You should go to the litecoin forums and act all indignant about them moving bitcoin posts to off topic too. Such bias and arrogance, ugh.
Do this
|
|
|
I was also optimistic until the OP refused to post proofs of payments and history of bets
|
|
|
A fraudulent business scheme When you're considering goals for yourself, don't forget to examine your work life. What changes could you make to become a more productive and pleasant but OP you are fucked up. and Guys you also be sure for not being scammed next time. Sorry for all who was been scammed and fuck this OP and hit negative Trust. Good Luck
Why bother? Now he doesn't give a fuck, it was at beginning that it was useful
|
|
|
Someone please give me a Scammer tag! Thanks for improving natural selection
|
|
|
ITT: we can't read and mix 'activity' with 'post count'
|
|
|
It increases by 14 every two weeks if you posted 14 times in those two weeks.
It's crazy how people misunderstand this rule 1 (ONE) post in a fortnight brings 14 points of activity
|
|
|
Great, thanks I have a problem, the + and the - are not working. I cannot see them, but everything else works fine though.
OS? Browser? BT++ version?
|
|
|
I never noticed that kind of behaviour. If that happens then yeah it's better not to show it.
I think it could be good to show it in Meta though. (No hot debates here)
|
|
|
Anyone else noticing this? (I don't have access to a computer before a few hours) Good password? (Are you able to talk in the chat?)
|
|
|
I agree but showing trade trustworthiness doesn't prevent them from giving useful ideas so I don't see how your post justifies not to show it It's just additional info
I think people would be quick to judge and not trust or listen to their involvement in the discussion because they have a bad trust rating. Do you think so? Why? Do people think scammer never say anything right or worth something? I personally always check why someone is negatively rated so after that it's easy to know whether you should listen to the guy depending on the context
|
|
|
Is there any reason why it isn't shown everywhere?
Trade trustworthiness is irrelevant to discussion. Scammers can still contribute useful ideas to a discussion. I agree but showing trade trustworthiness doesn't prevent them from giving useful ideas so I don't see how your post justifies not to show it It's just additional info
|
|
|
I think the problem is your server. I just add a url CSS node so I can't do much about that. What I could do instead is downloading the CSS, saving it in the in-browser BT++ saved data, then using this data as CSS. So even if it downloading the CSS lags (whatever the reason is), the CSS import will be instant.
Now that I'm writing it I think it's a good idea so yeah I'll code that. I'll have to check what max size I can save though.
|
|
|
Delete every post you've made in the thread.
Is that confirmed to work? Someone asked once but nobody ever answered
|
|
|
Do people really fall for this kind of things?
|
|
|
Ouais je comprends pas non plus...
|
|
|
L’autre problème, c’est qu’elle n’est pas si sécurisée que ça. Des hackers sont entrés dans le système. C’est un système qui va être victime de son succès, mais aussi de ses faiblesses. Ah bon ? Secp256k1 a été cassé ?
|
|
|
No thread for Schumi? Let me fix this
Good luck to you and your family
|
|
|
|