Can you share here your site?
187k visitors per year it's not a big goal, and a lot depends on how your visitors come, whether they are organic visits or you paid for advertising somewhere. If at least some part is real visits, then you should have already monetized at least a small part and that would certainly facilitate your further development.
I'm pretty sure your site isn't worth $15,000 and you'll have a hard time getting a loan with it as collateral.

Is the whattomine calculator relevant at all?
In comparison with some other alternatives, I have been getting completely different results on WTM for a long time. Or maybe it's just me misreading the information presented.

Is there any chance that before commenting, you can first inform yourself about what exactly Jambler offers and why we mention it in this discussion? Lmao. Also, do a little research on Jambler's relationship with the mixers mentioned above.

You are not funny at all, scammers here are not funny to anyone.

But to clarify, you created an account and came here to offer get-rich-quick schemes. At the same time, all you have behind you is a newly created account here and two Telegram groups with 4 and 20 subscribers.
There have been quite a few such attempts to extort money from scammers on this forum, some of them were much more sophisticated than yours. Fortunately, we all grew up here, so you'll have to look for victims elsewhere. Also, coming with alt accounts will not help you, but will only cause negative feedback on all connected accounts.

So, this is your stupid idea to get money, but that doesn't mean you can't be wise and stop this.

I will repost what inthelongrun says, there are never enough warnings about scammers.

He didn't even remember the name of the mixer, not that he followed any of their instructions. I think the most vital information is to know which mixer we are talking about, it's all speculation now. His whole theory that he came up with to spit on mixer services would fall apart if he were on a scam site.

Likewise, you cannot mix coins on Mixtum, Webmixer, [banned mixer] without Jambler. If by some chance Jambler or any partner mixer from their list was under investigation or seized, it would reflect on all the others and probably at the same time they would all have the same fate.

Regardless of theymos' decision, this is also an interesting question for the authorities. Who is responsible here, the Jambler that provides the complete mixing service or the official mixer partner that only promotes that service?

If an exception is acceptable, Jambler does not mix directly under its name, but I do it masked behind several other brands/domains. Maybe other non-Jambler mixers could adopt this model in a way that promotes the software on which the mixer works. So we could have, for example, tumblersoft.io which is the parent of [banned mixer] mixer or Unidevs, which provides background support to ensure clean coins for Unijoin...

I'm a little curious, but how is this percentage determined?
Is there an application for that, and what does the algorithm look like by which something abstractly like this is converted into percentages?



Yes, this was definitely an express self-destruction. The good thing is that he didn't put his hand in anyone's wallet, at least there are no such accusations. Of course, if we ignore the contest from which he withdrew his sponsorship, there is no abuse of exiting the high-rank level from this forum. About "ever", You've been here long enough to remember members like master-P or yogg who left their forum reputations with "fireworks". 

however, theymos understood that it could not be too restrictive, so he eased some of the rules. I believe that over time the most constructive solution will be defined.
Here is the most direct answer from theymos about mixer collections like this.

You may be right, I was converting from Bitcoin to Litecoin. Even so, this part of the process ^{Bitcoin Refund address} is not the most clear to me.

I believe that the most valuable feature you offer is the feedback system. I have noticed lately that you have introduced some new changes and now it looks something different. As far as I can see, there are now four types of reviews, active financial claims, settled fin. claims, comments and positive reviews. Seems like a good improvement.



My suggestion is that all four review badges should be visible when looking at the list of exchangers (in the reviews column), not only when we visit each partner separately.

I just made a transaction, I am quite satisfied with the whole process. Maybe I'll write a complete review somewhere.
What confuses me is entering the Refund address, which is not mandatory, but can be added later. However, during the process, I did not have the opportunity to enter it afterwards. Did I overlook it and why is it not mandatory? If a refund of the address was required, would I have to request a refund from support and what does that process look like?

I admit that the explanation on the website is not the most specific.

Is everything ok with the [banned mixer] clearnet page?
On my side, the site is not available on two different browsers (Chrome and Opera), while the Tor site is online and active.

---

Of course, you can, but wouldn't it be better to check a little before you write the first thing that comes to your mind? @coupable already answered that the campaigns were planned much earlier, but of course, you couldn't check that, could you?

note: these are rhetorical questions, you don't have to answer, I would even appreciate it if you refrained.



What are you talking about, man?
Most forum users consider you a troll, only in this thread do you show how superficially you conclude, so why would anyone take these suggestions of yours seriously?

note: these are also rhetorical questions, you don't have to answer, I would even appreciate it if you refrained. I'm not even going to answer you, so once again I'm asking you to refrain from further replies.

theymos decision to ban mixers was forced due to numerous investigations and the seizure of mixers by the authorities, and all this is to protect the forum. As both he and the forum are under US jurisdiction, if the US bans crypto casinos, it will be reflected on this forum as well. Looking at what is happening, it is not an impossible scenario at all.

Gambling is already quite dominant on this forum and such a trend continues because it seems that this industry has best adapted and implemented crypto-currencies. Certainly, I can't shake the impression that gambling and all discussions about it maintain the "popularity" of this forum to a considerable extent.

I completely forgot that you did the signature design as if an entire eternity had passed. Some of these designs are among the best I've seen on the forum, why did you even stop with this service?
Certainly, good luck with this service, although I am not sure about the perspective of business with signature campaigns here.

It is questionable to leave negative feedback based on suspicion or assumptions. There is no clear evidence.
With or without negative tags, Ratim's/Symmetrick account no longer enjoys the reputation it once had, so they do not disturb anything in his status. Based on the large number of already written posts and the fact that he is still active in the largest local community, that makes him interesting for campaign signatures.

The payrate is probably determined based on activity and forum attendance. If 4 out of 8 mixer signature campaigns move there, it will definitely cause more activity on the Altt forum. Greater activity and attendance cause an increase in the payment rate in campaigns. The opposite can happen to the Bitcointalk forum, because let's not lie, at least 50% of the traffic here is thanks to signature campaigns.


Everything looks like a gentle introduction to KYC on the forum and limits it to only KYC services. Don't be surprised if you soon see a ban on advertising for NO-KYC exchanges, and even casinos.

Here is the full repayment.
Due to extraordinary circumstances, there is an extra tip
250 USDT sent. tx id: 23ecbc30fc3a3da1d9c14e14120a57623c25ff6243f00bca82fc25f1ec7c8013
ups, 249 (-1 fee)

thanks shasan 

Good news from Tumbler.
However, I must point out one wrong statement that I read in one of your blogs. When we talk about choosing the best Anonymous Bitcoin wallets, Ledger can't possibly be in close competition here. We all already know many of their shortcomings, but just yesterday someone published an analysis of their application and the results are in great contrast to privacy and anonymity for all users of this wallet.
They collect every piece of information about the user's activities within the wallet, from the most common scroll to assets.

Here is a Twitter thread: https://x.com/rektbuildr/status/1732542258698694875?s=20

@dkbit98 exposed it on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5370521.msg63289409#msg63289409

Sve zavisi iz kojeg ugla gledas. Moze se reci da je drugi najaktivniji forum o kriptovalitama, a to vec zvuci mnogo bolje. 
Inace je u osnovi posvecen altcoinima i tokenima, pa je razumljiva pretpostavka spamfesta, bar sudeci po onome sto vidimo na ovom forumu u alt kategoriji.

Evo malo poredjenje bitcointalk i altcointalk

Why are you two spamming this thread? The raffle is over, we have a winner, so there is no need for this. Just look at a few posts above.