Din pacate, am observat ca UniJoin a mai organizat o tombola-fulger, premiul fiind unul dintre cardurile acelea frumoase. Tombola a fost din nou una cu 16 locuri, astfel ca acestea s-au ocupat rapid (din pacate, eu am observat concursul la 2-3 zile dupa ce s-a incheiat). Sper ca in viitor sa fiu mai vigilent si sa reusesc sa prind loc in cadrul acestor tombole, intrucat cardurile acelea chiar sunt deosebite. Desigur, voi anunta si aici cand o noua tombola va fi lansata. |
|
|
|
Please, anyone who wants to take care of translating our main thread, post the link here so we can add the link to the OP. Hey MixTum, there are some translations posted for a while now in your topic, but which were not added to OP yet. The translations are the following ones: 1. Filipino2. Portuguese3. GermanI hope this reminder will be useful.
At same time, there are also 2 translations pending: 1. Arabic2. UrduRESERVED THIS PLACE FOR URDU LANGUAGE TRANSLATION OF [banned mixer] I considered it's better to mentioned these ones as well, in case thepeterson and HONDACD125 forgot about their reservations. |
|
|
|
I just noticed that another raffle was held, the award being another UniJoin card. And - damn! - I missed it! I can only congratulate haloxon for his win and I hope that next time I'll see these raffles in time. And still, I hope that maybe planets will align and some more such cards will be distributed  |
|
|
|
While it is great to know that WEB503 has this situation covered as well, I still don't understand why such situations should occur. What I mean here is that I don't understand why people still use centralized exchanges. Are they really so naive about the huge risks they put into by using such exchanges? Can it be that people still don't know that if they don't possess their private keys they also do not possess their coins? People still do not comprehend that the State, the banks, the hackers or even the exchanges can steal their money? Is everybody still unaware that by passing through KYC they are jeopardizing their identities and lives? It really baffles me to see that years pass and users still did not learn anything from the past... |
|
|
|
But I guess this shouldn't be a problem if the mixer uses services like these. In the image you posted above there is also WW listed (besides CM). I understand, you added CM for the lulz, but WW should really not be present in your image, so maybe you can edit it? First of all, their operation is completely shut down, after both websites are not functional anymore. Second of all, even if the websites were still working, I would still not think they are a good example to be listed, considering their sudden disappearance from the forum, without any explanation. |
|
|
|
I can not quote your post in Meta, after I ignored this board.
I can reply to your post, if I have a thread link to open it and use Reply, not Quote. Indeed, posting in ignored boards is possible; only the quote function is not possible. Yes, that's a very useful link and it's not bad that you mentioned it, although it has no relation to OP. I was thinking that, maybe, it would be useful to have an implementation stating an error message when trying in vain to quote posts from ignored boards, such as the message shown when trying to merit posts from ignored boards, thus the users would know why the quote does not work. I don't know though if theymos would find the idea to be useful or useful enough to cover the work for making the code changes. |
|
|
|
I noticed something for a while, but only recently I figured out how things work. So if you have some boards at ignore you can't quote posts from them.During times I noticed sometimes that I can't quote some posts but I did not know why. When I was clicking on Quote button the screen made a short refresh but the quoted text did not appear in the Quick-Reply field. After I kept encountering this situation for a long time I finally managed to understand why that was happening. The problem occurred only when I was trying to quote texts (posts / topics) from ignored boards. However, you can open links of posts from ignored boards. Let's take this link, for example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5470785.0. It is from a topic posted in Russian local board, inside Новички child board. If you have Russian board at ignore (together with all its child boards) or if you only ignore Новички board, the link will still open when you click on it. But you can't quote it. A similar situation occurs also when trying to merit posts from ignored board: you can't do it. However, when trying to do that, you get an error message, saying that you can not merit that post. But when you try to quote a post from an ignored board no error message is displayed, which makes things more confusing. I thought to share this with the rest of the users, in case others also encountered this issue and did not know why it happened. |
|
|
|
Three new translations have been added to OP: Thank you, FP91G. With your help, all my four-topics sequel is now translated in Russian language! You did a great job! |
|
|
|
|
Спасибо FP91G за перевод второй части моей серии из четырех эссе на русский язык! Для меня большая честь, что эта тема была переведена в русском сообществе!
Я считаю эту серию из 4 эссе очень полезными, потому что она может помочь большему количеству людей узнать о Биткойне, его истории и легче понять его природу.
Текущая тема подчеркивает опасности, с которыми столкнутся многие страны, когда правительства начнут запускать CDBC. Многих соблазнит тот факт, что государство будет предлагать "криптовалюты" населению, но эта тема помогает нам понять, что ни одно правительство никогда не будет поощрять использование децентрализованных криптовалют своими гражданами. Все правительства стремятся только контролировать людей, а не помочь им стать свободными. Так что воспринимайте эту тему как предупреждение. Наступает эра CBDC, и мы все должны подготовиться к тому, чтобы не быть обманутыми правительством!
|
|
|
|
I come back to this thread to announce that I received the card I won won by DYING_S0ul at your 527th raffle. DYING_S0UL was very kind and let me have his prize -- so I thank him once more for this! I also thank krogoth for allowing his request of shipping me the card instead of him. Last, but not least, I also thank MJ for shipping! Here are 2 images with this beautiful card:   |
|
|
|
Avem un concurs nou! [Gewinnspiel] Welches ist der letzte Block in diesem Jahr? [BTC + Merit]https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5470339Se pot castiga urmatoarele: 1.5 mBTC, 0.25mBTC si 0.25 mBTC. Trebuie ghicite cele mai apropiate blocuri de ultimul bloc Bitcoin din 2023 (premiile au fost sponsorizate de 1miau, Learn Bitcoin and Laikai). Organizator: 1miau. Poate participa oricine, daca: (1) are contul inregistrat pana la data de 14 octombrie, (2) detine 2 adrese BTC pe care sa le controleze si cel putin una dintre ele sa aiba tranzactii inregistrate pe anul in curs. Nu se permite inregistrarea in concurs cu conturi alternative. Cine e prins ca incearca sa insele va primi feedback negativ de la 1miau. Modalitate de inscriere: fiecare participant trebuie sa ghiceasca 2 blocuri care sa fie cele mai apropiate de ultimul bloc Bitcoin al anului 2023 (si care sa nu fi fost alese de alti participanti). Inscrierile pot fi facute pana la data de 9 noiembrie, 23:59:59 UTC. Predictiile exprimate deja de alti utilizatori nu pot fi repetate. Predictiile si adresele BTC nu pot fi editate. Premiile vor fi distribuite incepand cu 2 ianuarie 2024. Pentru inscriere trebuie folosit urmatorul formular: Bitcointalk-Nutzername:
Meine Bitcoin-Adresse 1:
Meine Bitcoin-Adresse 2:
Tipp Block 1:
Tipp Block 2: Daca doreste cineva sa se inscrie, este rugat sa ii trimita lui 1miau un mesaj cu postarea pe care doresc sa o faca la inscriere, iar 1miau va verifica eligibilitatea si va traduce postarile in germana. Danke, 1miau, for this opportunity! |
|
|
|
- can you add the comment of cryptoID to the old table as well? (I added it to the Romanian old table) Nice suggestion, I've added it. Awesome! - Learnmeabitcoin, CoinCap and Localbitcoinschain.com should be deleted also from the old table (I deleted them already from the Romanian old table) It's deleted now. Okay Very good detection. (igel eyes  ) For consistency, adding a date here, like all entries so far, is very important, of course. I've added a date now. Thanks! I also added the elimination dates for the 3 sites.
Done and it's a good idea to add it but most likely, the result won't be very representative because most votes are already submitted due to one vote for each Bitcointalk account. Maybe we can screenshot the poll, save it, reset it and start it again. We might run it 1 year (or 2 years) and will see how the public opinion has (possibly) shifted. Seeing Woodie's suggestion made me realize that the poll contains 3 websites which were moved to the eliminated ones, therefore I believe they should not be part of the poll anymore: SmartBit, Coinmarketcap Block Explorer and Bitcoin.com. Besides, if I remember well, this poll contained initially all the explorers listed when OP was created. Since then many other websites were added. Perhaps the poll should contain now also the other explorers added? |
|
|
|
|
Я рад видеть, что FP91G перевел часть серии из четырех тем, в которых описывается, как государство выступает против криптографии, криптовалют и доступа к информации. Это эссе является прекрасной иллюстрацией творчества Тима Мэя, и удивительно видеть, что его мысли, высказанные более 30 лет назад, теперь являются частью нашей реальности.
Всем, кто еще не читал манифест, предлагаю прочитать его. Он короткий и содержит так много важного...
|
|
|
|
Avem concurs nou! GIVEAWAY TOGELBEThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5470472Se pot castiga urmatoarele: 1$ in MATIC (nu este gluma). Organizator: TotobettogelPoate participa oricine. Modalitate de inscriere: se alege un numar de la 00 la 99 (care nu a fost deja rezervat). Sincer sa fiu, nu eram hotarat daca merita sa postez aici tentativa asta de concurs, dat fiind premiul derizoiur, de 1$, si acela intr-o moneda care nici macar BTC nu este, dar in virtutea inertiei am zis sa mentionez totusi si acest concurs. Nici alti utilizatori ai forumului nu prea sunt atrasi, ca urmare pana acum s-au inscris doar 8 insi, desi concursul a fost lansat in urma cu aproape 48h |
|
|
|
|
This is another interesting article and, from my perspective, it is a must-read one. The material does not relate only to the content of the white paper, but presents also a nice piece of history: the emails exchanged by Satoshi with Wei Dai and a comparison made by an ex-forum user (gwern) between the shape of the white paper presented initially to Wei Dai and its final form.
I am more than sure that those interested in Bitcoin history will appreciate this material.
|
|
|
|
Avem inca un articol publicat de UniJoin: Satoshi’s White PaperArticolul descrie actul constitutiv al Bitcoin -- white paper. Insa, pe langa faptul ca descrie punctele mentionate in document, ne este prezentata si o mica istorie a acestui white paper, din perioada in care Satoshi comunica cu Wei Dai, precum si o comparatie intre prima varianta a docuentului si cea finala. De asemenea, este interesant si faptul ca aceasta comparatie a fost realizata de un fost utilizator al forumului -- gwern. |
|
|
|
Speaking about Denglisch, I was eager to ask for some time now, why do you consider it such a bad thing? I mean, in a modern world, we cannot escape the spread of English-speaking culture, and of course, each language will borrow words to one degree or another, especially if their meanings and subject components were originally invented in the English language field. Denglish is a bad thing because it alters your mother language. You as a nation and each individual of the nation should do everything is possible to preserve the mother language. Think about a natural reservation. All visitors must keep that place clean and as unaltered as possible. And someone asks: why can't I throw garbage on the ground and leave it there? / Because this is how this reservation can be preserved, that's why. Does it make sense?
For example, I don't really know how to say Halving or Mining or Staking the way it would be correct in German. [...] That is why I believe, than sometimes the usage of borrowed words are justified, especially when you don`t have an alternative and analogue in your mother tongue. Your answer is here: Denglisch bezieht sich also darauf, wenn es eine geläufige deutsche Übersetzung gibt, diese Übersetzung aber nicht verwendet wird, nicht unbedingt jedoch, wenn das Wort kryptospezifisch (wie z.B. Airdrop) oder überaus geläufig ist (z.B. Manager). In English, it means this Denglish therefore refers to when there is a common German translation but this translation is not used, but not necessarily when the word is crypto-specific (such as airdrop) or extremely common (e.g. manager). In conclusion: words which can not be translated can be used as they are; words used worldwide ("manager") can also be used as they are. But words which can be translated must be used in their German form. |
|
|
|
Apologies for my delayed intervention here. I was out of the country and I had only my phone with me, thus it would be very difficult to post long / complex posts.
I've removed it to "removed Blockexplorers". I've added a hint and pointed it out. I've removed it to "removed Blockexplorers". How about CoinCap [inaccessible] and Learnmeabitcoin [6,444 blocks behind (and counting)] explorers?  - 2 Months have passed since I last mentioned them and still no changes (I don't think they'll be back).Good idea, I've removed them and they are listed in "removed Blockexplorers" now. I'll also link your initial comment as a reference here. All these changes are now implemented in the Romanian translated table and as well in the old table. @1miau I have also 2 suggestions: - can you add the comment of cryptoID to the old table as well? (I added it to the Romanian old table) - Learnmeabitcoin, CoinCap and Localbitcoinschain.com should be deleted also from the old table (I deleted them already from the Romanian old table) - in the new table should we add a reference for Learnmeabitcoin, CoinCap and Localbitcoinschain.com regarding the moment when they were deleted, similar to the other deleted websites? E.g.: Bitcoinchain.com appears like this: "Bitcoinchain.com (Removed 9/2022)" I hope this helps |
|
|
|
Avem o noua actualizare a tabelului: 1. site=urile Learnmeabitcoin, CoinCap si Localbitcoinschain.com au fost eliminate, din cauza inactivitatii. Site-uri de explorare a blocurilor Bitcoin: Exploratoare EliminateToate site-urile eliminate din listă. | Nume (link) | Suportă Bech32? | Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* | Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) | Notă acordată de | Comentarii | Motivul eliminării | | __________________________ | ___________________ | ___________________________________ | _______________________________ | ________________ | _________________________________ | ______________________________ | | Learnmeabitcoin | Da (10/2022) / Nu (10/2022) | Nu (10/2022) | 5 / 10 Puncte | Nu | ajiz138 | inactiv | | CoinCap | Da (10/2020) / Nu (10/2022) | Nu (10/2020) | 4 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | inactiv | | Localbitcoinschain.com | Da (12/2019) / Nu (10/2022) | Da (12/2019) | 5 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 | inactiv |
2. A fost editata descriererile site-urilor BitcoinWho'sWho si cryptoID: primul cauta doar adrese BTC, nu si tranzactii, iar al doilea este nerecomandat pentru tranzactiile neconfirmate inca. | Nume (link) | Suportă Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)? | Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?** | Utilitate (scor subiectiv) *** | Funcționează fără JS | Notă acordată de | | ________________________ | ________________________________ | _________________________ | _____________________________ | __________________ | ________________ | | BitcoinWho'sWho | Da (09/2022) / Da (09/2022) | Da (09/2022) | 7 / 10 Puncte | Nu | GazetaBitcoin | | cryptoID | Da (12/2019) / Nu (10/2022) | Da (12/2019) | 6 / 10 Puncte | Nu | SFR10 |
|
|
|
|
I have shared compaign in my local Thread Pakistan and like to be added in your first page. I have double checked before posting and I believe that there is no mistake. You can check it and if you see any mistake, I will edit. Congrats for this translation, HONDACD125! I am more than glad to see another user which managed to realize this complex translation, which is, in fact, an adaptation to a local board. It's difficult to check thoroughy the Urdu translation but, from what I see, you added some important links in your post and I think they are valuable for Urdu users. Apart from this, I have only one small request to you. Please edit your post title and change it from "Re: Pakistan پوسٹ کے معیار کو بڑھانے کے لیے مہمات" to "وسٹ کے معیار کو بڑھانے کے لیے مہمات". It will look more professional this way.
@1miau: please don't forget also to add to OP zasad@'s translation. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
