|
What "blockchain wallet"? Please don't tell me that you're talking about blockchain.com/blockchain.info?
|
|
|
|
A new year, time for an update:
Thanks! You could/should make a YoY comparison, that would be very interesting.  |
|
|
|
There are even more threads about me. Are you selectively trying to cherry-pick those that suit the "gang's agenda"? Pull out the vilest of them all, like Timelord did. Make me even more famous, and you will be thanked for your contributions to the Lauda campaign.  |
|
|
|
Btw, you are starting to sound like mdayonliner, may I remind you that this thread is not about TECSHARE it is about you if you don't mind stop deflecting it with irrelevant things.
Nailed it. I was wondering about the resemblance, but I couldn't put a username to it. Please not that guy again.  |
|
|
|
I had a lot more respect for this uncompromising & antagonistic nihilist, that openly doesn't care about the community or DT, as by consequence they were helping to bring awareness of "trust issues" within DT1 for the longer-term benefit.
You may be describing another Lauda, Laudas, cat, cats, user, users, entity, as the above is not characteristic of me. Sequence of events (for historical documentation purposes):I will not even change it for OP [...] even if ordered by mr. thermos. I would go up to flag ban them
I couldn't give a shit about neither community nor theymos guidelines I will absolutely make no changes to these ratings. [removes negative trust related to merit giving] ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ A couple of you semi-shady folk are taking all of this very seriously, while I am just having my fun with y'all whilst doing good at the same time. That's the key difference. Many back-rooms of both sides (and yes, I am inside both "factions'" Slack channels and whatnot) do get their share of laughs from all of this. Every now and then I truly wonder how some users could possibly take all of this as seriously as they do, as if the forum and its systems of injustice law and policing right here are the crux of their whole life. Maybe they really are. Talk is cheap and for fun, just actions are what matters. That's enough for this thread from me.
Here's to another undoing of my words. Almost scammed myself, too bad you can't rate for almost.  Una mattina mi son svegliato
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao ♪
Una mattina mi son svegliato ♪ ♪
Eo ho trovato ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ l'invasor ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
|
|
|
|
Your reference should in fact be pointing to a case of them scamming or trying to scam an individual.
For something to be a scam there does not have to be any direct financial damage (It could be indirect, collateral, or even non-existent). A.
Unlike copyright law violations, plagiarism is truly the theft of ideas. It is singularly the most reprehensible wrong that can be committed within the realm of the intellect; and it is inherently fraudulent, an intellectual scam by definition.
The logical argument deriving from the reasoning by OP is very sound without any subjective nonsense. Maybe theymos will give his input on this. |
|
|
|
Wake up, Lauda. I think I got something to say to you. It's early 2020 and digital scamcoins are no longer cool. You dumped scamcoins all over the place. Now millions of young Indian boys wish they never saw your face (and other things). Oh, Lauda, can you stop trying to scam the entire country of India anymore?
What is my connection to India, other than you being a pajeet? |
|
|
|
-snipped findings-
It will be convenient if even 1 of these users turns out to be the monster under the bed you claim as you "obviously and clearly" warn us with what you consider valid feedback
Almost all of them were monsters to some degree so far, but yes it will be very convenient because I would be very right (quite a very familiar situation, yet again). Una mattina mi son svegliato
O bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao ♪
Una mattina mi son svegliato ♪ ♪
Eo ho trovato ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ l'invasor ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
Removed the 'bogus rating', updated with a "law-abiding" one. Good luck with all the mud-slinging and side-fights. That's enough for this thread from me. |
|
|
|
People are getting kicked an banned because they are trolling about ASIC scamming conspiracies. If you troll in certain channels you get banned.
Don't bullshit; I for one know that Chris! is very honest, and am quite sure that his ban isn't appropriate thus people are being censored. There are consequences for scammy behaviour from a shitcoin team,. |
|
|
|
* I have the impression that yesterday's post went unnoticed, and between dinner, the trip and the New Year's messages, I think nobody noticed, apart from that I also included more information in this post.
Looks very nice. How about YoY data? |
|
|
|
Things are tense in the Ravencoin discord. Well, not actually, but the government moderators have invented enemies to "protect" the citizens other discord users from hearing opposing opinions FUD.
You were censored for honestly just asking about things? Make a thread about it and flag these scammers once and for all. |
|
|
|
They also stole a lot of funds from early investors by claiming it was for safe keeping from hackers.
For sure this scam is starting to be exposed.
Do you have evidence that can support these claims? If you do, feel free to PM me. Perhaps not a scam, but the network requiring centralised maintenance/upkeep is not what it is meant to be.
Claiming it is decentralized or anything close to that if it requires maintenance makes it a scam. It makes it a scam worthy of a type-1 flag. |
|
|
|
Prune node
Pros:
Required only 2 GB by default.
This is wrong though. With the chainstate I believe the minimum is between 5 to 10 GB, but you should verify if you want exact numbers. That's it. They are required storage space for today: 284 GB for a full node, and 2 GB for a prune node. It's not. That's the blocks dir (blocks only), you're forgetting the chainstate (which you need for a prune node too). It sits slightly over 3.5 GB for me on a full node now, thus you'd need at least 5 GB (3.5 GB chainstate + 2 GB blocks) of total storage for the pruned one. |
|
|
|
"Routing Node"? What is this? Bitcoin nodes are not Onion Nodes; that is a term I haven't seen someone use to describe nodes.
That is what I got from Mastering Bitcoin - chapter 6 (A. Antonopoulos) All nodes include the routing function to participate in the network and might include other functionality. All nodes validate and propagate transactions and blocks, and discover and maintain connections to peers. In the full-node example in Figure 6-1, the routing function is indicated by an orange circle named “Network Routing Node.”
Ah alright, you got it off of his book. It's just very unusual to see it in say somebody's post. All good then. Prune node
Pros:
Required only 2 GB by default.
This is wrong though. With the chainstate I believe the minimum is between 5 to 10 GB, but you should verify if you want exact numbers. |
|
|
|
"Routing Node"? What is this? Bitcoin nodes are not Onion Nodes; that is a term I haven't seen someone us to describe nodes.
Otherwise quite a good thread, but I wouldn't place it in this section. Good job. |
|
|
|
I spy with my little eye..  |
|
|
|
Parabolic up!
Where's our "Go, Bitcoin, Go" guy when we need him?  Few post earlier Need him on every page, I like him. |
|
|
|
Parabolic up!
Where's our "Go, Bitcoin, Go" guy when we need him? |
|
|
|
You claim you changed your mind, I say you are a liar. Of course there is no problem with using this logic to negative rate people right?
If you think so, go ahead and rate. I will not be screaming, nor shouting nor crying like yall folk are. This is easy if you aren't a sensitive bitch, innit?  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
