Hi guys, We can confirm this is our domain, we mainly use this domain in case people have trouble accessing our main url. Everything is safe and solid. Regards, Lenny Sportsbet.io Thanks for the assurance. I think you need to list all the domains you use in your OP so that users do not get worried about phishing links. I certainly thought it was a phishing attempt but good to know that it was not.
|
|
|
Though it may not be sexually attractive to admit it, if I were running a business it would have to be Bitpay.
I wouldn't want to fuck around with my own exchange accounts on top of BTCpay. I want one agreement that results in fiat winding up in my account no matter what. I would not want any grey areas.
So BitPay is taking BTC from the clients but paying his clients (Merchants) in fiat? For example: I have service with namecheap and I use Bitcoin to pay them. If BitPay is operating like I said in the first line then namecheap is not actually receiving any Bitcoin but they are receiving fiat from BitPay?
|
|
|
Sad to see that Djokovic could not continue after losing first two sets. He retired which means officially Djokovic is out from US Open. Now the platform is wide open for Medvedev.
I do not see much competition for Medvedev to reach to Semi and to face Federer. If he somehow can beat Federer then Nadal will be his next challenge to have his first US Open title.
There are still a lot to unfold in this US Open.
|
|
|
Wait a second. It's not sportsbet.io! The interface looks same but check the URL in the top. What is that I am missing here? Is this sportsbet?
|
|
|
~snip~ Historically Virat doesn't like to give follow on to opposition, guess you missed my post ? he done that atleast 5 times so it makes sense why he didn't opt for follow on.
Yeah, I did see your post the one you are talking about. But adding only 168 and then to declare did not make sense to me. Was he worried about not getting much time to all out WI 2nd innings, or he was worried that rain could interrupt the match? If he was worried about rain interrupt then forcing WI for follow on was perfect decision since you know that they are not in good shape and you want to finish the match as early as you can without wasting time for your innings. If anything left then you always has chance to bat again. If he was worried about not getting much time to all out WI 2nd innings then batting the 2nd innings before WI also does not make sense. In cricketing common sense, it really did not make sense to me. It (the 2nd innings) was a wasted innings for India. Windies need 3 big innings to pull this off. If they win then will criticise virat Kohli's decision and more importantly every one will go gaga ( including me ) and say finally cricket won. This WI team does not have the caliber but that's not the excuse. You can not under estimate your opponent. You can slip anytime if you run out of your options.
|
|
|
He is talking about the 168 runs made in the second innings. Not the lead.
This did not make sense to me. Did Kohli think that they were only 168 runs short with the lead they had in the first innings? It seems like they wasted the 2nd innings. They could ask WI to follow on and can win the match from there. If needed then they could bat later but now it's impossible (assuming WI will not able to chase the run). Imagine somehow WI managed to chase this run (Yeah, we all know it's not likely to happen but still)?
|
|
|
You are telling the truth and I am going to tag the user after making this post. Edit: Done. I also think this is a scam accusations topic.
|
|
|
~snip~
It's Rublev who won against Krygios, it was a great match as Nick tries to survives with 30 aces but there's no denying is Rublev is getting tough and playing high level tennis.
Yeah, not good for Kyrgios. I did not watch the match but looking at scoreboard it's clear that both player did not lose any of their service in the first two sets. Losing in tie breaker is always frustrating. And since it happened twice with Kyrgios, I think he was broken inside for this and the result was not doing much (only lost one service) in the 3rd set. Anyway, Federer vs Goffin is under way. The next match I will be following is: Koepfer vs Medvedev
|
|
|
~snip~
But as I can see, things didn't played out as planned. India struggling at 9/1 after 6 overs. Mayank Agarwal trapped in front of the wickets by Kemar Roach for just 4 runs.
I pray for a batting disaster :-P India all out under 79 runs Target for WI is 378 runs to win. WI lost their 8th wicket to manage 278 runs but Roach played a phenomenal innings and WI won the match by only one wicket. How about that? :-D
|
|
|
For me, it's BTCpay since it's free and open-source with LN payment method. I have never used them, in fact I have never come across to a merchant who BTCpay. Quoting it for reference. I do not like any of them above but used BitPay and I do not like them at all. You require to have their own wallet and also they restricted some county which is not why Bitcoin invented. By the way, did you forget coinpayments.net? I thought that's also a payment processor?
|
|
|
~snip~
Come of Kohli! Follow on!
Unpredictable Kohli What the... Come on Kohli! Really!! India could wrap up WI again very easily and could have an inning in hand. :-( Okay, what could be his explanation here?
|
|
|
~snip~ So, you didn't bet either? You would probably lose today as well LOL No, I did not gamble. In fact I did not gamble since the World cup. Really trying myself to keep out of it and focusing on enjoying the match. Gambling is very stressful and you actually lose your analytical instinct, you will always side for the team you gambled no matter if they win or lose, plying better or not.
|
|
|
~snip~
I am not understanding how sportsbet.io's supposedly being involved in money laundering entitles losers to their money back.
GP does not need a reference, he himself is the reference :-P /s (Probably because it would stop your attempt to line your own pockets.) Don't take off his clothes :-D
|
|
|
Sorry to hear you lose. I have tagged the user too with others. By the way, have you considered to create a flag against this user? A flag type 3 is very appropriate in my opinion.
|
|
|
~snip~
I watched only the last 6 overs. Ideally, Kiwis should win this game easily, but everything could change in a couple of overs. In the shorter format, every team can ruin their chances in short time.
Not following the match but seems like our World cup runner up team lost 2 wickets already. I have no interest in this T20. So, I do not bother much about it.
|
|
|
One yorker or well directive bouncer can finish roach's inning, and on another hand, Jahmar Hamilton is in the mood of setting camp 3 runs with 56 balls, his defense is good though. No enough, he is gone :-P One more wicket to take and WI are surely going to trail by more than 250 runs. Despite the batting practice and all these things you are talking about, I think Kohli will ask WI to follow on. Winning by an innings is much more prestigious than winning by other margin and India have a good chance for it in this Test. Edit: WI booked by 117 runs LOL. Come of Kohli! Follow on!
|
|
|
I am willing to offer 0.2 BTC who helps me track down the person, I prefer someone living in Canada.
I would suggest you to talk to an escrow and update this thread with the information of the escrow. You are a newbie (account), no one is going to take you seriously unless you do things properly. And talking to an escrow in advance is the first step in my opinion. You also need to be very specific in your terms. Specify that you want the hunter to do xyz task for you.
|
|
|
Looking at the scoreboard it's obvious that WI will follow on and I think India will have an inning in hand LOL
Comparatively WI is batting well today. I was offline yesterday but watching the match, I did not expect them to score 100+ runs in this innings when they lost 7 wickets for 78 runs. The resistance we are seeing now from Roach is temporary.
|
|
|
Lets imagine what if the seller never come online the trade will be in dispute or will be released to me.
If the seller does not come online then I think LBC will release the coins to you after certain amount of wait. If the seller has very good reputation (which he has) then he is not going to ruin his account for a trade (not sure about the amount you have traded). I will also suggest you to wait until either LBC takes any step or the seller comes online again.
|
|
|
~snip~ Okay so its official they can't touch 200 runs mark. they are satisfy with singles in the 17th over and Southee has one more over left. 174 for 4 is the final score. I almost forgot about this series and the T20. I was too much into Test cricket especially in the Ashes :-P Anyway, for the team like NZ, this should not be hard job to chase. I have not seen the Sri Lankan innings. They left 6 wickets but still they are short in scoring run. This is unusual.
|
|
|
|