Can't start another list until I'm done with the last one.

You mean a victim tag?

For claiming not to be Ed Trice, you sure do care an awful lot about vilifying the person he stole $47,227 from and you never seem to mention your feelings about Ed Trice either. Interesting.

Nice

이미 답장 보냈어여 

제 생각도 그래요.

Not really an option with this particular illustration. Needs a human face, even if it's going to be a lame Guy Fawkes mask (which I'm trying to avoid for being over-done and agenda riddled).

Challenge thus accepted, and I elect to choose the weapon of your demise!

Title says it all. I'm working on an illustration and wanted to include some relative figures for bitcoin. This illustration will probably be viewed by millions of people over the next year. Unfortunately, Satoshi wasn't kind enough to let us know who he was or what he looked like, so I'm forced to look deeper than than into cryptography, e-cash, hashcash, etc in general.

Who do you think represents the fundementals of bitcoin (cryptography, economics, politics, open source and/or decentralized technology) that someone from the outside world should know about, and someone from inside Bitcoin would appreciate?

I had refused your request to ignore this and have subsequently chosen to post!

Good day sir! I said good day!

What I mean to say is, the majority of interest from outside parties these days is relative to investment rather than usage. It becomes difficult giving any advice to people once you learn they're trying to translate everything you say into investment advice.
 

Try being that guy in a whole country. It gets difficult giving advice when the majority of questions are "Should I buy BFL?".

Whether or not I'm funny is subjective and highly debatable, what is for certain is that humor is wasted on this community. Once you realize that, distinguishing between being a shithead for laughs and being a shithead for lack of anything better to do becomes increasingly difficult.

For the record, I've always had something better to do. When I'm not posting something funny, it's because I'm busy doing it.

Probably an SA goon.

Moot of 4chan gave a good argument for anonymity, saying that you're able to learn lessons without being villianized and that everyone should be allowed to ask questions without worrying about the consequences. I agree with this, but this community seems to think that applies to business and transactions as well. Making mistakes under my real name is absolutely fine with me because it gives people a point of reference for how well I've come along in my life later on. Since I'm not a scammer, the only thing I have to "worry" about really are trolls who take what I say and try to twist it against me later. This form of criticism, of course, also helps me to learn how to speak more precisely, so I take it as a good thing.

Amen to that!

Not that I'd bother doing something that grandiose again (I learned my lesson with pranking people when money is involved), but something tells me with the amount of on this forum, nothing you say would stop anyone from participating. I've been calling out scams since 2010. There's never a shortage of idiots on these forums (which is why it's a waste of time judging site owners based on loose affiliations with people who say "nigger" rather than dealing with the immense amount of actual scammers out there).

Disclaimer: I find numerous actions by MP to be inappropriate, but so is gambling, drinking, smoking, cursing, lying, hiding behind Tor, shitposting, ego, sockpuppets, etc.

Nope. Ask Theymos. The only accounts I've ever logged into are mine and DialCoin's (which isn't use anymore because DialCoin is out of business). During bans I usually just get back to work.

(I'm surprised as many posts of mine you've read you didn't know how adamantly against anonymity, sockpuppets and enabling them I am)

I don't have sockpuppet accounts, so you can go ahead and make Atlas's 30. I'm pretty sure half of the users here are scammers or trolls biding their time.

Since you seem to be turning this into a list of morality instead of fair gambling sites, I've taken the liberty of creating an add-on legend for you.


Moral Legend:

• = Sells shares in their site through a second party whose owner used the word "Nigger" in a blog
• = Admin owns and watches pornography of a tentacle nature
• = Admin is greedy and likes money way too much
• = Admin eats too many unhealthy foods and doesn't exercise properly
• = Admin enjoys roleplay or BDSM and potentially cheats on spouse
• = Admin has a big ego and is generally not a nice person to converse with

I don't care what you're trying to do, I care that you told everyone on this forum that anything and everything *they* are doing will be ineffective in relation to your own "work". When you stop doing *that*, you'll find that people will be more receiving of your efforts.

Stop trying to defend your little project and start realizing that the way you're talking about your project is *wrong* and will continue to attract the wrong kind of attention. Call me a troll, call the next chap a troll, call the whole world trolls .Whatever it takes to refuse to learn, right?

Edit: Please do not respond to this with another grandiose diatribe on how you're doing the lord's work. As I have always been, I'm referring to the way you present yourself. I couldn't give a rat's ass how you think I present myself, as I'm not trying to pitch something as being the end-all-solution to anything. Get a clue. You could have saved yourself like 20 posts so far.

That's a much better response!


Aww, so close.