Sometimes it is necessary for a person to have information about that user with whom he intends to do any type of business. Whenever I see someone with a negative trust, I click to know for what reason he received that feedback. Even without any intention of doing any business with it. And there, in my opinion, comes the question of neutral feedback, in many situations a neutral feedback would be enough.

But Neutral FeedBack is not enough. Because it does not appear easily to anyone. I think it should be highlighted when any user receives any feedback. Be it neutral or from a person who is not a DT member. It could have much less prominence than the flashy colors of green and red. But enough for the person to read that feedback about that user.

For example, there was this case of a user pretending to be Brazilian. And with that, he participated in translation bounties. It took more than 7 months before he received a negative trust. And at that time, he continued to participate in translations. He clearly is not Brazilian, any Brazilian could see that. But the neutral tag he had received did not matter since no one read. Only now, with a negative tag, maybe the people who hire him read the topic about him and can decide if he's the right person for the job.

They should give. They should offer anything, with the exception of LBJames. It's the great opportunity knocking on the door. AD is only 25 years old, would still have time to become the main star with the eventual retirement of LBJames. And for AD is also a great opportunity. He would play on a team that would probably play the next 3 conference finals.

I found this idea interesting. But the site seems a little big. And this background animation is exaggerated and unnecessary. Such a service would be interesting to access directly from the mobile, perhaps with just one app. So the page could be simpler.

Another issue is about not being able to see and test the platform before paying. When I click to sign up, I'll ask for $ 50. I do not know and do not trust the website to pay only to test and get to know the service.

This is interesting. I still believe that Bitcoin's great opportunities lie in the tourism industry and in the product industry that finds it difficult to establish relationships with banks. As is the case with marijuana. And now thinking better, if society moves in the direction of more liberal policies, with more individual freedoms, it would be great for Bitcoin.

Banks are conservative over many things to minimize the risks. A new industry that allows for free transit of money in a more open society can emerge against banks. Today, the only possible project in this direction is cryptocurrency.

Does anyone know what change they had made? KYC?

They had an incredible amount of pairs with shitcoins. They added almost any coin and kept it, even at a very low volume. I do not think the business model was really viable. In the bull market, the margins are very large and many businesses only existed because of this.

https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/liqui/

Are you asking the site to give back the value your child lost? Or to give back what he won?

What exactly is the value you are asking for?

I find it very improbable that a child of 12 years has managed to raise among his school friends more than $ 6200. And then, he exchanged that amount for Bitcoins, he created an account on a Dice website. All this in a few weeks...

It would be better to offer a small bonus, maybe $ 2 per review, and a prize of $ 50 in BTC, directly on the wallet for the best review.

The 2 dollars in BTC would be deposited in the site account and could be withdrawn after participating in any game and writing the review. You could get much more positive publicity and spending far less

Do you get this message when you directly use the Bitmex platform, or are you using some other App?

The message you receive is "ParticipateDoNotInitiate" ?
"Also known as a Post-Only order. If this order would have executed on placement, it will cancel instead. "

This is related to Stop Limit. And usually appears when using other apps or charts.

There is no definitive date yet. What exists is the discussion of the ideal format for discussions and dissemination of the project. And possibly a release in the next few weeks of formal specs. It is a call so that the people who like the project can participate with their doubts and suggestions.

Não foi a plataforma, foi um phishing utilizando o site do forum deles. Pessoal visitava o forum e aparecia como deslogado, quando digitava as informações o hacker pegava os dados e retirava os Bitcoins da conta.

Anything that has a price and opportunity for speculation can be a bubble. It is very difficult to determine the value of something. Especially when it is traded in several markets around the world.

If you believe the price will stabilize at 1400USD, you do not believe it's a bubble. You're just betting on a devaluation.

I sold mine immediately after Bitrex and Binance opened the pair with Bitcoin. I do not know if it was the biggest price, but it was definitely one of the best decisions I made. I did the same with all the other forks.

Faltam 86 pra que eu vire Hero. Eu queria distribuir mais Merits na nossa aba, mas pouca gente está escrevendo por aqui. Quase nenhum tópico criado.

The great challenge of the platforms that offer smart contracts is not the scalability. It's the challenge of a decentralized oracle. The middleman of trust. As long as there is no consensus of an oracle that can actually serve as a middleman in most contracts, and recognized by governments, the figure of the Judge and the lawyers will still be much needed.

This has probably been suggested before as a change in the forum, but maybe creating a script is simpler.

Show the amount of Merit that has been distributed in a topic in the title on the section list of topics. You would know how many merits a topic received before opening it. In the same way, we can see the number of responses and views that a topic had.

thanks for sharing. There are great maths behind ethereum 2.0. The tables he has shown are really simple and easy to understand. "The user must first acquire 32 ETH.."

Foi o block #15324. Demorou mais de 1 dia.

O bloco anterior era o #15323

Altura   15323 (Sequência Principal)
Timestamp   2009-05-22 13:35:06

Altura   15324 (Sequência Principal)
Timestamp   2009-05-23 14:43:58

Is there any possibility of Neutral Feedback being displayed? I mean, without the need to go to the user's profile?

I believe that in many situations neutral feedback about the user becomes necessary, but almost nobody will know that it exists.  Knowing that there is an investigation, discussion or even doubt about that user can be very useful in several situations.

 I think Theymos always try to get as close as possible to decentralized systems. Both with the Merit system and with the Trust System. Often, the suggestions involve centralizing the decisions in some people, like hiring someone or leaving with the mods, or a system of votes. Creating a democracy, with a system of equal votes for each user, is very difficult in an environment where anonymity must prevail. In this current system, it seems to me that the opinion of each user is quite important, although I have not studied the system completely. That is, you add someone or remove someone always counts. I do not have anyone on my Trust list, just the Defalt, but I removed some user I do not trust in opinion.

theymos_away is an alt account from theymos. SatoshiDice is a the companies Pr. Recently an user using a nick #bitcoinCore was tag. He was not trying to cheat anyone, so he was allowed to change his nick.

But sometimes others users try to impersonate theymos or other staff members. Especially with copper membership and the auction. So people need to always have extra careful when receiving a private message