Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 03:32:41 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 147 »
781  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Technobit 40 GH/s HEX16B(Bitfury ) 462.00 EUR 1/2 week of November on: October 31, 2013, 01:03:28 PM
The shipping says 2 Euros is that applicable for Australia?

782  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: DRILLBIT SYSTEM Miners - 2.7 GH/s thumbs 0.65 BTC, 21.7 GH/s boards 2 BTC on: October 31, 2013, 12:38:34 PM
Will it be possible to run these Drillbit boards with a Raspberry Pi that is already running a bitfury burner board, using cgminer? It would make a much simpler set up than having another Pi to look after.
Look at the photos on the previous page of this thread. What is attached to the Drillbit board?


I can see that a Pi running cgminer will run the Drillbit board on its own. My question was about compatibility - will having a bitfury burner board also running cause any problems? Driver conflicts perhaps?
What drivers have you installed that may conflict?
783  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: DRILLBIT SYSTEM Miners - 2.7 GH/s thumbs 0.65 BTC, 21.7 GH/s boards 2 BTC on: October 31, 2013, 12:32:23 PM
Will it be possible to run these Drillbit boards with a Raspberry Pi that is already running a bitfury burner board, using cgminer? It would make a much simpler set up than having another Pi to look after.
Look at the photos on the previous page of this thread. What is attached to the Drillbit board?

784  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Experimenting with Jalapeno firmware... on: October 31, 2013, 10:08:27 AM
what is the size of jalapeno fan
120mm
or 140mm?HuhHuhHuhHuhHuh??
90mm I think, might be 80mm

785  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] mcxNOW.com : Deposit. Earn Interest. Trade. on: October 30, 2013, 08:58:13 PM
CopperLark uses a different mining algorithm sha3 I believe, so it's an unusual coin.

786  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Experimenting with Jalapeno firmware... on: October 30, 2013, 11:18:55 AM
Anyone know if one of these programmers will work with the Jally?

I don't really want to buy a Dragon just to use once on something that's not going to do much ROI anymore.


http://www.ebay.com/itm/USB-Download-Programmer-Emulator-Debugger-For-AVR-JTAG-ICE-Atmega-AVR-STUDIO-/281117568350

787  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] mcxNOW.com : Deposit. Earn Interest. Trade. on: October 30, 2013, 10:39:30 AM
Pointless, firstly you are going down the path of stocks again not investment units, secondly Realsolid holds over 50% of the mcxFEE units, therefore he would have to pass the vote anyway.

I wasn't saying equal voting to each share, I said voting of the public holders vs. the owner, the publicly held shares voting rights are proportionally divided (Hypothetically let's say they have 70% influence) and then the owner has the remaining (30% in this scenario).

From the example given this removes voting rights from the portion of fee shares held by MCX now maintenance, the lotto, non share holding interest earning public and all of the owners reserved shares save for the ones he buys from the public stock in secret (if he does).  This is not stock this is feedback with a little bit of influence.  It could even be implemented and possibly should be implemented in a non-binding manner leaving all votes in public record vs. what actions were/were not taken.

This system could also be useful to add a feature to allow fee holders the ability to submit votes assuming they hold some number of shares > 1 and possibly with an attached fee to help weed out spam vote submission.
The site works well because it's not run by a committee or voters. Realsolid tends to do what he wants when he wants to. Your idea is out of touch with the reality of the situation.



788  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] mcxNOW.com : Deposit. Earn Interest. Trade. on: October 30, 2013, 07:48:18 AM
My biggest problem with MCXFee is that we only get a portion of the divs and we on't really own anything. Selling the trading engine and the site will not give us a bitcent and if realsolid decided that a certain service is separate from the original deal of the fees shared...... we are screwed again.

It would have sound more promising if realsolid took the effort to enlist MCXFee on Bitfunder, Havelock and crytostocks. Generally really solid no one gives a satoshi about your identity the people just want the peace of mind knowing that someone out there knows it and willing to help in case you decided to screw us all over.

When I put money in a bank account I don't get to own the bank either. I might get some interest if I am lucky. mcxFEE are not stock equities, they are not intended to give you part ownership of mcxNOW, they are a simple investment vehicle like units in an investment fund, you are trying to compare them to something they were never intended to be.


Another benefit of the model he chose is avoidance of securities laws around the trading of ownership, which I believe would be an issue in Australia (as well as most of the developed world).  The part which concerns me is that the Fee holders are provided no voting rights which IMHO should be offered as part of the package even though ownership has not been transferred, even if they were only afforded a 51% to 70% vote against the owner cumulatively it would allow them to form super majorities if something particularly negative were to be introduced and the owner still effectively has full control of the system in all other cases.  Ultimately the purpose of this is to view true community reaction to the happenings of the exchange and provide a valuable record to how these decisions have been handled.

Would be a nice feature for fee holders to ask for and might increase desirability even further regarding fee shares.....
Pointless, firstly you are going down the path of stocks again not investment units, secondly Realsolid holds over 50% of the mcxFEE units, therefore he would have to pass the vote anyway.

789  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] mcxNOW.com : Deposit. Earn Interest. Trade. on: October 30, 2013, 07:27:18 AM
My biggest problem with MCXFee is that we only get a portion of the divs and we on't really own anything. Selling the trading engine and the site will not give us a bitcent and if realsolid decided that a certain service is separate from the original deal of the fees shared...... we are screwed again.

It would have sound more promising if realsolid took the effort to enlist MCXFee on Bitfunder, Havelock and crytostocks. Generally really solid no one gives a satoshi about your identity the people just want the peace of mind knowing that someone out there knows it and willing to help in case you decided to screw us all over.

When I put money in a bank account I don't get to own the bank either. I might get some interest if I am lucky. mcxFEE are not stock equities, they are not intended to give you part ownership of mcxNOW, they are a simple investment vehicle like units in an investment fund, you are trying to compare them to something they were never intended to be.




790  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Butterfly Labs New 600GH "Mining Card" - RED FLAGS?!?! on: October 30, 2013, 05:46:28 AM
Oh, look.



http://bbbscam.net/

people in glass houses....
791  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: DRILLBIT SYSTEM Miners - 2.7 GH/s thumbs 0.65 BTC, 21.7 GH/s boards 2 BTC on: October 30, 2013, 01:58:02 AM
That Coolermaster fan you linked is only sleeve bearing, that wont have a very good life expectancy. Best to go with ball bearing fans.

792  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] mcxNOW.com : Deposit. Earn Interest. Trade. on: October 29, 2013, 01:29:22 PM
The release of 45,000 mcxFEE share just went on the market a fewf hours ago at 0.4BTC each only available to existing mcxFEE owners for 72hr then what's left goes on public sale. They seem to be selling quite well.

https://mcxnow.com/buymcx.html

A novel concept fee shares, I see Cryptsy has tried to copy it, interested to see how it goes.
793  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] mcxNOW.com : Deposit. Earn Interest. Trade. on: October 28, 2013, 10:37:19 PM
mcxFEE is the ultimate pre-mine scam! It will go down in the record books next to Ripple. That said, good on him, I would have done the same if I had thought of it first.

794  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: DRILLBIT SYSTEM Miners - 2.7 GH/s thumbs 0.65 BTC, 21.7 GH/s boards 2 BTC on: October 27, 2013, 01:10:14 PM
Any news for the 8 chips board?
Is hashing what speed?
Seems to be a lack of progress reports on that board.

795  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [Official] Cryptsy Delisting Poll on: October 27, 2013, 12:28:09 PM
Just goes to show you how many junk coins are out there nowadays, which only makes support work for the exchanges with little return.

If I was Cryptsy I would look at the last months volume of each coin, set a minimum BTC volume they should have achived, and suspend any that didn't make that minimum.

I figure a month is long enough to see if a coin is still alive.

You don't need a poll, you could auto script it.
796  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL ASIC STATUS 5/29 on: October 26, 2013, 09:18:59 AM
Now they only need to ship in quantity...

1000 shipped just recently... woah wait... did you want quantity in April or October I am confused?
BFL reckon they have shipped over 10,000 units, considering they are only shipping March/April orders still they must have had a lot of orders. I know April was a big order  month because that's when their chips finnaly arrived and they did that youtube video of the first tests.



Laughable.

Reckon they mined 10,000 units and shipped them 1 year late.


Considering their first chips arrived from the foundry in April 2013,  your claim is laughable. Typical troll.

I can just see a mining rig with several thousand Jalapeno systems all cabled up ti a raspberry Pi to make more profit.

797  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: BFL ASIC STATUS 5/29 on: October 26, 2013, 09:12:38 AM
Now they only need to ship in quantity...

1000 shipped just recently... woah wait... did you want quantity in April or October I am confused?
BFL reckon they have shipped over 10,000 units, considering they are only shipping March/April orders still they must have had a lot of orders. I know April was a big order  month because that's when their chips finnaly arrived and they did that youtube video of the first tests.

798  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Black Arrow announces 28nm 100Ghash Bitcoin ASIC from $1.49/Ghash on: October 25, 2013, 03:25:37 PM
I think there should be a X-2.

X-1 is 100GH/s
X-3 is 2TH/s

Can we get something inbetween?

The X3 is now 2x 3U units. Just saying...
Don't you know bigger is better, that's why the BTC net hash has jumped by 2PH/s in the last couple of weeks! 2TH/s is the new BFL Jalepeno 100GH/s the Block Erupter stick. Let me up size you!

799  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: DRILLBIT SYSTEM Miners - 2.7 GH/s thumbs 0.65 BTC, 21.7 GH/s boards 2 BTC on: October 25, 2013, 03:22:02 PM
Any plans for paypal?  Huh
Search this thread on the word paypal and you will learn that paypal will not accept more payments until after product ships. So it's not a matter of "plans"


800  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [CLOSED] NanoFury NF1 USB stick - Group Buy + Product Assembly on: October 25, 2013, 07:48:58 AM
How is the production coming along, any eta?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 ... 147 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!