Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:04:06 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 323 »
621  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Interested in selling up to 5000 bitcoins for USD bank wire on: May 28, 2013, 09:23:29 PM
Let me know if you're interested, and what price you would be willing to pay.

You must be a VERY reputable trader for me to think about doing a deal.

Why would you want a bank wire that large? That has *got* to attract some attention. I can't even get a few thousand anymore in my Korean bank without them literally calling me and asking "uhh, what is this wire related to? derp".
622  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What is a POST? on: May 28, 2013, 08:20:15 PM
I don't quite understand you response.  To create a post, do you hit reply on an existing thread, or go to "new topic" and create a new discussion?

A post is:

  • any thread you start (like this one)
  • any response inside of any thread anywhere
  • a wooden pole usually used for holding up a fence
623  Other / Meta / Re: Marketplace trust on: May 28, 2013, 07:45:46 PM
This is exactly what the forum needed thank you theymos finally the forum gets a feedback score!!!
Hopefully you can only rate members you agree to trade with? if not i will donate to get the feature added.

You can rate anyone, read through the thread and all will be explained.

God damn.... BOO HISS. f me in the a, that sucks.. Theymos it is simple make a trade button both people enter terms both hit accept hitting accept is a binding agreement.. then you can rate the trade. f!@# how hard is that.  

This. Transaction related feedback is the only feedback anyone should care about imo, otherwise it becomes a political tool and popularity contest, or completely spammable like bitcoin-otc.
624  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Mattew N. Wright still passing off a scam in the past as just a "prank" on: May 28, 2013, 07:23:33 PM
So, you are publicly stating that all the BTC generated by your Avalon (except the % you have auctioned) will go to repay your debt with the community?

I'd be happy to answer your question (thank you for keeping the loaded words and insinuations to only a few this time . I know it was difficult for you  Roll Eyes). I have no need to make any public announcements because I don't owe the community any debt (at least I was under the impression this community is far larger than the number of people involved in my bet..at least I hope it is or bitcoin has no chance of success).

Most have already been paid, but the people remaining I have made settlements with and they will be paid per their terms, and yes, not only did the auctioned shares go straight to paying some of those settlements but bitcoins mined from those rigs will also be used for settlements. I'm not involved in bitcoin for profits at the moment, I'm involved to make money so that I can pay what I agreed to pay. Since that bet I was told by someone "trust takes years to build and seconds to break". I take that to heart now and have no intention of being in any role that requires unnecessary trust. That said, I've made my personal life and identity public to a point of weakness, to ensure that I am held accountable for my actions always. I'm happy to learn and help others learn from my actions as well. Can't wait to finish making things right and continue doing what I do best-- building.

See you around Rampion.
625  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Mattew N. Wright still passing off a scam in the past as just a "prank" on: May 28, 2013, 07:05:14 PM
Matt, I hope you have at least the balls and the decency to keep the promise you did in your "apology" to the community, just a few months ago:
I will not be involved in any businesses in this community any longer.

Rampion. your trolling is starting to become obvious. That post was made almost 9 months ago (not a few) and it was made when I left the first time and hadn't attempted to make things right. The fact that you'd cheaply try to paint a picture otherwise shows me you're not interested in making things right, just attempting to make me look bad.

Oh... Wait... You are now auctioning shares of your batch #3 Avalon to noob members
Some are noobs, some are trusted members who know me. You continue to use loaded words to paint a darker picture to fit your skewed reality. Case in point:

Instead of using that income to repay your debt,
I saw this kind of ignorance in the auction thread itself. People don't realize that in order to pay back millions of dollars in faux internet bets denominated in BTC, you actually have to earn BTC. It seems like a much smarter thing to do to purchase a mining rig that earns BTC when you have to make payments in BTC over a long period of time, doesn't it? Also, why did you think that those bitcoins that went towards buying the rig were mine? Did you think I don't have any friends who know my difficult situation? You sure do love making assumptions, something only a troll would be doing.

you come back to the community to increase your profit.
You incorrectly assume I had a profit to begin with, instead of a huge net loss in addition to making good on my promises. All you're doing is proving to me that you don't actually care about this issue, you just want to spew misdirected venom.

The mistakes I made are mine to own and make up for. It is absolutely clear to everyone here that Rampion has a hard on for trolling me (as could be seen as far back as the auction thread). I'll be happy to prove anyone of like thought wrong with future actions, but I'm a little tired now responding to uninformed vitriol. If you can post an actual argument, I'll obviously respond (because I enjoy learning, especially about myself!). Judging by the direction you're taking though, it seems you're out of steam and are stuck on a loop so I'll go ahead and leave this one for now.

Well I don't know about your country, but if you read the law here, a child is defined as someone in the age range of 0-18
Please look up the definition of that word. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

Despite everything, I appreciate even the trolls for helping to remind me of what I should be striving to be better then. Thanks for that.
626  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: First (and best) altcoin ever: Tonal Bitcoin (TBC) on: May 28, 2013, 06:52:04 PM
Could you explain for a dummy what benefit to someone already using BTC using TBC would give?
627  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Windmill construction workshop accepts Bitcoin on: May 28, 2013, 11:01:44 AM
This forum already has it's fair share of windmills.

And you are busy fighting them  Cheesy
For freedom!
628  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Windmill construction workshop accepts Bitcoin on: May 28, 2013, 10:29:47 AM
This forum already has it's fair share of windmills.
629  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Mattew N. Wright still passing off a scam in the past as just a "prank" on: May 28, 2013, 09:34:27 AM
So, an analogy would be that in order to show the level of trust of a neighborhood, you would need to break into those people's homes and steal a few things.  You would have given them back later, right?
You must never have been a hacker before if you don't understand that logic. I admit it's a controversial logic that non hackers don't understand, and it's something TradeFortress is pulling right now by suckering newbies into trusting him on Ripple etc (which I don't approve of), but at the time I thought it was an appropriate display and I had always had problems with my boundaries in regards to trolling. I don't have those problems now, my life has been fundamentally changed thanks to a wake up call, a few creative outlets presenting themselves and a new job that keeps me thinking about consequences of actions.

Looking back though, it was in fact inappropriate and over the top and could have given people a certain sense of comfort to do more stupid things with their money (aside from the already stupid thing they did with it). The battle I was fighting was a losing one though and I made things worse by deflecting the attention away from the real criminal. What else is there to talk about? After 8 months and having already apologized, started settlements with everyone involved (paying half already), you'll excuse me if I don't jump up and down to help you beat this dead horse. Is this just because you don't like the word "prank"? I'll use a different word then. How about "stunt"?
630  Economy / Speculation / Re: OKPay to stop processing transfers to/from all Bitcoin exchanges on: May 28, 2013, 09:26:48 AM
that this OKPay withdrawal is just another part of the tactical manouevres undertaken by Government institutions to crack down on Bitcoin.  

Is there any evidence for that? or is that your TFH talking?

It's cultist thinking. They told me that their bank just closed the account because of too much traffic basically. It made them nervous. They're looking for a new bank to work with. Governments have bad qualities, banks have bad qualities, but I still don't understand how people think that whatever happens from banks is necessarily a conspiracy against bitcoin. I've run a payment services provider before (DialCoin). You have to be *insanely* paranoid about every cent going through it, because that money can put your company in jail. I don't blame banks for being banks, it's their business model that's broken.
631  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Mattew N. Wright still passing off a scam in the past as just a "prank" on: May 28, 2013, 09:16:30 AM
You thought Pirate was legit
I have neither believed he was legit nor non-legit, only that people were so quick to judge (just like you) what they didn't research or understand themselves. It doesn't matter what I *posted* at that time, because most of it was posted to draw out logical fallacies, discussion or to piss off trolls who already had grudges against me (people like you right now). I naively thought my stunt would somehow have an impact to stop the blind trust in this community, at the same time I was honestly enjoying myself bothering people like you who think they have me "figurered out". Yea, it was pretty dumb and I was definitely detached from reality on it. As some others posters have already said elsewhere, "he only taught himself a lesson". People are still falling for total bullshit here on a daily basis, so overall it was just a waste of reputation and a pretty immature thing to do.

Thus, you really thought that Pirate was not a ponzi
I still have no evidence he was a ponzi, just common sense and speculation that he was one. I still have no evidence Zhou Tong stole money from Bitcoinica, just common sense and speculation. What I've learned from all this is that you shouldn't interrupt the mob mentality unless you have *evidence* against them, not just opinion. It was very entertaining to screw with the mob, push them on, etc, but I honestly was so disconnected that I wasn't realizing the gravity of the situation (e.g. they weren't just trolls, they were people afraid of losing their money)

you really thought you had chances to win that bet
There's always a chance I could have won the bet, but that wouldn't have told anyone if Pirate was a ponzi or not, it could have simply meant his con was intended to be even longer and pull in more suckers. It has already been argued that he could have used my bet to instill *more* trust for his scam (which is not what I had intended and felt horrible after making that connection myself). What I would have done with funds if I had won is obvious. I am here to build, I am friends with almost every business and exchange owner in bitcoin. Do you really think I would have kept the money if I had won? Really? Why do you think I am driven by money? I waste money all the time just to get ideas out there (as you should know by now) and see if things will work, probing and poking the world around me. I want to correct my ideas and become successful on honest terms, I always have. This community is largely negative, bias and abusive though, and that has jaded my opinion quite a lot. Luckily, I have bounced back and have a new "fence" to not cross in my life.

If you wished to "teach a lesson", you would have created a bet that you had no chances to win (and with a complete different wording and terms).
You assume too much. What you mean is, if *you* had wanted to teach a lesson, *you* would have done A or B. I am not you, and I didn't understand what was going to happen. I was disconnected from reality on that one.

you are just laughing at us all.
I was laughing at you all until I realized that what I had done had collateral damage, in which case I stepped up and am making good on it like any man should. I'm not sorry for pulling a prank, I'm sorry for not realizing the damage it was causing. I threw eggs at a guy's house and broke his window basically, and you're here telling me that "You obviously knew that throwing that egg would break the window". Really? I "obviously knew"? You really don't know me very well if you think I "obviously know" things before doing them.  Wink

the real step forward for you would be to admit your real mistake
I've admitted all my mistakes regarding that bet. Your opinion and repeating the same thing over again is not going to materialize a new mistake out of thin air. If you can prove to me that I did something that I didn't realize I was doing, I'm obviously going to learn from it, but you can't argue with a person who knows themself and why they do things that they intended to hurt others. You're wasting your time.

Saying over and over yours was just a "prank" to "teach a lesson" just proves you are not really sorry about what you did
Repeating that to yourself doesn't make it true. Only I know how sorry I really am and everyone who was involved in the bet who has continued communication with me knows what's really going on in my life, mind and heart after all that mess. You're a bystander, so obviously you don't know the whole story, but you don't need to. All you need to know as a member of the community is that I'm not a danger, not a scammer, and am making good on my misguided promises of past as I grow up and take the reigns, raise the bar and look for a more mature existence.

That's what makes me mad at you
I'm not mad at you for trying to call me out on what you logically believe to be a hole, but I do have understanding that when you're drunk in the street and punch someone in the face, simply saying "I'm sorry" the next day doesn't cut it, and that you and people like you will keep me company for quite a while. I'm not afraid of that as I know myself and what my intentions in life are (hint: they're to build, not destroy).

you are looking for shortcuts to avoid facing the harsh truth
Count the threads I've started and replied to in this community regarding this issue. Count the lost businesses, contacts, relationships, trust and well, money, that I've lost doing the *right* thing. I'm pretty sure the harsh truth has been faced and you're the one avoiding it now.

Until you don't do that, for me you will still be an untrustworthy, mentally unbalanced child.
I can live with that. There are some people who think because I said a 17 year old girl is hot in her pictures (which she is), that that makes me a pedo (someone who likes toddlers), or someone who thinks because I stood up for what I thought was right that I am a "paid shill" of this or that. I can honestly live with one more anonymous, sockpuppet voice not trusting me. I'm not here for you, I'm here for me and the people who appreciate me. Not to be cliche but, "Hater's gonna hate".

Cheers
632  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Cheater accusation: Surpbitcoin. on: May 28, 2013, 08:19:29 AM
Auctions are binding (with few exceptions), and I would agree that breaking that near finish line is unethical.

Thank you. He's a cheater, like I said. Not a scammer, not a murderer, not a child molester, not a spammer, not the worst person even on these forums, but someone whom cheats (regardless of attempted disclaimers).
633  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Cheater accusation: Surpbitcoin. on: May 28, 2013, 08:09:05 AM
Unless a contract is signed / commitment is made, seller is free to change, and so is buyer.  

Auctions are a form of binding contract. That's kind of the point. People expect to be reserved the exclusive opportunity to purchase if they risk the largest amount of money up front. In this case, this was cheated from the highest bidder despite making it appear the otherwise winning bidder was only hours away from winning.

Anywy, if you read it, I said he is a cheater, not a scammer. Even with your jaded view you should be able to agree to that, considering "cheating is a part of ruthless business" and all that.
634  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why chinese ppl should use bitcoins not they copy-cat "CHINA"coin? on: May 28, 2013, 08:01:42 AM
do the chinese even call their country china?

Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo

"'Murika" seems so much simpler in comparison.
635  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Cheater accusation: Surpbitcoin. on: May 28, 2013, 07:58:09 AM
Auctions by their very nature prohibit such gaming. Disclaimers on viruses do not excuse the virus maker. Cheating is cheating. Don't (you or anyone else) put up an auction without the intent to sell to the highest bidder *here*, have some integrity.

Welcome to real World.

Seller sells for max profit, and buyer buys for best deal. Period.
That is not the "real world", that is a sad world lacking in any integrity. If that's the world you're helping build then you're part of the problem. Your groceries do not get sold to someone else while you're carrying them to the checkout, you don't also don't use *auctions* to test the market. Auctions are the final attempt to sell, after all else has failed.
636  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DWOLLA vs Paypal vs Bitcoin on: May 28, 2013, 07:53:54 AM
I'll start the ball rolling with the actual text (plus some more of my own) of the infographic in a table format as well as the bitcoin column (which I want to fill out with the help of people here).

Hey Matthew, you forgot something like that:

------ Dwolla ------------ Paypal ------------ Bitcoin ------
Transparency and open accountability
No
No
Yes (blockchain)

What are you thoughts?

Seperately, not bad! I'll add them!
637  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Cheater accusation: Surpbitcoin. on: May 28, 2013, 07:40:18 AM
Auctions by their very nature prohibit such gaming. Disclaimers on viruses do not excuse the virus maker. Cheating is cheating. Don't (you or anyone else) put up an auction without the intent to sell to the highest bidder *here*, have some integrity.

638  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] WorldCoinForum.org Staff & Rapid Growth Report on: May 28, 2013, 12:43:48 AM
This is the most obvious sockpuppet circle jerk spam thread I've ever seen. You didn't even attempt to hide your flagrant self promotion. Carry on.
639  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Mattew N. Wright still passing off a scam in the past as just a "prank" on: May 28, 2013, 12:38:52 AM
How this guy isn't banned is beyond me.  The community is asking for it.

You contradicted yourself there. The community *was* asking for it, and they got it (albeit not a smart thing to do). The level of scams and trust to strangers at that time in the forum was insane. The stunt that I pulled was to show that no matter who you trust, an escrowless bet with an internet stranger is the epitomy of stupid. I went out of my way to make it painfully clear to everyone that "I cannot tell a lie", and other textbook scammer claims, and people still went on blind faith. I even raised the maximum bets allowed to give the same people a chance and it backfired because they only took it more seriously. What I did was stupid, the *wrong* way to "teach a lesson" (which TradeFortress is now learning as well) and I regret having gone down that path.

As for being banned, I've been banned many times, for many reasons, never created a sock puppet account to subvert the ban and always took it seriously as a reflection of myself, corrected myself, and came back to work harder, troll less, and do more "good". My intention is to have a net positive effect on the community and to get these ideas out of my head and working before I die. If my childish games have taught me a lesson to be more serious, and I understand what is expected of me, why would you attempt to rob me of the chance to make up for my mistakes by banning and ignoring? Have you never made a mistake? Do you not believe in reform? Do you think anyone who has been to jail before should be forced to stay there forever? Do you not realize that sometimes people's biggest mistakes are the defining point in their life before they go on to do great things? How about instead of mocking the person I was, you inquire as to the person I strive to be? Or, you and a few others on this forum could just post your life history as I have always done openly and let's see what petty, superficial criticisms we can come up with to make blanket judgements on your character. Smiley

I'm not the same person I was when I posted that bet. I was completely disconnected from reality. Thanks everyone here who has had their share of mistakes for cluing me into the real world, and to everyone else who wastes a breath trying to slow me down, I'll be happy to drive you crazy by simply continuing on a path of learning and experience. Enjoy the show I guess.
640  Economy / Services / Re: Graphics Design help will pay .5btc (Raised to 1btc if completed with 24h) on: May 28, 2013, 12:12:29 AM
Just slapped these together for you since you're in a hurry.





Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 323 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!