All the more reason to not buy Apple products because they are arrogant to say that they have a strict requirements for their apps but they can't even catch that these app is a phishing attempt. I had a good relation with Apple back when they still didn't remove auxiliary parts of the phone which defeats the purpose and I find more capable Android phones pop up of the market that are better in any aspect.

That takes a lot of patience, I mean 3 years is a long time and hopefully you can get a lot of cash out of the bitcoin that you are going to save. Maybe if you can, try to do some kind of investment with your bitcoin instead of just hodling it so as to create an interest overtime, you are hodling and at the same time you are earning something from your investment, I plan to this but currently, I don't have that much bitcoin so I will just have to wait.

Most personal data are already available, its just that it is the government that is holding that data so you have some assurance that you won't get any information leak because of bureaucracy that makes it difficult to request for your personal info. I have heard of this advice but I don't know if it is true but whenever you do something online you can always use fake credentials and still make it look legitimate, I wouldn't really go the tax avoiding route but if the part of what I am earning is going to be taken by an incompetent government then I might consider doing it.

Maybe you can benefit by putting the bitcoin in a mixer or sell it on a P2P exchanges. I don't know much about tax evasion but I think that you already listed offshore which is a really great idea and I think that you should pursue it because you are not that hot in the eyes of the government and the tax department, hell you can even create your own shell company and funnel the money there. Don't ask how I know this, I just binged Ozark so I have some ideas.

How about we worry where we get those power instead of focusing on the power consumption, the power consumption for bitcoin will only go up as the adoption grows a bigger day by day, we need to make a more green energy sources. The only reason for this is just to make bitcoin look bad and make the prices go down.

I did some search about the cheapest car, and a 15k seems to be the lowest, which means that 1 bitcoin is worth around 900k USD which doesn't prove anything but that bitcoin can grow much bigger if we just let it, I think that this person just played himself. The reason that bitcoin has a slow transaction is that it doesn't have the same infrastructure as a traditional financial institutions that are heavily flawed.

Not going to happen, I really don't want to gamble something that I had a hard time earning, so to say I am not that easy to be tempted to spend what I earn into something frivolous and expensive like gambling. There is no such thing as strategy on dices, you just throw and let the RNG do its work.

With the current prices of bitcoin and if at the next 10 years it will continue to go up, I think that 1500 bitcoin is enough to go on a retirement and have some money for inheritance if having a family is on the table. I mean 1 bitcoin can keep you good for atleast a year but we have to consider that the prices isn't always going high.

Security of the seastead does seem concerning but in the long run, we can make this problem go away by making the seasteads a profitable economic hotspots for many countries and then we can bargain a deal that they will have some degree of privileges if they in turn protect the seastead from the possibility of attacks from pirates or other hostile forces. Small countries, don't need an army to protect itself let alone a seastead.

Tell that to China, banning bitcoin usage by the public combined with mass surveillance, Internet censorship, and propaganda, I think that if a government were to do something drastic, I think that they will be able stop bitcoin. I forgot to mention that North Korea is also one of the countries that can stop bitcoin.

That is the reason at the simplest form but I have to add that they also fear technology and the things that are intangible that is why they do not risk doing anything involving finance online because they don't know whether to trust the site or not. It is not the fault of the people entirely that they are afraid of what they do not know, the fault also lies on educators, they need to tell this people what they need to know about bitcoin and cryptocurrency.

As many people will think here, I would quite do the opposite, what you are presenting is not an opportunity to exit but an opportunity to buy, imagine how many bitcoin you are going to get and hodl with a 10 USD value, becoming a millionaire is going to be a guarantee if you get around 1k bitcoin at that price.

There are better things to do with your bitcoin besides hodling it, you can invest it in bankroll to make it grow more. I think the real winners is not the hodlers but the smart ones that make more bitcoin even though they are sleeping.

This is bad for betting sites that are planning to sponsor football clubs in the future, I mean what is wrong with that? I mean, its not like every kid who watches the game is going to be looking for those sponsorships in the first place, they care more about their favorite players than the stickers on their shirt. And its not the responsibility of the sponsors to make children not know about gambling, maybe to some extent yes but it is entirely on the parents that are looking out for their own child. This is bad because gambling sponsorships AFAIK are generous when they are the sponsor.

I think that everyone will eventually join a competition along the way, it is just a matter of time. I don't have any preferences because the competitive one in my opinion is a gimmick by the website to make more traffic in their platform and to have more players participate in betting, which is not that different to betting solo because you still bet, you just don't have the drive to do it everyday.

I think that we should have more of this kind of things to be honest, with this we can see what is the absolute limit that a man or a woman can do when pushed to do it. This kinds of competitions need to be mainstream, no bloods, guts and punches flying out but just pure raw muscle. I will be watching this but I don't plan on betting anytime soon.

They can argue all they want but we all know that they have the ability to write off their taxes by setting up charity events or donations. I am not saying that the government should tax half of the of their income, a simple 1 digit increase could make all the difference. Why do people protect the rich when they clearly doesn't care about the people below them.

But at the least they can contribute more to the taxes and more bigger public projects can be made because the big companies pay huge amount of taxes. I know that it won't affect but at the least they are being hurt where it matters, their finances.
Will the company that made a better product be able to keep up with the growth of their product because if they can't afford that they can easily lose sales and most of the time, these small companies that get successful are being bought by the big companies although not in a sense that the main company is buying but their other companies, as I have said in the earlier post, big companies can sabotage the small companies, and one of the way is to poison the well for the potential investors.

Thank God that there are people that is pushing to make UBI(Universal Basic Income), this is life changing thing with the growing population and with more and more industries leaning into automation, a lot of people are going to lose their jobs and UBI could be one of the many solutions to prevent catastrophic things from happening. It is a good move for Jack Dorsey to donate the money from his first NFT to a charity because this can help in promoting his idea and make more people try to buy his NFTs because they are now conditioned that they are buying something that will contribute to the society.

No it isn't bad if the ones that are going to be taxed are the big businesses like Amazon, Facebook and other companies, not to mention that rich individuals need to be taxed to because they do not contribute anything to the society and they almost have the say on what to do for our future despite not contributing that much to taxes. The only companies that are hurt in this pandemic are the family owned and small business but most companies have already recovered so I think that these tax hike is a good thing but only if it is used not for military spending.