I also consider myself a gambling addict, but not to the point that I'm being sh*t outside my gambling activities.

Even coming from a big loss, I still know my responsibilities, as obviously, everyone should act like that. Being end up disappointed and regrettable is part of being a gambler. It's also just fine to feel sad and not in good mood after a loss because "no one" is excused from being hit by emotional feelings.

As far as my own approach is concerned, there's nothing really specific about what I do to control my bankroll. If I feel like gambling, I will just enter the scene because I do like to do it at that time. Likewise, there's also no specific time when I need to stop. It's all on me depending on my mood.

We just have to follow our own way of how to be responsible gamblers and try to keep it that way.

For that situation by OP, I think we should just let them have their fun. The fact that they are even willing to risk that kind of amount means they are ready to let go of their money. But I think that story won't happen for real not unless that guy is really rich and money is just a piece of paper on him lol.

Sometimes, the worst experience is really necessary to happen for those people to understand what gambling can brings.

I just hope that in case of a worst-case scenario, they will learn afterward, at least.

I might disagree with that. I'm sure that there's no such thing as top boxing councils and organizations thinking of disappointment.

It's just that Casimero is still not ranked up to be able to qualify for a much bigger fight. Simple as it is, he just needs to keep winning from now on and do everything to work on his rankings and soon, he will be eligible again to fight against top ranks or if fortunate, for another title bout.

Since Casimero started again from scratch, it will really take time for him to be in a discussion at the contender's table again but I'm sure he will be able to reach there soon. I'm biased with that expectation as part of being a long-time PH boxing enthusiast and there are reasons to be believed that it will happen.

Don't just consider 2022 as the worst as this year also gives us the opportunity to buy coins at their considered cheap price.

We might not see again cheap prices like this when Bitcoin started to fuel its gas again for another trip to the moon.

Since everything is speculative, just do our best to accumulate coins as best as we can. It's good that we are always prepared when the market now started to change its trend. It's not that bull run will never happen again, it's just a matter of "when".

As a die-hard fan of the Dallas Mavericks for a long, I was impressed with the recent win that almost cost them to lose it but got saved by Luka's magic.

My concern is, the fact that Luka needs to average 50 or 60 points per game to win is something not good for me in the long term, especially that with the stats like that per game, they are only winning by a small margin or the worst, they are losing that game. I know he's getting more points like that as he's the main guy for the team but still, he badly needed some help.

As I always said, Mavericks can always rely on Luka's consistency but I do hope that his teammates will also do their very best.

That makes sense especially if we talk about those crypto-gambling sites that is running for a long now and already established a good reputation. That's why every time someone is asking for me a suggestion of what crypto-gambling sites should they play, my response is always those sites that already reached the status of being reputable in the crypto-gambling industry.

However, there are users who ended up on a gambling site that is not known well or just starting the early phase of their operation. For that, since the reputation is still in question, at least these sites should have a license because if they don't have that time to comply with simple and necessary requirements to operate, which just requires a bit of effort to acquire, how come users can trust them that they will fully commit on good service.

I think you are not getting the picture of what I'm saying.

Since they are called hunters, they are supposed to only choose to participate in bonus-related campaigns if they think that they can handle that properly.

Obviously, these hunters are better at how to leverage their funds but to make it more effective, they will only choose the bonus that will make things smoother compare to dealing with a bit more struggle.

As you said, there's no guarantee that they will earn from it therefore they will be picky on what bonus they will be involved.

That's what a "real hunter" does.

The FIBA scheduling is one of the reasons why it was unclear for now if PBA can able to invite guest teams to the Governor's Cup.

As per the news, according to PBA Chief Marcial, the only agreement is guest teams will be just this conference.

Looks like, no possibility to see guest teams next conference. No time to wrap it up on the preferred schedule. If Bay Area Dragons will consider inviting again, that might be a conflict on their return to Japan in March. PBA's next conference will be on January 22.

Their discussion looks like a chill one. If the agreement is clear and no such thing as in the event of loss, there will be one to blame, they are good to push their plan on gambling that kind of money. As long as they understand that gambling is not a joke, they can gamble the hell of their money even how much it is, and just mind their own business.

Since gambling requires some luck especially playing casino games, I just hope that luck will guide them lol.

Looks like others really questioning the capability of Pinoys to spend big on big events like this. Better stop that average salary discussion lol.

Believe me, the venue will be jam-packed once the event commences here. There are lots of people here in the country who can afford to buy that tickets for that once-in-a-lifetime experience as it's unclear when it will happen again in the future.

Don't stick too much with the idea that Pinoys can't handle the ticket cost. It's "TEAM USA" we are talking about here.

What's the essence now of having a restricted area if no call will be made for a "monster dunk" attempt?

That play by Gordon is really dangerous but these players don't care about that as they are really feeling it when there's an attempt of doing it.

Anyways, since that dunk counted, it doesn't spoil the fun and can be a candidate for Dunk of the Year.

Then these users you are referring to are not good bonus hunters lol.

A good bonus hunter knows and understands how to take advantage of those and will "ONLY" just hunt those achievable bonuses and promotions that are possible to reach even for casual and average gamblers without spending too much.

They know just by reading the terms if a certain bonus is worth trying or not.

Besides, why think that a licensed provider can be useful during the time when users are being fuc*ed up by these casinos even with a license?

In order to at least minimized being shi*tted by these online casinos, just play at those casinos that already earned being reputable in the industry.

But honestly, complaints and issues are sometimes because of the user's fault.

Technically and in a much simple description, having a license is a necessary thing to make the business legal. Gambling site owners can't just operate in other countries or regions as that will be subject to legal jurisdiction. Having a license will somehow make it smooth.


Not sure about this and I'm not aware, but just want to ask a question, is there a case already where a gambling site, specifically with a Curacao license, turned into a scammed site and just went off without any trace? If there is, I don't understand why these sites will apply for a license as even though it's easy to have a Curacao license, the requirements needed are personal documents of its owners and detailed information about their business, and these are strictly screened.

Scam gambling sites, as I see, won't bother to apply for any license.

What the hell happened to Dragon's monster shooting percentage at the 3-point area? We called those kinds of shots as "baldog" here.

During the last 6-7 minutes of the last quarter, never even saw them trying to make a rally, and already gave up early which is supposed to be not their usual performance. As the commentators said, the Dragons are being overpowered by the Ginebra's experience playing in the Finals.

Ginebra's LA Tenorio, despite playing for limited minutes and a veteran role in the entire conference, heated up in the Finals when really needs. Well, he won't be achieved being a 4x Finals MVP for no reason.

Let's see the adjustments that the Dragons will do the next game.

Referring to where this series of quotes started, I didn't even realize that I was already so close to leveling up my progress on Stake.

I didn't bother to check my progress as I think that was not achievable and out of hand but I just continue gambling regularly there.

Good to see that kind of program where losses also have a role lol.

Walang nailagay na deadline or cut-off si OP kaya baka di na pasok ang pick namin dahil tapos na ang Game 1 at ang nangyari pa, di man lang dikit ang laban at medyo nagkalat ang Bay Area Dragons at malamya nung last quarter. Obviously kasi, prior to the start of the series ang cutoff.

Siguro sa mga late comer gaya ko, automatic na ang dapat piliin ko na lang is iyong Game 7.

Ginebra 4-3 kung eligible pa.

Kung void ang mga nag-place after Game 1, isang user lang ang kasali kaya goodluck sa iyo @Yamifoud lol.

I'm replying to the sub-reply that I quoted as the discussion now created related branches of discussion.

I already responded directly to what OP is being asked on the subject.


Some users are really not that used to reading TOS especially if they saw a long line of statements there.

At least by asking customer support directly, users with no effort on search any terms related to the use of VPN will get, at least, the most accurate answer and response, for them to know what should be the drill.

However, there are users that will just decide to use VPN right away as they think it's just fine. In case of account-related problems later on, while using a VPN, their ignorance is not an excuse but rather face the possible consequences.

The first thing I will do is to tell my friend to stop that crap of making that amount target as a purpose why should we gamble. Instead, I will told him that we will try to maintain winning as much as possible without aggressively trying to reach any target.

Second, I will give him a disclaimer that in case of being sh*t, don't blame me for losing that much.

Next, before starting the actual gamble, I will ask this question several times,"are you really sure?".

Moving forward, I will play it on several slots with a $1 bet as a minimum and since I can't control the flow of the game, I will just hope that luck would come to me. I will also consider choosing casino games where the buy-in feature seems worth spending on.

Lastly, hope for the best.

In fairness to Russell Westbrook, I can say that he's performing well overall since coming off the bench.

Trading Westbrook might make sense but saying trading him is the key for the Lakers to improve is still subject to "what if".

The Lakers are doing well recently until Anthony Davis got sidelined again. For let's say Zach LaVine or Demar DeRozan is playing there instead of Westbrook, nothing will really change that much if, on the other hand, Anthony Davis is always out consistently.