...?
|
|
|
Avem concurs nou! 2023 Holiday giveaway Raffle 100 slots 21 prizeshttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474780Se pot castiga urmatoarele: cafea columbiana Lightning, moneda scoasa la imprimanta 3D de catre krogoth, 5 portofele VOYR Tangem, timbre, set de 3 monede Stellar Lumens, deschizator de capace Litecoin HODL, bomboane, cuburi de gheata metalice Balletcrypto (nu stiam ca exista asa ceva Oo), portofel Balletcrypto pentru LTC gravat pe spate in onoarea celui de-al treilea halving al Litecoin, 2 pachete cu niste carti de joc Bitcoin, doua suporturi magnetice pentru carti de vizita, 2 portofele Lynx Black Monero, portofel Lynx Ethereum DIY. Organizator: MoparMiningLLCPoate participa oricine, daca are contul inregistrat inainte de 01.01.2023 (cu exceptia celor care au mai achizitionat produse de la organizator). Nu este permisa inregistrarea cu conturi alternative. Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat). Cei care au achizitionat produse de la utilizator pot rezerva 2 locuri in cadrul rombolei. Transportul: se achita de catre castigator.
|
|
|
As for "overlooking" the OP's facts, what I'm saying is that someone who trusts 1miau for his overall ability to leave correct feedbacks and for his trust list, is not going to change because of those facts. This is correct. 1miau is a very good forum contributor and a fair DT user. If we look at 1miau's feedbacks we can see that they are more fair compared to many other (DT) users' feedbacks. Maybe someone does, but it's not going to be massive as in the case of Ratimov. This is also true. I highly doubt that 1miau would risk being massively distrusted. 1miau acted in a fair and correct manner for years, while Ratimov tried to fool the entire forum for years. 1miau wrote useful topics and never tried to impersonate other authors, while Ratimov plagiarized and presented other's work as being his. 1miau did not make a career with copy-pasted essays, while Ratimov earned thousands of merits with copy-paste. 1miau never extorted someone with negative feedbacks, while Ratimov terrorized many forum users which ever dared to state the truth about him. 1miau earned his respect in time, while Ratimov bought an army of minions by showering them in merits. 1miau is a correct forum user, while Ratimov is a bad joke. Should I continue? I guess not.
|
|
|
Maybe he is a voice actor and so many offensive sentences are the result of him dubbing this movie? I don't think he is a voice actor but, for sure, he is an actor. He played his role well all these years when he succeeded in fooling all the forum about what-a-great-contributor the imposter is.
|
|
|
In fact, I like to add at the end of my translations the following code I added it to all my translations which were made at AOBT's initiative (I did not add the banner to the translations I made before they were proposed here).
Porf: please be aware that there are some translations made by you which have still the old model for the above sentence ( link 1, link 2, link 3, link 4; at link 4 maybe you can take a look also at the image links as they are broken...).
Last but not least: Hatchy, OP was updated. Welcome to our Hall of Fame!! I am also welcoming Hatchy! And great job with those avatars
|
|
|
This time all spots were occupied in only 13 minutes! I guess it's a new record. As usual, I was having my beauty sleep at that moment so I missed the raffle Again.
|
|
|
Astazi MixTum a organizat a patra tombola, avand ca premiu unul dintre cardurile mentionate mai sus: [Free Raffle] Exclusive MixTum collectible card №6Din nou, locurile s-au ocupat extrem de rapid, in doar 13 minute. Nu am reusit sa ma inscriu nici acum la acest concurs, insa speranta moare ultima
|
|
|
Avem concurs nou! [FREE RAFFLE]538th - ฿ECAUSE I AM STILL IN A GOOD MOOD-CYPHER HODL LOADED BALLEThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474683Se pot castiga urmatoarele: un card Cypher Hodl incarcat cu 0.00005 BTC. Organizator: krogothmanhattanPoate participa oricine, daca s-a inregistrat inainte de 1 iulie. Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat). Transportul: gratuit in SUA; pentru restul lumii se va discuta cu minerjones. Concursul este identic cu cele anterior realizate de OP.
Mie mi se pare mult mai OK/accesibila varianta electronica, dar asta's eu. Cartea chiar trebuie citita, asadar e o tombola foarte faina. Eu sunt mai de moda veche... Imi place sa tin cartile in maini, sa dau paginile cu degetele... sa le simt mirosul de hartie... Multa bafta! Sa fie
O sa fac un pic de curatenie printe concusrurile de pe prima pagina si: * "Test our new Bitcoin wallet (iOS) and earn $20 in Bitcoin" l-am sters ca nu mai are activitate din septembrie * "Utopia P2P Ecosystem 💎 Poker Client - Review Campaign 🔎" l-am sters ca este pe pauza de aproape o luna * "[Competition]: The Signature End... - Prize: 2mBTC" se pare ca s-a terminat fara castigatorDe acord cu toate propunerile. Sunt in dubiu daca la cardul Unijoin ultima "ridicare de mana" este o inscriere valida sau nu (cred ca nu). Nu e eligibil si nici nu cred ca va fi selectat... doar daca nu s-o fi saturat UniJoin sa astepte sa se umple locurile
|
|
|
Avem un concurs nou! [free raffle] Mastering Bitcoin bookhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474667Se pot castiga urmatoarele: o editie tiparita in limba engleza a cartii Mastering Bitcoin, autor Andreas Antonopoulos (cartea nu este noua). Organizator: iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2Poate participa oricine daca are contul inregistrat inainte de 1 septembrie. Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 1 la 6 (care nu a fost deja rezervat).. Transportul: gratuit in UE.
|
|
|
With an account like this theymos will have a hard time getting accepted to sig camps. Theymos will be fine He may start by ranking up with theymos_away
|
|
|
P2P in CEX and DEX exchanges requires KYC. DEXs do not require KYC (or, at least, most of them).
|
|
|
I've been curious for a while, so I checked: Ratimov (2627711) received 1110/11924=9.30% Merit for deleted posts and 1522/11924=12.76% Merit for short posts. So Ratimov received 1522 merits (which is more than necessary for becoming Legendary!!!) for writing a few letters. Those must have been amazing letters!
And, as great minds think the same, I also thought about a short analysis today: it's the first time in the past 214 weeks since Ratimov's supporters ( n.b. -- users trusting him) are not more than the ones distrusting him. On latest update provided by LV, there are 49 users trusting him and 49 distrusting him. There are still a lot trusting him but the balance goes in the right direction, to say so. For example, at the end of week 45, so just before he made the circus inside AOBT thread (which generated everything that followed), he was trusted by 71 users and distrusted by only 24. During same week, his DT strength was +13, while now it is -9. And I am sure that the numbers of those distrusting him and of those which will stop trusting him will keep growing.
|
|
|
Terima kasih dansus021 telah menerjemahkan topik saya di forum Bahasa Indonesia!
Topik tentang reputasi dalam sistem perdagangan online ini merupakan kode etik umum dan dapat diterapkan dalam kehidupan kita sehari-hari juga. Namun, secara online hal ini lebih penting.Contoh di forum kita : tidak mudah membangun reputasi yang baik, mendapatkan kepercayaan orang lain, dan kemudian reputasi itu bisa saja hancur total dalam beberapa saat. Bagi yang belum tahu, bisa melihat apa yang terjadi pada Yogg yang merupakan anggota yang sangat dihormati di sini. Namun dalam waktu kurang dari sedetik, seluruh reputasinya hilang setelah dia melakukan kesalahan besar. Dia tiba-tiba mendapati dirinya memiliki peringkat Trust -40.
Jujurlah, ramah, dan tepati janji Anda! Ini semua yang diperlukan untuk memiliki reputasi yang baik. Sangat mudah untuk mengatakannya, tetapi pada saat yang sama sangat sulit untuk dilakukan.
Saya berdoa yang terbaik untuk kalian semua terumata untuk deals Anda di Masa depan!
|
|
|
On the other hand p2P can be used through CEX and kyc is mandatory for p2P services. Because of these basically we cannot avoid sex. You may want to rephrase that
Everything has pros and cons. For DEX, we will fully guarantee our privacy Who is we? but there will be disadvantages such as high transaction fees and not enough services like CEX provides us. Especially for day traders, DEX does not yet offer a daily trading feature. Why are you engaged in such a risky thing like day trading? You like losing money? For those still believing in getting rich over the night I suggest reading this topic: Trade vs. HODL - avoid traps. For me, both are good and each person has their own choice depending on their needs. I wouldn't be so stubborn as to say that people who are using CEX are idiots just for the sake of privacy. Some would also say that smoking is healthy or excessive drinking of alcohol is healthy. That doesn't mean that those activities are healthy. You can say and think whatever you want, that will not make CEXs a good phenomena in crypto space.
p2p services are not available here. So DEX can be used to trade cryptos and CEX to cash them out as needed. Because we don't usually need to cash out large amounts, CEX can be used to cash out small amounts as needed. Or avoiding Cex we can physically sell crypto to known crypto investors. In this case at least we will not have any fear of document theft See? You already answered yourself about how to avoid CEXs although you don't have DEXs in your are.
You are wrong, most DEXs provide p2p features but because the number of DEX users is still limited, p2p trading will be a bit difficult. For example, it will take us longer to find suitable buyers and sellers, we do not have as many options as in CEX. This happens because so many users headed to CEXs at the beginning. Time passes and people start to understand the huge risks they are confronted with when using CEXs and DEXs came into play recently. The more people will use DEXs the more DEXs will exist. This is an effort we all have to do in order to avoid this plague caused by CEXs. One more thing, p2p on centralized exchanges is no longer pure peer-to-peer trading because of exchange intervention. While that ensures the transaction goes smoothly and we can complain if a dispute arises, it makes the transaction no longer truly peer-to-peer. Peer-to-peer services by CEXs are a joke, as you are also fully exposed to all risks involved by CEXs. Stay away of these services! By the way, if you use CEX to withdraw or convert to fiat, it means your identity is exposed, it is not necessary for you to use DEX to trade when your identity is known as CEX has be collected. This is true. Never associate crypto with CEXs and with banks! For more information you can also read this topic of mine: 12 years later and people still don't know to use Bitcoin nor what it's good for.
|
|
|
I won’t take anyone’s side here since you already know my position, but Kingf1sher’s post was not about Ratimov. This was probably misunderstood. I can't find the threat post, but confirmation that Kingf1sher was talking about madnessteat remains in the archives. I also remember that story where Madnessteat somehow "threatened" Kingf1sher. Thank you for clarifying this, lovesmayfamilis. So let me see if I understood this right: it was madnessteat the one threatening Kingf1sher, right? If so, are you so kind, please, to find the post containing those threats? I would like to report them, as this deserves a ban. As a coincidence, this only proves a Romanian saying: tell me who your friends are, so I'll know who you are. madnessteat is one of Ratimov's minions and this says a lot about Ratimov's character as well.
As for the recent discussion about 1miau, I believe that his reputation precedes him and everybody knows what an exemplary forum contributor he is.
|
|
|
|