I don't get it, how is removing a member from one's distrust list equal to one supporting the previously distrusted member?
Royse777 just felt like he needed to make some changes in his trust list and reconcile with some members after a disagreement that happened a sometime ago. I don't think by doing such, it means he has exceedingly poor judgment. It's not like he has already added Vod under his trustlist, but, even if he did so, it's his Custom trust list. logfiles, how could you get the completely backwards idea that I be against Vod here? (!) Please review again the links that you quoted. You may also review my trust page, both sent and received feedback. I agree with Vod’s accusation that OgNasty is a trust abuser (plus a scammer, a troll, etc.). My trust list has contained ~OgNasty ever since I made my very first custom trust list in early 2018, long before democratic DT even existed! And a few days ago, I issued negative trust feedback to Mr Nasty, which I should have done long ago. Royse777 was defending OgNasty against me, in a way that shows peculiarly poor judgment. I have excluded Royse777 accordingly: I would not trust his tags, and I certainly would not trust his inclusions and exclusions to be brought into my trust network. I addressed this here, because I could not reply to to Royse in Mr Nasty’s locked thread; and given what this whole episode shows about Royse’s own judgment, I need not reach the arguments that he thereby raised. Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.) |
|
|
|
Please stop derailing the discussion with irrelevant nonsense that wholly evades the substance of the matter. Thanks. Back on topic—the point that Timelord evaded:Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.) |
|
|
|
...
For someone all of a sudden hero worshiping @Lauda LOLWUT. Are you both blind and mentally retarded? I have been consistently heroine-worshipping Lauda for years! Creating Lauda stories, Lauda fan art, Lauda satires, Lauda catbat witch memes and Lauda+ Terminator memes... “All of a sudden”? eddie13, I hope you don’t mind if I cherry-pick a salutary quote from you here:
you're biting the hand that feeds given Royse777 only just removed their distrust of @Lauda “Hand that feeds”? How the fuck could Royse777 have any practical effect on either me or Lauda? Oh, yes: You, a well-known deranged troll, live in a delusional fantasy that DT must be somehow important to me. Lauda is “ banned in the same way as satoshi”, in case you didn’t notice. And the suggestion that anybody here is “the hand that feeds” her is conceited and disgusting. Fuck you. Smart people will arguably keep including her, so as to keep seeing her valuable tags. (Lack of maintenance is a problem, but I think that’s outweighed by the amount of real trouble prevented by Lauda’s tags.) For my part, I think that anyone who distrusts Lauda is too stupid to be worth worrying about. ... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ... Mr Nasty is a well-known trust abuser.
Only someone dump Thanks for that sage advice. Your opinions as a butthurt professional spam-supporter and plagiarist are duly noted, and filed in “ taken under advisement”. 🗑️
Back on topic—the point that Timelord evaded:Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.) |
|
|
|
Out of curiosity, how the hell this topic become OG VS nullius VS suchmoon? I meant well. In a CH troll thread which suchmoon has been feeding by pretending to tell others not to feed it (ill-behaviour that I have not yet had time to address adequately), Mr Nasty vomited up some dumb comments matching his name in filthy malice. I thus red-tagged him as a troll, which I should have done long ago. He then started a butthurt whine thread accusing me of “Trust Abuse”. Although his thread is self-moderated, I didn’t believe that even Mr Nasty was so low as to accuse someone, then delete the one and only answer of the accused. Thus, I replied. He more or less promptly deleted my reply—and locked the thread! LOL, what a thin-skinned sissy little bitch he is, behind his veneer of tough-guy pretenses. (Too bad, it would be ironically inappropriate for me to call him a “pussy” in this context. 😼)Mr Nasty is not worth his own “Reeeeeee” thread. So I decided that it was most convenient to put my deleted reply right here. suchmoon then jumped in to insult me, and vaguely to insinuate some sort of impotent threat against my trust rating. (I hereby must link also to the Loyce archive as a precaution; for on another thread, suchmoon appears to have deleted some of her posts after I caught her in some humiliating stupidity.) Either she was lying when she recently claimed to have me on ignore (LOL), so she saw my obiter dictum matchmaking remark about her suitability for Mr Nasty—or she is pathologically obsessed with traducing me ( i.e., pitiably following me around to troll me)—or both. Pick your poison. I hope that that suitably explains it. This thread may now return to its topic of Mr Nasty obsessively shitposting about Vod. Or not. *shrug* |
|
|
|
Wow. OP hereby, #2695747 “BountyDetective” has the dubious distinction of having received Lauda’s very last sent negative feedback: Trust summary for BountyDetectiveTrusted feedback| Lauda | 2020-10-14 | Reference | Avoid this bounty manager. Belligerent and irresponsible. Uses red trust to attack people complaining about bounty issues. |
Having now wasted carefully spent way too much time examining the referenced thread, I didn’t even bother writing my own creative and incisive feedback text—just copied Lauda’s big red cat-scratch. BountyDetective is that horrible. |
|
|
|
Nulli VS SM?
OMG I can't wait! I have been so bored.. So sorry to disappoint you. I am actually serious about what I said, re “not worth my time”. Before she trolls me to provoke me further, the aptly-named lunatic (like the aptly-named Mr Nasty) should perpend the plain fact that I am not CH. Not morally—and not in terms of ability, leadership skills (if I give a fuck—which I don’t), etc. Although I may be “ nobody”, I am not to be crossed. But as it is, besides maintaining the memory of Lauda’s legend, I will probably just toy with a few nitwits, wind down my forum activity, maybe make some technical posts if I feel like it... I am pretty much sick and tired of the forum now. Kitty gone. What’s the point? There is a whole world outside of Internet forums! Thought Lauda leaving may stamp the boredom in permanence, but maybe not? There, you and I can agree! Or at least concur, after a fashion. At least 51% of the reason why I returned to the forum on 2020-01-01 was to reconnect with Lauda. Plus, you are not as much a damn liberal as suchmoon. I think that you and I could probably at least sort of get along, eddie—well, except that your friend Mr Nasty behaved like an obscene lout toward my friend Lauda. If you’re pissed off that I attacked your friend, then surely you must at least somewhat understand where I am coming from. <hippies_singing_kumbaya.jpg> |
|
|
|
Presenting indisputable and undisputed facts in agreement with PN7’s commendation is “bait”. In a post not specifically addressing you, either—I must have been baiting you. OK, whatever. You “win”. I commend you for announcing your revocation of your reputation. Cat put her money where her mouth was. All principles. No hypocrisy. Among numerous other examples from the accusations of liars, defamers, and trolls:it seems owner of Lauda's account was changed ( may be account sold ::) )
There are some sins one should never commit. A trusted source told me that I have not sold my account. If I cease to be "Lauda" then according to my well-known principles, I must affirmatively prevent anybody else from using this name and forum account ever again. |
|
|
|
eddie13, if you really want to attempt beating a dead cat, why don’t you make a “productive” use of your valuable time, and open a new Reputation thread with evidence of past account-selling by Lauda, a.k.a. banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore. If you have a problem with me, please take it up with me elsewhere. (Whether or not I choose to waste my own time with that.) Thanks. Hereby, you really can’t argue with my point that Lauda’s account was terrifically valuable—and she was also most excellently positioned for an exit scam. She exited the honest way, fully in accord with her stated principles.
#Respect for, at times, my greatest adversary, and most worthy debate opponent I have encountered on the forum.. |
|
|
|
Does that mean, “yes”? If you suppose that I would deign to care about the ill-conceived clusterfork of democratic DT, then you are as much such-a-lunatic as suchmoon. I had thought to suggest that CH should marry her; but I think that you are a better match, Mr Nasty.
P.S., some of your recent (and not-so-recent) ill-behaviour will be addressed—if not duly, then at least as much as I have time for. I have been busy; and you’re not worth it, any more than your prospective bridegroom is. |
|
|
|
I commend you for announcing your revocation of your reputation. Cat put her money where her mouth was. All principles. No hypocrisy. Among numerous other examples from the accusations of liars, defamers, and trolls:it seems owner of Lauda's account was changed ( may be account sold  ) There are some sins one should never commit. A trusted source told me that I have not sold my account. If I cease to be "Lauda" then according to my well-known principles, I must affirmatively prevent anybody else from using this name and forum account ever again. Pause to speculate on what money the account would have been worth! —On the account sale market that Lauda always fought. A handsome payoff, no doubt. Alternatively, she was perfectly set up for an exit scam. Whereas honesty is what one is, not only what one does. It is the anarchy of the good who, being good, hold fast to honour out of pride... It is they who would embrace death before the self-negation of dishonour—not as a sacrifice, but as a supreme act of pure selfishness... —“death before dishonour”... I had in mind a few people when I wrote those words from my personal political manifesto. Most, I know only from the history books. It has been my honour to know Lauda, even across the distance of cypherspace.
Good luck with whatever your situation is.
As cats have 9 lives and "one" is gone, we need to find rest 8 cats here. Nine feline forum lives are already spent. It has been a wild forum life, - or perhaps, nine forum lives |
|
|
|
Somebody appears mad that their boyfriend Lauda went bye bye and as a result I gained a new fan. Let me retry this, at a level of literacy and culture that is more appropriate for you: Do you seriously suppose that you be worth my time, bitch?I wonder how long this dingleberry will hang on before the inevitable flushing down the toilet with his turd friends who came before him. ...or that an Internet forum so be, with Lauda gone. At least 51% of the reason why I returned to the forum on 2020-01-01 was to reconnect with Lauda.
My trust feedback was too hasty: I omitted to mention that you are a well-known scammer. And a legendary trust abuser, liar, defamer... Now fixed. I have passed judgment on you... Having thus dispensed with the matter, I am not particularly inclined to waste further time on you. |
|
|
|
I have been contemplating, and am beginning to prepare something Lauda-related. It may take awhile.
There will be another mystery left by the kitty unsolved.
The gender. I've always thought that the kitty was a lady based on the way of expressing her thoughts and the attitude. This is how I felt it but I guess we'll never know the truth. It is the subject of such speculation, I think that the forum has more total pages discussing “Lauda: male or female??” than there are in the Wall Observer. (IIRC, when Lauda was a candidate for infofront’s current position, r0ach threw an entomoid fit over the prospect that a(n alleged) woman may moderate WO.)I categorized Lauda as “probably female” [...]
It's unlikely according to Lauda's past comments. You think that I'm a she?  LOL. You think that she’s a he? Lauda has said so many self-contradictory things over the years about his, her, or their persona. Too smart to leak intersectable partitioning information. Reconstructed from the post that I accidentally deleted on Monday: :-(If Lauda is actually a man, then I owe him a beer for a hell of a defencive psy-op. Whereas if Lauda is actually a woman, then... I owe her a beer for a hell of a defencive psy-op. Cheers, kitty. All that I know for sure is that Lauda is a WITCH, she turned me into a newt (I got better), and she confessed to being a flying catbat!Internal “proof” link is now only of historical interest; no hard feelings.As I was initiated into a cryptic cult with rites of the goddess Hecate, the renowned paranormal researcher William Blake caught this photograph of Lauda shapeshifted to the form of a flying catbat:  The witch LAUDAIdentified Flying Object (IFO)
(Better than a UFO. Much better than an ICO.)Is any more actual proof needed to sustain a charge of witchcraft?  I think I just got doxxed.  Even the very name of the proven catbat witch Lauda was condemned by the forum’s administration... Virtue was the edit distance between your name and "Lauda".  ...who has finally BURNED BANNED THE WITCH with most extreme measures to save the forum from her WITCHCRAFT!Lauda is banned in the same way as satoshi, such that it isn't possible to even log into the account anymore. |
|
|
|
Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.) Please be advised that I will exclude you accordingly; and I suggest that others consider the soundness of your judgment here. Since I cannot reasonably reply to you in a locked thread where my posts are deleted, and it is anyway not worth my time, all I have to say to your last reply to me thereby is that I know perfectly well how the trust system works; and I do not need your lecture.
Now, [Mr Nasty,] I have posted this here in the knowledge that since you are accusing me, deleting my post would be what you would call a “bitch move”. You are already whining like a bitch. Don’t make it any worse, now.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty is not worth another thread; so I will just leave this here for Vod’s amusement. Money quote: Now, I have posted this here in the knowledge that since you are accusing me, deleting my post would be what you would call a “bitch move”. You are already whining like a bitch. Don’t make it any worse, now. Mr Nasty’s self-moderated hissy fit against me is now locked.
Deleted Post
« Sent to: nullius on: Today at 06:04:24 AM »A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave. Subject: In re #18321 “OgNasty”If you suppose that I would deign to care about the ill-conceived clusterfork of democratic DT, then you are as much such-a-lunatic as suchmoon. I had thought to suggest that CH should marry her; but I think that you are a better match, Mr Nasty. And if, perchance, you may fancy that I would have the time and patience to write an essay explaining to you what is perfectly obvious to anyone with two eyes and a brain, then either you are prepared to pay me good BTC, or you’re just dumb in addition to being a well-known scammer whose trolling just went beyond the pale. To be perfectly clear: You are a failed “rapper” whose life revolves around a scammy “fan” club on an Internet forum. Your only honest characteristic is your chosen sobriquet, “Nasty”. You are trash. It is absurd that the likes of you would dare even to speak of the likes of me; and though such may be way of the world as it is today, you shall not expect me to play your game with a 46-page (and counting) forum thread that would be a complete waste of my time. (With all due respect to Vod, why does he bother?) I have passed judgment on you, with no more than a monosyllabic word; for that is already more than you are worth: “ Troll.” Because you chose to cry about your tag like any common scum, I have addressed your thread hereby. Having thus dispensed with the matter, I am not particularly inclined to waste further time on you. Now, I have posted this here in the knowledge that since you are accusing me, deleting my post would be what you would call a “bitch move”. You are already whining like a bitch. Don’t make it any worse, now. Opinions and objections >/dev/null. Few affronts are as frustrating to a man as demonstrating to him the limits of his own power.
I have not reviewed nullius's trust history but this feedback obviously is not a feedback I would like/hope/suggest anyone to leave for others considering I have some understanding of trust and flag system. I have seen nullius around with some sensible posts and hopefully this is not something serious he left. I am quite serious. I do not jest with red tags (although I have occasionally told friendly jokes in neutrals). PS: Right now he is not in the trust network so the feedback really does not add anything but users like him will be in the trust network in no time and it will reflect in the default trust rating. To the contrary, it is the likes of me who get kicked out of Default Trust, leaving it as a cesspool. Your such remark shows that you have not been paying attention. Your opinions are duly noted, and filed in “ taken under advisement”. 🗑️ |
|
|
|
What the fuck!? Wow... I am at a loss for words here. (Peanut gallery, STFU.) (Sorry, Loyce, I usually don’t look at this thread unless Lauda posts here. Since democratic DT has worked out exactly as I predicted, I stopped caring if Lauda is on DT; she is, and remains, included in my trust list. Those tags have saved me much trouble; I need to keep seeing them right up top. No really, now I am very fucking sorry that I wasn’t watching this thread moment by moment.) I need a new topic title! So do I.
Edit edit again (whatever): See post title. LOL.
Are you guys sure? Because of this : I'll consider ChipMixer and let you know whether I would accept to advertise them. Thanks OP for your excellent work here. ;)
Chipmixer campaign has the magic and power to change peoples mind. :)
Don’t you know Lauda’s wry sense of humour. I’m pretty sure she was making fun at all the assorted idiots who whine at DarkStar_.
Are you trying to understand a cat?
Fair point. Lauda is Schrödinger's cat now. Gone and not gone simultaneously. Damn it, you stole my line.
Goodbye Lauda. You had a great innings. Thanks for that. OK, now I get it. |
|
|
|
I am not trolling you, but discussion about location would be unhealthy for DT members. ..
Yes, near to 2,000,000 (BTT users) /divided by 200 (countries), That is about 10,000 BTT user per country ;D ;D This forum does not have anywhere even close to two million active real-life individual users. Many accounts are inactive, and/or are alts (especially from large-magnitude spammer alt farms). Whatever the number of active individual users may be, it cannot be evenly divided between every country on Earth. I would expect that the numeric majority of users are probably from the United States. If you live in a small country with very few Bitcoin users, then you could practically dox yourself just by saying where you are. And even ten thousand is way too small an anonymity set for some—especially because other leaked bits of information can further partition that set into smaller and smaller pieces. For example, if you disclose whether you are male or female, leak any significant information about your age, etc., etc. Some people choose to disclose various bits of information. But you should always be aware of how each piece of information that you disclose forms another partition of your anonymity set, which overlaps with the other partitions in a Venn Diagram. That is called an intersection attack. If you disclose too much information, an investigator (or a cyberstalker) can keep intersecting these sets to whittle down the possibilities until your anonymity set converges on 1 member, i.e. you. For opsec, if you value your privacy, you need to learn to think about this in rigorous terms. |
|
|
|
You are right that it doesn't mean anything.
But... It does mean something: It means that you were on the right side of calling out a scammer. Wear it as a badge of honour. I just counted, and I only have 13 fake negative feedbacks, plus 4 fake inactive flags. Damn it, I have been slacking! Lauda has —hundreds? thousands? so very many fake negative feedbacks ( some of which make me jealous of her), plus 7 malicious fake inactive flags. JollyGood, the DT who tagged the scammer who tagged you, has— eh, it looks like close to a hundred fake negative feedbacks, and 8 fake inactive flags. You have only 1 fake negative feedback—and you have a very worrisome neutral? Stop sigspamming, do something useful, and you will earn more fake feedbacks! If you don’t get attacked by bad people, it means that you are not doing anything right! |
|
|
|
How many owners have this account changed? I am reading about your missing bitcoins in your story. But more than a year has passed. It's time to end your depression. Or you need to change the forum and look for a psychologist. We all sometimes lose something. And only we are to blame for this. There is no need to break, any failure makes us stronger. So stop whining buddy. Get up and start over.
What the fuck was that dude? Depression does not end, that is an offensive thing to say <snip rant>...then how come suicide rates are not dropping huh? To answer your question: Modernity has brought an increase in weak-minded fools; and some of them exercise their absolute, inalienable rights over their own bodies. (Anybody who is forcibly prevented from committing suicide is a slave, whose body and life are owned by another. There is nothing wrong with suicide.) Those shitty mantras you just said is only applicable to mentally well people. The audacity dude. Everybody has a hard life, more or less. In my experience, there are two kinds of people: Those who have it really hard (or even harder), and are thus hardened against the inevitable problems of life; and spoiled brats who have it relatively easier, so they whine about “depression” and/or kill themselves over trivialities. To be clear, some people commit suicide in circumstances that are truly inhuman and unendurable; but they constitute a negligible minority of suicides. You dare to speak of audacity? You have no idea what lovesmayfamilis’ life may have been like, to reach the strong-minded will-to-overcome perspective quoted above! Based on my own experience, it sounds to me like the stern, but kindly advice of somebody who has survived some hardship. When you are seized in adversity’s embrace, you have no spare time and energy to be “depressed”: You do or die.So, right back at you: “What the fuck was that dude?” You just went nuts on somebody who gave decent life advice to an obvious scammer throwing a self-righteous pity-party, instead of saying something mean to the scammer as he deserves.
To hell with self-pity. Especially when it is used as a cheap excuse for begging and even worse, scamming. That is stealing from other people who have hard lives, thus increasing their suffering so that you can take the easy way out! If OP here is really starving (which I seriously doubt is anything but a lie), then he is trying to use dishonesty to seize bread straight from others’ mouths, and stuff it into his own. For my part, I have zero sympathy if such criminals starve to death. I save my caring for people who deserve it. Moralistic bullshit from spoiled brats >/dev/null. Most people have heard cherry-picked misquotes of the second part of this, without the first. It is thus twisted from praise of strength into a weak, saccharine platitude.From life’s school of war. —That which does not kill me, makes me stronger. |
|
|
|
You really want to beat a dead horse, and turn this topic into another suchmoon sermon about suchmoon’s opinion of how to use the trust system? - Before your post, I noticed that minerjones had changed his feedback to neutral, for whatever reason. (That’s his call.) Why are you still arguing?
- As for me, by the way: I only posted here because a participant in this thread sent me a PM asking me to explain why I had sent merit to minerjones. So—I explained, publicly. I don’t want to be a killjoy, or derail a thread in which I have not chosen to participate.
I think that the folks who want these interviews can now return to whatever they were doing. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
